《明史演义（现代白话版）》是《历朝通俗演义（现代白话版）》的明朝部分，详细记叙了朱元璋从平民发迹到建立大明王朝，再到明朝灭亡二百七十六年间的历史。作者将历史人物行艺术再加工，以人物演义的形式生动描述了明朝的政治、经济、军事等面貌；采纳众多历史典籍，咏叹大明王朝的兴亡，并启发后世引以为鉴。         全书旁征博引，文史详备，真实可靠，行文张弛有度，自批自评，妙趣横生，其人物丰富，主次分明，故事生动，评独到，集文学性与历史性、趣味性于一体，让人读来不忍释卷，可谓通俗史著的经典之作。不但可以作为一般的休闲读物，也可以作为历史爱好者的参考书。

More’s “Utopia” was written in Latin, and is in two parts, of which the second, describing the place ([Greek text]—or Nusquama, as he called it sometimes in his letters—“Nowhere”), was probably written towards the close of 1515; the first part, introductory, early in 1516. The book was first printed at Louvain, late in 1516, under the editorship of Erasmus, Peter Giles, and other of More’s friends in Flanders. It was then revised by More, and printed by Frobenius at Basle in November, 1518. It was reprinted at Paris and Vienna, but was not printed in England during More’s lifetime. Its first publication in this country was in the English translation, made in Edward’s VI.’s reign (1551) by Ralph Robinson. It was translated with more literary skill by Gilbert Burnet, in 1684, soon after he had conducted the defence of his friend Lord William Russell, attended his execution, vindicated his memory, and been spitefully deprived by James II. of his lectureship at St. Clement’s. Burnet was drawn to the translation of “Utopia” by the same sense of unreason in high places that caused More to write the book. Burnet’s is the translation given in this volume. The name of the book has given an adjective to our language—we call an impracticable scheme Utopian. Yet, under the veil of a playful fiction, the talk is intensely earnest, and abounds in practical suggestion. It is the work of a scholarly and witty Englishman, who attacks in his own way the chief political and social evils of his time. Beginning with fact, More tells how he was sent into Flanders with Cuthbert Tunstal, “whom the king’s majesty of late, to the great rejoicing of all men, did prefer to the office of Master of the Rolls;” how the commissioners of Charles met them at Bruges, and presently returned to Brussels for instructions; and how More then went to Antwerp, where he found a pleasure in the society of Peter Giles which soothed his desire to see again his wife and children, from whom he had been four months away. Then fact slides into fiction with the finding of Raphael Hythloday (whose name, made of two Greek words [Greek text] and [Greek text], means “knowing in trifles”), a man who had been with Amerigo Vespucci in the three last of the voyages to the new world lately discovered, of which the account had been first printed in 1507, only nine years before Utopia was written. Designedly fantastic in suggestion of details, “Utopia” is the work of a scholar who had read Plato’s “Republic,” and had his fancy quickened after reading Plutarch’s account of Spartan life under Lycurgus. Beneath the veil of an ideal communism, into which there has been worked some witty extravagance, there lies a noble English argument. Sometimes More puts the case as of France when he means England. Sometimes there is ironical praise of the good faith of Christian kings, saving the book from censure as a political attack on the policy of Henry VIII. Erasmus wrote to a friend in 1517 that he should send for More’s “Utopia,” if he had not read it, and “wished to see the true source of all political evils.” And to More Erasmus wrote of his book, “A burgomaster of Antwerp is so pleased with it that he knows it all by heart.” Sir Thomas More, son of Sir John More, a justice of the King’s Bench, was born in 1478, in Milk Street, in the city of London. After his earlier education at St. Anthony’s School, in Threadneedle Street, he was placed, as a boy, in the household of Cardinal John Morton, Archbishop of Canterbury and Lord Chancellor. It was not unusual for persons of wealth or influence and sons of good families to be so established together in a relation of patron and client. The youth wore his patron’s livery, and added to his state. The patron used, afterwards, his wealth or influence in helping his young client forward in the world.

