Ce este dragostea? Cum poate fi explicat ceva at?t de intim, de misterios, de minunat? Autorul nu ??i propune s? ne dezv?luie vreun mare adev?r filosofic, nici s? ne ofere sfaturi practice. Nu ne ?nva?? cum s? avem orgasm sau cum s? sc?p?m de gelozie. Nu ne spune c? femeile g?ndesc cu o alt? parte a creierului dec?t b?rba?ii, nici nu ne arat? cum s? ne salv?m rela?ia. ?n schimb, ne ajut? s? ?n?elegem comportamentul sexual ?i social, dar ?i mecanismele din spatele unor reac?ii pe care le consider?m normale ?i fire?ti.?n c?utarea r?spunsului la ?ntrebarea Ce este dragostea?, Richard David Precht exploreaz? discipline dintre cele mai diverse: biologia, psihologia, sociologia, filosofia, chiar ?i chimia. De la fiecare vom afla c?te ceva despre dragoste: c?t de egoiste sunt genele noastre ?i c?t de mult ne influen?eaz?; ce este tipic comportamentului sexual feminin ?i celui masculin; c?t de mare este aportul culturii la capacitatea noastr? de a ne ?n?elege pe noi ?n?ine ?i de a ?n?elege lumea, ca femeie sau ca b?rbat; ce se ?nt?mpl?, de fapt, ?n creierul nostru c?nd iubim; care este diferen?a dintre dragoste ?i sex; de ce a devenit at?t de important? pentru noi dragostea romantic?.?n final, afl?m c? dragostea nu are explica?ie. Ea nu poate fi dec?t tr?it?!

Critic erudit ?i pamfletar de for??, Paul Zarifopol (1874-1934) a fost un fin observator al omului ?i al fibrei care alc?tuie?te ?es?turile sociale profunde. Volumul de fa?? cuprinde eseuri care au r?mas de o actualitate acut?, chiar ?i la aproape un secol dup? ce au fost scrise.Coroziv ?i doct, discursul aduce ?n fa?a cititorului concepte esen?iale pentru morala ?i politica mai mult sau mai pu?in balcanice ale Rom?niei interbelice. Lumina ?n care ne sunt prezentate tipul politic ?i geniul organizator, de pild?, ne ofer? at?t senza?ia unei glacia?iuni temporale, c?t ?i pe aceea a unei familiarit??i inefabile.

Pornind de la leg?tura natural? care se creeaz? ?ntre mam? ?i copil, D.W. Winnicott exploreaz? o serie de probleme cotidiene din via?a unui bebelu? ?i a mamei lui, cum ar fi hr?nirea, pl?nsul ?i joaca, grijile, primele mi?c?ri spre independen??, precum ?i, mai t?rziu, probleme serioase, cum sunt furtul ?i minciuna. Importan?a mamei la ?nceputul vie?ii, timiditatea, educa?ia sexual? ?n ?coal? ?i r?d?cinile agresivit??ii sunt expuse ?ntr-o manier? direct?, accesibil? ?i prietenoas?. Pe parcursul fiec?rui capitol, Winnicott scoate ?n eviden?? abilit??ile ?nn?scute ale mamei ?i ale p?rin?ilor ?n general ?i face diferen?a ?ntre acestea ?i deprinderile care trebuie achizi?ionate de-a lungul timpului de c?tre cei care cresc ?i educ? un copil. Capacitatea voastr? de a ?ti ceea ce este real ?i ceea ce nu este real ?i este de mare ajutor copilului din toate punctele de vedere, pentru c? el nu reu?e?te s? ?n?eleag? dec?t treptat c? lumea nu este a?a cum ne o imagin?m ?i c? imagina?ia nu este chiar ca lumea real?. Dar fiecare are nevoie de cealalt?. ?ti?i prea bine c? primul obiect pe care ?l iube?te bebelu?ul – o buc??ic? de p?tur? sau o juc?rie moale –?nseamn? pentru el o parte din propria persoan? ?i, dac? i o lua?i sau o da?i la sp?lat, este o tragedie. C?nd bebelu?ul ?ncepe s? arunce obiectul iubit ?i alte obiecte (a?tept?ndu-se, desigur, s? le ridice cineva ?i s? i le dea ?napoi), atunci ?ti?i c? a venit momentul ?n care ave?i ?i voi permisiunea de a pleca ?i a v? ?ntoarce. Unele persoane cred c? un copil este ca lutul ?n m?inile unui olar. Ele ?ncep s? ?l modeleze ?i se simt responsabile de ceea ce vor ob?ine. Total gre?it. Dac? asta este ceea ce sim?i?i, ve?i fi cople?i?i de o responsabilitate pe care nu trebuie s? v-o asuma?i. Dac? accepta?i ideea c? bebelu?ul con?ine ?n el tot ce ?i trebuie pentru a tr?i, atunci ve?i putea acorda mai mult? aten?ie procesului de dezvoltare ?i ve?i fi ferici?i s? r?spunde?i nevoilor lui.

