Of all the myths which have come down to us from the East, and of all the creations of Western fancy and belief, the Personality of Evil has had the strongest attraction for the mind of man. The Devil is the greatest enigma that has ever con-fronted the human intelligence. So large a place has Satan taken in our imagination, and we might also say in our heart, that his expulsion therefrom, no matter what philosophy may teach us, must for ever remain an impossibility. As a character in imagi-native literature Lucifer has not his equal in heaven above or on the earth beneath. In contrast to the idea of Good, which is the more exalted in proportion to its freedom from anthropomor-phism, the idea of Evil owes to the presence of this element its chief value as a poetic theme. The discrowned archangel may have been inferior to St. Michael in military tactics, but he cer-tainly is his superior in matters literary. The fair angels—all frankness and goodness—are beyond our comprehension, but the fallen angels, with all their faults and sufferings, are kin to us. There is a legend that the Devil has always had literary aspi-rations. The German theosophist Jacob B?hme relates that when Satan was asked to explain the cause of God’s enmity to him and his consequent downfall, he replied: “I wanted to be an author.” Whether or not the Devil has ever written anything over his own signature, he has certainly helped others compose their greatest works. It is a significant fact that the greatest im-aginations have discerned an attraction in Diabolus. What would the world’s literature be if from it we eliminated Dante’s Divine Comedy, Calderón’s Marvellous Magician, Milton’s Paradise Lost, Goethe’s Faust, Byron’s Cain, Vigny’s Eloa, and Lermon-tov’s Demon? Sorry indeed would have been the plight of litera-ture without a judicious admixture of the Diabolical. Without the Devil there would simply be no literature, because without his intervention there would be no plot, and without a plot the story of the world would lose its interest. Even now, when the belief in the Devil has gone out of fashion, and when the very mention of his name, far from causing men to cross themselves, brings a smile to their faces, Satan has continued to be a puissant personage in the realm of letters. As a matter of fact, Beelzebub has perhaps received his greatest elaboration at the hands of writers who believed in him just as little as Shake-speare did in the ghost of Hamlet’s father.

Cititorul l rentlnete pe acelai Cezar Ivnescu agitat, polemic, necrutor nainte de toate cu sine nsui, ca s aib ndreptirea de a pretinde i altora rigoare maxim i fr rabat, n judecarea formelor sensibile, de a aprecia, dup normele grele ale destinului scriitoricesc predispoziia confrailor de a se angaja cu toat fiina n aventura fr seamn a creaiei de tip genial. Legea acceptabil i de aur se deduce din preceptul motenit dup textele sacre: muli chemai, dar puini alei. Cezar Ivnescu se dorete a fi printre acetia din urm. i chiar este (!) dac i se identific semnele i rnile. Nu trebuie s ne neliniteasc, prin urmare, cuvintele grele, cu rost n fond, i cu hotrrea omului, la adresa impostorilor, a criticilor de ocazie, a meseriailor de duzin. Pe corabia argonauilor muli s-au ncumetat s urce la plecare, dar puini s-au nvrednicit s poarte cununa de legend la ntoarcere. Urcuul pe scara lui Iacob, pn la ntlnirea cu lumin, ngerii i poezia adevrat, nu-i este accesibil oricui.“ – Petru Ursache

A ncerca experiena rentoarcerii ctre firescul ce a fost nainte, adic o recuperare n registru postmodernist, o sprtur n cuirasa metatextului, spre o reevaluare a resurselor poetice, o revigorare natural, fr acea automacerare sisific, a te elibera de capcanele pe care i le-ai ntins singur n desiul textului, a evada din ngrdire zidindu-i alt cas a poeziei, iat direcia derulat contient de Rodica Braga, cu o implicare tonifiant […]. Contribuia poetic a Rodici Braga n aceast carte este fundamental, ntruct intrrile ei (s-ar putea scrie un studiu aparte despre organizarea muzical programatic a acestui Commentarius perpetuus..., organizare ce ar pune n eviden mai exact principiul tonal care st la baza ntregii construcii poetice) umplu material un spaiu rarefiat de eul autoscopic al lui Mircea Ivnescu…“. (Marin Mincu)Rodica Braga este o scriitoare deplin, cu acces egal la mai multe modaliti ale expresiei literare. […] Poemele cresc paralel cu proza nvluie concentric acelai miez tare al analizei: trecerea. Proza vibreaz nu de puíne ori poematic, iar poemele au o poveste discret n fundal.[…] Poezia Rodici Braga are un timbru propriu, modulat volum dup volum, cu un elegant echilibru ntre cntecul nalt-reflexiv al modernitii i frngerile de ritm ale postmodernitii dezvrjite“. (Irina Patra)Rodica Braga scrie o literatur oarecum special, cu sonoriti dramatice vtuite, cu vibraii de afectivitate […] ce se practic puin la noi i pe care am numi-o, mprumutnd termenii muzicali, de camer. O poezie de interior, dar un interior al fiinei, al sufletului ce reverbereaz n sine, profund, la zgomotul tumultuos din afar, capabil a nregistra, cu finee, ns cu fineea unui seismograf sentimental, seismele produse n omenescul vital de scurgerea implacabil a timpului...“. (Constantin Cublean)

