Euthyphro (Ancient Greek: Euthuphron) is one of Plato's early dialogues, dated to after 399 BC. Taking place during the weeks leading up to Socrates' trial, the dialogue features Socrates and Euthyphro, a religious expert also mentioned at Cratylus 396a and 396d, attempting to define piety or holiness. Background The dialogue is set near the king-archon's court, where the two men encounter each other. They are both there for preliminary hearings before possible trials (2a).Euthyphro has come to lay manslaughter charges against his father, as his father had allowed one of his workers to die exposed to the elements without proper care and attention (3e–4d). This worker had killed a slave belonging to the family estate on the island of Naxos; while Euthyphro's father waited to hear from the expounders of religious law (exegetes cf. Laws 759d) about how to proceed, the worker died bound and gagged in a ditch. Socrates expresses his astonishment at the confidence of a man able to take his own father to court on such a serious charge, even when Athenian Law allows only relatives of the deceased to sue for murder. Euthyphro misses the astonishment, and merely confirms his overconfidence in his own judgment of religious/ethical matters. In an example of "Socratic irony," Socrates states that Euthyphro obviously has a clear understanding of what is pious and impious. Since Socrates himself is facing a charge of impiety, he expresses the hope to learn from Euthyphro, all the better to defend himself in his own trial. Euthyphro claims that what lies behind the charge brought against Socrates by Meletus and the other accusers is Socrates' claim that he is subjected to a daimon or divine sign which warns him of various courses of action (3b). Even more suspicious from the viewpoint of many Athenians, Socrates expresses skeptical views on the main stories about the Greek gods, which the two men briefly discuss before plunging into the main argument. Socrates expresses reservations about such accounts which show up the gods' cruelty and inconsistency. He mentions the castration of the early sky god, Uranus, by his son Cronus, saying he finds such stories very difficult to accept (6a–6c). Euthyphro, after claiming to be able to tell even more amazing such stories, spends little time or effort defending the conventional view of the gods. Instead, he is led straight to the real task at hand, as Socrates forces him to confront his ignorance, ever pressing him for a definition of 'piety'. Yet, with every definition Euthyphro proposes, Socrates very quickly finds a fatal flaw (6d ff.). At the end of the dialogue, Euthyphro is forced to admit that each definition has been a failure, but rather than correct it, he makes the excuse that it is time for him to go, and Socrates ends the dialogue with a classic example of Socratic irony: since Euthyphro has been unable to come up with a definition that will stand on its own two feet, Euthyphro has failed to teach Socrates anything at all about piety, and so he has received no aid for his own defense at his own trial (15c ff.).

O parte dintre noi au tr?it vremuri grele pe care uneori le mai vis?m, le povestim sau despre care scriem ?nc?, f?r? patima cumplit? care i-a cuprins pe profitorii de atunci, care ?i ast?zi ne fac r?u, ?i chiar mai r?u dec?t ?pe vremea aceea“, cum se zice. E drept c? noi am prev?zut-o ?ntr-un fel sau altul, spun?nd-o celor care se-ncumetau s? ne asculte, f?r? preten?ia, Doamne, fere?te!, de a ne considera ?i disiden?i, cum o f?cur? cei men?iona?i mai sus. Previziunile noastre s-au bazat pe o anume cunoa?tere a mersului istoriei, care, cum se ?tie, se tot repet?, cu mici deosebiri, fire?te. Oricum, ceva cuno?tin?e de economie politic? nu ne stric? nici ?n zilele noastre, pentru a ne da seama de jocul frecvent al trecerii de la economia politic? la politica economic? ?i, mai ales, al trecerilor de la un sistem sau or?nduire economic? la alta ?i invers, cum le-am tr?it noi: de la capitalism la socialism ?i viceversa. Ca un fel de ciud??enie, au r?mas considera?iunile despre noul eon sau noua er? (New Age) ale filosofului din Lancr?m, mai ales c? acestea s-au realizat abia dup? c?derea comunismului, pe care n-o mai prev?zuse Blaga. (Alexandru Surdu) Eseuri filosofice de acela?i autor 1. Voca?ii filosofice rom?ne?ti, Editura Aca?de?miei Rom?ne, Bucure?ti, 1995, 216 p.; edi??ia a II-a, Editura Ardealul, T?rgu-Mure?, 2003, 206 p. 2. Confluen?e cultural-filosofice, Editura Pai?de?ia, Bucure?ti, 2002, 219 p. 3. M?rturiile anamnezei, Editura Paideia, Bu?cu?re?ti, 2004, 193 p. 4. Comentarii la rostirea filosofic?, Editura Kron-Art, Bra?ov, 2009, 186 p. 5. Izvoare de filosofie rom?neasc?, Editura Biblioteca Bucure?tilor, Bucure?ti, 2010, 171 p.; edi?ia a II-a, Editura Renaissance, Bucu?re?ti, 2011, 161 p. 6. A sufletului rom?nesc cinstire, Editura Re?naissance, Bucure?ti, 2011, 197 p. 7. Pietre de poticnire, Editura Ardealul, T?r?gu-Mure?, 2014, 179 p.