Are femeia vreun rol ?n evolu?ia spiritual? a b?rbatului? Ce anume, ?n iubire ?i ?n erotism, declan?eaz? intui?ii ?i tr?iri care dep??esc datul, ordinarul, norma? Otto Weininger, un g?nditor catalogat drept misogin ?i antisemit, repune ?n discu?ie opera Peer Gynt al lui Ibsen, st?ruind asupra temelor sale favorite: superioritatea masculinului, asociat spiritului, fa?? cu femininul, asociat instinctualit??ii oarbe, lipsite de spirit, de perspectiv?, deci ?i de valoare. Aforistica acestui autor, deopotriv? prezent? ?n volumul de fa??, abordeaz? problematica sadismului ?i a masochismului, imoralitatea dus? p?n? la ilegalitate ?i crim?, culmin?nd cu – sau decurg?nd din – p?catul originar.

Volumul cuprinde o culegere de eseuri scrise de un filosof despre c?teva teme fierbin?i ale actualit??ii. Este un exerci?iu de ?angajare“ ?n cotidian, explor?nd statutul ?i ?utilitatea“ abord?rii filosofice ?ntr-o lume care pare s? -?i fi pierdut direc?ia. Valentin Mure?an scrie despre criza filosofiei, despre felul ?n care ar trebui reformat sistemul de ?nv???m?nt, despre anomaliile culturale ale dragostei ori despre secretul construirii unor institu?ii morale. Reflec?iile, amare ?n constat?ri, dar entuziaste ?n construirea solu?iilor, sunt completate de c?teva portrete sentimentale ale unor colegi.

Via?a marelui g?nditor german, supranumit sihastrul de la Sils Maria a fost plin? de str?lucire dar ?i de aspecte mai pu?in cunoscute publicului larg. ?ntre ace?tia se num?r? patima fa?? de muzic? a autorului ?tiin?ei vesele ?i A?a gr?ita Zarathustra dar ?i rela?ia de formare ?i de profund? iubire avut? cu Richard Wagner ?i so?ia sa, minunata Cosima – prezen?e vii ?n aceast? monografie eseistic?, ce con?ine fragmente din coresponden?a acestor mon?tri sacri ai culturii universale, coresponden?? ?n urma lecturii c?reia te alegi cu o imagine calda, expresiv?.