A szerz? a két nem k?z?tti klasszikus konfliktushelyzeteket vázol fel, majd k?nnyedén kivitelezhet? és hatékony megoldásokat kínál a kezelésükre. Ha megfogadjuk tanácsait, vérbeli "férfiszelídít?ként" nem esik majd nehezünkre, hogy k?lcs?n?s megbecsülésre és szerelemre épül? párkapcsolatban éljünk, olyan intim viszonyban, amelyben kulcsszerepet játszik a humor, és amelyben álmaink férfija szívesen és ?nszántából k?vet bennünket, hogy kapcsolatunk boldog és sikeres legyen.

Un b?ie?el singuratic ?i f?r? prieteni Un b?rbat secretos care a petrecut ani de zile ?ncerc?nd s? transforme metalele ?n aur Unul dintre cele mai mari genii ale tuturor timpurilor Toate cele de mai sus! ? Afl? mai multe despre adev?ratul Isaac Newton ?n aceast? biografie amuzant? ?i minunat ilustrat?!

A bájos, v?r?s hajú Répássy Rebeka szereti a magas sarkú cip?ket, a drágak?veket és a bécsi kávét. Nem szereti viszont a tenger gyüm?lcseit, a tolakodó pasikat és a felt?nést. A sors szeszélye folytán mégis egyik pillanatról a másikra az osztrák tévé képerny?jén találja magát, és a Kísérletkastély cím? valóságshow ígéretes szerepl?jeként egy ország kíséri figyelemmel minden mozdulatát. A tét Rebeka számára százezer euró, a hírnév, és váratlan ráadásként a szívfájdítóan jókép? producer, Marcus szerelme. A Bécsben dolgozó magyar lány igyekszik megállni a helyét a kereskedelmi tévék számára ismeretlen világában, ahol semmi sem az, aminek látszik: az ellenfelek barátnak álcázzák magukat, a segítség kerül? utakon jár, és még az igazi szerelem is álruhába bújik. Vajon ki mozgatja a szálakat a háttérben? Mi a szerepe az eseményekben a titokzatos újságírón?nek, Fr?ulein Lemkének? ?s vajon megtartja-e Rebeka kezdeti elhatározását, miszerint nem hajlandó szerelmeskedni a kamerák el?tt? Aki a rokonszenves Rebekához hasonlóan kedveli az osztrák f?várost, a karácsonyi hangulatot és a bécsi kávét, az kül?n?sen élvezni fogja PALOT?S PETRA izgalmakban és fordulatokban nem sz?k?lk?d? regényét.

Cartea se adreseaz? elevilor, studen?ilor, precum ?i publicului larg de cititori, monografia ?n cauz? – semnat? de marele c?rturar Ion Iano?i, membru al Academiei Rom?ne – constituind una dintre lucr?rile de v?rf despre uria?ul romancier de la Iasnaia Poliana.

The girl had been an orphan from childhood, and Rowland Trowbridge had been almost as a father to her. Avice loved him and watched over him as a daughter; at least, that had been the case until lately. A few weeks since, Mr. Trowbridge had succumbed to the rather florid charms of Mrs. Black, his housekeeper, and told Avice he would marry her in a month. Though greatly surprised and not greatly pleased, Avice had accepted the situation and treated the housekeeper with the same pleasant courtesy she had always shown her. The two “got along” as the phrase is, though their natures were not in many ways congenial. Avice remained at the window till she saw at last Leslie Hoyt’s tall form approaching. She ran to open the door herself. “Oh, Judge Hoyt,” she cried, “Uncle hasn’t come yet! There must be something wrong! What can we do” THE MARK OF CAINBY CAROLYN WELLS AUTHOR OF “A CHAIN OF EVIDENCE,” “THE GOLD BAG,” “THE WHITE ALLEY,” ETC.WITH A FRONTISPIECE IN COLOR BY GAYLE HOSKINS

