对佛教经典《地藏本愿经》《佛说盂兰盆经》《佛说父母恩重难报经》三部经的翻译解释。

《中阿含经》共六十卷，共收经二百二十二部，，分为五诵十八品，为东晋僧伽提婆与僧伽罗叉所译。本书节选了《中阿含经》中的二十部经。读者可从中体察《中阿含经》之全貌，领会佛陀当年为众比丘说法传教的殷殷苦心，并了解一些佛教历史，理解有关佛说的基本教义、基本理论，一步坚定学习佛教，信奉善行，自度度人，常乐我净的信心。

《楞伽经》，七卷，十品，全称《大乘楞伽经》。现奉献给读者的这部《楞伽经》，是唐译本。由于此译本几经校勘，加之采用以梵本对照前两个译本的方法，因此，义理方面较前其他版本更准确、完备，文字之表述也更加通畅、流利，受到佛教界的一致肯定和推崇 在众多大乘经典中，《楞伽经》*突出的特在其融会贯通，它不仅融会了大小二乘，而且贯通了空有二宗；不仅糅合了如来藏系和唯识系的思想，而且融摄了性相二宗。在中国佛教中，它既是「法相唯识宗」依据的经典之一，同时也是禅宗初祖达磨传付慧可的重要经典，其对中国佛教的影响可见一斑。

《药师经》全名《药师琉璃光如来本愿功德经》，是佛陀应文殊师利菩萨要求而示的净土法门，为佛教中的净土经典之一。它的主要宗教价值在于描绘了东方琉璃净土，宣说了药师如来的本愿功德，是药师佛信仰主要依据的经典。经典中叙说东方琉璃世界是药师佛因地所发十二大愿而证成的，就其主旨来说，是使众生早证菩提；但另一方面，药师佛也注重为众生求得现世的安乐，这与阿弥陀佛的偏向来生安乐不同，故为佛教界将药师法门视为现世众生消灾延寿法门的缘由。又，本经除了表述药师佛的信仰，还对药师佛信仰和阿弥陀佛信仰作了沟通，此为本经另一特色所在。

本书旨在弘扬西方阿弥陀佛的净土教义，提出了一系列关于净土信仰和往生方法的理论，并大量引证各种经律论释，多达五十余部，以申明净土要义。全书以《观无量寿经》的趣旨，统以贯之，由于道绰时代正逢北周武帝毁佛，形成佛教末法思想的普遍，再加上诸宗派多排斥净土法门，故本书中亦多有论辩，着重于破除异议，使得净土法门在社会上广泛盛行，深社会各阶层中。

本经为现存大乘经典中*早时期问世的作品，也是有关弥陀经典中的*早文献，是净土经典的*早先驱。《般舟三昧经》说西方世界须摩提国阿弥陀佛有种种相好威仪庄严，放大光明。若有人一心系念此佛，经过一日夜或七昼夜，就可甚深禅定，面见此佛。 《般舟三昧经》归纳起来说，大体上有三个特：一、以持名念佛，往生净土；二、念佛三昧为一切三昧之王；三、禅净离合，归于净土。这三个特，为本经作为净土思想*先驱的地位和价值。 佛教徒以成佛作为自己修持的*终归宿。“般舟三味”的行持，能令十方诸佛现前。本经以有系统的层次揭“三昧”是确切可得的。

对佛教经典《宗镜录》的翻译解释。

此经当属初期大乘经典，与《般若经》、《维摩经》、《法华经》等约略同时，与本经<*净地陀罗尼品>内容相同。 从内容上看，此经<分别三身品>和《法华经．寿量品》所说相通，反映出大乘佛教对佛如来观念的变化。 在教义理论上，此经基本上同于《般若经》的说空与《法华经》的法身常在思想。原始佛教也有空观，即诸法缘起故诸法皆空，而大乘的空观则更彻底，不仅诸法皆空，而且诸法皆空思想的自体也必须是空的。

