繁华盛唐，衣冠缙绅，终是狂澜难挽。 “五代十国全史”全套八部，唐末五代通俗说史类作品，以史料为本，用缜密的逻辑分析和生动幽默的笔触，道尽这一纷争不断、波谲云诡的重要历史时期。重点叙述从唐末黄巢起义，到宋灭北汉的一百多年间（875—979年）发生的各种重大历史事件，包括黄巢起义、梁晋争雄、五代更替、十国兴起、赵宋统一等，详细解析其始末缘由，全景描绘唐宋间五代十国大乱世。 本书系部《黄巢起义》。

本书围绕五卅运动策源地——上海大学的历史，用纪实文学手法和生动通俗的语言，描述了上海大学这座“红色学府”诞生的时代背景以及在中国革命端年代的起起伏伏；再现了上海大学师生在五卅运动中谱写的悲壮序曲，留下“北有五四运动之北大，南有五卅运动之上大”令人热血澎拜的红色记忆；展现了上海大学以放、创新、包容的氛围培育坚实革命力量、孕育新生希望，为追求民族独立和人民解放而做出了卓越贡献，留下“武有黄埔、文有上大”的美誉。

党的十一届三中全会以来，上海经济社会发展不断实现新的跨越，成绩巨大，变化显著。在波澜壮阔的改革放程中，上海各条战线在市委、市政府的领导下，解放思想，大胆探索，敢闯敢试，敢为天下先。在改革放的各个领域，都诞生了一批先行先试的改革案例，涌现了一批勇于改革创新的人物，留下了一个个生动鲜活的改革创新故事，这是上海改革放的历史见证。本书以历史沿革为线索，以历史事件和历史人物为关节，简明扼要地以故事的形式加以叙述，勾画上海近40年改革放尤其是党的十八大以来的发展历程，记录上海人民拓取的坚实脚步，描绘上海激荡人心的沧桑巨变。

长篇报告文学《为什么是深圳》以宏大的视野为我们展开一幅深圳的历史画卷，全景式记录深圳从1980年到2020年40年里波澜壮阔的发展历程。深圳作为中国改革开放的桥头堡，也是中国走向全球化的先行者，勇立潮头，经历多次转型，在“科学技术是生产力”的战略认知下，终找准了自己的发展之路——科技创新。作者视角独特，选取四家企业：位列世界500强的科技企业华为和腾讯，21世纪强力崛起的创新企业大疆和云天励飞，讲述它们的创新创业故事。从这四家企业的生动故事中我们可以窥斑见豹，国家实行改革开放的强国之路、深圳市政府的政策和制度支持、企业家追赶世界先进水平的历史使命感、“敢为天下先”的创新精神在深圳四十年腾飞中缺一不可，这是对“为什么是深圳”这一时代追问好的回答。

本套装包括：《逻辑思考的100个关键》、《高效赋能》、《脑力赋能：一看就会的用脑秘籍，拿来即用的高效指南》、《超级大脑的七个习惯：激发大脑潜能，激活高效人生》、《出众，从改变习惯开始：迈向卓越人生的七大习惯法则！》、《高效人士的问题解决术》、《NLP思维：高效人士都在用的影响力沟通技能》、《赢在下班后：知名咨询专家倾力打造34种高效思维模式》

