本书从哲学角度出发，阐述了古今中外哲学史上的名家对当代哲学和古典哲学的分析研究，有对古典作品的研究，对思想史的研究，还有旧文新刊上的重要论题。真实作为历史的基础我们应该了解;篇幸布局与行文明晰作为手法应该通俗易懂。一个是肌体,另一个是肌体的健康。当我专注于哲学与城邦之间的张力,也就是专注于政治哲学的至高主题时,就进一步确定了这种想法。至高形式的、或海德格尔式的当代哲学与古典哲学的区别,是由当代哲学的历史特性塑造出来的,以所谓的历史意识为先决条件,因此必须了解这种意识多少有些隐私、的根源。

《世界·大师·原典·文库：人性论（中文导读插图版）（套装上下册）》作者认为一切科学都与人性有关，对人性的研究应是一切科学的基础。《人性论（中文导读插图版）（套装上下册）》试图通过对人性的研究来揭示制约人的理智、情感和道德行为的准则。全书分三卷，卷讨论知性；第二卷讨论情感；第三卷讨论道德。

《世界·大师·原典·文库：人性论（中文导读插图版）（套装上下册）》作者认为一切科学都与人性有关，对人性的研究应是一切科学的基础。《人性论（中文导读插图版）（套装上下册）》试图通过对人性的研究来揭示制约人的理智、情感和道德行为的准则。全书分三卷，卷讨论知性；第二卷讨论情感；第三卷讨论道德。

《世界·大师·原典·文库：人性论（中文导读插图版）（套装上下册）》作者认为一切科学都与人性有关，对人性的研究应是一切科学的基础。《人性论（中文导读插图版）（套装上下册）》试图通过对人性的研究来揭示制约人的理智、情感和道德行为的准则。全书分三卷，卷讨论知性；第二卷讨论情感；第三卷讨论道德。

《了凡四训》又名《命自我立》，为明代袁了凡先生所作的家训，以其亲身经历教戒他的儿子袁天，认识命运的真相，明辨善恶的标准，改过迁善的故事。 本书将了凡四训四篇分为若干章节编写，每一章另外提炼标题，如*篇立命之学，其章节为：*章解题，第二章孔先生算命……除了解题这一章外，其他每一章都分为原文、注释、译文、解读、名言哲语五个部分。 本书的通俗性表现在注释、译文，一般读者读完这两部分就弄懂了原文的含义，注释则具有知识性，将古汉语基本知识告诉读者。 本书的趣味性在于例证这些故事，用事例更好地说明本段文字的含义，形象生动，引人胜。 本书的权威性体现在解读和名言哲语。本书解读注重用简明通俗的语言解读原文内容，同时引用古今圣贤对原文道理的说明。其中的名言哲语则引用古今中外名人的话或者人们长期以来经验总结的警句哲言，以这些*权威性的话来*后说明本文的道理。

自由教育是从庸俗中解放出来。古希腊人关于“庸俗”有一个绝妙的词：他们称之为apeirokalia，形容缺乏对美好事物的经历。自由教育将赠予我们之于美好的事物的经历。根据事物本身的状况，我们可以期望从正确理解的人性人不得不在二者之间选择，要么选择令人愉悦的谬见带来的心灵平静，要么选择令人烦恼的真理带来的心灵平静。哲学总在盼着世界的围墙倒塌，它突破了世界的围墙，放弃了对世界的眷恋（attachmenttheworld），这种放弃*令人痛苦。另一方面，诗歌如同宗教，深深扎根于对世界的眷恋....中比从科学中获得更为直接的帮助，从敏感和精致中比从几何学的精神中获得更为直接的帮助。如果我没弄错，这就是为何现在的身由教育几乎等同于阅读古希腊经典。就像别人被一匹良马、一条好狗或一只灵鸟取悦那样，我自己则因好朋友们而获得更高的快乐……古代的贤人们通过将它们写进书中而遗留下来的财富，我与我的朋友们一起开启它并穿行其中，而且如果我们发现了什么好东西，我们就把它挑出来，并当作一次丰盛的收获，倘若我们因此而能相互促益的话。