　　有史以来受中外伟人推崇的心学大师。王阳明是中国历史上罕见的在立德、立功、立言三方面都有显著作为的大家。作为思想家，他开创了儒学新天地，成为一代“心学”宗师；作为军事家、政治家，他立下了不世之功，彪炳史册。他在立德、立功、立言上皆居绝顶，成就“真三不朽”，实现了古今圣贤的人格理想。其独具一格的心学思想流传至今，响彻中外，在中国、朝鲜半岛以及东南亚国家乃至全球都有重要而深远的影响。 　　浮躁现实中，修炼强大内心的秘密武器。王阳明的心学思想融合了儒、释、道三家之精髓，旨在呼唤人的本体意识，着重强调个体本身的价值和自我人性的修养。它高扬主体意识，强调内心的力量，追求透明本心、胸中洒脱，对改善现代人的精神状态有着积极的作用，是现代人修养身心的*指导思想；同时，它对现代人个性的发展、思想的自由解放、事业的开拓进取也都有着有益的启示。由此，美国哈佛大学教授杜维明断言：“二十一世纪是王阳明的世纪。”

《中国哲学史史料学》是著名的哲学家张岱年先生的著作。张先生曾任清华大学哲学系教授、北京大学哲学系教授，他也曾为北大哲学系研究生设中国哲学史史料学课程，本书是他整理课程讲义的成果。 观与材料的统一，是哲学史研究的基本要求；掌握信实的材料，是达到这一要求的前提。张先生说，本书的任务，就是对中国哲学史的材料行考订、鉴别，确定其历史年代与史料价值。 本书列举了从先秦到近代的重要的中国哲学史料，简要地介绍了每一种史料的重要观和学术价值，清晰地考证了其成书年代，并引用史学家的观，吸纳了出土简帛文献及现当代学者的研究成果，来帮助读者更好地理解史料内容，十分具有引导性。本书考证有理有据，语言简洁干练，引文准确精审，是学习和研究中国哲学的经典门书。 此次出版，是以河北人民大学出版社1996年版的《张岱年全集》（第四卷）页269-445为底本，以三联书店1982年版《中国哲学史史料学》为校本行修订的。《附录》所列若干重要文献目录，具有极高的文献价值，因底本无而校本有，便附于此版正文之后。

1788年2月22日，叔本华诞生于格但斯克。他的先祖原是荷兰人，到他的曾祖父时才移居此地。他们一家，世代经商，素来就是地方上的富绅，俄皇彼得大帝游幸格但斯克时，就以他们家为招待所。到他的祖父时，又挣得许多产业，财势更加浩大。他的父亲海因里希长袖善舞，具有商业头脑，并以暴躁的脾气、独立的个性，及对自由的热爱而知名于时。

劳模精神，是指爱岗敬业、争创一流，艰苦奋斗、勇于创新，淡泊名利、甘于奉献的劳动模范精神。它是由一代又一代各条战线的劳动模范在中国共产党的团结和带领下，在中国革命、建设、改革的伟大实践中锤炼形成的。 本书从历史、理论、现实相结合的视界，通过劳动模范的典型事例，描绘了在中国人民从站起来、富起来到强起来的历史性飞跃中，劳动模范始终站在时代前列的丰富实践，展现了劳动模范作为工人阶级的优秀代表，在平凡的岗位上创造了不平凡业绩的生动场景，阐述了劳模精神的孕育形成和丰富发展，并结合现实论述了劳模精神的历史地位和当代价值。

　　自中国共产党成立以来，在革命、建设、改革过程中，各行各业涌现出了一批又一批为国家富强、民族复兴和人民幸福而矢志奋斗的技能人才。在他们身上体现出来的精神，已经发展成为一种具有社会主义性质的工匠精神。工匠精神主要是指爱国敬业、心无旁骛的精神，一丝不苟、精益求精的精神，道技合一、传承创新的精神。工匠精神是中国共产党革命精神的重要组成部分，是革命精神的时代发展和延伸。 　　《工匠精神/中国共产党革命精神系列读本》坚持史论结合，通过讲述不同时期、不同领域的工匠模范的感人事迹，以挖掘其背后所蕴含的宝贵工匠精神。在阐述工匠精神形成发展和基本内涵的基础上揭示其在中国精神、革命文化和社会主义建设中所占据的重要历史地位，以更好地发挥工匠精神在实现中华民族伟大复兴过程中的价值和作用。