《信睿周报第三十七期》内容简介： 1-7 王小伟：道德物化与技术哲学 8-11龙缘之：珍奈特·劳伦斯个展访谈 12-14朱慧玲：保守主义书评 15-17吴靖书评 18-20张曦专栏 21-23韩烨专栏 24 主题书单：道德物化" 《信睿周报第三十八期》内容简介： 1-7张颖访谈：在历史与性别研究之间/陈利 8-11回望人类千年计算史/王哲然 12-13游戏评论：后生存者/董宇翔 14-17书评：《盗版者与出版者》/于露 18-20魏颖专栏 21-23唐克扬专栏 24 书单" 《信睿周报第三十九期》内容简介： 1.孙来臣：从内外之争到全球转向：西方东南亚历史研究视野变迁 2.《横渡孟加拉湾》作者访谈 3.苏世天：老挝田野调查反思 4.越南志怪文学的文化渊源和中国对比 5.泰国新世代艺术 6.张曦专栏 7.韩烨专栏 8.东南亚研究书单 《信睿周报(2020.第40期)》内容简介：《信睿周报》第40期为年终特辑“Re思想与艺术2020”，将呈现来自不同领域的30位学者和艺术家对2020年中国思想界/艺术界的参与或观察。“Re思想与艺术”是《信睿周报》自2019年起创立的年终项目，受到了学界和艺术界的广泛关注和回应，我们将把这份思想回顾的工作延续下去，希望能记录下观念层面的变迁，为我们的时代留存一条精神线索。 《信睿周报第四十一期》内容简介： "1-7顾凡及：脑科学的范式革命 8-9罗丁豪：认识、保护、模拟大脑图谱 10-12 杨闰哲：“民主”的神经网络 13-15 曹安洁：认知科学死了吗？ 16-18冯尚：人类的“机械协同进化”——脑机接口的概念、技术与未来 19-23脑科学的未来（受访嘉宾：李沉简、David Poeppel、Masud Husain、Randy McIntos、徐敏、李楠、井淼） 24 主题书单：脑科学前沿" 《信睿周报第四十二期》内容简介： 1-5夏榆：我害怕忘却——对话俄罗斯作家斯捷潘诺娃 6-8马强：俄罗斯心灵：乡土社会的文化表达 9-12张猛：谁也不知道，接下来会发生什么——专访俄罗斯独立策展人安东尼·盖萨 13-15尹洁：是神经伦理还是神经炒作？ 16-17 王程韡：鳗鱼的旅行，鳗鱼的“修行” 18-20魏颖专栏05 21-23唐克扬专栏05 24书单：俄罗斯研究"

一部全景式解读*乱的乱世魏晋南北朝的大历史之作！ 魏晋南北朝，一个多民族斗争和融合，从大乱到大治的时期。司马家族以联姻、结盟的权谋手段，夺权上位，三家归晋；世家大族权力垄断致使宗室、外戚内斗，酿成“八王之乱”；衣冠南渡，王、庾、桓、谢诸大姓北方士族与江南吴地士族联合，挟天子以令诸侯，“王与马，共天下”；高门世族日渐糜烂，寒门士子趁机崛起，引发“侯景之乱”；涌中原北方的匈奴、鲜卑、羯、氐、羌等建立“十六国”；北魏孝文帝迁都洛阳，行汉化改革；北齐、北周沿袭拓跋鲜卑与汉族的融合趋势。 长达四百年的乱世，铁血的战火淬炼了人性，旋涡之中的英雄不问出处，展现各领风骚的无限可能：隐忍上位司马懿、闻鸡起舞祖逖、残酷战神冉闵、奋起寒微刘裕、狼性君主赫连勃勃、千古一后冯太后、壮志未酬宇文邕、奇才远略陈霸先、一代英主杨坚…… 本书以精炼的白描手法，以真实而有温度的历史细节，描绘了一幅中华文化如何抵挡塞外文化冲，吸收其野蛮精悍之血，自我更新，并*终迎来前所未有大一统之隋唐盛世的燃情图卷。

比尔·盖茨花了十年时间调研气候变化的成因和影响。在物理学、化学、生物学、工程学、政治学和经济学等领域的专家的支持下，他专注于探索减少温室气体排放的新技术。 在本书中，比尔·盖茨从电力、制造业、农业、交通等碳排放主要领域分析了零排放面临的挑战，可使用的技术工具以及我们需要的技术突破，并提供了一套涵盖广泛但每一步都切实可行的行动计划。 关于人类未来 要想阻止全球变暖，要想避免气候变化的影响，人类需要停止向大气中排放温室气体。 关于技术创新 无论是过去还是现在，零排放都具备坚实的逻辑基础，但实现零排放的目标要基于创新驱动。 关于投资机会 “零碳”产业是一个巨大的经济机遇，那些能在这一领域有所突破的国家将是未来十几年引领全球经济的国家。 诚如比尔·盖茨在书中一再强调的，实现零排放并非易事，但如果我们遵循他给出的计划，这个目标定会实现。无论你是政策决策者、企业家，还是忙于生计的普通民众，你都可以贡献力量，一起帮助这个世界避免气候灾难。

