本书是山东省社会科学规划项目(编号 19CKSJ03)的结项成果。意识形态安全是国家安全的核心要素，互联网络已是当前思想阵地建设的 *前沿。书稿以马克思主义中国化的*新理论成果为指导，研究目的是巩固马克思主义在意识形态领域指导地位的根本制度。作者从网络 意识形态斗争的基本现状入手,分析研判网络意识思想阵地建设的各方面现状，要统筹各个领域有可能出现的风险点，增强风险意识，力 争在网络意识形态斗争中敢于亮剑、打好主动仗，为*建设社会主义现代化国家创造良好的思想环境。

本书以马克思主义哲学基本原理与国外马克思主义哲学为主要论域，立足于对相关经典文本的解读来把握和评论相关思想者的思想;以理论问题研究与人物思想研究、一般研究 与个别研究相结合的方式，力求在反思和评论有关代表性思想者的学术观基础上，厘清马克思主义社会哲学的理论问题、深化对马克思主义社会哲学的一般研究;从社会发展论、社会自然关系论、社会主体论、社会规范论和社会研究方法论等方面，对马克思主义社会哲学行了较为系统、具有-定创新性的思考 和研究。

本书从宏观的、综合的视角，深系统地探析了“中国道德语言”的特定内涵、元隐喻、传统形态、伦理表意功能、伦理叙事模式、民族特色、价值维度、国际化等重要内容。论述了每个民族都有道德语言，但不同民族的道德语言在形式和内容上均具有巨大差异。中国道德语言主要是全体中华民族共同使用的道德语言，是中华民族用于记载道德生活经历、交流道德思想、表达道德情感、叙述道德意志、说明道德信念、描述道德行为方式的工具，但由于认识不到位、重视不够等原因等内容。同时作者还阐述了中国道德语言自成体系、具有民族特色，对源远流长的中国道德文化发挥着强有力的建构作用，其价值不应该受到忽视。中国道德语言是中华民族伦理价值诉求的汉语表达系统，反映中国作为伦理型社会的现实。

道德规范在实践中*可靠的保障就是道德自律，道德理想就是“*道德律”，即“道德金律”。伦理学上有关“道德金律”的典型学说，中国古代的孔子的“己欲立而立人，己欲达而达人”之“忠道”与基督教、康德等的相关学说皆有共同之处。但是也有重大区别：孔子的学说属于世俗样态的，其有效性依靠的是道德“他律”；而基督教道德律是宗教性质的，康德的学说是理性主义的，后二者在道德实践中的有效性依靠的是“自律”，它更具有一定程度上的现实性。“道德金律”的要件在于其必不可缺的“权利观”这个必要且不充分的条件，它和人类理性不断互相促也互为条件。道德内容、道德实践的律己形式取决于社会文化系统。权利观念也是人类理性发展随带的结果，因为人类文明的发展与步只能依靠理性。当然人类理性也是受限的，它是一个历史过程，但从整体来说人的理性具有自我修正、自我调节、自我完善的的能力，所以道德律具有趋同性而渐趋成熟和完善。

大学生生命观教育是一个涉及家庭、学校、社会及个体等多元责任主体参与的过程。责任伦理为研究大学生生命观教育问题提供了新的视角，其内含的责任意蕴、伦理特以及鲜明的实践特征等均体现出大学生生命观教育的内在伦理诉求，在大学生生命观教育中彰显出中重要应用价值。 本书聚焦当前大学生生命观及其教育的现状，在责任伦理的视域下，从内容维度、目标向度、主体角度等重新梳理教育的逻辑理路，从理念层面、主体层面、实践层面行实践探索。

《庄子》是哲学和文学的高妙结合，《庄子》以其深邃的思想哲理与超绝的艺术魅力对中国文化建构产生了深远影响。随着中国文化的世界传播，《庄子》也在海外流传来，但西方学者关注的重是庄子的哲学思想，《庄子》作为文学文本在异质文化中获得了怎样的阐释和表达值得关注。本课题从当代西方庄学研究中，提取文学相关部分，梳理《庄子》作为文学文本在异质文化中的传播与受，以深化对海外庄学研究的认识，拓展《庄子》文学研究的视域及内涵。基于跨文化研究参照系设置的需要，首先梳理国内《庄子》文学研究的关注重及主要成果，析出具有典型意义的《庄子》文学品格。在此基础上，以翻译学的视角，把《庄子》西译作为一种“文化事实”予以观照，对《庄子》文学特征在跨文化翻译中的体现、变形或失落等行考察，揭示在跨文化传播过程中，中国古典文学在西方文化里的表达形态，为更好地推介《庄子》及类似的文学文本探索有效路径。同时，以比较文学的视角，通过文本分析，发掘整理以英语国家为代表的西方《庄子》文学研究成果，分析其关注重的特色取向，揭示其与中国本土研究间的差异性和互补性；运用影响研究和跨学科研究的相关方法，揭示《庄子》与西方文学创作、西方后现代文化发展的关联。