Among the notable books of later times-we may say, without exaggeration, of all time--must be reckoned The Confessions of Jean Jacques Rousseau. It deals with leading personages and transactions of a momentous epoch, when absolutism and feudalism were rallying for their last struggle against the modern spirit, chiefly represented by Voltaire, the Encyclopedists, and Rousseau himself--a struggle to which, after many fierce intestine quarrels and sanguinary wars throughout Europe and America, has succeeded the prevalence of those more tolerant and rational principles by which the statesmen of our own day are actuated. On these matters, however, it is not our province to enlarge; nor is it necessary to furnish any detailed account of our author's political, religious, and philosophic axioms and systems, his paradoxes and his errors in logic: these have been so long and so exhaustively disputed over by contending factions that little is left for even the most assiduous gleaner in the field. The inquirer will find, in Mr. John Money's excellent work, the opinions of Rousseau reviewed succinctly and impartially. The 'Contrat Social', the 'Lattres Ecrites de la Montagne', and other treatises that once aroused fierce controversy, may therefore be left in the repose to which they have long been consigned, so far as the mass of mankind is concerned, though they must always form part of the library of the politician and the historian. One prefers to turn to the man Rousseau as he paints himself in the remarkable work before us. That the task which he undertook in offering to show himself--as Persius puts it--'Intus et in cute', to posterity, exceeded his powers, is a trite criticism; like all human enterprises, his purpose was only imperfectly fulfilled; but this circumstance in no way lessens the attractive qualities of his book, not only for the student of history or psychology, but for the intelligent man of the world. Its startling frankness gives it a peculiar interest wanting in most other autobiographies. Many censors have elected to sit in judgment on the failings of this strangely constituted being, and some have pronounced upon him very severe sentences. Let it be said once for all that his faults and mistakes were generally due to causes over which he had but little control, such as a defective education, a too acute sensitiveness, which engendered suspicion of his fellows, irresolution, an overstrained sense of honour and independence, and an obstinate refusal to take advice from those who really wished to befriend him; nor should it be forgotten that he was afflicted during the greater part of his life with an incurable disease. Lord Byron had a soul near akin to Rousseau's, whose writings naturally made a deep impression on the poet's mind, and probably had an influence on his conduct and modes of thought: In some stanzas of 'Childe Harold' this sympathy is expressed with truth and power; especially is the weakness of the Swiss philosopher's character summed up in the following admirable lines: "Here the self-torturing sophist, wild Rousseau, The apostle of affliction, he who threw Enchantment over passion, and from woe Wrung overwhelming eloquence, first drew The breath which made him wretched; yet he knew How to make madness beautiful, and cast O'er erring deeds and thoughts a heavenly hue Of words, like sunbeams, dazzling as they passed The eyes, which o'er them shed tears feelingly and fast. "His life was one long war with self-sought foes, Or friends by him self-banished; for his mind Had grown Suspicion's sanctuary, and chose, For its own cruel sacrifice, the kind, 'Gainst whom he raged with fury strange and blind. But he was frenzied,-wherefore, who may know? Since cause might be which skill could never find; But he was frenzied by disease or woe To that worst pitch of all, which wears a reasoning show."