One of the greatest works of philosophy, political theory, and literature ever produced, Plato’s Republic has shaped Western thought for thousands of years, and remains as relevant today as when it was written during the fourth century B.C.Republic begins by posing a central question: "What is justice, and why should we be just, especially when the wicked often seem happier and more successful?" For Plato, the answer lies with the ways people, groups, and institutions organize and behave. A brilliant inquiry into the problems of constructing the perfect state, and the roles education, the arts, family, and religion should play in our lives, Republic employs picturesque settings, sharply outlined characters, and conversational dialogue to drive home the philosopher’s often provocative arguments.Highly regarded as one of the most accurate renderings of Plato's Republic that has yet been published, this widely acclaimed work is the first strictly literal translation of a timeless classic. This Special Collector's Edition includes a new introduction by Prof. Colin Kant, PH.D, a noted Platonian and Socratic scholar.

《庄子》是中国古代典籍中的瑰宝，庄子文章以其特有的瑰丽想象、变幻莫测的故事，构成了别具一格的世界。清代文学家刘熙载评其文“意出尘外，怪生笔端”，鲁迅先生也说：“其文汪洋辟阖，仪态万方，晚周诸子之作，莫能先也。”所谓以谬悠之说,荒唐之言,无端崖之辞, 来结构文章，给人以新奇有趣之感。但《庄子》中涉及的大量历史典故以及纵横浪漫的文风，有时又让人难以准确明白地理解，所以此书又比较难懂。鉴于以上特，王景琳、徐匋二位学者拈出《庄子》中比较重要而有争议的意象、事物、词语等，行深浅出的分解与辨析，使枯奥晦涩的关节得以准确而平实的疏通与解读，为更加深、准确地读懂《庄子》，扫清了障碍，带读者真正“庄子的世界”。

Within our Society (the International Society for Krishna Consciousness), guru has been taken to be synonymous with diksa-guru, but what about those great souls who have introduced us to Krsna consciousness? What relationship do we have with these Vaisnavas, and what are our obligations toward them, as well as toward parents, teachers, sannyasis, and other superiors who help guide us back to Godhead? Not much has been said by the Society on these topics, and hardly any appreciation is shown for those souls who labor to elevate us day by day.The scriptures, however, glorify as guru all Vaisnavas who guide a conditioned soul back to Godhead — be they instructors or initiators — advocating a culture of honor and respect. ISKCON needs to reflect upon these principles further, and the purpose of this book is to act as a catalyst toward such an end.

南怀瑾先生的著述涉及儒、释、道等中国传统文化经典，他常以经史合参的讲述方式、生动幽默语言，结合古今中外历史人文典故，结合当下的日常生活，引领新世代的人们直入文化的核心智慧，让读者更乐于了解历史人文的博大精深。本套装收录东方出版社已出版的南怀瑾作品。

美如今正处于一种矛盾的处境。 一方面，它如通货膨胀般蔓延四溢：到处都可以感受到人们对美的狂热崇拜。另一方面，美失去了一切超越性，屈服于消费的内在性：它塑造了资本的美学的一面。美以及崇高或震动所带来的对消极性的体验，完全被纯粹的快乐即赞所取代。美*终被色情化。 本书既为我们展示了那些以真理、灾难或诱惑表现出来的美的形式，也阐明了那些建立美的伦理或政治的美的维度。 阅读韩炳哲的书，意味着不断地被鞭策唤醒。……他的社会批判虽然不谙体恤之情，然而韩炳哲仍然热情地拥抱自己所处的这个时代。 ——《周刊》 ------------- 韩炳哲作品系列（见识城邦出品）（已出齐） 《精神政治学》（2019年3月） Psychopolitik 《爱欲之死》（2019年3月） Agonie des Eros 《在群中》（2019年3月） Im Schwarm 《他者的消失》（2019年6月） Die Austreibung des Anderen 《倦怠社会》（2019年6月） Müdigkeitsgesellschaft 《娱乐何为》（2019年6月） Gute Unterhaltung 《暴力拓扑学》（2019年10月） Topologie der Gewalt 《透明社会》（2019年10月） Transparenzgesellschaft 《美的救赎》（2019年10月） Die Errettung des Sch?nen