Ce este adev?rul? De unde ?tiu cine sunt? De ce ar trebui s? fim buni? Exist? multe c?r?i despre filosofie. Cu toate acestea, Cine sunt eu? difer? fa?? de celelalte lucr?ri de introducere ?n filosofie. Nimeni nu a reu?it p?n? acum s? pun? cititorul fa??-n fa?? cu marile ?ntreb?ri ale omenirii ?ntr-o manier? at?t de documentat?, de competent? ?i, ?n acela?i timp, cu umor ?i cu elegan??. Prezenta lucrare reprezint? o c?l?torie unic? prin noianul de cuno?tin?e pe care le avem despre om. Precht ne prezint? tot ceea ce este mai nou ?n neuro?tiin??, ?n psihologie ?i ?n filosofie. Fie c? pleac? ?n cercetarea sensului vie?ii pornind de la analiza unui episod din Star Trek sau de la melodia Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds a celor de la Beatles, cartea ne pune ?n fa?a unui traseu captivant, ?n care vom descoperi cele mai surprinz?toare lucruri despre noi ?n?ine.

Antropologie ?i antroposofie ? Max Dessoir despre antroposofie ? Franz BrentanoAlc?tuind cuprinsul acestei lucr?ri, Rudolf Steiner reveleaz? ?c?teva din firele ?tiin?ifice care trebuie trasate pornind de la antropozofie la filozofie, la psihologie ?i la fiziologie“. Cunoa?terea omului va trebui atunci s? fie extins? ?in?nd cont de enigmaticele aspecte ale vie?ii sale interioare, privite din perspective multiple. ?n aceast? carte, Rudolf Steiner prezint? ?n scris aspectele semnificative ale configur?rii ?ntreite a fiin?ei omene?ti: corpul fizic, organismul sufletesc ?i configura?ia spiritual?.

Imagineaz?-?i c? e?ti într-o ma?in? a timpului care te poart? înainte ?i înapoi prin propria via??. Te duce în trecut, la anii copil?riei, când înv??ai s? mergi pe biciclet?, apoi te face s? revezi primul t?u s?rut, cel dintâi serviciu sau anii mai târzii, când te confrun?i, eventual, cu divor?ul. Înso?it de Platon, afl? ce spun marii gânditori ai lumii despre toate aceste pietre de hotar de pe drumul vie?ii noastre. Aristotel î?i va vorbi despre importan?a începerii ?colii, Freud despre îndr?gostire, Heidegger despre implica?iile psihologice ale mutatului, iar Nietzsche despre criza vârstei de mijloc. La drum cu Platon te ajut? s? în?elegi ?i s? vezi cu al?i ochi evenimentele majore, momentele-cheie ?i fazele de tranzi?ie din via?a ta, f?când filosofia s? par? accesibil? ?i plin? de umor!

Critica ra?iunii pure, tradus? de Nicolae Bagdasar ?i Elena Moisuc ?n 1969, a ajuns la cea de-a treia edi?ie. Cu acest prilej, profesorul dr. Ilie P?rvu, de la Facultatea de Filosofie a Universit??ii din Bucure?ti a ?ngrijit noua opera?ie de editare, fiind astfel corectate unele erori de tipar ?i unele inconsecven?e terminologice. Totodat?, exist? un motiv ?n plus pentru ca studen?ii care posed? edi?ia a II-a a traducerii, ap?rut? ?n 1995, s? apeleze ?i la cea de-a treia edi?ie: ?n aceasta din urm? au fost indicate diferen?ele dintre edi?ia I german? (din 1781) ?i edi?ia a II-a (din 1787).

Volumul red? circuitului public, pentru prima oar? ?n limba rom?n?, trei din operele g?nditorului atenian. Este vorba de Scrisori (?n num?r de treisprezece, deosebit de importante pentru cunoa?terea g?ndirii platoniciene, dar ?i pentru ?n?elegerea epocii ?i a personalit??ilor cu care a venit ?n contact filosoful), Dialoguri suspecte (Minos, Rivalii, Theages, Hipparhos, Clitofon) ?i Dialoguri apocrife (Axiohos, Despre drept, Despre virtute, Demodocus, Sisyfos, Eryxias).Traducerea apara?ine lui ?tefan Bezdechi, care a realizat ?i aparatul critic al Scrisorilor (introducere ?i note).

O analiz? aplicat? a operei unuia dintre cei mai controversa?i g?nditori germani, supranumit monahul de la Sils-Maria; o lectur? ?n filigran a modului nietzschean de abordare a c?torva concepte dificile, interpretate la modul catastrofic: supraomul, ve?nica ?ntoarcere a aceluia?i, anti-Christul. Lucrarea se situeaz? ?n buna ?i prestigioas? tradi?ie a marilor creatori care comenteaz? textele fundamentale ale omenirii dintr-un unghi specific.