Mülkiyet kar??t? ya?l? anar?ist, hayat?n?n son y?llar?nda ironik bir durumda kald?. ?svi?re vatanda?l???na girmenin yollar?n? arayan Bakunin'e sunulan se?enek, orada bir ev sahibi olmas?yd? ve belki de en hazini, sahip olaca?? bu ev nedeniyle, polisin, resm? tutanaklara “Michael Bakunin, rantiye” notunu dü?mesiydi. 18 May?s 1814'te Rusya'da do?an Michael Aleksandrovich Bakunin, 1 Temmuz 1876'da ?ldü?ünde ülkesinden ?ok uzaklardayd? ve cenazesinde yaln?zca 30–40 ki?i vard?. Gen? Bakunin i?in, “A?k, insan?n yeryüzündeki en üst misyonuydu. Bir insan?n kendini a?ks?z vermesi, Kutsal Ruh’a kar?? i?lenmi? bir günaht?”.. ?Kad?nlar taraf?ndan olduk?a ?ekici bulunan Mihail'in ise kad?nlarla ili?kisi hep ruhsal bir a?k olarak kald?.??svi?re'nin muhte?em manzaras? e?li?inde George Sand romanlar? okuyan Bakunin, Frans?z dü?üncesinin Alman dü?üncesinden üstün oldu?u inanc?n? sa?lamla?t?r?yordu. ? Bakunin, Marx i?in, “O, beni duygusal idealist olarak adland?r?yordu; hakl?yd?. Ben de onu, hoyrat, kendini be?enmi? ve ac?mas?z olarak de?erlendiriyordum; ben de hakl?yd?m” diyordu.. ? Kendisine ili?kin konularda kindar olmayan Bakunin, Herzen'in kar?s?na g?sterdi?i so?uklu?u hayat?n?n sonuna kadar unutamad?.?“Art?k reaksiyonun muzaffer gü?lerine kar?? Sisifos'un ta??n? yuvarlamak i?in ne gerekli güce ne de güvene sahibim. Bu yüzden, mücadeleden ?ekiliyor ve arkada?lar?mdan tek bir iyilik bekliyorum: "Unutulmak”,?Orta ve ge? on dokuzuncu yüzy?lda, radikal sol –yani, a?g?zlü kapitalizm ele?tirmenleri ve sanayi i??ilerinin ?zgürlü?ünün savunucular?– iki temel franksiyona ayr?l?yordu: Marksistler ve anar?istler. Kabaca s?ylemek gerekirse (ki bu son derece kar???k bir hik?yedir), kazanan Marksistler oldu ve yirminci yüzy?l?n tüm ba?ar?l? sol devrimleri –Rus, ?in ve Küba, ?rne?in– Marksist ilkelere ba?l?l?klar?n? ilan ettiler. ? Marksistler ile anar?istler aras?ndaki sava? bu noktada tarihsel bir meraktan ?te devam eden bir meseledir. Pi?man olmayan ya da ele?tirilmeyen tek ger?ek Marksist sol Kim Jong Il ve taraf etraftaki birka? entelektüel ve profes?rdür. Anar?izm ise uygulanabilir bir toplumsal hareket olarak ?kinci Dünya Sava??yla yava? yava? tükenmeye yüz tutmu?ken küreselle?me kar??t? hareket ve d?nemimizin di?er radikalizmleri i?inde yeniden dirilmeye ba?lam??t?r. ? Ne var ki, d?neminde –Marx’?n di?erleriyle aras?ndaki– bu sava? bir ?lüm kal?m meselesiydi ve Marksizm muhtemel kapitalizm kar??t? olarak ve yan? s?ra anar?izm kar??t? olarak tan?mlan?yordu. Asl?nda, Marx’?n yazarl??? anar?izme y?nelik sald?r?lar? a??s?ndan handiyse gülün? bir geni?li?e ula?m??t?r. Marx’?n Alman ?deolojisi kitab?n?n büyük b?lümü –yüzlerce sayfas?– bireyci/anar?ist Max Stirner’e y?nelik bir sald?r?dan ibarettir. Felsefenin Sefaleti Proudhon’a kar?? büyük?e bir fikir sava??d?r. Marx onca zaman ve enerjisini Bakunin’e sald?rmaya harcam??t?r: ?“dangalak!”?“canavar, et ve ya? y???n?,” “sap?k” vesaire: ?bu tabirler, has?mlar? s?z konusu oldu?unda Marx’?n bildik üslubudur: yazarl??? yar? bilimsel inceleme, yar? s?zlü tacizdir. Marx’?n, gerek kendi a?z?ndan gerekse de kimi s?zcülerini kullanarak ony?llar boyunca y?neltti?i ve muhtemelen di?erleri denli e?lenceli olmayan var olan su?lamas?, Bakunin’in bir muhbir oldu?u y?nündeydi ve Marx’?n bu ba?ar?l? sald?r?lar? nihayetinde Bakunin’in Enternasyonal ???i Z?mb?rt?s?ndan tasfiyesine yol a?t?.. ?

煮云法师关于佛七的示，近代念佛的实录，记载佛七中的各种事迹，可作为研究近代念佛法门演变的材料。

《杂阿含经》是以言行录的体裁，记述佛陀和他的弟子们的修行与弘法活动。经中揭示了佛教的基本教义，如缘起、十二因缘、三法印、四圣谛、八正道、四念处等，故被称为“佛教圣典”。由于《杂阿含经》不重玄理、义解，重视的是修行实践，因而诵读此经，有助于现代人修行佛法。

《胜鬘经》弘传于南北朝，备受教内教外的重视。本经为大乘如来藏系经典中代表作之一。内容叙述胜?N夫人对释尊立十大誓愿、三大愿，并自说大乘一乘法门，阐释圣谛、法身、如来藏等。 　经中认为三乘之教归于大乘之一乘，得一乘即得如来法身。众生虽被烦恼所缠，然其本性清净无垢，与如来同等，故皆具有如来之性（佛性、如来藏）。且以如来藏为基础，即使在生死轮回之世界，亦有获得涅槃之可能。本经之一乘思想，即是承继法华经者，而成为大乘佛教之重所在。又本经之特色乃在以在家妇人说法，故与维摩居士所说之“维摩经”，并为大乘佛教在家佛教之代表作。　全书共分十五章，包括如来真实功德、十受、三愿、摄受、一乘、无边圣谛、如来藏、法身、空义隐覆真实、一谛、一依、颠倒真实、自性清净、真子、胜?N等。