《摆渡在有-无之间的哲学》是作者近二十年有关*哲学问题的持续思考与讨论的总结。所谓*哲学问题，也就是哲学中*基础、*恒常，同时也是*困难的那些问题。这本书分上、下两篇。上篇为“沉思篇”，是作者直面对*哲学问题展的思考。下篇为“解释篇”，是在上篇基础上对哲学史上一些*重要的哲学家有关*哲学问题的思考的分析、讨论与反思。

如果选择权在你，那么你为什么要做这件事呢?需要自己决定如何去做的时候，何必迟疑?如果你能看清自己的路，高高兴兴地走下去，不要转向;如果你看不明前方的路，可以先停下来，听听斯多葛派哲学家的思考。《每日斯多葛》选辑斯多葛哲学的经典段落，配合浅显易懂的文字，让心灵恢复安静、沉着、稳定。每天一篇短文，每月一个主题，可按日期每天阅读一篇，也可以自主选择喜爱的主题阅读。       你会发现：天地之间有许多事情，是你的哲学里所没有梦想到的呢。

M. Lévy-Bruhl then explains that, whilst recognising the entire coherence of Comte’s collective labours, he proposes to confine his present study to the earlier and principal work, the Philosophy, which in M. Lévy-Bruhl’s opinion is the dominant and more fruitful composition.??This he regards as the representative work of the nineteenth century, as shown by the intellectual history of the period. He points to its influence on thought in England, in Europe, and in America. It will surprise many persons to learn that in M. Lévy-Bruhl’s opinion two eminent French writers, who assuredly neither were, nor were supposed to be, Positivists, “have done more for the diffusion of the ideas and method of Comte than Littré and all the other Positivists together.” ??These two are Taine and Renan, much as they differed from Comte’s actual scheme and doctrines. Renan indeed spoke of Comte as destined to prove one of the typical names of the century. The present writer remembers Renan saying to him with a most genial welcome, “I too am a believer in the religion of humanity.” ??Professor Lévy-Bruhl followed up his History of Modern Philosophy in France by a substantial work on the philosophy of Auguste Comte. It forms a volume of the Bibliothèque de Philosophie Contemporaine, which has already devoted four other works to the Positive Philosophy. It is as well to premise that this treatise dealt solely with the philosophy, not with the polity, or any part of the religious scheme of Comte. Professor Lévy-Bruhl writes as a student, but not as an adherent of Auguste Comte. His entire work is rather an exposition, not a refutation, or a criticism, or an advocacy of Comte’s philosophical system. But it may be said at once that no one abroad or at home, certainly neither Mill, nor Lewes, nor Spencer, nor Caird, has so truly grasped and assimilated Comte’s ideas as M. Lévy-Bruhl has done.??In his Introduction M. Lévy-Bruhl very clearly states the scope of his work, and his own general attitude. He traces the origin of Comte’s philosophy in the mental effervescence of the first generation of the present century towards a reorganisation of society, after the upheaval left by the Revolution and its consequences. He correctly states the relation of St. Simon to Comte as being that of an initial stimulus. ??The cardinal difference between Comte and all the socialists and founders of social and religious Utopias consisted in this, that Comte saw the necessity of a new system of philosophy as the indispensable preliminary to any reorganisation of society.

Ce este adev?rul? De unde ?tiu cine sunt? De ce ar trebui s? fim buni? Exist? multe c?r?i despre filosofie. Cu toate acestea, Cine sunt eu? difer? fa?? de celelalte lucr?ri de introducere ?n filosofie. Nimeni nu a reu?it p?n? acum s? pun? cititorul fa??-n fa?? cu marile ?ntreb?ri ale omenirii ?ntr-o manier? at?t de documentat?, de competent? ?i, ?n acela?i timp, cu umor ?i cu elegan??. Prezenta lucrare reprezint? o c?l?torie unic? prin noianul de cuno?tin?e pe care le avem despre om. Precht ne prezint? tot ceea ce este mai nou ?n neuro?tiin??, ?n psihologie ?i ?n filosofie. Fie c? pleac? ?n cercetarea sensului vie?ii pornind de la analiza unui episod din Star Trek sau de la melodia Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds a celor de la Beatles, cartea ne pune ?n fa?a unui traseu captivant, ?n care vom descoperi cele mai surprinz?toare lucruri despre noi ?n?ine.