本书是已经出版的《论语通解（一）》一书的姊妹篇，续集，内容包括作者第十三讲至二十四将的内容。本书作者以亲和力的语言和轻松的讲座方式呈现给读者。作者通过自己对《论语》经典著作的深刻地理解和切身地体悟，结合当前读者工作生活中的困惑，进行了通俗地讲解和阐释。

许多人很想读经典，但苦于读不懂，又缺乏好的方法。作者在书中不仅分享了自己的学习方法，还提倡快乐学习，书画怡情。《论语》作为儒家经典，仰之弥高，钻之弥深。故人云：半部《论语》治天下；今人云：一句《论语》治天下；其实不用一句，一“孝”字做真，即可遍行天下，亦可大治天下。

　　系统阐述中国哲学史研究方法论的专著，讨论了哲学的性质、哲学史的范围、哲学基本问题与基本派别、哲学思想的理论分析方法、哲学遗产的批判继承、整理史料的方法等各方面，其中关于整理史料方面论述尤为详细，并附有张先生关于中国哲学史学习研究方法的若干文章。书中提出了一些基本而可行的研究方法，对今日行中国哲学史的学习研究仍具有重要参考价值。 　　本书内容原为张岱年先生1979年为北大哲学系研究生讲授的“中国哲学史方法论”课程讲义，而后扩充整理成书，1983年由中华书局出版，此后多次再版。此次出版，以河北人民出版社1996年版《全集》所收为工作本，并以中华书局本对校，订正历次排印中出现的文字标讹误，核对引文，统一体例。新编人名、书篇名索引，以供读者查找之便。

 今天他将为你启幸福《幸福之路》是罗素的一本经典名著，拥有广泛的读者。在这本书里，罗素不依任何高深的学说，而是把一些经由他自己的经验和观察证实过的通情达理的意见归纳起来，制做出一张良方，希望无数对生活感到困惑和郁闷的男男女女，能够在此找到医治他们病案的方子，能够在以后凭着适当的努力变得幸福。  《幸福之路》浅显易懂，读起来饶有趣味。正如罗素写此书的目的，“希望那些遭受不幸而并未享受幸福的众多男女能够诊断出自己的症状并找出摆脱的方法”。的大门，门外是条布满鲜花的幸福之路！

本书是汉语学界*部关于康德判断表的研究专著。以往关于判断表的各种争论，多根源于表格的构成要素不符合传统逻辑的形式要求，这就使判断表丧失了自身的有效性根基，并逐渐被视作范畴表的牵强的附属物。本书主要通过发掘康德沉默时期手稿（尤其是1775年《杜伊斯堡遗稿》的散页）中的内容，尝试还原出康德基于“a-b-x”这种新判断结构而对判断表的构建过程，并基于此，对判断表构成要素的合理性、完备性证明等争议问题行再思考。 康德对判断表的构思与设立，实际上正反映了他通过对传统逻辑的改造，以重建形而上学的潜在思路。重新理清判断表的逻辑根基，不仅能恢复该表格在先验哲学中的有效性，揭示先验哲学体系的真正逻辑基础，还可以延伸出对逻辑与形而上学的关系问题的思考。