More’s “Utopia” was written in Latin, and is in two parts, of which the second, describing the place ([Greek text]—or Nusquama, as he called it sometimes in his letters—“Nowhere”), was probably written towards the close of 1515; the first part, introductory, early in 1516. The book was first printed at Louvain, late in 1516, under the editorship of Erasmus, Peter Giles, and other of More’s friends in Flanders. It was then revised by More, and printed by Frobenius at Basle in November, 1518. It was reprinted at Paris and Vienna, but was not printed in England during More’s lifetime. Its first publication in this country was in the English translation, made in Edward’s VI.’s reign (1551) by Ralph Robinson. It was translated with more literary skill by Gilbert Burnet, in 1684, soon after he had conducted the defence of his friend Lord William Russell, attended his execution, vindicated his memory, and been spitefully deprived by James II. of his lectureship at St. Clement’s. Burnet was drawn to the translation of “Utopia” by the same sense of unreason in high places that caused More to write the book. Burnet’s is the translation given in this volume. The name of the book has given an adjective to our language—we call an impracticable scheme Utopian. Yet, under the veil of a playful fiction, the talk is intensely earnest, and abounds in practical suggestion. It is the work of a scholarly and witty Englishman, who attacks in his own way the chief political and social evils of his time. Beginning with fact, More tells how he was sent into Flanders with Cuthbert Tunstal, “whom the king’s majesty of late, to the great rejoicing of all men, did prefer to the office of Master of the Rolls;” how the commissioners of Charles met them at Bruges, and presently returned to Brussels for instructions; and how More then went to Antwerp, where he found a pleasure in the society of Peter Giles which soothed his desire to see again his wife and children, from whom he had been four months away. Then fact slides into fiction with the finding of Raphael Hythloday (whose name, made of two Greek words [Greek text] and [Greek text], means “knowing in trifles”), a man who had been with Amerigo Vespucci in the three last of the voyages to the new world lately discovered, of which the account had been first printed in 1507, only nine years before Utopia was written. Designedly fantastic in suggestion of details, “Utopia” is the work of a scholar who had read Plato’s “Republic,” and had his fancy quickened after reading Plutarch’s account of Spartan life under Lycurgus. Beneath the veil of an ideal communism, into which there has been worked some witty extravagance, there lies a noble English argument. Sometimes More puts the case as of France when he means England. Sometimes there is ironical praise of the good faith of Christian kings, saving the book from censure as a political attack on the policy of Henry VIII. Erasmus wrote to a friend in 1517 that he should send for More’s “Utopia,” if he had not read it, and “wished to see the true source of all political evils.” And to More Erasmus wrote of his book, “A burgomaster of Antwerp is so pleased with it that he knows it all by heart.” Sir Thomas More, son of Sir John More, a justice of the King’s Bench, was born in 1478, in Milk Street, in the city of London. After his earlier education at St. Anthony’s School, in Threadneedle Street, he was placed, as a boy, in the household of Cardinal John Morton, Archbishop of Canterbury and Lord Chancellor. It was not unusual for persons of wealth or influence and sons of good families to be so established together in a relation of patron and client. The youth wore his patron’s livery, and added to his state. The patron used, afterwards, his wealth or influence in helping his young client forward in the world.