Tr?s?turi fundamentale ale unei concep?ii moderne despre lume?Cum se comport? filosofia c? art? fa?? de libertatea omului, ce este aceast? libertate, ?i dac? am ajuns s? ne ?mp?rt??im din ea, sau putem ajunge la acest lucru: iat? problema fundamental? a scrierii mele. Toate celelalte expuneri ?tiin?ifice au fost f?cute numai pentru ca, ?n cele din urm?, s? arunc?m ?i mai mult? lumin? asupra unei probleme care, dup? p?rerea mea, prezint? cea mai mare importan?? pentru om. ?n aceste pagini vrem s? d?m o filosofie a libert??ii.“ – Rudolf Steiner

F?r? a propune o terminologie aristotelic? bine precizat? pe teritoriul limbii rom?ne, transpunerea de fa?? reprezint? un moment important ?n raportarea rom?neasc? la opera Stagiritului.Traducere de ?tefan Bezdechi efectuat? dup? textul grec publicat de W. Christ ?n colec?ia ?Teubner“, Lipsca, 1906. Pentru realizarea ei au fost utilizate urm?toarele surse:Die Metaphysik des Aristoteles, traducere ?n limba german? de J. R. V. Kirchmann, ap?rut? ?n dou? volume ?i prev?zut? cu note ample ?n colec?ia ?Philosophische Bibliothek“, numerele 38 ?i 39, la Berlin, ?n 1871;Aristoteles, Metaphysik, traducere ?n limba german? de Adolf Lasson, ?n care cele patrusprezece c?r?i ale Metafizicii sunt a?ezate ?ntr-o r?nduial? mai logic? dec?t a?a cum au fost transmise ?n originalul grec, traducere ap?rut? ?n 1924, la Jena;Aristote, Métaphysique, traducere ?n limba francez? de J. Tricot, cu o prefa?? de A. Diés, ap?rut? ?n colec?ia ?Bibliothèque des textes philosophiques“, J. Vrin, la Paris, ?n 1933.La marginea textului a fost trecut? pagina?ia edi?iei Bekker, dup? care se fac ?n mod obi?nuit cita?iile din opera lui Aristotel.Confruntarea traducerii a fost f?cut? de prof. Aram M. Frenkian.

M. Lévy-Bruhl then explains that, whilst recognising the entire coherence of Comte’s collective labours, he proposes to confine his present study to the earlier and principal work, the Philosophy, which in M. Lévy-Bruhl’s opinion is the dominant and more fruitful composition.??This he regards as the representative work of the nineteenth century, as shown by the intellectual history of the period. He points to its influence on thought in England, in Europe, and in America. It will surprise many persons to learn that in M. Lévy-Bruhl’s opinion two eminent French writers, who assuredly neither were, nor were supposed to be, Positivists, “have done more for the diffusion of the ideas and method of Comte than Littré and all the other Positivists together.” ??These two are Taine and Renan, much as they differed from Comte’s actual scheme and doctrines. Renan indeed spoke of Comte as destined to prove one of the typical names of the century. The present writer remembers Renan saying to him with a most genial welcome, “I too am a believer in the religion of humanity.” ??Professor Lévy-Bruhl followed up his History of Modern Philosophy in France by a substantial work on the philosophy of Auguste Comte. It forms a volume of the Bibliothèque de Philosophie Contemporaine, which has already devoted four other works to the Positive Philosophy. It is as well to premise that this treatise dealt solely with the philosophy, not with the polity, or any part of the religious scheme of Comte. Professor Lévy-Bruhl writes as a student, but not as an adherent of Auguste Comte. His entire work is rather an exposition, not a refutation, or a criticism, or an advocacy of Comte’s philosophical system. But it may be said at once that no one abroad or at home, certainly neither Mill, nor Lewes, nor Spencer, nor Caird, has so truly grasped and assimilated Comte’s ideas as M. Lévy-Bruhl has done.??In his Introduction M. Lévy-Bruhl very clearly states the scope of his work, and his own general attitude. He traces the origin of Comte’s philosophy in the mental effervescence of the first generation of the present century towards a reorganisation of society, after the upheaval left by the Revolution and its consequences. He correctly states the relation of St. Simon to Comte as being that of an initial stimulus. ??The cardinal difference between Comte and all the socialists and founders of social and religious Utopias consisted in this, that Comte saw the necessity of a new system of philosophy as the indispensable preliminary to any reorganisation of society.