这是一本展现了英国历史全貌的精彩著作。杰里米·布莱克将3000年的大不列颠浓缩在此书中，带读者进行了一次令人叹为观止的英国历史之行。 本书以年代为轴，从战争、政权更迭、经济和文化发展等方面，介绍了英国是如何从一个小小的岛屿国家逐渐壮大并一步步成为"执世界之权柄"数百年的大英帝国，又是如何逐渐式微的。书中以当今大热的苏格兰独立公投事件为契机，展现了现代"英国化"的发展进程。 本书从英国地理环境对其发展的影响入手，探讨了英国社会和政治文化的形成，也为读者展现了历经沧桑后英国民众的国家认同感和集体记忆。大英帝国的崛起、称霸到终结的进程在书中都有清晰体现。

　　本手绘作品集以大连老建筑为题材，以写生为艺术表达形式，力求在呈现城市老建筑风貌的同时，为读者介绍一些相关的历史背景。全书精选了近50幅大连标志性建筑手绘图，配以中文介绍，并有英文、俄文、日文翻译，便于读者对这些建筑背后的大连故事有一个简要的了解，从而回顾我们屈辱的近代史，以警醒青年一代铭记历史、不忘初心、矢志复兴。

本书是国家社会科学基金重大课题“生物哲学重要问题研究”阶段性成果。沿用内格尔目的论形式，扩展至迈尔内涵，得到泛化目的性作为研究对象，对其使用层级新颖性判定条件。 提出思想的“粒度”概念，在目的论所依赖的逆因果解释项中，寻找基于“多重实现”与“层级往复”的解释要素。另外，本书还回应了金在权的“层级划界疑难”等问题。由此，作者认为，“粒度”就是思想的边界条件，是“泛化目的论的突现解释何以可能”的论证基础。

本书旨在突出教育改革的中国模式、教育发展的中国道路和教育振兴的中国行动。具体来说，本书对教育体制改革、农村和城市教育综合改革、企业教育综合改革等宏观问题行了专题研究；对基础教育、职业教育、成人教育、高等教育、民族教育、师范教育等各级各类教育改革行了分类研究；对缩小我国教育的地区差距、性别差距、民族差距等问题行了探索；对市场经济快速发展、知识经济初见端倪、经济全球化背景下的中国教育战略对策行了思考。

高校学生资助工作是教育扶贫的主要途径，事关脱贫攻坚和社会公平，是阻断贫困代际传递的战略举措，也是助力学生全面成长成才的重要手段。多年来，党和国家始终高度关注贫困家庭学生成长成才问题，不断优化工作理念，建立健全高校学生资助政策体系，在长期的实践探索中积累了丰富且宝贵的经验，对推动新时代高校学生资助工作发展具有重要的理论和现实意义。党的十九大强调要继续坚持立德树人根本任务，推教育公平，努力让每个孩子都能享有公平而有质量的教育，使绝大多数城乡新增劳动力更多受高等教育。这为新时代高校学生资助工作指明了发展方向、明确了工作任务、拓展了工作内容。本书试图以高校学生资助工作的理论研究为基础，通过对我国高校学生资助工作的历史考察概括总结其发展经验，并聚焦新的时代背景和发展环境，深分析当前高校学生资助工作所面临的机遇和挑战，探索工作机制优化和模式创新的基本路径，为新时代高校学生资助工作的创新发展提供有益借鉴。

本书是16位学者给大一新生讲授人生经历、治史学心得等的课堂实录，是中国人民安心历史学院本科教学改革的系列成果之一。2011年秋，中国人民大学历史系开设了“学史入门”这门入学引导课程（之后也以“新生研讨课”等名开过），请校内外的著名学者给新生上课，分享自己的人生经历、读书方法、治史心得、学术思考，新生在感受史家之精彩生活、人格魅力的同时，了解历史学是什么，比如史学研究的主要领域与方法，学术的前沿信息，如何读书、治学，进入大学之后应该如何听课、记笔记、写论文，如此等等，既有宏观的思考，又有具体的学习方法建议，让新生尽快适应从中学到大学，从应试教育到通识教育、学术研究的转变。本书在整理课堂录音的基础上编辑而成，在整理与编辑的过程中保持文本的现场感，是一份非常珍贵的课堂实录。

