《吕氏春秋》集合诸子百家杂而不杂之言，包罗天地古今万物众生之理！全书的内容以儒家、道家的理论为基础，集合了各家之学说融于一炉，是中国汉代大统一时代前政治、军事、哲学、谋略思想的出色总结。

《曾国藩家书》内容广博，既有治军为政之道，又有人生处世之谈，是研究其人及这一时期历史的重要资料。曾氏家书行文从容镇定，形式自由，在平淡的家常事中蕴含真知良言。曾国藩推崇儒家学说，讲求经世致用的实用主义，可谓道德文章冠冕一代。

《反经》是一本实用性韬略奇书，由唐代赵蕤所著。它以唐以前的汉族历史为论证素材，集诸子百家学说于一体，融合儒、道、兵、法、阴阳、农等诸家思想，所讲内容涉及政治、外交、军事等各种领域，并且还能自成一家，形成一部逻辑体系严密、涵盖文韬武略的谋略全书。为历代有政绩的帝王将相所共悉，被尊奉为小《资治通鉴》，是丰富、深厚的汉族传统文化中的瑰宝。

原名《世说》，唐代称《世说新书》或《世说新语》，后者成为本书专名大约在北宋时期。《世说新语》是中国古代小说的萌芽，其简洁隽永的传神描写是后世众多仿效者难以企及的。此书不仅在文学上有重要意义，并且记载的大多是真人真事，历来也受史学界的重视。

弗兰西斯·培根被马克思称为“英国唯物主义和整个现代实验科学的真正始祖”。他的思想博大精深，是文艺复兴以来欧洲古典人文主义价值观念和政治理想的集中体现，深受各国读者的追捧。 《听培根谈人生哲理》立足于培根的主体思想，精选了《培根随笔》中的经典段落和名言警句，深探讨关于人生真谛、社会发展、自身情感等诸多方面的问题，帮助读者展对人生的思考，帮助人们指引正确的方向，摆脱困难的纠缠，走上美好的人生之路。

本书包括有震古烁今的管理智慧；道法自然，反对人为；人事天事，无为乃治；无为行世，管理实践 等内容。

立学、立言之著  立德、立身之典《传习录》是王阳明的问答语录和论学书信集，是一部儒家简明而有代表性的哲学著作。包含了王阳明的主要哲学思想，是研究王阳明思想及心学发展的重要资料。《传习录》不但全面阐述了王阳明的思想，同时还体现了他辩证的授课方法，以及生动活泼、善于用譬、常带机锋的语言艺术。因此该书一经问世，便受到了士人的推崇。

忍是一种能力，一种修养，一种韬略“凡事忍耐，多想自己缺，增益其所不能；照顾大局，只要不妨大的原则，多多原谅人家。忍耐*难，但作为一个政治家，必须练习忍耐。”——*在1944年时对“忍耐”所做的一段精辟的剖析。君子忍人之所不能忍，容人之所不能容，处人之所不能处。——马南邨

《礼记》初时据说有一百多篇，后为汉朝学者戴德简化为85篇，世人称之为《大戴礼记》。在编撰过程中，我们从权威版本中筛选出极为经典、实用，且具有文学价值的28个篇章，将其编辑成册。将每篇分为诸多小节，每个小节分为三部分：原文、注释与译文。整本书结构严谨，言简意赅，意蕴深远。

《墨子》为战国百家中墨家的经典。墨子提倡兼爱、非攻、尚贤、尚同、天志、明鬼、非命、非乐、节葬、节用，对哲学、逻辑学都有研究和贡献。此外，他在军事学、工程学、力 学、几何学、光学上都有相当的研究和贡献，先秦的科学技术成就大都依赖《墨子》以传。

《鬼谷子》一书是其后学者根据其言论整理而成的，这部两千多年前的谋略学巨著，是中国传统文化中的奇葩，历来被人们称为“智慧之禁果，旷世之奇书”。其思想内容十分丰富，涵盖了哲学、政治学、军事学、心理学、社会学、文学、情报学等多种学科，是一部可以被广泛解读的著作。它一直为中国乃至世界军事家、政治家和外交家所研究，现又成为当代商家的之书。它所揭示的智谋权术的各类表现形式，被广泛运用于内政，外交、战争、经贸及公关等领域，其思想深深影响今人，享誉海内外。