Among the notable books of later times-we may say, without exaggeration, of all time--must be reckoned The Confessions of Jean Jacques Rousseau. It deals with leading personages and transactions of a momentous epoch, when absolutism and feudalism were rallying for their last struggle against the modern spirit, chiefly represented by Voltaire, the Encyclopedists, and Rousseau himself--a struggle to which, after many fierce intestine quarrels and sanguinary wars throughout Europe and America, has succeeded the prevalence of those more tolerant and rational principles by which the statesmen of our own day are actuated. On these matters, however, it is not our province to enlarge; nor is it necessary to furnish any detailed account of our author's political, religious, and philosophic axioms and systems, his paradoxes and his errors in logic: these have been so long and so exhaustively disputed over by contending factions that little is left for even the most assiduous gleaner in the field. The inquirer will find, in Mr. John Money's excellent work, the opinions of Rousseau reviewed succinctly and impartially. The 'Contrat Social', the 'Lattres Ecrites de la Montagne', and other treatises that once aroused fierce controversy, may therefore be left in the repose to which they have long been consigned, so far as the mass of mankind is concerned, though they must always form part of the library of the politician and the historian. One prefers to turn to the man Rousseau as he paints himself in the remarkable work before us. That the task which he undertook in offering to show himself--as Persius puts it--'Intus et in cute', to posterity, exceeded his powers, is a trite criticism; like all human enterprises, his purpose was only imperfectly fulfilled; but this circumstance in no way lessens the attractive qualities of his book, not only for the student of history or psychology, but for the intelligent man of the world. Its startling frankness gives it a peculiar interest wanting in most other autobiographies. Many censors have elected to sit in judgment on the failings of this strangely constituted being, and some have pronounced upon him very severe sentences. Let it be said once for all that his faults and mistakes were generally due to causes over which he had but little control, such as a defective education, a too acute sensitiveness, which engendered suspicion of his fellows, irresolution, an overstrained sense of honour and independence, and an obstinate refusal to take advice from those who really wished to befriend him; nor should it be forgotten that he was afflicted during the greater part of his life with an incurable disease. Lord Byron had a soul near akin to Rousseau's, whose writings naturally made a deep impression on the poet's mind, and probably had an influence on his conduct and modes of thought: In some stanzas of 'Childe Harold' this sympathy is expressed with truth and power; especially is the weakness of the Swiss philosopher's character summed up in the following admirable lines: "Here the self-torturing sophist, wild Rousseau, The apostle of affliction, he who threw Enchantment over passion, and from woe Wrung overwhelming eloquence, first drew The breath which made him wretched; yet he knew How to make madness beautiful, and cast O'er erring deeds and thoughts a heavenly hue Of words, like sunbeams, dazzling as they passed The eyes, which o'er them shed tears feelingly and fast. "His life was one long war with self-sought foes, Or friends by him self-banished; for his mind Had grown Suspicion's sanctuary, and chose, For its own cruel sacrifice, the kind, 'Gainst whom he raged with fury strange and blind. But he was frenzied,-wherefore, who may know? Since cause might be which skill could never find; But he was frenzied by disease or woe To that worst pitch of all, which wears a reasoning show."