本书比较整全地呈现出船山体用思想结构及其相较于道学传统的差异性。船山体用之基本义是气作为宇宙全体的变合流行，其无方所无定体，无法被抽象为不变本体，人只能在聚散变化之用中见体。此义在性论层面即性日生日成，性体不是初生之际受命于天的某种不变本体，而是来自天之生生之德。继善成性，以后天之习使其不断充实生成，近精纯整全之天德，此为由用生体。民族文化历史可视为民族之性的生成丰富，其中*重要的资源，一则为先圣经典的传承与诠释，一则为国史对丰富境遇的描述与持守。通过经学去理解经典，通过读史来磨练扩充其伦理政治德性，这个过程既是其个体习与性成的体用相生，也是整个民族历史不断生成并持守自身一以贯之的过程。

O parte dintre noi au tr?it vremuri grele pe care uneori le mai vis?m, le povestim sau despre care scriem ?nc?, f?r? patima cumplit? care i-a cuprins pe profitorii de atunci, care ?i ast?zi ne fac r?u, ?i chiar mai r?u dec?t ?pe vremea aceea“, cum se zice. E drept c? noi am prev?zut-o ?ntr-un fel sau altul, spun?nd-o celor care se-ncumetau s? ne asculte, f?r? preten?ia, Doamne, fere?te!, de a ne considera ?i disiden?i, cum o f?cur? cei men?iona?i mai sus. Previziunile noastre s-au bazat pe o anume cunoa?tere a mersului istoriei, care, cum se ?tie, se tot repet?, cu mici deosebiri, fire?te. Oricum, ceva cuno?tin?e de economie politic? nu ne stric? nici ?n zilele noastre, pentru a ne da seama de jocul frecvent al trecerii de la economia politic? la politica economic? ?i, mai ales, al trecerilor de la un sistem sau or?nduire economic? la alta ?i invers, cum le-am tr?it noi: de la capitalism la socialism ?i viceversa. Ca un fel de ciud??enie, au r?mas considera?iunile despre noul eon sau noua er? (New Age) ale filosofului din Lancr?m, mai ales c? acestea s-au realizat abia dup? c?derea comunismului, pe care n-o mai prev?zuse Blaga. (Alexandru Surdu) Eseuri filosofice de acela?i autor 1. Voca?ii filosofice rom?ne?ti, Editura Aca?de?miei Rom?ne, Bucure?ti, 1995, 216 p.; edi??ia a II-a, Editura Ardealul, T?rgu-Mure?, 2003, 206 p. 2. Confluen?e cultural-filosofice, Editura Pai?de?ia, Bucure?ti, 2002, 219 p. 3. M?rturiile anamnezei, Editura Paideia, Bu?cu?re?ti, 2004, 193 p. 4. Comentarii la rostirea filosofic?, Editura Kron-Art, Bra?ov, 2009, 186 p. 5. Izvoare de filosofie rom?neasc?, Editura Biblioteca Bucure?tilor, Bucure?ti, 2010, 171 p.; edi?ia a II-a, Editura Renaissance, Bucu?re?ti, 2011, 161 p. 6. A sufletului rom?nesc cinstire, Editura Re?naissance, Bucure?ti, 2011, 197 p. 7. Pietre de poticnire, Editura Ardealul, T?r?gu-Mure?, 2014, 179 p.

One of the greatest works of philosophy, political theory, and literature ever produced, Plato’s Republic has shaped Western thought for thousands of years, and remains as relevant today as when it was written during the fourth century B.C.Republic begins by posing a central question: "What is justice, and why should we be just, especially when the wicked often seem happier and more successful?" For Plato, the answer lies with the ways people, groups, and institutions organize and behave. A brilliant inquiry into the problems of constructing the perfect state, and the roles education, the arts, family, and religion should play in our lives, Republic employs picturesque settings, sharply outlined characters, and conversational dialogue to drive home the philosopher’s often provocative arguments.Highly regarded as one of the most accurate renderings of Plato's Republic that has yet been published, this widely acclaimed work is the first strictly literal translation of a timeless classic. This Special Collector's Edition includes a new introduction by Prof. Colin Kant, PH.D, a noted Platonian and Socratic scholar.