Among the notable books of later times-we may say, without exaggeration, of all time--must be reckoned The Confessions of Jean Jacques Rousseau. It deals with leading personages and transactions of a momentous epoch, when absolutism and feudalism were rallying for their last struggle against the modern spirit, chiefly represented by Voltaire, the Encyclopedists, and Rousseau himself--a struggle to which, after many fierce intestine quarrels and sanguinary wars throughout Europe and America, has succeeded the prevalence of those more tolerant and rational principles by which the statesmen of our own day are actuated. On these matters, however, it is not our province to enlarge; nor is it necessary to furnish any detailed account of our author's political, religious, and philosophic axioms and systems, his paradoxes and his errors in logic: these have been so long and so exhaustively disputed over by contending factions that little is left for even the most assiduous gleaner in the field. The inquirer will find, in Mr. John Money's excellent work, the opinions of Rousseau reviewed succinctly and impartially. The 'Contrat Social', the 'Lattres Ecrites de la Montagne', and other treatises that once aroused fierce controversy, may therefore be left in the repose to which they have long been consigned, so far as the mass of mankind is concerned, though they must always form part of the library of the politician and the historian. One prefers to turn to the man Rousseau as he paints himself in the remarkable work before us. That the task which he undertook in offering to show himself--as Persius puts it--'Intus et in cute', to posterity, exceeded his powers, is a trite criticism; like all human enterprises, his purpose was only imperfectly fulfilled; but this circumstance in no way lessens the attractive qualities of his book, not only for the student of history or psychology, but for the intelligent man of the world. Its startling frankness gives it a peculiar interest wanting in most other autobiographies. Many censors have elected to sit in judgment on the failings of this strangely constituted being, and some have pronounced upon him very severe sentences. Let it be said once for all that his faults and mistakes were generally due to causes over which he had but little control, such as a defective education, a too acute sensitiveness, which engendered suspicion of his fellows, irresolution, an overstrained sense of honour and independence, and an obstinate refusal to take advice from those who really wished to befriend him; nor should it be forgotten that he was afflicted during the greater part of his life with an incurable disease. Lord Byron had a soul near akin to Rousseau's, whose writings naturally made a deep impression on the poet's mind, and probably had an influence on his conduct and modes of thought: In some stanzas of 'Childe Harold' this sympathy is expressed with truth and power; especially is the weakness of the Swiss philosopher's character summed up in the following admirable lines: "Here the self-torturing sophist, wild Rousseau, The apostle of affliction, he who threw Enchantment over passion, and from woe Wrung overwhelming eloquence, first drew The breath which made him wretched; yet he knew How to make madness beautiful, and cast O'er erring deeds and thoughts a heavenly hue Of words, like sunbeams, dazzling as they passed The eyes, which o'er them shed tears feelingly and fast. "His life was one long war with self-sought foes, Or friends by him self-banished; for his mind Had grown Suspicion's sanctuary, and chose, For its own cruel sacrifice, the kind, 'Gainst whom he raged with fury strange and blind. But he was frenzied,-wherefore, who may know? Since cause might be which skill could never find; But he was frenzied by disease or woe To that worst pitch of all, which wears a reasoning show."

