如果选择权在你，那么你为什么要做这件事呢?需要自己决定如何去做的时候，何必迟疑?如果你能看清自己的路，高高兴兴地走下去，不要转向;如果你看不明前方的路，可以先停下来，听听斯多葛派哲学家的思考。《每日斯多葛》选辑斯多葛哲学的经典段落，配合浅显易懂的文字，让心灵恢复安静、沉着、稳定。每天一篇短文，每月一个主题，可按日期每天阅读一篇，也可以自主选择喜爱的主题阅读。       你会发现：天地之间有许多事情，是你的哲学里所没有梦想到的呢。

M. Lévy-Bruhl then explains that, whilst recognising the entire coherence of Comte’s collective labours, he proposes to confine his present study to the earlier and principal work, the Philosophy, which in M. Lévy-Bruhl’s opinion is the dominant and more fruitful composition.??This he regards as the representative work of the nineteenth century, as shown by the intellectual history of the period. He points to its influence on thought in England, in Europe, and in America. It will surprise many persons to learn that in M. Lévy-Bruhl’s opinion two eminent French writers, who assuredly neither were, nor were supposed to be, Positivists, “have done more for the diffusion of the ideas and method of Comte than Littré and all the other Positivists together.” ??These two are Taine and Renan, much as they differed from Comte’s actual scheme and doctrines. Renan indeed spoke of Comte as destined to prove one of the typical names of the century. The present writer remembers Renan saying to him with a most genial welcome, “I too am a believer in the religion of humanity.” ??Professor Lévy-Bruhl followed up his History of Modern Philosophy in France by a substantial work on the philosophy of Auguste Comte. It forms a volume of the Bibliothèque de Philosophie Contemporaine, which has already devoted four other works to the Positive Philosophy. It is as well to premise that this treatise dealt solely with the philosophy, not with the polity, or any part of the religious scheme of Comte. Professor Lévy-Bruhl writes as a student, but not as an adherent of Auguste Comte. His entire work is rather an exposition, not a refutation, or a criticism, or an advocacy of Comte’s philosophical system. But it may be said at once that no one abroad or at home, certainly neither Mill, nor Lewes, nor Spencer, nor Caird, has so truly grasped and assimilated Comte’s ideas as M. Lévy-Bruhl has done.??In his Introduction M. Lévy-Bruhl very clearly states the scope of his work, and his own general attitude. He traces the origin of Comte’s philosophy in the mental effervescence of the first generation of the present century towards a reorganisation of society, after the upheaval left by the Revolution and its consequences. He correctly states the relation of St. Simon to Comte as being that of an initial stimulus. ??The cardinal difference between Comte and all the socialists and founders of social and religious Utopias consisted in this, that Comte saw the necessity of a new system of philosophy as the indispensable preliminary to any reorganisation of society.

Ce este adev?rul? De unde ?tiu cine sunt? De ce ar trebui s? fim buni? Exist? multe c?r?i despre filosofie. Cu toate acestea, Cine sunt eu? difer? fa?? de celelalte lucr?ri de introducere ?n filosofie. Nimeni nu a reu?it p?n? acum s? pun? cititorul fa??-n fa?? cu marile ?ntreb?ri ale omenirii ?ntr-o manier? at?t de documentat?, de competent? ?i, ?n acela?i timp, cu umor ?i cu elegan??. Prezenta lucrare reprezint? o c?l?torie unic? prin noianul de cuno?tin?e pe care le avem despre om. Precht ne prezint? tot ceea ce este mai nou ?n neuro?tiin??, ?n psihologie ?i ?n filosofie. Fie c? pleac? ?n cercetarea sensului vie?ii pornind de la analiza unui episod din Star Trek sau de la melodia Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds a celor de la Beatles, cartea ne pune ?n fa?a unui traseu captivant, ?n care vom descoperi cele mai surprinz?toare lucruri despre noi ?n?ine.

Antropologie ?i antroposofie ? Max Dessoir despre antroposofie ? Franz BrentanoAlc?tuind cuprinsul acestei lucr?ri, Rudolf Steiner reveleaz? ?c?teva din firele ?tiin?ifice care trebuie trasate pornind de la antropozofie la filozofie, la psihologie ?i la fiziologie“. Cunoa?terea omului va trebui atunci s? fie extins? ?in?nd cont de enigmaticele aspecte ale vie?ii sale interioare, privite din perspective multiple. ?n aceast? carte, Rudolf Steiner prezint? ?n scris aspectele semnificative ale configur?rii ?ntreite a fiin?ei omene?ti: corpul fizic, organismul sufletesc ?i configura?ia spiritual?.