More’s “Utopia” was written in Latin, and is in two parts, of which the second, describing the place ([Greek text]—or Nusquama, as he called it sometimes in his letters—“Nowhere”), was probably written towards the close of 1515; the first part, introductory, early in 1516. The book was first printed at Louvain, late in 1516, under the editorship of Erasmus, Peter Giles, and other of More’s friends in Flanders. It was then revised by More, and printed by Frobenius at Basle in November, 1518. It was reprinted at Paris and Vienna, but was not printed in England during More’s lifetime. Its first publication in this country was in the English translation, made in Edward’s VI.’s reign (1551) by Ralph Robinson. It was translated with more literary skill by Gilbert Burnet, in 1684, soon after he had conducted the defence of his friend Lord William Russell, attended his execution, vindicated his memory, and been spitefully deprived by James II. of his lectureship at St. Clement’s. Burnet was drawn to the translation of “Utopia” by the same sense of unreason in high places that caused More to write the book. Burnet’s is the translation given in this volume. The name of the book has given an adjective to our language—we call an impracticable scheme Utopian. Yet, under the veil of a playful fiction, the talk is intensely earnest, and abounds in practical suggestion. It is the work of a scholarly and witty Englishman, who attacks in his own way the chief political and social evils of his time. Beginning with fact, More tells how he was sent into Flanders with Cuthbert Tunstal, “whom the king’s majesty of late, to the great rejoicing of all men, did prefer to the office of Master of the Rolls;” how the commissioners of Charles met them at Bruges, and presently returned to Brussels for instructions; and how More then went to Antwerp, where he found a pleasure in the society of Peter Giles which soothed his desire to see again his wife and children, from whom he had been four months away. Then fact slides into fiction with the finding of Raphael Hythloday (whose name, made of two Greek words [Greek text] and [Greek text], means “knowing in trifles”), a man who had been with Amerigo Vespucci in the three last of the voyages to the new world lately discovered, of which the account had been first printed in 1507, only nine years before Utopia was written. Designedly fantastic in suggestion of details, “Utopia” is the work of a scholar who had read Plato’s “Republic,” and had his fancy quickened after reading Plutarch’s account of Spartan life under Lycurgus. Beneath the veil of an ideal communism, into which there has been worked some witty extravagance, there lies a noble English argument. Sometimes More puts the case as of France when he means England. Sometimes there is ironical praise of the good faith of Christian kings, saving the book from censure as a political attack on the policy of Henry VIII. Erasmus wrote to a friend in 1517 that he should send for More’s “Utopia,” if he had not read it, and “wished to see the true source of all political evils.” And to More Erasmus wrote of his book, “A burgomaster of Antwerp is so pleased with it that he knows it all by heart.” Sir Thomas More, son of Sir John More, a justice of the King’s Bench, was born in 1478, in Milk Street, in the city of London. After his earlier education at St. Anthony’s School, in Threadneedle Street, he was placed, as a boy, in the household of Cardinal John Morton, Archbishop of Canterbury and Lord Chancellor. It was not unusual for persons of wealth or influence and sons of good families to be so established together in a relation of patron and client. The youth wore his patron’s livery, and added to his state. The patron used, afterwards, his wealth or influence in helping his young client forward in the world.