Mülkiyet kar??t? ya?l? anar?ist, hayat?n?n son y?llar?nda ironik bir durumda kald?. ?svi?re vatanda?l???na girmenin yollar?n? arayan Bakunin'e sunulan se?enek, orada bir ev sahibi olmas?yd? ve belki de en hazini, sahip olaca?? bu ev nedeniyle, polisin, resm? tutanaklara “Michael Bakunin, rantiye” notunu dü?mesiydi. 18 May?s 1814'te Rusya'da do?an Michael Aleksandrovich Bakunin, 1 Temmuz 1876'da ?ldü?ünde ülkesinden ?ok uzaklardayd? ve cenazesinde yaln?zca 30–40 ki?i vard?. Gen? Bakunin i?in, “A?k, insan?n yeryüzündeki en üst misyonuydu. Bir insan?n kendini a?ks?z vermesi, Kutsal Ruh’a kar?? i?lenmi? bir günaht?”.. ?Kad?nlar taraf?ndan olduk?a ?ekici bulunan Mihail'in ise kad?nlarla ili?kisi hep ruhsal bir a?k olarak kald?.??svi?re'nin muhte?em manzaras? e?li?inde George Sand romanlar? okuyan Bakunin, Frans?z dü?üncesinin Alman dü?üncesinden üstün oldu?u inanc?n? sa?lamla?t?r?yordu. ? Bakunin, Marx i?in, “O, beni duygusal idealist olarak adland?r?yordu; hakl?yd?. Ben de onu, hoyrat, kendini be?enmi? ve ac?mas?z olarak de?erlendiriyordum; ben de hakl?yd?m” diyordu.. ? Kendisine ili?kin konularda kindar olmayan Bakunin, Herzen'in kar?s?na g?sterdi?i so?uklu?u hayat?n?n sonuna kadar unutamad?.?“Art?k reaksiyonun muzaffer gü?lerine kar?? Sisifos'un ta??n? yuvarlamak i?in ne gerekli güce ne de güvene sahibim. Bu yüzden, mücadeleden ?ekiliyor ve arkada?lar?mdan tek bir iyilik bekliyorum: "Unutulmak”,?Orta ve ge? on dokuzuncu yüzy?lda, radikal sol –yani, a?g?zlü kapitalizm ele?tirmenleri ve sanayi i??ilerinin ?zgürlü?ünün savunucular?– iki temel franksiyona ayr?l?yordu: Marksistler ve anar?istler. Kabaca s?ylemek gerekirse (ki bu son derece kar???k bir hik?yedir), kazanan Marksistler oldu ve yirminci yüzy?l?n tüm ba?ar?l? sol devrimleri –Rus, ?in ve Küba, ?rne?in– Marksist ilkelere ba?l?l?klar?n? ilan ettiler. ? Marksistler ile anar?istler aras?ndaki sava? bu noktada tarihsel bir meraktan ?te devam eden bir meseledir. Pi?man olmayan ya da ele?tirilmeyen tek ger?ek Marksist sol Kim Jong Il ve taraf etraftaki birka? entelektüel ve profes?rdür. Anar?izm ise uygulanabilir bir toplumsal hareket olarak ?kinci Dünya Sava??yla yava? yava? tükenmeye yüz tutmu?ken küreselle?me kar??t? hareket ve d?nemimizin di?er radikalizmleri i?inde yeniden dirilmeye ba?lam??t?r. ? Ne var ki, d?neminde –Marx’?n di?erleriyle aras?ndaki– bu sava? bir ?lüm kal?m meselesiydi ve Marksizm muhtemel kapitalizm kar??t? olarak ve yan? s?ra anar?izm kar??t? olarak tan?mlan?yordu. Asl?nda, Marx’?n yazarl??? anar?izme y?nelik sald?r?lar? a??s?ndan handiyse gülün? bir geni?li?e ula?m??t?r. Marx’?n Alman ?deolojisi kitab?n?n büyük b?lümü –yüzlerce sayfas?– bireyci/anar?ist Max Stirner’e y?nelik bir sald?r?dan ibarettir. Felsefenin Sefaleti Proudhon’a kar?? büyük?e bir fikir sava??d?r. Marx onca zaman ve enerjisini Bakunin’e sald?rmaya harcam??t?r: ?“dangalak!”?“canavar, et ve ya? y???n?,” “sap?k” vesaire: ?bu tabirler, has?mlar? s?z konusu oldu?unda Marx’?n bildik üslubudur: yazarl??? yar? bilimsel inceleme, yar? s?zlü tacizdir. Marx’?n, gerek kendi a?z?ndan gerekse de kimi s?zcülerini kullanarak ony?llar boyunca y?neltti?i ve muhtemelen di?erleri denli e?lenceli olmayan var olan su?lamas?, Bakunin’in bir muhbir oldu?u y?nündeydi ve Marx’?n bu ba?ar?l? sald?r?lar? nihayetinde Bakunin’in Enternasyonal ???i Z?mb?rt?s?ndan tasfiyesine yol a?t?.. ?

Within our Society (the International Society for Krishna Consciousness), guru has been taken to be synonymous with diksa-guru, but what about those great souls who have introduced us to Krsna consciousness? What relationship do we have with these Vaisnavas, and what are our obligations toward them, as well as toward parents, teachers, sannyasis, and other superiors who help guide us back to Godhead? Not much has been said by the Society on these topics, and hardly any appreciation is shown for those souls who labor to elevate us day by day.The scriptures, however, glorify as guru all Vaisnavas who guide a conditioned soul back to Godhead — be they instructors or initiators — advocating a culture of honor and respect. ISKCON needs to reflect upon these principles further, and the purpose of this book is to act as a catalyst toward such an end.

