Interanimations电子书

售价：¥

0人正在读 | 0人评论

9.8

作者：Pippin, Robert B.

出版社：University of Chicago Press

出版时间：2015-07-21

字数：58.3万

所属分类：进口书 > 外文原版书 > 文学/自传/回忆录

温馨提示：数字商品不支持退换货，不提供源文件，不支持导出打印

为你推荐

哈利·波特与被诅咒的孩子(第一部和第二部):伦敦西区原创舞台剧的官方剧本

￥25.00

诗翁彼豆故事集

￥10.00

Elon Musk: Moving the World One Technology at a Time

￥24.44

Elon Musk

￥95.11
Whimsical Words and Dramatic Affairs

￥0.01

神奇动物：格林德沃之罪:原创电影剧本

￥25.00

House, M.D. 豪斯医生官方指南

￥105.17

The Guardian Herd: Stormbound

￥39.13

读书简介
目录
累计评论(0条)

读书简介
目录
累计评论(0条)

In this latest book, renowned philosopher and scholar Robert B. Pippin offers the thought-provoking argument that the study of historical figures is not only an interpretation and explication of their views, but can be understood as a form of philosophy itself. In doing so, he reconceives philosophical scholarship as a kind of network of philosophical interanimations, one in which major positions in the history of philosophy, when they are themselves properly understood within their own historical context, form philosophy's lingua franca. Examining a number of philosophers to explore the nature of this interanimation, he presents an illuminating assortment of especially thoughtful examples of historical commentary that powerfully enact philosophy.After opening up his territory with an initial discussion of contemporary revisionist readings of Kant's moral theory, Pippin sets his sights on his main objects of interest: Hegel and Nietzsche. Through them, however, he offers what few others could: an astonishing synthesis of an immense and diverse set of thinkers and traditions. Deploying an almost dialogical, conversational approach, he pursues patterns of thought that both shape and, importantly, connect the major traditions: neo-Aristotelian, analytic, continental, and postmodern, bringing the likes of Heidegger, Honneth, MacIntyre, McDowell, Brandom, Strauss, Williams, and A iA ek-not to mention Hegel and Nietzsche- into the same philosophical conversation.By means of these case studies, Pippin mounts an impressive argument about a relatively under discussed issue in professional philosophy-the bearing of work in the history of philosophy on philosophy itself-and thereby he argues for the controversial thesis that no strict separation between the domains is defensible.

目录展开