Among the notable books of later times-we may say, without exaggeration, of all time--must be reckoned The Confessions of Jean Jacques Rousseau. It deals with leading personages and transactions of a momentous epoch, when absolutism and feudalism were rallying for their last struggle against the modern spirit, chiefly represented by Voltaire, the Encyclopedists, and Rousseau himself--a struggle to which, after many fierce intestine quarrels and sanguinary wars throughout Europe and America, has succeeded the prevalence of those more tolerant and rational principles by which the statesmen of our own day are actuated. On these matters, however, it is not our province to enlarge; nor is it necessary to furnish any detailed account of our author's political, religious, and philosophic axioms and systems, his paradoxes and his errors in logic: these have been so long and so exhaustively disputed over by contending factions that little is left for even the most assiduous gleaner in the field. The inquirer will find, in Mr. John Money's excellent work, the opinions of Rousseau reviewed succinctly and impartially. The 'Contrat Social', the 'Lattres Ecrites de la Montagne', and other treatises that once aroused fierce controversy, may therefore be left in the repose to which they have long been consigned, so far as the mass of mankind is concerned, though they must always form part of the library of the politician and the historian. One prefers to turn to the man Rousseau as he paints himself in the remarkable work before us. That the task which he undertook in offering to show himself--as Persius puts it--'Intus et in cute', to posterity, exceeded his powers, is a trite criticism; like all human enterprises, his purpose was only imperfectly fulfilled; but this circumstance in no way lessens the attractive qualities of his book, not only for the student of history or psychology, but for the intelligent man of the world. Its startling frankness gives it a peculiar interest wanting in most other autobiographies. Many censors have elected to sit in judgment on the failings of this strangely constituted being, and some have pronounced upon him very severe sentences. Let it be said once for all that his faults and mistakes were generally due to causes over which he had but little control, such as a defective education, a too acute sensitiveness, which engendered suspicion of his fellows, irresolution, an overstrained sense of honour and independence, and an obstinate refusal to take advice from those who really wished to befriend him; nor should it be forgotten that he was afflicted during the greater part of his life with an incurable disease. Lord Byron had a soul near akin to Rousseau's, whose writings naturally made a deep impression on the poet's mind, and probably had an influence on his conduct and modes of thought: In some stanzas of 'Childe Harold' this sympathy is expressed with truth and power; especially is the weakness of the Swiss philosopher's character summed up in the following admirable lines: "Here the self-torturing sophist, wild Rousseau, The apostle of affliction, he who threw Enchantment over passion, and from woe Wrung overwhelming eloquence, first drew The breath which made him wretched; yet he knew How to make madness beautiful, and cast O'er erring deeds and thoughts a heavenly hue Of words, like sunbeams, dazzling as they passed The eyes, which o'er them shed tears feelingly and fast. "His life was one long war with self-sought foes, Or friends by him self-banished; for his mind Had grown Suspicion's sanctuary, and chose, For its own cruel sacrifice, the kind, 'Gainst whom he raged with fury strange and blind. But he was frenzied,-wherefore, who may know? Since cause might be which skill could never find; But he was frenzied by disease or woe To that worst pitch of all, which wears a reasoning show."