Mülkiyet kar??t? ya?l? anar?ist, hayat?n?n son y?llar?nda ironik bir durumda kald?. ?svi?re vatanda?l???na girmenin yollar?n? arayan Bakunin'e sunulan se?enek, orada bir ev sahibi olmas?yd? ve belki de en hazini, sahip olaca?? bu ev nedeniyle, polisin, resm? tutanaklara “Michael Bakunin, rantiye” notunu dü?mesiydi. 18 May?s 1814'te Rusya'da do?an Michael Aleksandrovich Bakunin, 1 Temmuz 1876'da ?ldü?ünde ülkesinden ?ok uzaklardayd? ve cenazesinde yaln?zca 30–40 ki?i vard?. Gen? Bakunin i?in, “A?k, insan?n yeryüzündeki en üst misyonuydu. Bir insan?n kendini a?ks?z vermesi, Kutsal Ruh’a kar?? i?lenmi? bir günaht?”.. ?Kad?nlar taraf?ndan olduk?a ?ekici bulunan Mihail'in ise kad?nlarla ili?kisi hep ruhsal bir a?k olarak kald?.??svi?re'nin muhte?em manzaras? e?li?inde George Sand romanlar? okuyan Bakunin, Frans?z dü?üncesinin Alman dü?üncesinden üstün oldu?u inanc?n? sa?lamla?t?r?yordu. ? Bakunin, Marx i?in, “O, beni duygusal idealist olarak adland?r?yordu; hakl?yd?. Ben de onu, hoyrat, kendini be?enmi? ve ac?mas?z olarak de?erlendiriyordum; ben de hakl?yd?m” diyordu.. ? Kendisine ili?kin konularda kindar olmayan Bakunin, Herzen'in kar?s?na g?sterdi?i so?uklu?u hayat?n?n sonuna kadar unutamad?.?“Art?k reaksiyonun muzaffer gü?lerine kar?? Sisifos'un ta??n? yuvarlamak i?in ne gerekli güce ne de güvene sahibim. Bu yüzden, mücadeleden ?ekiliyor ve arkada?lar?mdan tek bir iyilik bekliyorum: "Unutulmak”,?Orta ve ge? on dokuzuncu yüzy?lda, radikal sol –yani, a?g?zlü kapitalizm ele?tirmenleri ve sanayi i??ilerinin ?zgürlü?ünün savunucular?– iki temel franksiyona ayr?l?yordu: Marksistler ve anar?istler. Kabaca s?ylemek gerekirse (ki bu son derece kar???k bir hik?yedir), kazanan Marksistler oldu ve yirminci yüzy?l?n tüm ba?ar?l? sol devrimleri –Rus, ?in ve Küba, ?rne?in– Marksist ilkelere ba?l?l?klar?n? ilan ettiler. ? Marksistler ile anar?istler aras?ndaki sava? bu noktada tarihsel bir meraktan ?te devam eden bir meseledir. Pi?man olmayan ya da ele?tirilmeyen tek ger?ek Marksist sol Kim Jong Il ve taraf etraftaki birka? entelektüel ve profes?rdür. Anar?izm ise uygulanabilir bir toplumsal hareket olarak ?kinci Dünya Sava??yla yava? yava? tükenmeye yüz tutmu?ken küreselle?me kar??t? hareket ve d?nemimizin di?er radikalizmleri i?inde yeniden dirilmeye ba?lam??t?r. ? Ne var ki, d?neminde –Marx’?n di?erleriyle aras?ndaki– bu sava? bir ?lüm kal?m meselesiydi ve Marksizm muhtemel kapitalizm kar??t? olarak ve yan? s?ra anar?izm kar??t? olarak tan?mlan?yordu. Asl?nda, Marx’?n yazarl??? anar?izme y?nelik sald?r?lar? a??s?ndan handiyse gülün? bir geni?li?e ula?m??t?r. Marx’?n Alman ?deolojisi kitab?n?n büyük b?lümü –yüzlerce sayfas?– bireyci/anar?ist Max Stirner’e y?nelik bir sald?r?dan ibarettir. Felsefenin Sefaleti Proudhon’a kar?? büyük?e bir fikir sava??d?r. Marx onca zaman ve enerjisini Bakunin’e sald?rmaya harcam??t?r: ?“dangalak!”?“canavar, et ve ya? y???n?,” “sap?k” vesaire: ?bu tabirler, has?mlar? s?z konusu oldu?unda Marx’?n bildik üslubudur: yazarl??? yar? bilimsel inceleme, yar? s?zlü tacizdir. Marx’?n, gerek kendi a?z?ndan gerekse de kimi s?zcülerini kullanarak ony?llar boyunca y?neltti?i ve muhtemelen di?erleri denli e?lenceli olmayan var olan su?lamas?, Bakunin’in bir muhbir oldu?u y?nündeydi ve Marx’?n bu ba?ar?l? sald?r?lar? nihayetinde Bakunin’in Enternasyonal ???i Z?mb?rt?s?ndan tasfiyesine yol a?t?.. ?