Nicolae Breban este stpnit de – i ajunge s stpneasc el nsui – voina de putere creatoare. Creaia este, dup Fr. Nietzsche, adevrata voin de putere. Ct pot crea – att exist“, iat relaia definitorie i poate chiar sensul vieii, raliat adnc unei ontologii a artei literare. Scriitorul se teme cel mai mult de insuficiena voinei. ntotdeauna a fost ngrozit de un succes de mna a doua. Un succes a fost faptul c n Frana i-au fost publicate romane dificile“, ntr-un context literar i istoric defavorabil. (…) Breban triete cu luciditate abisal; vis estetic“. Urmeaz, aadar, i nu contrazice autonomia esteticului. Omul i cultura sunt artificioase, nu naturale. El crede c, n esen, literatura nu s-a schimbat niciodat de la Homer ncoace.“ (Marian Victor Buciu) Un romancier pentru o generaie a literaturii. Nici un prozator romn nu a trit, dup 1960, o evoluie att de rapid. Succesul fulgertor al lui Nicolae Breban nu poate i nici nu trebuie s fie judecat independent de momentul 1965 al literaturii tinere. O generaie de povestitori i de poei avea nevoie de un adevrat romancier pentru a-i consacra, aa cum se cuvine, strlucirea. Nu de un romancier fcut prin aglomerarea povestirilor, strlucitor pe fiecare pagin, spectaculos prin fiecare personaj al su; generaia reclam nu un autor care tie s povesteasc, ci un scriitor nzestrat cu vocaie de romancier: de adevrat constructor.“ (Cornel Ungureanu)

Ormai Norbert Kossuth Lajos mellett szolgált, s remek meggy?z?képességével ?tezer vadászkatonát állított a szabadságharcba. Gyorsan t?rt el?re, az 1848 júliusában még hadnagyi rangban szolgáló Ormait tíz hónap múlva már ezredessé léptették el?, Kossuth kinevezte a honvéd vadászezredek f?felügyel?jévé. Pár nappal azután, miután visszavonult és lemondott beosztásáról, császári fogságba esett, majd a hadbírósági tárgyalása napján kivégezték.Az egykori ezredes életét és halálát máig legendák ?vezik. Sokan, még a neves t?rténészek is, minden komolyabb utánajárás nélkül nevezték Ormait szélhámosnak. E kiadvány számos ponton tisztázza az Ormaival kapcsolatos félreértéseket, torzításokat, és megpróbál hiteles adatok, valamint eredeti okmányok k?zlésével hozzájárulni pályaívének teljesebb megrajzolásához.

Raporturile dintre cuvinte i confer poemelor sale conotaii metafizice derulate ntr-o muzic enigmatic a linitii i tcerii, fiecare cuvnt scris avnd parc viaa i destinul su (ca n poemele uruguaienei Delmira Agustini), brodnd misterioase asociaii greu de tradus chiar n limba romn, ceea ce m-a determinat s le las s zburde singure, citndu-le deseori pe acelea crora nu le-am gsit corespondentul n dicionarul meu srac n sinonime.Poemele Alinei Beiu-Deliu au o densitate i un dramatism care refuz tiparele obinuite ale feminitii, fiind ncrcate de un lirism convulsiv care explodeaza deseori cu farmecul spontaneitii imediate, alteori cu delicateea i fragilitatea disimulrilor, care printr-un inexplicabil algoritm, dezvluie mai mult dect acoper mesajul poetic, crend o atmosfer grav de filigran incomprehensibil la prima lectur, dar care se limpezete treptat, pe msura repetrii, n toat splendoarea, obligndu-l pe cititor s se ntrebe, n final, dac singurtatea poetei este o simpl izolare sau o form de aprare a libertii sale ctigate prin suferin.“ (Valeriu Cuner)

Parodicul nu este doar unul dintre modurile comice; el este rezultatul variatelor ncercri pe care literatura le face spre a se rennoi prin autonegare. Asumndu-i acest rol, literatura parodic are luciditatea de a-i etala mecanismul auto-producerii, analizndu-i exagerrile, dar i constitutivele convenii. Aceast ntoarcere spre literaritatea literaturii pe care mizeaz orice demers parodic este camuflat prin aparena orientare spre diferii autori, texte sau stiluri. Orice parodist este, simultan, explorator prin textele altora, dar i autorul ce-i analizeaz lucid teritoriul propriului text. Una dintre aceste dou dimensiuni poate fi dominant ntr-o parodie, oscilaiile fiind generate att de parodist, ct i de contextul estetic cruia acesta i aparine. Dac, n mod normal, principiile critice urmeaz dezvoltrii formelor literare, discursul parodic este un discurs critic contient deghizat n form literar sau un discurs literar cu finalitate critic. Vorbim de parodia studiat estetic i nu de parodia ca simpl deformare, comis din ignoran.“ O fenomenologie a parodicului din Evul Mediu, epoc modern i postmodern, aceast carte ofer i analiza parodicului n operele unor scriitori ca Urmuz, Caragiale, Crtrescu .a.