本书稿是关于《老子》的讲记，内容涉及《老子》的后半部分。南怀瑾先生以深厚的文史功底，敏锐的社会洞察力，对《老子》的内涵做了充分的阐解、辨正和引述。书内容具有深浅出，明白通畅等的特。

本书为南怀瑾先生于二〇〇七年应几方敦请举行三次演讲之记录，内容包括：新旧文化的企业家反思，国学与中国文化，漫谈中国文化与金融问题。本书从《管子》《货殖列传》《食货志》等中国古代典籍的财货观切入，分析讲述近一个世纪的金融、企业及管理体制的演进，化古为今，视野广阔。 本书原由台湾老古文化事业公司出版。兹经版权方台湾老古文化事业公司授权，复旦大学出版社将老古公司二〇〇八年十二月版校订出版，以供研究。

《庄子》是继《老子》之后体现道家学说的重要作品。现今通行的《庄子》一书分为内篇、外篇、杂篇三部分，共33篇。它既是一部哲学著作，又散发着浓厚的浪漫主义色彩，更深刻地影响了后世的文学创作。鲁迅曾评价说：“其文汪洋辟阖、仪态万方，晚周诸子之作，莫能先也。”《庄子诵读本》（插图版）是“中华经典诵读工程配套读本”之一，专为4—12岁的少年儿童编写，我们依据权威版本选录《庄子》，并附有拼音，对难字、难词、难句做了精炼、准确、易懂的注释，同时，配有大量与文字密切关联的图片，让读者在愉悦的审美中品味经典的魅力。

本书集中在一个问题上：廊下派与苏格拉底。要理解这个问题，就必须把它放到政治哲学的语境去考察，因为苏格拉底据说是政治哲学的创始人。廊下派间地来自苏格拉底，并且在德性问题等方面也受苏格拉底的观，这是否就意味着廊下派忠实地继承了苏格拉底的思想呢？该问题本身就是现代学术界争论不休的话题。不管廊下派如何对待苏格拉底，他们的结论对我们理解苏格拉底乃至整个西方思想来说，肯定都不只有滴的借鉴意义。  

本书是汉语学界*部专论施泰因特别是施泰因对于交互主体性现象学的研究的专著。自胡塞尔的现象学发生所谓的“超越论的转向”以后，对其现象学是一种“唯我论”的批评就不绝于耳。本书尝试表明，施泰因（以及其他早期现象学家）恰恰是借“同感”来讨论对他人的通达，以避免“唯我论”的困扰，并借此发展交互主体性现象学的。 在此问题脉络中，施泰因有关同感和交互主体性现象学研究的特殊意义与价值主要体现在：（1）她将同感问题置自赫尔德以来的整个思想史传统之中来考察；（2）她在精神科学的总体视域下对同感行现象学的研究；（3）她将同感现象学运用到具体的精神科学领域（比如伦理学、美学和社会政治哲学等）中，并*终成为勾连现象学和中世纪经院哲学的核心基础之一。

适应生活变化和危机的能力是健康、富有成效的生活的关键能力。不幸的是，我们很容易陷愤怒和无助的情绪中。"复原力”的优势帮助读者摒弃消极的、自我挫败的想法，摆脱"受害者”和"好孩子”的角色，同时提高解决问题的技能，在困难时期保持幽默和乐观，变得既自立又对社会负责。通过掌握维持健康、活力和积极情绪的五个发展阶段，读者可以学会面对逆境，克服障碍，直面人生。

礼仪，是人类精神文明长期发展与演变的产物。它既是人们日常交流不可缺少的工具，也是村落、族群、团体、国家之间往来的规则与约定。佛教与儒家在我国长期的历史发展中，积累了丰富的礼仪规范，产生了广泛而深远的影响。本书收录的论文，既有对某种佛教礼仪的特别解读，也有对儒家礼乐的深探讨；既有推陈出新、关注现实之作，也有重在礼仪传承意义的论述。资料翔实，论证有据，适合对佛教、儒家及中国传统文化感兴趣的读者阅读。

