恩斯特·马赫（Ernst Mach，1838-1916），是19-20世纪之交奥地利著名的物理学家、生物学家、心理学家、哲学家。他不仅在科学上作出了杰出的成就，还在科学哲学方面卓有成就，在其生前身后，对他的研究一直是学术界的热。本书是美国科学哲学界对马赫的一部研究纪念文集，是美国著名的“波士顿科学哲学研究丛书”中的一种。本文集由美国科学哲学学会前主席R.S.科恩主编。文集中主要篇目有：前言；恩斯特·马赫：作为教师和思想家的生活；马赫对感觉分析得贡献；马赫对气体动力学的贡献；马赫对激波的求知欲；马赫和当代物理学；马赫：物理学、知觉和科学哲学；马赫、爱因斯坦和实在论的探索；马赫原理和爱因斯坦的引力理论；马赫的科学哲学对我们时代的重要性；马赫和科学统一；马赫和经验论者的科学概念；马赫的生物学的知识论等。

本书是德国哲学家尼采里程碑式的作品，用优美的语言，以散文诗的形式，阐释了他的哲学思想，谱写了自由主义的人性之歌，呼吁人们追问生命的真谛，活在当下。本书不仅具有睿智的思想，也是德语美文的代表作品之一，旨在让读者通过本书，找寻人生的真谛，获得快乐的源泉。

　　作者从一位普通百姓的视角，重新注析解读了《大学》。全书由经、传两大部分构成。经分八节，传分十章。按章句解读的形式，讲解了这部古老的儒家经典。旨在弘扬传统文化，向德砺学，塑造更加美好的人格。

为什么一直拼命努力却无法获得理想的业绩？为什么总有一些人能轻轻松松地实现目标？严格按照上司或客户的要求工作，就一定能让对方满意吗？如何才能读懂趋势，及时赶上下一个风口？ 回答上面这些问题的关键，在于能否从更高维度发现问题和解决问题。本书通过大量职场问题的解决案例，详细解析了运用“元思维”实现高维度思考的两种方法：Why型思维和类推思维。Why型思维通过追问上层目的，帮助我们冲破思维定式和狭隘视野，洞察问题的本质；类推思维通过放眼大千世界，教我们如何从其他领域借鉴灵感，从而实现跳跃式创意。 如果你正被繁重的工作压得喘不过气来，或者正因为创意陷僵局而一筹莫展，那么不妨按着本书的提示，启一段简单高效的职场问题解决训练吧。如果能像无人机一样，像谷歌地球一样，从杂务中抽离出来，拉长镜头看一看，你会发现崭新的世界、不同的视角，所有难题都能迎刃而解。

本书收录李宗吾的《我对于圣人之怀疑》与《厚黑教主别传》两部作品。

房龙从人文主义的立场出发，站在全人类的高度重新审视人类由史前时代、古希腊、古罗马时代、中世纪、文艺复兴时代到现代的几千年文明的变迁，期间善与恶，黑暗与光明，步与反动的不断搏杀，勾勒出一幅波澜壮阔的人类思想解放史。房龙将一部欧洲“思想解放史”，改写成一部宽容与专横的斗争历史，他行走于人类自身的宽容与偏执、美德与现实的对立交锋之间，深度剖析人类精神上“不宽容”的原因，讲述人类奋斗与自我救赎的跌宕传奇。房龙认为宽容就是“自己活，也让别人活”，他提倡 以理性和宽容代替无知与偏执，并指出人类只有消除了自身的恐惧，才能从根本上消除不宽容。这是一部描写人类思想发展史、畅销近百年的通俗历史读本，是关于宽容和自由思想的人文主义经典之作。