公元前500—前200年，文化中国的诸子时代，确立了中国人生活和思考的轴心。春秋的诸侯和家臣都不重要，主角是“素王”孔子，然而孔子的“礼”在战国刚刚到来时就饱受挫折，兵家、纵横家以用计取代礼，其后有变法，西河之学与稷下之学交相辉映，启了热闹的诸子时代。孟子、庄子、老子、墨子互相辩驳，他们创造的思想观念，至今流淌在中国人的血液中。这个时代终结于“儒家圣化”和“儒门王圣运动”，终局也就是荀子的门徒韩非子的帝王学。 ------------- 《文化的江山》系列共3辑12册，中信出版集团·见识城邦出品： 第—辑：文化中国的起源 文化的江山01：文化中国的来源 文化的江山02：王朝中国的确立 文化的江山03：中国风雅颂 文化的江山04：中国轴心期 第二辑：走出王朝的中国史 文化的江山05：走向世界历史的国度 文化的江山06：通往文艺复兴的岁月 文化的江山07：追求思想共和的时代 文化的江山08：近代化与中国大航海 第三辑：告别晚清的近代史 文化的江山09：世界近代史的中国影响 文化的江山10：被西洋与东洋夹的天下 文化的江山11：告别晚清的中国近代史 文化的江山12：文化中国里的新文化运动

你是否有自己独立的想法？ 你是否有自己独立的观？ 你是否有自己独立的思考方式？ …… 我们往往以为，一旦形成了自己独一无二且有趣的观，就已经做好准备去面对世界及所有的挑战了，但是，这是一个错误的认知。事实上，拥有自己的思想只是始的*步。我们还需要将观转变为一种立场，并应用逻辑找到论据支撑。 而在现实世界中，广为流传的演讲、电视中的广告、杂志上的一篇文章，很多看似合乎逻辑的背后其实往往存在着逻辑错误。如果可以的话，我们应当反复琢磨自己和他人思考的逻辑，而这就是所谓的批判性思维。 真正的批判性思维是应用正确的逻辑去思考事情。通过学习优秀逻辑的基本原理，就不会再轻易地被混乱逻辑所愚弄。同时，你将更容易在重要的问题上提出可靠的观。本书的目的就是阐述所有你需要的批判性思维技巧。 《人人都该懂的批判性思维》属于湛庐文化重磅推出的“新核心素养”系列图书之一。本系列图书致力于推广通识阅读，扩展读者的阅读面，培养批判性思考的能力。其中涵盖了哲学、心理学、法律、艺术、物理学、生物科技等诸多人文科学和自然科学的知识，其中《人人都该懂的批判性思维》讲述了批判性思维的基本技能，可以帮你塑造强有力的逻辑，形成清晰有力的论。

　　坎贝尔是一名在神话的奇妙世界中寻找启示的文化英雄，他创造性地将人文价值及宇宙性的精神体验，注当代科学及艺术的诠释中，不仅丰富了神话学的研究领域，更为人类未来的新神话辟出辽阔的想象空间。在本书中，他将文学、哲学、心理学、人类学、考古学等知识应用到对神话的解读，并将神话思维应用到对人类历史、东西方文明、战争与和平等人类共同面临的问题的解读中。他用超越人类社会中各种幻象冲突的真理贯通了古今中外的智慧，他认为神话在个人与社会，社会与自然的融合过程中，尤其是人回归内在的过程中，起到的作用可以被无限放大。他告诉人们：生命的目标，在于使身体脉动契合宇宙的脉动，使自己的本性契合大自然。 　　本书是坎贝尔很重要的一本著作，精选自他在库珀联盟联盟学院论坛的演讲，汇集了他一生重要的学术思想，他用亲近大众的语言、独特的表达方式和热情洋溢的情感感染着聆听者。他在书中不仅剖析了科学对神话的影响，纵论人类的发展历史和东西方文化的邂逅和碰撞，探寻人们内心的回归旅程，而且还引导人们认识了大自然、地球和宇宙外太空。 　　读者通过这本书不仅可以经历历史上人类精神的一次次伟大飞跃，而且也可以行一次由外在世界到我们内心深处奥秘知识的深探索。正如坎贝尔所说：人会找到数千年走来的路。在这一刻，个人在神话与梦境中永生

　　第三帝国辉煌的时代即将结束。在海上、空中，德国人的威风不再，陆上也只能节节溃退。盟军于1944年6月6日的登陆彻底扭转了战局，虽然德国士兵尽了*的努力，但仍然难逃覆灭的命运。而此时的希特勒将赌注全押在了超级武器上，妄图一举成功，结果……