导言说明了何谓黄老道家，黄老道家的演变历史，黄老道家的研究为何重要，黄老道家的主要特征，以及出土文献中有哪些文本值得作为黄老道家的文献来研究。*章集中阐述了黄老道家两大侧面——老子与黄帝各自的作用与功能，讨论了这两者为何能够构成互补的关系。后面四篇则分别是对马王堆帛书《黄帝四经》、上海博物馆藏竹简《恒先》、《凡物流形》、《三德》这四种出土文献的详细研究，涉及到黄老道家的宇宙论、人性论、气论以及特有的思维结构和语言表达方式。

这是一本足以彻底改变你思维世界的小书。正如著名行为学家孙路弘所说，缺乏逻辑已成为社会的一种流行病症：逻辑紊乱症候群。而《简单的逻辑学》就如一场及时雨，一本治愈社会疾病的宝典，的确是应该人手一册。

“心灵/心智（mind）是什么？我是谁？纯粹的物质能思考或感受吗？灵魂（soul）在哪里？面对这些问题时，人人都会陷困惑之中。我们编纂此书，为的是尝试展示这些困惑，让它们变得生动鲜明。我们的目的不是要直回答这些大问题，而是要动摇世人的思维：既包括那些有着严肃坚定的科学世界观的人，也包括那些对人类灵魂怀有宗教或者灵性主义想象的人。我们认为，目前要想回答这些问题并不容易，我们首先要对问题行根本反思，然后才能期望人们在‘我’这个字究竟是什么意思上达成共识。因此，本书旨在刺激、扰乱和迷惑读者，让显而易见的东西变得奇异起来，也许还会让奇异的东西变得显而易见。” 出于上述动机，二位主编为本书选文27篇，包含了从科幻小说、戏剧对话到哲学论文多种文体，除两位编者的作品外，更有图灵、博尔赫斯、道金斯、内格尔等重要人物的代表作。各篇文章围绕自我感、精神是否存在及有否特性、身心关系、自由意志、自我意识和“自我”特性等经典问题分类编排，每篇结尾均附主编者的评论反思。选文、反思及二者间的隔空对话，各有精彩与妙趣，对理解相关哲学认知问题、生物问题、人工智能问题等应大有助益。

作者用优美、流畅的文笔，从鱼、动物、仿生、语言、生命、命运、梦、交往等八个维度，从内部解构庄子哲学，并通过与老子、列子哲学的比较，以及它在先秦、近代思想坐标中的相对“位置”，在外部的联系对比中揭示庄子哲学的特色，提出一系列富有启发性的观。比如，《庄子》中为什么鱼先出场，“物物者非物”这个判断如何体现庄子之道对老子之道的继承、发展，对齐物论和庄周梦蝶，为何要从庄子之道的高度出发才能有确解，以及庄子言意之辨对中国国民性格的深刻影响等，皆剖析理，颇具深度与新意。

以维也纳学派为代表的“逻辑经验主义”曾在二十世纪的世界思想界风行一时。殷海光即是深受这波学术思潮影响的学者之一，本书正是他长期钻研的心得之作，对一般初学者容易混淆的概念及不易理解的原理皆详加说明，引领读者逻辑研究的世界。 在清华大学跟随金岳霖先生读研究生期间，殷海光先生写出了《逻辑讲话》，此书别出心裁，采用独创的对话体，有如拉家常，试图将高深的逻辑学通俗化，上市后受到广泛认可。之后，殷海光先生在《逻辑讲话》及讲义版的基础之上，写成《逻辑新引》，依旧采用对话体，一位老师与两位学生聊天，老师谆谆善诱，学生倾耳聆听。 本书循序渐，深浅出，清晰易懂，注重严格的推论训练和逻辑的应用功能，使逻辑初学者在学习时可免于枯燥无味。

对世界负责任，而不是仅仅对自己的国家负责任，这在理论上是一个中国哲学视界，在实践上则是全新的可能性，即以“天下”作为关于政治/经济利益的优先分析单位，从天下去理解世界，也就是要以“世界”作为思考单位去分析问题，超越西方的民族/国家思维方式，就是要以世界责任为己任，创造世界新理念和世界制度。

卡尔·西奥多·雅斯贝尔斯（Karl Theodor Jaspers，1883- 1969） 德国存在主义哲学家、神学家、精神病学家。雅斯贝尔斯主要探讨内在自我的现象学描述，及自我分析和自我考察等问题。他强调每个人都存在独特和自由性。在1949年出版的《历史的起源与目标》中，他提出了一个很著名的命题——“轴心时代”。代表作有:《时代的精神状况》《存在哲学》等。