如果选择权在你，那么你为什么要做这件事呢?需要自己决定如何去做的时候，何必迟疑?如果你能看清自己的路，高高兴兴地走下去，不要转向;如果你看不明前方的路，可以先停下来，听听斯多葛派哲学家的思考。《每日斯多葛》选辑斯多葛哲学的经典段落，配合浅显易懂的文字，让心灵恢复安静、沉着、稳定。每天一篇短文，每月一个主题，可按日期每天阅读一篇，也可以自主选择喜爱的主题阅读。       你会发现：天地之间有许多事情，是你的哲学里所没有梦想到的呢。

《摆渡在有-无之间的哲学》是作者近二十年有关*哲学问题的持续思考与讨论的总结。所谓*哲学问题，也就是哲学中*基础、*恒常，同时也是*困难的那些问题。这本书分上、下两篇。上篇为“沉思篇”，是作者直面对*哲学问题展的思考。下篇为“解释篇”，是在上篇基础上对哲学史上一些*重要的哲学家有关*哲学问题的思考的分析、讨论与反思。

佛家道德话语蕴含着丰富的伦理思想及独特的表达艺术。在中华民族道德生活史上，佛家道德话语不断地与儒家道德话语、道家道德话语交锋、交融，*终成为中华民族优秀传统道德文化的一部分，并且对中国人的道德生活乃至是文化艺术生活等都产生了深远影响。本书对佛家道德话语的历史变迁、体系构建、伦理蕴含、日常应用、表达艺术、规范转型、时代价值等问题展开系统性深入研究，这对于人们更为精准地把握佛家道德话语的精华及更好地传承和弘扬中华优秀传统文化具有十分重要的价值和意义。

本书内容主要分为三大部分:*部分导论和虞翻的背景、易学脉络介绍，揭示了易学家的时代和时代的易学家之间的关系在学术发展中 的作用。第二部分阐述虞翻易学的道德形而上学:太极和乾坤的德性化运动通过易学图式把经验世界勾绾起来,在易道特有的天人意识之 中确证道德意义。该部分试图开显具有中华伦理文化意味的原伦理境域。第三部分论述虞翻易学伦理思想的主要体例及其伦理思想的表达 方法，如卦爻关系、卦气卦变、月体纳甲、消息旁通、易象象征等等。

儒家伦理思想正是借助汉语的语言I具財得以表达。根据汉语对儒家伦理思想的作用与贡献，儒家道德语言的主要内容分为以下五个方面: (一) 一部分汉语词汇被儒家用来表达其基本道德概念:如表达道德形而上概念的天、理、气;表达儒家美德和道德规范概念的仁、义;表达道德人格概念的圣人、君子。(二) 一部分汉语被儒家用来表达其道德命题及其论证，如对人性善恶的命题及论证)。(三) -部分汉语被儒家用来解释其基本观念,如汉代经学、宋明理学、清代考据学。儒家道德观念的发展在很大程度上正是通过对早期儒家道德语言的不断诠释而实现的。(四) -部分汉语则被儒家用作道德修辞，如儒家文献中常见的表达道德观念的比喻、排比等修辞形式。(五) -部分汉语语言被儒家用作道德叙事，如通过家风家训、历史故事等表达道德观念,还通过行动的语言”礼”、 视听的语言“乐”、“物化”的语言‘ 器物”等表达其道德观念。总之，儒家对汉语的自觉或不自觉地充分运用， 对儒家道德观念的构建和传播意义重大。也正是由于汉语的独特性，儒家道德观念在概念、命题、论证、叙事等方面也具有显著的特，就总体而言，儒家道德语言是一种以以为本的语言文化。

本书从《道德经》是一部以“道法自然”为公理性假设且具有严密逻辑的哲学著作的视角，对其行了全新阐述和释译，力图克服传统注家的逻辑缺失。全书基于《道德经》各章内容分别阐述：什么是“道”，如何认识“道”的本质特征（“无”），如何认识并遵从“道”之“无‘为’”与“无‘不为’”准则，如何认识并纠正“不道”等人为行为等问题；还阐释了《道德经》的自然宇宙观、社会系统思想、认识规律的方法论；还阐述了《道德经》的哲学思想对于当今社会之生态文明建设的重要启示。