　　提起第二次世界大战，人们给予更多关注的是东线和西线的战事，殊不知从非洲沙漠发起，而深意大利西西里岛及本土南方，历时两年的南方前线也一样得异常惨烈。曾经不可一世的沙漠之狐隆美尔在盟军的下节节溃败，再也没有了往日的威风；纳粹德国的军队由非洲退到西西里岛，又退回意大利本土，后被迫继续向意大利北方退却。而盟军每前一步，也都付出了相当巨大的血和肉的代价……这一切对于彻底败纳粹，取得反法西斯战争的全面胜利，有着不可或缺的重要意义。

　　德国潜水艇部队在整个第二次世界大战期间，共沉同盟国和中立国的船只达1400万吨。这一方面是由于英、美两国低估了潜水艇的作用；另一方面是由于德国潜水艇指挥官的技艺高超。他们的个人领导才能、技术水平令他们的对手都称赞不已。但由于他们参加的是一场丧失人性的战争，他们的失败也就在所难免了。

　　1940年春，在侵占波兰之后，希特勒又将目光瞄向了挪威和丹麦，之后是比利时、荷兰、法国。纳粹德国采用闪电战的方式，以短的时间占领了上述诸国。如果说闪电战是一种成功的战术，那么，由此获得的一系列胜利是不是太轻松了？

这是一本图文并茂的丝绸之路史。作者海尔曼·约瑟夫·弗里施先生用通俗易懂的文字，描述了丝绸之路的地理地貌，并对沿路不同国家、文化予以展望。他记述了那些对丝绸之路的发展和持续曾经以及仍然甚至在将来依然非常重要的地方和场所，从而令读者了解到丝绸之路上那些东亚、中亚以及西亚国家的历史、文化和独特魅力，借助引人注目的照片和生动鲜明的文字，令读者穿越古今，有身临其境之感。

家人对你的期待是否让你困扰？ 你的生活中充满了嫉妒、竞争或不自信等元素吗？ 与别人交往时，你是否总会陷入同一种破坏性的模式中？ 作者将多年研究成果整合成本书，将人生早的6年拆解开，为我们分别展示了一个人因何变得严厉或和善、冷淡或黏人、病态或健康。0～6个月的主题是自体感与自我界限，理应感受到自我价值和能力，否则可能自恋或产生反社会心理；0～3岁的主题是关系模式，理应养成健康的依恋模式，否则可能面临与人相处的问题；3～6岁主要涉及良心，理应学会兼顾自己和他人，否则可能过于墨守成规或叛逆。通过阅读本书，读者可以解读自己的童年经历，认清真实的自己，探索出一套更健康的模式以处理原生家庭问题。

本书是著名历史学家周策纵先生的代表作。全书分为上、下两编，上编集中细致地描述了五四运动的成因、社会支持力量和发展经过，厘清了由学生发动的“五四”事件如何一步步扩展为一场全国性的政治爱国运动；下编剖析了五四运动对政治、社会、文学和思想领域的影响，全面而系统地论述了新文化运动、文学革命以及当时的各种社会政治思潮。作者引用的资料翔实，论证客观，对新式知识分子的社会功能和历史命运行了深的分析和研究。本书呈现了一幅完整的“五四”历史图景。

《哲学是很好玩儿的》(套装共15册)包括生命哲学、心灵哲学等多种哲学思想结晶，读者可以从入门开始，通过通俗易懂的方式学会如何用哲学思维思考，感受哲学里的自我和世界，帮读者重新审视自我和我们栖居的世界，以及和这个世界的关系，捕捉心中迸发的迷惑与感悟，进而把它们锤炼为人生的智慧。

《文学大师经典作品***》（套装共34册）遴选了徐志摩、胡适、傅雷、泰戈尔、朱自清、周作人等的经典文学作品，包括散文诗歌、名画欣赏等，大师们或婉约，或温情，或浪漫，为读者们展开了一幅幅生动着迷的文学画卷。

【内容简介】 为帮助全省各级司法行政部门和有关单位、广大司法鉴定人学习掌握和执行《江苏省司法鉴定管理条例》，江苏省司法厅组织编写了本书，对《条例》逐条进行解读，阐述立法背景， 力求准确反映条文立法原意，对执行《条例》工作中可能遇到的问题进行了分析，具有一定的指导意义。

【内容简介】 该书立足于中外全民阅读理论与实践，对“全民阅读视野中的公共阅读服务体系”作出系统研究，探索构建起服务于公共阅读服务体系建构的理论体系，以期为政府促进全民阅读提供参考，为丰富图书馆学、新闻传播学、公共管理学提供补充。