《我们内心的冲突》指出，由于社会文化所塑造的人总是与我们想成为的人背道而驰——我们做了很多不是出于本心的选择和决策，于是产生了这些主宰我们人生的基本冲突。为了解决这些冲突，我们不但虚构了“理想化意象”自欺欺人，通过“外化”把责任推给他人，还基于不同的性格倾向发展出一系列各不相同的防御策略。但这些策略更像是精致的代偿与逃避，不但没有消除冲突，反而使我们深感恐惧、焦虑和绝望，以致在神经症的道路上越陷越深。本书的内容主要来自对病人和自身的心理分析的经验总结，对致力于提高精神分析理论和治疗方法的精神分析工作者很有帮助。

Are you awakening spiritually and feeling weird?You’re not alone. Truly, you are not alone. You have many spiritual helpers, and just like Angela, you can learn to communicate with them and enlist their support. Lorelle Taylor’s extraordinary book traces Angela’s journey from normal to weird. Join her as she confronts challenges and undertakes deeply spiritual lessons while exploring the biggest questions. Learn about life and death from angels, spirit guides, Jesus and God. Discover how to overcome obstacles in your own path as you too discover the secrets for a fulfilled and happy life. Start reading?Getting Used to Weird: A very different sort of Love Story?today and you’ll discover that on this journey, you’re also getting used to love. You’ll come away with the knowledge that “Love is the answer to all questions.”

　　《周易》是中华传统文化之根，同时又充满了神秘色彩，人们往往视其为预测吉凶祸福的“占筮之书”，对其文化内涵则敬而远之。《周易文化导读》力图揭开《周易》神秘的面纱，从文化的角度去解读《周易》。作者介绍了研习《周易》不可回避的一系列基本问题，并通过对《周易》六十四卦经文的今译和文化导读，以深入浅出的方式和通俗易懂的文字揭示《周易》博大精深的文化内涵，旨在引导初学《周易》者以及广大传统文化爱好者洞悉《周易》之人文精神和教化意义。

《大学》原本是《礼记》中的一篇。宋代人把它从《礼记》中抽出来，与《论语》《孟子》《中庸》相配合，便成了“四书”之一，是讨论古代教育理论的重要著作，宗旨在于弘扬光明正大的品德，在于让百姓仁爱敦睦、明理向善。

Euthyphro (Ancient Greek: Euthuphron) is one of Plato's early dialogues, dated to after 399 BC. Taking place during the weeks leading up to Socrates' trial, the dialogue features Socrates and Euthyphro, a religious expert also mentioned at Cratylus 396a and 396d, attempting to define piety or holiness. Background The dialogue is set near the king-archon's court, where the two men encounter each other. They are both there for preliminary hearings before possible trials (2a).Euthyphro has come to lay manslaughter charges against his father, as his father had allowed one of his workers to die exposed to the elements without proper care and attention (3e–4d). This worker had killed a slave belonging to the family estate on the island of Naxos; while Euthyphro's father waited to hear from the expounders of religious law (exegetes cf. Laws 759d) about how to proceed, the worker died bound and gagged in a ditch. Socrates expresses his astonishment at the confidence of a man able to take his own father to court on such a serious charge, even when Athenian Law allows only relatives of the deceased to sue for murder. Euthyphro misses the astonishment, and merely confirms his overconfidence in his own judgment of religious/ethical matters. In an example of "Socratic irony," Socrates states that Euthyphro obviously has a clear understanding of what is pious and impious. Since Socrates himself is facing a charge of impiety, he expresses the hope to learn from Euthyphro, all the better to defend himself in his own trial. Euthyphro claims that what lies behind the charge brought against Socrates by Meletus and the other accusers is Socrates' claim that he is subjected to a daimon or divine sign which warns him of various courses of action (3b). Even more suspicious from the viewpoint of many Athenians, Socrates expresses skeptical views on the main stories about the Greek gods, which the two men briefly discuss before plunging into the main argument. Socrates expresses reservations about such accounts which show up the gods' cruelty and inconsistency. He mentions the castration of the early sky god, Uranus, by his son Cronus, saying he finds such stories very difficult to accept (6a–6c). Euthyphro, after claiming to be able to tell even more amazing such stories, spends little time or effort defending the conventional view of the gods. Instead, he is led straight to the real task at hand, as Socrates forces him to confront his ignorance, ever pressing him for a definition of 'piety'. Yet, with every definition Euthyphro proposes, Socrates very quickly finds a fatal flaw (6d ff.). At the end of the dialogue, Euthyphro is forced to admit that each definition has been a failure, but rather than correct it, he makes the excuse that it is time for him to go, and Socrates ends the dialogue with a classic example of Socratic irony: since Euthyphro has been unable to come up with a definition that will stand on its own two feet, Euthyphro has failed to teach Socrates anything at all about piety, and so he has received no aid for his own defense at his own trial (15c ff.).