Tr?s?turi fundamentale ale unei concep?ii moderne despre lume?Cum se comport? filosofia c? art? fa?? de libertatea omului, ce este aceast? libertate, ?i dac? am ajuns s? ne ?mp?rt??im din ea, sau putem ajunge la acest lucru: iat? problema fundamental? a scrierii mele. Toate celelalte expuneri ?tiin?ifice au fost f?cute numai pentru ca, ?n cele din urm?, s? arunc?m ?i mai mult? lumin? asupra unei probleme care, dup? p?rerea mea, prezint? cea mai mare importan?? pentru om. ?n aceste pagini vrem s? d?m o filosofie a libert??ii.“ – Rudolf Steiner

F?r? a propune o terminologie aristotelic? bine precizat? pe teritoriul limbii rom?ne, transpunerea de fa?? reprezint? un moment important ?n raportarea rom?neasc? la opera Stagiritului.Traducere de ?tefan Bezdechi efectuat? dup? textul grec publicat de W. Christ ?n colec?ia ?Teubner“, Lipsca, 1906. Pentru realizarea ei au fost utilizate urm?toarele surse:Die Metaphysik des Aristoteles, traducere ?n limba german? de J. R. V. Kirchmann, ap?rut? ?n dou? volume ?i prev?zut? cu note ample ?n colec?ia ?Philosophische Bibliothek“, numerele 38 ?i 39, la Berlin, ?n 1871;Aristoteles, Metaphysik, traducere ?n limba german? de Adolf Lasson, ?n care cele patrusprezece c?r?i ale Metafizicii sunt a?ezate ?ntr-o r?nduial? mai logic? dec?t a?a cum au fost transmise ?n originalul grec, traducere ap?rut? ?n 1924, la Jena;Aristote, Métaphysique, traducere ?n limba francez? de J. Tricot, cu o prefa?? de A. Diés, ap?rut? ?n colec?ia ?Bibliothèque des textes philosophiques“, J. Vrin, la Paris, ?n 1933.La marginea textului a fost trecut? pagina?ia edi?iei Bekker, dup? care se fac ?n mod obi?nuit cita?iile din opera lui Aristotel.Confruntarea traducerii a fost f?cut? de prof. Aram M. Frenkian.

O analiz? aplicat? a operei unuia dintre cei mai controversa?i g?nditori germani, supranumit monahul de la Sils-Maria; o lectur? ?n filigran a modului nietzschean de abordare a c?torva concepte dificile, interpretate la modul catastrofic: supraomul, ve?nica ?ntoarcere a aceluia?i, anti-Christul. Lucrarea se situeaz? ?n buna ?i prestigioas? tradi?ie a marilor creatori care comenteaz? textele fundamentale ale omenirii dintr-un unghi specific.

Critica ra?iunii pure, tradus? de Nicolae Bagdasar ?i Elena Moisuc ?n 1969, a ajuns la cea de-a treia edi?ie. Cu acest prilej, profesorul dr. Ilie P?rvu, de la Facultatea de Filosofie a Universit??ii din Bucure?ti a ?ngrijit noua opera?ie de editare, fiind astfel corectate unele erori de tipar ?i unele inconsecven?e terminologice. Totodat?, exist? un motiv ?n plus pentru ca studen?ii care posed? edi?ia a II-a a traducerii, ap?rut? ?n 1995, s? apeleze ?i la cea de-a treia edi?ie: ?n aceasta din urm? au fost indicate diferen?ele dintre edi?ia I german? (din 1781) ?i edi?ia a II-a (din 1787).

Volumul red? circuitului public, pentru prima oar? ?n limba rom?n?, trei din operele g?nditorului atenian. Este vorba de Scrisori (?n num?r de treisprezece, deosebit de importante pentru cunoa?terea g?ndirii platoniciene, dar ?i pentru ?n?elegerea epocii ?i a personalit??ilor cu care a venit ?n contact filosoful), Dialoguri suspecte (Minos, Rivalii, Theages, Hipparhos, Clitofon) ?i Dialoguri apocrife (Axiohos, Despre drept, Despre virtute, Demodocus, Sisyfos, Eryxias).Traducerea apara?ine lui ?tefan Bezdechi, care a realizat ?i aparatul critic al Scrisorilor (introducere ?i note).