道德经解析一书是一位八旬老人在对《道德经》行二十余年的自学、摸索、思考、体悟之后，所总结出的心得与体会。作者以长沙马王堆汉墓帛书《老子》甲本为底本，以帛书乙本和王弼本或傅奕本之文字补足缺字。在此基础上，作者对每一章的字词均作了详尽的注释，并逐句逐段行详细的语法结构分析，帮助读者弄懂字词句的意思，此为作者的研读方法，也是此书的一大特色。在解读部分，作者注重理论与实践的结合，引人思考。全书观新颖，有助于读者对《道德经》行全面的了解和学习。

黄怀信编著的《周易本经汇校新解》对《周易》本经进行全面校理和详细解读，每卦由原文、汇校、注释、训译、卦说五部分组成。《前言》部分主要分析介绍《周易》本经的构成体例，以及整理研究《周易》的方法等问题。

《中国道教史》是一部道教通史，以时间为经，以教派分化为纬，全面系统地介绍了道教产生、发展和流传的历史。 《中国道教史》全书所记时限始于道教产生前的秦汉社会状况和思想渊源，止于当代道教在世界各地的传播。 《中国道教史》所记内容涉及道教及各支派的经籍、教义、人物、教制、教职等等，同时兼及道教的节日、礼俗、圣地、遗迹、建筑、文学、艺术等等。 在对道教作全面考察的同时，《中国道教史》还对道教与中国古代政治、社会、经济、文化、思想的关系，作了深刻的分析。

　　《管子》绝非只讲利益，而是认为人只有在基本需要得到满足以后，才有能力开启精神、道德上的追求。“仓廪实则知礼节，衣食足则知荣辱”，就是要为人类的“义”和“利”建立次序，主张先现实后理想。这不但符合人性，更易知易行，有别于儒家舍利取义的一套理论。 　　“中信国学大典”之《管子》，学者赵善轩等在撰写导读，并对精彩段落、经典语句加以赏析与点评。因此，这是一个版本权威、评点精准、特色鲜明的《管子》新注，尤其适合普通国学爱好者阅读。

　　我们究竟应该怎样活着？人生这堂课到底有何意义？企业家应该如何正确地经营企业？正确的人生观对个人、组织、人类具有何等重大的意义？ 　　今天我们之所以要讨论活着的意义，不是为了让我们拿出大把时光去闲置，不是为了让我们放弃理想和责任，而恰恰是提醒我们：在追求幸福的道路上，不要丢失自己。 　　本书以李嘉诚的经典演讲点题，并结合他本人以及商业史上的经典案例，从成长、生存、成功、生活、幸福五个维度深入探讨了“人生这堂课”这一哲学基本命题，内容涉及理想与信仰、成长与奋斗、知识与教育、人生的修为、处世的智慧以及生活的乐趣、慈善与孝道等人生关键词，展现了李嘉诚深刻的人生与经营智慧，字字句句，全是恳切之言，让无数人在迷茫时找到活着的意义，激发自身潜在的伟大力量。

《忏悔录》这本书是卢梭晚年在迫害和种种指责、中伤下所写的悲愤之作，就首先具有强烈的抗争和自我辩护的色调。这一点他并不回避。但是他更强调的是，这完全是一部真害的赤裸裸的自我揭示之作。因为在他看来，只有真实的忏悔和揭示，才能达到自辩的目的。并且不仅如此，这种真实的忏悔还将为“研究人”这一崇高事业作出重要贡献。可以说，这三个目的：抗争、真实、为研究人做出范例，构成了《忏悔录》的基调、内容和高度。而在这三者中。真实性是关键的所在，也是不容易做到的。《忏悔录》的精彩之处和人们会向它提出的种种疑问，也都集中在这里。

《中华圣贤经》收录了《呻吟语》《省心路》《省心杂言》《劝世文》《小窗幽记》《围炉夜话》《菜根谭》《小窗自纪》等多本古代哲书，从中采撷精华，内容涉及人生理想，品德修养，探索求知，成功励志，修身养性等各个方面。

《我在北大听哲学》通过透视孔子、老子、庄子、慧能、魏晋名士等先哲的生命哲学，在引入北大教授楼宇烈、王博、杨立华、王中江、王岳川等观点的同时，也融入了作者自己的生命体验和精神追索，所涉及的面向，揭示的问题，指出的方向，将给你种下解决生命中根本问题的种子。 《我在北大听哲学》所阐述的先哲，他们或为理想而生，或回归大道，或沉痛逍遥，或救度众生，或隐遁乡野，了解他们在各种环境下的选择与作为，以及他们的哲学思想，不仅能为我们认识自我，理解中国哲学打开一扇窗，也可以为我们透视当下的社会以及自我的生存，提供不一样的视角。