本书是笛卡尔重要的哲学著作，在这部著作中，笛卡尔通过普遍怀疑的方法，力图使心灵摆脱感官的桎梏，通过纯粹理智来获得正确的知识。他探讨了上帝是否存在、感官是否可靠、怎样寻求真理避免错误等问题。他从“我思故我在”的命题出发，推出上帝的存在和外界物体的存在，重新确立心灵、上帝和物体的观念的可靠性。本书被看作近代西方哲学的奠基之作，直引发了欧洲大陆的理性主义风潮，对后世影响深远。

中西哲学的比较研究自清末开始，至今已延续了百余年。本书从源头和基本理念入手，以代表人物老子和亚里士多德为主要对象，剖析中西哲学的异同，目的是发扬中国哲学的优良传统，吸取西方哲学的长处，探讨、总结人类理论思维发展的共同规律，推动哲学研究向前发展，促进社会主义精神文明建设。

汤一介先生是当代著名哲学家、哲学史家、哲学教育家。他在儒学、早期道教、魏晋玄学、佛教、中国文化与哲学、中西文化比较等领域都做出了深、精专的研究。尤其是对中国传统哲学的现代诠释颇具慧心，他提出中国哲学以三个基本命题来表达真、善、美的观，这就是天人合一、知行合一、情景合一。 汤先生著述宏丰，主编《20世纪西方哲学东渐史》，次系统、完整地展示了20世纪西方哲学东渐的百年历程，被张岱年先生称为“一项贯通中西哲学视野的难得的学术工程”。而皇皇十卷本《汤一介集》基本囊括了汤先生已发表的论著与访谈，本书的编选材料即从这部文集而来。 汤先生一生致力于儒、释、道三教的研究，后又归宗于儒。他曾讲道：“在儒家的生死观念中，所感到痛苦的是‘苦在德业之未能竟’。”汤先生一生的德业，是无愧于儒家的担当精神与责任意识的。

1929年，美国发生经济大萧条，之后蔓延至全球。当时，股市崩盘、银行倒闭、通胀居高不下、金融市场动荡、人们收下降、几千万人失业…… 大萧条不仅导致美国乃至世界的经济社会大变动，在学术上也使得现代宏观经济学成为一门独立的学科。为这次大萧条寻求一个合理的理论解释，是经济学界一项具有挑战性的任务，也是为之后类似危机寻求可行解决方案的尝试。 学术界确实没有“浪费”大萧条。几十年来，一代又一代的学者在研究大萧条问题；对于大萧条的研究及其结论，影响了后世的货币政策、金融监管等。伯南克是众多研究者中的一位杰出代表。自称“大萧条迷”的伯南克，先后撰写了一系列关于大萧条的研究文章，集结成《伯南克论大萧条》这本书。他在书中用美国及其他多个国家的大量数据、资料，包括经济数据、工资、就业情况等，从总供给、总需求、名义工资等角度，围绕大萧条发生的原因和传导机制行了深分析。他认为，研究大萧条，可以体会到很多经济运作的规律和本质。这些研究的确也帮助他在后来作为美联储主席应对2008年的次贷危机时，得以吸取大萧条时期的政策教训，并且总体上避免了同样的错误，帮助美国渡过了危机。 20世纪30年代的经济大萧条早已成为历史，但看看当前世界的各类经济新闻，大萧条时期的种种教训仍然具有很强的警示意义。

《为什么我们需要公共哲学》集结了桑德尔早年有关“公共哲学”的珍贵论述，主要探讨了政治生活、哲学思潮、共同体、道德等公共哲学的核心问题。全书分三部分，回顾了美国从托马斯·杰斐逊以来的政治传统和争论，论述了自由主义是怎样丧失其道德与公民言论的，探讨了州营彩票、名人隐私、平权行动、辅助自杀、堕胎、干细胞研究、排污权、总统撒谎等时事热的道德与政治问题，评论了哈特曼、杜威、罗尔斯等思想家各种不同的自由主义政治理论。 乔治城大学教授迪欧尼（E.J.Dionee Jr）曾说：“无论你的政治立场是什么，只要你读过迈克尔·桑德尔这本《为什么我们需要公共哲学》，都会认它令人振奋、富有洞见且鼓舞人心。保守主义者会在这本书中发现一种他们从来不知晓的自由主义，它高度关注责任、共同体以及个体德性的重要性。对于自由主义者和民主党人来说，如果他们认识到自己的阵营需要一种参与性的公共哲学，那么会在这本书中找到他们正好需要的骨架、轮廓与基本原则。面对多半令人丧气、内容匮乏的政治辩论，桑德尔的作品无疑了一帖众人亟需且高明的解药。” 桑德尔的这些文章既面向相关领域的学者，也有助于大众读者在美国社会文化发展的脉络中理解正义、平等、自由等政治哲学基本概念，认识到个体本位的自由主义的局限性。在获取政治哲学的主要议题和论证这些知识的同时，这本书展现了哲学理论在公共生活中的应用，也一定有助于读者重新认识和思考我们当代的公共生活。