Imagineaz?-?i c? e?ti într-o ma?in? a timpului care te poart? înainte ?i înapoi prin propria via??. Te duce în trecut, la anii copil?riei, când înv??ai s? mergi pe biciclet?, apoi te face s? revezi primul t?u s?rut, cel dintâi serviciu sau anii mai târzii, când te confrun?i, eventual, cu divor?ul. Înso?it de Platon, afl? ce spun marii gânditori ai lumii despre toate aceste pietre de hotar de pe drumul vie?ii noastre. Aristotel î?i va vorbi despre importan?a începerii ?colii, Freud despre îndr?gostire, Heidegger despre implica?iile psihologice ale mutatului, iar Nietzsche despre criza vârstei de mijloc. La drum cu Platon te ajut? s? în?elegi ?i s? vezi cu al?i ochi evenimentele majore, momentele-cheie ?i fazele de tranzi?ie din via?a ta, f?când filosofia s? par? accesibil? ?i plin? de umor!

《论语》《孟子》《大学》《中庸》合称“四书”，是儒家的经典古籍，在中国思想史上占有重要的地位。钱穆先生所著《四书释义》分为《论语要略》《孟子要略》《大学中庸释义》三个部分，对“四书”作出阐释与发挥。其中《论》《孟》两书裁为要略，分门别类，提纲挈领，有助于读者把握两书要领；《学》《庸》则为其释义，备列全文，使学者体悟篇中宏旨。本书已经是经典著作，深受读者喜爱。

《世界·大师·原典·文库：人性论（中文导读插图版）（套装上下册）》作者认为一切科学都与人性有关，对人性的研究应是一切科学的基础。《人性论（中文导读插图版）（套装上下册）》试图通过对人性的研究来揭示制约人的理智、情感和道德行为的准则。全书分三卷，卷讨论知性；第二卷讨论情感；第三卷讨论道德。

《世界·大师·原典·文库：人性论（中文导读插图版）（套装上下册）》作者认为一切科学都与人性有关，对人性的研究应是一切科学的基础。《人性论（中文导读插图版）（套装上下册）》试图通过对人性的研究来揭示制约人的理智、情感和道德行为的准则。全书分三卷，卷讨论知性；第二卷讨论情感；第三卷讨论道德。

《世界·大师·原典·文库：人性论（中文导读插图版）（套装上下册）》作者认为一切科学都与人性有关，对人性的研究应是一切科学的基础。《人性论（中文导读插图版）（套装上下册）》试图通过对人性的研究来揭示制约人的理智、情感和道德行为的准则。全书分三卷，卷讨论知性；第二卷讨论情感；第三卷讨论道德。

本书从哲学角度出发，阐述了古今中外哲学史上的名家对当代哲学和古典哲学的分析研究，有对古典作品的研究，对思想史的研究，还有旧文新刊上的重要论题。真实作为历史的基础我们应该了解;篇幸布局与行文明晰作为手法应该通俗易懂。一个是肌体,另一个是肌体的健康。当我专注于哲学与城邦之间的张力,也就是专注于政治哲学的至高主题时,就进一步确定了这种想法。至高形式的、或海德格尔式的当代哲学与古典哲学的区别,是由当代哲学的历史特性塑造出来的,以所谓的历史意识为先决条件,因此必须了解这种意识多少有些隐私、的根源。

自由教育是从庸俗中解放出来。古希腊人关于“庸俗”有一个绝妙的词：他们称之为apeirokalia，形容缺乏对美好事物的经历。自由教育将赠予我们之于美好的事物的经历。根据事物本身的状况，我们可以期望从正确理解的人性人不得不在二者之间选择，要么选择令人愉悦的谬见带来的心灵平静，要么选择令人烦恼的真理带来的心灵平静。哲学总在盼着世界的围墙倒塌，它突破了世界的围墙，放弃了对世界的眷恋（attachmenttheworld），这种放弃*令人痛苦。另一方面，诗歌如同宗教，深深扎根于对世界的眷恋....中比从科学中获得更为直接的帮助，从敏感和精致中比从几何学的精神中获得更为直接的帮助。如果我没弄错，这就是为何现在的身由教育几乎等同于阅读古希腊经典。就像别人被一匹良马、一条好狗或一只灵鸟取悦那样，我自己则因好朋友们而获得更高的快乐……古代的贤人们通过将它们写进书中而遗留下来的财富，我与我的朋友们一起开启它并穿行其中，而且如果我们发现了什么好东西，我们就把它挑出来，并当作一次丰盛的收获，倘若我们因此而能相互促益的话。