The present publication is intended to supply a recognised deficiency in our literature—a library edition of the Essays of Montaigne. This great French writer deserves to be regarded as a classic, not only in the land of his birth, but in all countries and in all literatures. His Essays, which are at once the most celebrated and the most permanent of his productions, form a magazine out of which such minds as those of Bacon and Shakespeare did not disdain to help themselves; and, indeed, as Hallam observes, the Frenchman's literary importance largely results from the share which his mind had in influencing other minds, coeval and subsequent. But, at the same time, estimating the value and rank of the essayist, we are not to leave out of the account the drawbacks and the circumstances of the period: the imperfect state of education, the comparative scarcity of books, and the limited opportunities of intellectual intercourse. Montaigne freely borrowed of others, and he has found men willing to borrow of him as freely. We need not wonder at the reputation which he with seeming facility achieved. He was, without being aware of it, the leader of a new school in letters and morals. His book was different from all others which were at that date in the world. It diverted the ancient currents of thought into new channels. It told its readers, with unexampled frankness, what its writer's opinion was about men and things, and threw what must have been a strange kind of new light on many matters but darkly understood. Above all, the essayist uncased himself, and made his intellectual and physical organism public property. He took the world into his confidence on all subjects. His essays were a sort of literary anatomy, where we get a diagnosis of the writer's mind, made by himself at different levels and under a large variety of operating influences. Of all egotists, Montaigne, if not the greatest, was the most fascinating, because, perhaps, he was the least affected and most truthful. What he did, and what he had professed to do, was to dissect his mind, and show us, as best he could, how it was made, and what relation it bore to external objects. He investigated his mental structure as a schoolboy pulls his watch to pieces, to examine the mechanism of the works; and the result, accompanied by illustrations abounding with originality and force, he delivered to his fellow-men in a book. W. C. H. KENSINGTON, November 1877. THE LIFE OF MONTAIGNE The author of the Essays was born, as he informs us himself, between eleven and twelve o'clock in the day, the last of February 1533, at the chateau of St. Michel de Montaigne. His father, Pierre Eyquem, esquire, was successively first Jurat of the town of Bordeaux (1530), Under-Mayor 1536, Jurat for the second time in 1540, Procureur in 1546, and at length Mayor from 1553 to 1556. He was a man of austere probity, who had "a particular regard for honour and for propriety in his person and attire . . . a mighty good faith in his speech, and a conscience and a religious feeling inclining to superstition, rather than to the other extreme. Between 1556 and 1563 an important incident occurred in the life of Montaigne, in the commencement of his romantic friendship with Etienne de la Boetie, whom he had met, as he tells us, by pure chance at some festive celebration in the town. From their very first interview the two found themselves drawn irresistibly close to one another, and during six years this alliance was foremost in the heart of Montaigne, as it was afterwards in his memory, when death had severed it.