郭象《庄子注》作为玄学理论的集大成者，在魏晋时代具有"思想熔炉""课题聚焦""思维经纬"的理论地位。郭象《庄子注》把庄子思想现实化、具体化为一种人生实践与处世精神，对中国美学和艺术新变影响深刻。《庄子注》一书，堪称魏晋诸多美学形貌的理论写照、哲学根据。本书以郭象《庄子注》为核心文本，在具体阐释郭象哲学思想的基础上，提炼了其内在的美学意蕴。在一种前后美学语境的转换历程中，本书细致而具体地架构了郭象哲学与魏晋美学思潮之间的深度关联，以确立郭象及《庄子注》在中国美学史上的历史地位。

本书是部基于《周易·蒙卦》文本而阐发古代中国儿童哲学的专著，立足儒家经学话语系统，从象、数、义、理、占、气、史多重维度分卷诠释《蒙》卦之卦象、卦辞、爻象、爻辞、《彖传》、《象传》的深刻内涵与哲学义理，通过对卦爻辞中“蒙”“匪我求童蒙，童蒙求我”“初筮告，再三渎，渎则不告”“发蒙”“包蒙”“勿用取女”“困蒙”“童蒙”“蒙”等观念的解读，揭示“蒙”之本义与儿童哲学蕴意，结合当今的教育实践，探讨儒家童蒙教育的理念与方法。由《蒙》卦而演绎至《颜氏家训》《三字经》《弟子规》，在亲亲伦理、智慧启蒙、待人物处事维度上挖掘传统蒙学经典中的优秀教育内容，以启发读者重新认识中国的儿童教育问题，助推儿童哲学的本土化建构。

你是什么样子，世界就是什么样子。你的问题就是世界的问题。世界是个人内心的显现，假如你的心不清净，外面的世界就会是颠倒的。 在本书中，克里希那穆提告诉我们，只有摆脱内心束缚，破心智障碍，才能修得平和淡定。当内心安静时，你才能获得心灵的平和之美。

《中华圣贤讲什么》为概述古代圣贤思想或学说的普及读物，采取总-分-总的叙述方式，由“儒道为中国文化的主体”（赵吉惠）、“孔子及两千五百年儒学变迁”（梁启超）、老子（梁启超）、“中国先贤学说”（胡怀琛）四部分组成，供传统文化爱好者阅读，初步了解中国传统文化的主要内容。

《李叔同说佛》是弘一大师晚年将其学佛的心得整理、修订，以大才子、大学者、大艺术家的俗家修为向常人揭示出佛门的真谛。他的演讲稿与辑录的处世格言被梁实秋、林玉堂等作家誉为“一字千金，值得所有人慢慢阅读、慢慢体味、用一生的时间静静领悟”。

本书是儒家思想文化的重要核心载体，是中华民族为宝贵的精神财富。这些经典中蕴含了华夏先哲的智慧，记述了儒家学说的核心思想。本书内容涉及历史、哲学、文学等诸多方面。四书五经自南宋定名后一直延续至今，影响极为深远。阅读本书，既可修身养性，又可增智广识，还可立德励志。本书在参考多个版本的基础上，对四书五经进行精编精选，通俗易懂的语言为读者扫除了字、词、句等阅读障碍。原汁原味的再现了当时的历史背景和社会生活以及人物的情感、精神风貌。对于文章中难以理解的部分，更做出了详细解释，让人一目了然。阅读本书，通晓古今智慧，塑造完整人格，丰富美好情感，同时改进我们的生活态度、工作态度和思维方式，成就不一样的人生。