Antropologie ?i antroposofie ? Max Dessoir despre antroposofie ? Franz BrentanoAlc?tuind cuprinsul acestei lucr?ri, Rudolf Steiner reveleaz? ?c?teva din firele ?tiin?ifice care trebuie trasate pornind de la antropozofie la filozofie, la psihologie ?i la fiziologie“. Cunoa?terea omului va trebui atunci s? fie extins? ?in?nd cont de enigmaticele aspecte ale vie?ii sale interioare, privite din perspective multiple. ?n aceast? carte, Rudolf Steiner prezint? ?n scris aspectele semnificative ale configur?rii ?ntreite a fiin?ei omene?ti: corpul fizic, organismul sufletesc ?i configura?ia spiritual?.

O analiz? aplicat? a operei unuia dintre cei mai controversa?i g?nditori germani, supranumit monahul de la Sils-Maria; o lectur? ?n filigran a modului nietzschean de abordare a c?torva concepte dificile, interpretate la modul catastrofic: supraomul, ve?nica ?ntoarcere a aceluia?i, anti-Christul. Lucrarea se situeaz? ?n buna ?i prestigioas? tradi?ie a marilor creatori care comenteaz? textele fundamentale ale omenirii dintr-un unghi specific.

F?r? a propune o terminologie aristotelic? bine precizat? pe teritoriul limbii rom?ne, transpunerea de fa?? reprezint? un moment important ?n raportarea rom?neasc? la opera Stagiritului.Traducere de ?tefan Bezdechi efectuat? dup? textul grec publicat de W. Christ ?n colec?ia ?Teubner“, Lipsca, 1906. Pentru realizarea ei au fost utilizate urm?toarele surse:Die Metaphysik des Aristoteles, traducere ?n limba german? de J. R. V. Kirchmann, ap?rut? ?n dou? volume ?i prev?zut? cu note ample ?n colec?ia ?Philosophische Bibliothek“, numerele 38 ?i 39, la Berlin, ?n 1871;Aristoteles, Metaphysik, traducere ?n limba german? de Adolf Lasson, ?n care cele patrusprezece c?r?i ale Metafizicii sunt a?ezate ?ntr-o r?nduial? mai logic? dec?t a?a cum au fost transmise ?n originalul grec, traducere ap?rut? ?n 1924, la Jena;Aristote, Métaphysique, traducere ?n limba francez? de J. Tricot, cu o prefa?? de A. Diés, ap?rut? ?n colec?ia ?Bibliothèque des textes philosophiques“, J. Vrin, la Paris, ?n 1933.La marginea textului a fost trecut? pagina?ia edi?iei Bekker, dup? care se fac ?n mod obi?nuit cita?iile din opera lui Aristotel.Confruntarea traducerii a fost f?cut? de prof. Aram M. Frenkian.

Tr?s?turi fundamentale ale unei concep?ii moderne despre lume?Cum se comport? filosofia c? art? fa?? de libertatea omului, ce este aceast? libertate, ?i dac? am ajuns s? ne ?mp?rt??im din ea, sau putem ajunge la acest lucru: iat? problema fundamental? a scrierii mele. Toate celelalte expuneri ?tiin?ifice au fost f?cute numai pentru ca, ?n cele din urm?, s? arunc?m ?i mai mult? lumin? asupra unei probleme care, dup? p?rerea mea, prezint? cea mai mare importan?? pentru om. ?n aceste pagini vrem s? d?m o filosofie a libert??ii.“ – Rudolf Steiner

Critica ra?iunii pure, tradus? de Nicolae Bagdasar ?i Elena Moisuc ?n 1969, a ajuns la cea de-a treia edi?ie. Cu acest prilej, profesorul dr. Ilie P?rvu, de la Facultatea de Filosofie a Universit??ii din Bucure?ti a ?ngrijit noua opera?ie de editare, fiind astfel corectate unele erori de tipar ?i unele inconsecven?e terminologice. Totodat?, exist? un motiv ?n plus pentru ca studen?ii care posed? edi?ia a II-a a traducerii, ap?rut? ?n 1995, s? apeleze ?i la cea de-a treia edi?ie: ?n aceasta din urm? au fost indicate diferen?ele dintre edi?ia I german? (din 1781) ?i edi?ia a II-a (din 1787).