立德修身的恒言警句为学立业的至理名言《小窗幽记》为陈眉公所著的修身处世格言，条条都是人生的回味和处世的领悟，体现了儒家修身、齐家、治国、平天下的积极人生态度，又兼容了佛家超凡脱俗和道家清静无为的智慧，历来被称为修身养性、提升自我修养的佳作。

蒙养之学  传世经典《龙文鞭影》原名《蒙养故事》，是古代非常有名的汉族儿童启蒙读物。作者的寓意是，看了这本《龙文鞭影》，青少年就有可能成为“千里马”。《龙文鞭影》主要是介绍中国历史上的人物典故和逸事传说。它问世后，成为*受欢迎的童蒙读物之一。

读经典的书，做有根的人。雅言传承文明，经典浸润人生。诵读中华经典，是四至十二岁学生学习中华传统文化的有效方式，也是中央文明办、*、国家语委主办的“中华诵·经典诵读行动”大力推动的一项校园文化建设活动。

意大利著名作家伊塔洛·卡尔维诺说：“一部经典作品是一本每次重读都像初读那样带来发现的书”，“一部经典作品是一本即使我们初读也好像是在重温的书”，“一部经典作品是一本永远不会耗尽它要向读者说的一切东西的书”。经典就是那些常读常新、能够不断给我们的心灵带来启示和震撼、能够伴随我们整个人生的伟大作品。经典，魅力无穷，力量巨大，它能够穿越历史的烟尘，在完全不同的时空里散发出令人炫目的光辉。

哲学就其本性而言，并不是要为我们解决生活和工作中的具体问题，它是要我们去思考根本的问题。当一个人懂得用哲学去思考问题的本质时，他就具备了一个宽阔的视野，具备了一个好的心态，达到一种较高的境界，活得更透彻、更明白。读哲学的目的并不是要成为哲人，像苏格拉底、亚里士多德那样先知先觉，而是要品味深藏在理论中的精髓，以此滋养心灵、提升内在，彻底唤醒沉寂的理性与桎梏的心灵。 《每天读西方哲学》以西方哲学史为基础，依据哲学发展的时间顺序，精心选取了50位著名的哲学家，用通俗易懂的语言讲述了他们的生平以及主要的哲学思想，文中还穿插了一些哲学大咖们的趣闻逸事，让读者在轻松的阅读中走哲学家们的真实生活和独特思想。希望每一位翻此书的人，都可以透过哲学大师们的思想和哲语，在喧嚣中找到宁静，在浮华中发现真实，在繁杂中看到简单。

《论语》是一部记录孔子及其弟子言行的语录体著作，至 今已有2500多年。它的哲学思想以“仁”、“礼”为核心， 影响着世代中国人及华人世界，是重要的儒家经典。本书对 《论语》一书进行了全面的解译，并结合现实予以进一步 解读。

《解读柏拉图》没有一位哲人像柏拉图那样关注严格的哲学思考，也没有一位哲人能以更为丰富的想象力和创造力吸引读者加入哲学对话。柏拉图其人其书两千多年来被人们不断解读，大家众说纷纭，莫衷一是。本书以广博的视野、权威的眼光、平时的语言介绍了柏拉图的复杂思想和多方面的天才创见，展示了柏拉图研究的**成果。

《存在主义简论》与众多研究存在主义的著作相比，本书作者别具匠心地把存在主义定位为一种生活方式，力图全面展现存在主义哲学家的人间情怀，深入诠释存在主义思想与我们日常生活的血肉联系。不仅梳理了存在主义的缘起、发展和式微的演变历程，还细述了存在主义思想对当代艺术、文学和政治生活的影响，重申了存在主义运动将继续在21世纪的哲学舞台上扮演重要角色。

《解读苏格拉底》苏格拉底是西方历***著名、*神秘的哲学家。两千多年过去了，围绕其生平学说仍有许多疑团悬而未解。谁要置苏格拉底于死地？谁对苏格拉底的记述*真？谁受苏格拉底的影响*深？本书在博采百家之长的基础上，再现了苏格拉底的生平行迹，考察了历史上的苏格拉底和各家笔下的苏格拉底之间的复杂关系，剖析了苏格拉底对后世哲学的深远影响。