《了凡四训》又名《命自我立》，为明代袁了凡先生所作的家训，以其亲身经历教戒他的儿子袁天，认识命运的真相，明辨善恶的标准，改过迁善的故事。 本书将了凡四训四篇分为若干章节编写，每一章另外提炼标题，如*篇立命之学，其章节为：*章解题，第二章孔先生算命……除了解题这一章外，其他每一章都分为原文、注释、译文、解读、名言哲语五个部分。 本书的通俗性表现在注释、译文，一般读者读完这两部分就弄懂了原文的含义，注释则具有知识性，将古汉语基本知识告诉读者。 本书的趣味性在于例证这些故事，用事例更好地说明本段文字的含义，形象生动，引人胜。 本书的权威性体现在解读和名言哲语。本书解读注重用简明通俗的语言解读原文内容，同时引用古今圣贤对原文道理的说明。其中的名言哲语则引用古今中外名人的话或者人们长期以来经验总结的警句哲言，以这些*权威性的话来*后说明本文的道理。

究竟什么才是知识？ 知识从何而来？ 为什么有些信念的来源就是可靠的知识? 哲学家对知识的思考有哪些不同的答案呢？ …… 关于知识的问题，几千年来一直是哲学家思考的重，他们彼此争论，寻求问题的答案。对知识的哲学研究就是认识论。在书中，你可以读到柏拉图、康德、笛卡儿等不同哲学家对知识的思考，重塑你对知识的认识，也能在外在主义、内在主义、怀疑主义、经验主义的理解中启你对哲学的思考。 但你不要期待能在书中找到关于知识的*终答案，因为哲学中没有公认的答案。阅读本书时，*好的做法是试着自己评估每一种哲学立场，判断它是否正确。这不仅仅是一种本能反应，因为每一种立场都会伴随着赞成或反对的观，这些观都值得你自己去仔细考量，从而判断它们是否令人信服。你甚至可以添加一些自己的思考，享受一次令人兴奋的体验。 《人人都该懂的认识论》属于湛庐文化重磅推出的“新核心素养”系列图书之一。本系列图书致力于推广通识阅读，扩展读者的阅读面，培养批判性思考的能力。其中涵盖了哲学、心理学、法律、艺术、物理学、生物科技等诸多人文科学和自然科学的知识，其中《人人都该懂的认识论》从哲学的角度出发，对知识行了一场哲学思考，可以帮助你更好地理解知识，探讨知识到底从何而来，启一场对哲学的重新思考。

本书是一部基督教世界通史，以时间为经，以地区和国别为纬，全面系统地介绍了基督教产生、发展和流传的历史。全书所记时限始于基督教产生前的犹太社会状况，止于基督教在近现代中国的流传。所记内容按教派分化展，广泛涉及基督教及各支派的经籍、教义、神学、人物、组织、教制、教职等等，同时兼及基督教的节日、礼俗、圣地、遗迹、建筑、文学、艺术等等。在对基督教本身作全面考察的同时，书中还对基督教与政治、社会、经济、文化的关系作了深刻的分析，对一些重要史事和学术问题也提出了新的见解。

本书内容为如来藏系经典的汉译以及重要的如来藏经典文本所包含的思想之研究。书中重研究分析的如来藏类佛经和论典为《如来藏经》《央掘魔罗经》《不增不减经》《大法鼓经》《胜鬘经》《无上依经》《大云经》《大般涅槃经》《圆觉经》《楞伽经》《楞严经》《究竟一乘宝性论》《佛性论》《大乘起信论》等十一部经和三部论，结论是：上述如来藏经典全部不存在“伪经”或“伪论”的问题。如来藏经典并非大乘佛教独立的派系，而是对于如来法身以及众生成佛的依据等问题所作的新诠释，尤其是，后期如来藏经典已经被瑜伽行派所吸收摄取。后，如来藏说并不存在近代以来学术界所指责的与“大梵”说没有区别等问题；宣称如来藏是“基体”因而如来藏思想不是佛教等说法是没有经典根据的。

本书记录著名学者赵敦华教授最近十几年的研究心得，是一部关于中西哲学与马克思哲学对话的原创论文集。作者创造性地试图用达尔文的发生学观，重新解释中国文明的起源；用中西比较哲学的方法，重新理解先秦经典；并且对马克思主义，做了正本清源的工作。全书分三篇，上篇：马克思哲学：正本清源；中篇：西方哲学：推本溯源；下篇：中国哲学:返本新。