Kitab?n ba?l?ca vasf? olarak, Antik Yunan polisinden günümüze uzanan yolda, ?ocuk ve gen? yeti?tirmenin kamusal ve insan? ?nemini ortaya koyarken, fizik?, ahl?k? ve kültürel y?nleriyle bir bütün olarak e?itim felsefesi üzerine kaleme al?nm?? en temel eserlerden biri olmas? g?sterilebilir… ?Bu noktada, Rousseau’nun, “Tüm yazd?klar?m i?inde en iyi eserim” diye takdim etti?i?Emile’in 1762’de yay?nland???nda lanetlenip, 30 y?l sonra, Frans?z Devrimi’nin ?ncüleri i?in Frans?z milli e?itiminin ilham kayna?? addedildi?i dikkate al?nd???nda, Kant’?n e?itim üzerine sarf etti?i s?zlerin tarihsel ve toplumsal ba?lam? da ortaya ??kar. 18.yüzy?l?n ortalar?ndan 19.yüzy?l?n ba?lar?na dek ge?en bir ?mürlük sürede k?ta Avrupas? büyük bir do?umun sanc?lar?yla sars?lmaktad?r. ?ncesi ve sonras? diye tarihi ikiye ay?ran ?ifte Devrim (Sanayi ve Frans?z Devrimi) büyük bir zihinsel d?nü?üme yol a?mak üzeredir. Kant’? büyüten, ya da büyüklü?üne ayr?ca de?er katan bir unsur da, onun i?te bu ?a??n insan? olmas?d?r. ?Kant, 1806’daki Jena Sava??n? ve Napoleon i?galinin Alman milleti üzerinde yaratt??? ?ok ve deh?eti g?remeden vefat etse de, Wilhelm von Humboldt gibi e?itim reformcular? arac?l???yla Prusya (genel itibar?yla da Alman) e?itim sistemi i?in ne denli ?nemli bir yol a?t???n? tüm kitap boyunca seziyor gibidir. Bununla birlikte Kant’?nE?itim ?zerine’si, milli dilde ibadet edip, okumay? yazmay? te?vik eden Luhterci gelene?in Pietizmle kendini yenilemi? ve Büyük Frederich taraf?ndan te?vik edilmi? olan e?itim anlay???n?n olgunla?ma ?a??n?n da bir ürünüdür. Bu sebeple, kitab?n tamam?na h?kim olan motif, Ayd?nlanmac? bir “i?sel ?zgürle?im” ve “ruhan? terbiye” aras?nda kurulmas? gereken büyük dengedir. ? ? ?Bu arka plan? dikkate alarak, ?imdi kitaba biraz daha yak?ndan bakabiliriz… E?itim ?zerine, memleketin sayg?n ?evirmenlerinden biri olan Ahmet Aydo?an’?n sunu? ve ?ns?züyle ba?l?yor. ?stü kapal? fakat sitem dolu bir de?erlendirme yaz?s? olan “’Sapere Aude!’ Diye ??kt?k Yola”, Kant’a s?zü teslim etmeden evvel, 30 sayfada, Kant’?n dü?ünce dünyas?ndan ne denli uzakta kald???m?z?n ele?tirisini yap?yor. Bu arada, kitab?n ortaya ??k?? ?yküsüne de 22.sayfada a??klay?c? bir notla yer veriliyor. K?ningsberg ?niversitesi’nde muhtelif zamanlarda verilen dersler i?in haz?rlanan notlardan derlendi?i anla??lan?E?itim ?zerine, modern Türk?e’nin bir felsefe dili olamamas?n?n da etkisiyle, ?e?itli dipnotlar arac?l???yla kavramlar?n ve kelimelerin daha anla??l?r k?l?nd??? bir h?lde okura sunuluyor. ? “?nsan E?itilmesi Gereken Bir Varl?kt?r”: ? ?Kant, dü?üncelerini temellendirdi?i giri? sayfalar?nda insan?n e?itime muhta? ten varl?k oldu?u ger?e?inden hareket ediyor ve insan?n ancak e?itimle insan olabilece?ini dile getiriyor. (s.35) E?itime y?nelik bu yakla??m, Kant’?n idealizm felsefesinin ger?ekle?mesine giden yolu a?an anahtarlardan biri say?labilir.? ? ???NDEK?LER: ? KANT'IN YA?AMI…KANT'A G?RE AYDINLANMA NED?R?AHLAKIN METAF?Z???…KANT VE E??T?M ?ZER?NE….KANT VE TANRIKANT IN ELE?T?REL FELSEFES?KANT’IN ELE?T?REL FELSEFES?NE PLATON VE PARMEN?DES?N KATKILARI Kritisizm Nedir? KANT FELSEFES?N?N TEMEL KAVRAMLARIKANT’IN KURAMSAL METAF?Z?K ELE?T?R?S? HAKKINDAK? D???NCELER?..I. KANT'IN LE?BN?Z- WOLFF VE HUME'UN FELSEFELER?NE Y?NEL?K ELE?T?R?S?II. KANT'TA METAF?Z?K B?LG?N?N OLANA?I: METAF?Z?K OLANAKLI MIDIR?SONU?LARKANT’IN D?NYA YURTTA?LI?I AMACINA Y?NEL?K GENEL B?R TAR?H D???NCES?KANT’?I EBED? BARI?” D???NCES?S?YAS? HAKLARDA TEOR? VE PRAT?K ?L??K?S? ?ZER?NEK?RESELLE?EN SORUNLAR KAR?ISINDA KANT ET???UNUTULMAZ KANT S?ZLER?…..