Such is the system which underlies the Meditations of Marcus Aurelius. Some knowledge of it is necessary to the right understanding of the book, but for us the chief interest lies elsewhere. We do not come to Marcus Aurelius for a treatise on Stoicism. He is no head of a school to lay down a body of doctrine for students; he does not even contemplate that others should read what he writes. His philosophy is not an eager intellectual inquiry, but more what we should call religious feeling. The uncompromising stiffness of Zeno or Chrysippus is softened and transformed by passing through a nature reverent and tolerant, gentle and free from guile; the grim resignation which made life possible to the Stoic sage becomes in him almost a mood of aspiration. His book records the innermost thoughts of his heart, set down to ease it, with such moral maxims and reflections as may help him to bear the burden of duty and the countless annoyances of a busy life. It is instructive to compare the Meditations with another famous book, the Imitation of Christ. There is the same ideal of self-control in both. It should be a man's task, says the Imitation, 'to overcome himself, and every day to be stronger than himself.' 'In withstanding of the passions standeth very peace of heart.' 'Let us set the axe to the root, that we being purged of our passions may have a peaceable mind.' To this end there must be continual self-examination. 'If thou may not continually gather thyself together, namely sometimes do it, at least once a day, the morning or the evening. In the morning purpose, in the evening discuss the manner, what thou hast been this day, in word, work, and thought.' But while the Roman's temper is a modest self-reliance, the Christian aims at a more passive mood, humbleness and meekness, and reliance on the presence and personal friendship of God. The Roman scrutinises his faults with severity, but without the self-contempt which makes the Christian 'vile in his own sight.' The Christian, like the Roman, bids 'study to withdraw thine heart from the love of things visible'; but it is not the busy life of duty he has in mind so much as the contempt of all worldly things, and the 'cutting away of all lower delectations.' Both rate men's praise or blame at their real worthlessness; 'Let not thy peace,' says the Christian, 'be in the mouths of men.' But it is to God's censure the Christian appeals, the Roman to his own soul. The petty annoyances of injustice or unkindness are looked on by each with the same magnanimity. 'Why doth a little thing said or done against thee make thee sorry? It is no new thing; it is not the first, nor shall it be the last, if thou live long. At best suffer patiently, if thou canst not suffer joyously.' The Christian should sorrow more for other men's malice than for our own wrongs; but the Roman is inclined to wash his hands of the offender. 'Study to be patient in suffering and bearing other men's defaults and all manner infirmities,' says the Christian; but the Roman would never have thought to add, 'If all men were perfect, what had we then to suffer of other men for God?' The virtue of suffering in itself is an idea which does not meet us in the Meditations. Both alike realise that man is one of a great community. 'No man is sufficient to himself,' says the Christian; 'we must bear together, help together, comfort together.' But while he sees a chief importance in zeal, in exalted emotion that is, and avoidance of lukewarmness, the Roman thought mainly of the duty to be done as well as might be, and less of the feeling which should go with the doing of it. To the saint as to the emperor, the world is a poor thing at best. 'Verily it is a misery to live upon the earth,' says the Christian; few and evil are the days of man's life, which passeth away suddenly as a shadow. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?*** ? "MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS" was born on April 26, A.D. 121. His real name was M. Annius Verus, and he was sprung of a noble family which claimed descent from Numa, second King of Rome. Thus the most religious of emperors came of the blood of the most pious of early kings. His father, Annius Verus, had held high office in Rome, and his grandfather, of the same name, had been thrice Consul. Both his parents died young, but Marcus held them in loving remembrance. On his father's death Marcus was adopted by his grandfather, the consular Annius Verus, and there was deep love between these two. On the very first page of his book Marcus gratefully declares how of his grandfather he had learned to be gentle and meek, and to refrain from all anger and passion. The Emperor Hadrian divined the fine character of the lad, whom he used to call not Verus but Verissimus, more Truthful than his own name. He advanced Marcus to equestrian rank when six years of age, and at the age of eight made him a member of the ancient Salian priesthood. The boy's aunt, A

   美国著名学者施特劳斯曾经写下《论卢梭的意图》一文，力图解卢梭言辞激烈且屡遭误解的檄文《论科学和文艺》的写作企图之谜。本书为中国著名学者刘小枫对施特劳斯文的逐段绎读，以图通过这种方式学习当代解经大家解读经典文本的经验，从而学习如何像卢梭理解自己那样理解卢梭，以资纪念卢梭诞辰三百周年。