Mülkiyet kar??t? ya?l? anar?ist, hayat?n?n son y?llar?nda ironik bir durumda kald?. ?svi?re vatanda?l???na girmenin yollar?n? arayan Bakunin'e sunulan se?enek, orada bir ev sahibi olmas?yd? ve belki de en hazini, sahip olaca?? bu ev nedeniyle, polisin, resm? tutanaklara “Michael Bakunin, rantiye” notunu dü?mesiydi. 18 May?s 1814'te Rusya'da do?an Michael Aleksandrovich Bakunin, 1 Temmuz 1876'da ?ldü?ünde ülkesinden ?ok uzaklardayd? ve cenazesinde yaln?zca 30–40 ki?i vard?. Gen? Bakunin i?in, “A?k, insan?n yeryüzündeki en üst misyonuydu. Bir insan?n kendini a?ks?z vermesi, Kutsal Ruh’a kar?? i?lenmi? bir günaht?”.. ?Kad?nlar taraf?ndan olduk?a ?ekici bulunan Mihail'in ise kad?nlarla ili?kisi hep ruhsal bir a?k olarak kald?.??svi?re'nin muhte?em manzaras? e?li?inde George Sand romanlar? okuyan Bakunin, Frans?z dü?üncesinin Alman dü?üncesinden üstün oldu?u inanc?n? sa?lamla?t?r?yordu. ? Bakunin, Marx i?in, “O, beni duygusal idealist olarak adland?r?yordu; hakl?yd?. Ben de onu, hoyrat, kendini be?enmi? ve ac?mas?z olarak de?erlendiriyordum; ben de hakl?yd?m” diyordu.. ? Kendisine ili?kin konularda kindar olmayan Bakunin, Herzen'in kar?s?na g?sterdi?i so?uklu?u hayat?n?n sonuna kadar unutamad?.?“Art?k reaksiyonun muzaffer gü?lerine kar?? Sisifos'un ta??n? yuvarlamak i?in ne gerekli güce ne de güvene sahibim. Bu yüzden, mücadeleden ?ekiliyor ve arkada?lar?mdan tek bir iyilik bekliyorum: "Unutulmak”,?Orta ve ge? on dokuzuncu yüzy?lda, radikal sol –yani, a?g?zlü kapitalizm ele?tirmenleri ve sanayi i??ilerinin ?zgürlü?ünün savunucular?– iki temel franksiyona ayr?l?yordu: Marksistler ve anar?istler. Kabaca s?ylemek gerekirse (ki bu son derece kar???k bir hik?yedir), kazanan Marksistler oldu ve yirminci yüzy?l?n tüm ba?ar?l? sol devrimleri –Rus, ?in ve Küba, ?rne?in– Marksist ilkelere ba?l?l?klar?n? ilan ettiler. ? Marksistler ile anar?istler aras?ndaki sava? bu noktada tarihsel bir meraktan ?te devam eden bir meseledir. Pi?man olmayan ya da ele?tirilmeyen tek ger?ek Marksist sol Kim Jong Il ve taraf etraftaki birka? entelektüel ve profes?rdür. Anar?izm ise uygulanabilir bir toplumsal hareket olarak ?kinci Dünya Sava??yla yava? yava? tükenmeye yüz tutmu?ken küreselle?me kar??t? hareket ve d?nemimizin di?er radikalizmleri i?inde yeniden dirilmeye ba?lam??t?r. ? Ne var ki, d?neminde –Marx’?n di?erleriyle aras?ndaki– bu sava? bir ?lüm kal?m meselesiydi ve Marksizm muhtemel kapitalizm kar??t? olarak ve yan? s?ra anar?izm kar??t? olarak tan?mlan?yordu. Asl?nda, Marx’?n yazarl??? anar?izme y?nelik sald?r?lar? a??s?ndan handiyse gülün? bir geni?li?e ula?m??t?r. Marx’?n Alman ?deolojisi kitab?n?n büyük b?lümü –yüzlerce sayfas?– bireyci/anar?ist Max Stirner’e y?nelik bir sald?r?dan ibarettir. Felsefenin Sefaleti Proudhon’a kar?? büyük?e bir fikir sava??d?r. Marx onca zaman ve enerjisini Bakunin’e sald?rmaya harcam??t?r: ?“dangalak!”?“canavar, et ve ya? y???n?,” “sap?k” vesaire: ?bu tabirler, has?mlar? s?z konusu oldu?unda Marx’?n bildik üslubudur: yazarl??? yar? bilimsel inceleme, yar? s?zlü tacizdir. Marx’?n, gerek kendi a?z?ndan gerekse de kimi s?zcülerini kullanarak ony?llar boyunca y?neltti?i ve muhtemelen di?erleri denli e?lenceli olmayan var olan su?lamas?, Bakunin’in bir muhbir oldu?u y?nündeydi ve Marx’?n bu ba?ar?l? sald?r?lar? nihayetinde Bakunin’in Enternasyonal ???i Z?mb?rt?s?ndan tasfiyesine yol a?t?.. ?

Via?a fiec?ruia dintre noi se desf??oar? pe fundalul unor nara?iuni?sau teorii filosofice discrete ?i insesizabile, care ne ofer? sens ?i ne ?ndrum? ?n momentele de cump?n?.Au o istorie fascinant? ?i uneori extrem de agitat?, care st? m?rturie?pentru str?daniile noastre de a ?n?elege lumea ?i de a o transforma ?ntr-un mediu familiar.Cartea de fa?? ne prezint? istoriile a trei dintre aceste nara?iuni,?cunoscute mai mult filosofilor, cu toate c? ele ?ncearc? s? ofere r?spuns?la ?ntreb?ri tulbur?toare ?i de?o importan?? cov?r?itoare pentru?noi to?i: de ce exist? lumea, ?n ce const? identitatea persoanei, ce?este realitatea.