Volumul red? circuitului public, pentru prima oar? ?n limba rom?n?, trei din operele g?nditorului atenian. Este vorba de Scrisori (?n num?r de treisprezece, deosebit de importante pentru cunoa?terea g?ndirii platoniciene, dar ?i pentru ?n?elegerea epocii ?i a personalit??ilor cu care a venit ?n contact filosoful), Dialoguri suspecte (Minos, Rivalii, Theages, Hipparhos, Clitofon) ?i Dialoguri apocrife (Axiohos, Despre drept, Despre virtute, Demodocus, Sisyfos, Eryxias).Traducerea apara?ine lui ?tefan Bezdechi, care a realizat ?i aparatul critic al Scrisorilor (introducere ?i note).

Imagineaz?-?i c? e?ti într-o ma?in? a timpului care te poart? înainte ?i înapoi prin propria via??. Te duce în trecut, la anii copil?riei, când înv??ai s? mergi pe biciclet?, apoi te face s? revezi primul t?u s?rut, cel dintâi serviciu sau anii mai târzii, când te confrun?i, eventual, cu divor?ul. Înso?it de Platon, afl? ce spun marii gânditori ai lumii despre toate aceste pietre de hotar de pe drumul vie?ii noastre. Aristotel î?i va vorbi despre importan?a începerii ?colii, Freud despre îndr?gostire, Heidegger despre implica?iile psihologice ale mutatului, iar Nietzsche despre criza vârstei de mijloc. La drum cu Platon te ajut? s? în?elegi ?i s? vezi cu al?i ochi evenimentele majore, momentele-cheie ?i fazele de tranzi?ie din via?a ta, f?când filosofia s? par? accesibil? ?i plin? de umor!

《世界·大师·原典·文库：人性论（中文导读插图版）（套装上下册）》作者认为一切科学都与人性有关，对人性的研究应是一切科学的基础。《人性论（中文导读插图版）（套装上下册）》试图通过对人性的研究来揭示制约人的理智、情感和道德行为的准则。全书分三卷，卷讨论知性；第二卷讨论情感；第三卷讨论道德。

《论语》《孟子》《大学》《中庸》合称“四书”，是儒家的经典古籍，在中国思想史上占有重要的地位。钱穆先生所著《四书释义》分为《论语要略》《孟子要略》《大学中庸释义》三个部分，对“四书”作出阐释与发挥。其中《论》《孟》两书裁为要略，分门别类，提纲挈领，有助于读者把握两书要领；《学》《庸》则为其释义，备列全文，使学者体悟篇中宏旨。本书已经是经典著作，深受读者喜爱。

《了凡四训》又名《命自我立》，为明代袁了凡先生所作的家训，以其亲身经历教戒他的儿子袁天，认识命运的真相，明辨善恶的标准，改过迁善的故事。 本书将了凡四训四篇分为若干章节编写，每一章另外提炼标题，如*篇立命之学，其章节为：*章解题，第二章孔先生算命……除了解题这一章外，其他每一章都分为原文、注释、译文、解读、名言哲语五个部分。 本书的通俗性表现在注释、译文，一般读者读完这两部分就弄懂了原文的含义，注释则具有知识性，将古汉语基本知识告诉读者。 本书的趣味性在于例证这些故事，用事例更好地说明本段文字的含义，形象生动，引人胜。 本书的权威性体现在解读和名言哲语。本书解读注重用简明通俗的语言解读原文内容，同时引用古今圣贤对原文道理的说明。其中的名言哲语则引用古今中外名人的话或者人们长期以来经验总结的警句哲言，以这些*权威性的话来*后说明本文的道理。

《世界·大师·原典·文库：人性论（中文导读插图版）（套装上下册）》作者认为一切科学都与人性有关，对人性的研究应是一切科学的基础。《人性论（中文导读插图版）（套装上下册）》试图通过对人性的研究来揭示制约人的理智、情感和道德行为的准则。全书分三卷，卷讨论知性；第二卷讨论情感；第三卷讨论道德。