The Divine Comedy describes Dante's journey through Hell (Inferno), Purgatory (Purgatorio), and Paradise (Paradiso), guided first by the Roman poet Virgil and then by Beatrice, the subject of his love and of another of his works, La Vita Nuova. While the vision of Hell, the Inferno, is vivid for modern readers, the theological niceties presented in the other books require a certain amount of patience and knowledge to appreciate. Purgatorio, the most lyrical and human of the three, also has the most poets in it; Paradiso, the most heavily theological, has the most beautiful and ecstatic mystic passages in which Dante tries to describe what he confesses he is unable to convey (e.g., when Dante looks into the face of God: "all'alta fantasia qui mancò possa" — "at this high moment, ability failed my capacity to describe," Paradiso, XXXIII, 142). "IN the midway of this our mortal life, I found me in a gloomy wood, astray Gone from the path direct: and e'en to tell It were no easy task, how savage wild That forest, how robust and rough its growth, Which to remember only, my dismay Renews, in bitterness not far from death.." (Dante) IN the midway of this our mortal life,I found me in a gloomy wood, astrayGone from the path direct: and e'en to tellIt were no easy task, how savage wildThat forest, how robust and rough its growth,Which to remember only, my dismayRenews, in bitterness not far from death.Yet to discourse of what there good befell,All else will I relate discover'd there.How first I enter'd it I scarce can say,Such sleepy dullness in that instant weigh'dMy senses down, when the true path I left,But when a mountain's foot I reach'd, where clos'dThe valley, that had pierc'd my heart with dread,I look'd aloft, and saw his shoulders broadAlready vested with that planet's beam,Who leads all wanderers safe through every way. Then was a little respite to the fear,That in my heart's recesses deep had lain,All of that night, so pitifully pass'd:And as a man, with difficult short breath,Forespent with toiling, 'scap'd from sea to shore,Turns to the perilous wide waste, and standsAt gaze; e'en so my spirit, that yet fail'dStruggling with terror, turn'd to view the straits,That none hath pass'd and liv'd. My weary frameAfter short pause recomforted, againI journey'd on over that lonely steep,The hinder foot still firmer. Scarce the ascentBegan, when, lo! a panther, nimble, light,And cover'd with a speckled skin, appear'd,Nor, when it saw me, vanish'd, rather stroveTo check my onward going; that ofttimesWith purpose to retrace my steps I turn'd. ? ?About Dante: ? Durante degli Alighieri, simply referred to as Dante (1265–1321), was a major Italian poet of the Middle Ages. His Divine Comedy, originally called La Comedia and later called Divina by Boccaccio, is widely considered the greatest literary work composed in the Italian language and a masterpiece of world literature. In Italy he is known as il Sommo Poeta ("the Supreme Poet") or just il Poeta. He, Petrarch and Boccaccio are also known as "the three fountains" or "the three crowns". Dante is also called the "Father of the Italian language".

Dup? treisprezece ani de la prima apari?ie, m?-ntreb unde-a ajuns oare Drumul furnicilor? Strada pe care plou?-ntotdeauna ?i-o fi luat un new look? Josefina, musca dintre ferestre, cum se adapteaz? la termopane? La baie apa continu? s? curg? zi ?i noapte ca un fluviu particular? Colacul de s?rm? ploioas? s-o fi dezr?sucit de tot, l?s?nd moartea pe dinafar?? Vreun paparazzi o fi ob?inut vreo poz? a p?s?rii din pod pe care nimeni n-a z?rit-o? Nu m?-ntreba?i pe mine, eu n-am f?cut altceva dec?t s? bat la ma?in? litere unele dup? altele. Tot ce ?tiu este c? ?i dup? treisprezece ani norii ?i be?ele de chibrit r?m?n cele mai frumoase lucruri de pe lume. (Constantin Ab?lu??, decembrie 2010)

Mihai Eminescu este considerat de cititori ?i de critica literar? mondial? drept cea mai important? voce poetic? din literatura rom?n?. ?Titlul de fata reprezinta cea mai bogata colectie de poezii a poetului Mihai Eminescu. In cele 650 de pagini regasiti titluri celebre precum: Floare albastra * Revedere * Scrisoarea III * Luceafarul * Ce te legeni... * Mai am un singur dor * Sara pe deal

Canute the Great

Cardinal Mazarin

History of Europe 1816-1830

History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire

The Art of War in the Middle Ages

An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding