纵横家始祖，兵家法宝。 ??? 《鬼谷子》是人类文明 “轴心时代”产生的一部奇书，其思想内容十分丰富，涵盖了哲学、政治学、军事学、心理学、社会学、文学、情报学等多种学科，是一部可以被广泛解读的著作。《鬼谷子》提出了“捭阖”、“反应”、“内揵”、“飞箝”、“忤合”、“揣摩”等游说和谋略的原则和技巧，对纵横家学说的理论构建做出了重要贡献。它提供的智慧与谋略至今仍对现实生活中的方方面面有着指导意义。

 《生命的悲剧意识》是乌纳穆诺*代表性的著作之一。在本书中，作者以充满激情的语言反复呼喊：生命的悲剧意识来自对永恒的渴望。他在书中充满感情地指出，人不是通过幸福来感知自身，因为幸福常常使我们忘了自己。相反，苦难才使得我们回归到自身，获得了属于我们的深刻意识，重新成为自己的中心。这不是一本通常意义上的哲学著作，这里没有艰涩深奥的理论探析，枯燥乏味的概念论证，反而更像是一个哲人充满激情而又克制的内心独白：他不需要依赖理性来探索和追究什么，而是深人本身。在乌纳穆诺笔下，“人”不是一个被用来抽象思考的哲学概念，一个属于共性的词汇，而是具体的存在，是心灵与肉体的结合；是你，是我，是我们的兄弟，是所有人。这是乌纳穆诺哲学中非常动人的闪光，由此出发，他重新肯定了个体生命的价值：对宇宙而言，我是微不足道；对我个人而言，我却是一切。作为一个作家，乌纳穆诺的哲学著作也承袭了他的文学语言，简洁有力，充满诗性。他的语言充满激情，思维却很是缜密。他绝不依靠语词本身的复杂艰深来使读者望之却步。相反，与一般哲学著作相比，本书的行文充满诗意，通俗易懂的语言中蕴含着深刻又直指本心的力量。乌纳穆诺的语言似乎有种魔力：他激情澎湃，却又非常克制，两者的结合使阅读过程极为享受，既震撼于其激烈的情感，又为其深邃的哲理所折服。

《论道德的谱系》是尼采畅论“善”与“恶”两种对立的价值观的力作，它从自然人和社会人的角度人手，揭示道德观产益的自然条件。社会条件甚至病理条件，挖掘了人在不同条件下创造不同的价值观的共同的原始动力，旨在重估一切旧的价值，确立未来道德哲学的标准。《论道德的谱系》的主旨并不在于探问道德的未来，而是探问道德的过去，道德的来源与历史，即那依然笼罩在黑暗之中，或者至少是向黑暗深处延伸的来源与历史。《论道德的谱系》为道德制定了一个家谱，而其副标题“一篇论战檄文”则暗示着，尼采将在这里探讨一些颇具挑衅性的东西，而读者也很快就会知道，被我们今天视作高贵正派的那些价值却有着粗俗鄙陋的起源，而善与恶则有着非常可疑的祖先。这本书深到了人类心灵史的深处，是一部深刻的书。

本书是美国比较文学学会前会长、著名汉学家苏源熙教授关于比较文学的名著。作者通过讨论中国的《诗经》注释史，从而广泛地探讨了存在于其中的比较诗学的课题。本书采用解构主义的修辞阅读方法，重构了中国儒家对于《诗经》诗歌的注释方式，将其视为一种“讽寓性”的古典美学模式；又以同样的修辞阅读法，重新解读了17—18世纪欧洲传教士关于中国哲学问题的争论和黑格尔对中国历史的哲学论述，并将这两者与儒家注经者并置，把他们的工作视为可资比较的、以美学模式建构中国历史的创造。另一方面，此书在《诗经》研究上也颇多新见，具体分析了《诗经》从“诗言志”到“诗以言志”中得到“讽寓性”意义的过程，指出《国风》讽寓意义的获得与汉儒将注释《雅》《颂》的传统施加到《国风》上有关，又分析了《诗大序》及其理论来源《礼记·乐记》两者差异中表现出的意义，而在对《诗经》具体文本的细读中也能发现重大的理论问题。

　　汉译四部《阿含经》——《杂阿含经》、《中阿含经》、《长阿含经》与《增一阿含经》，是由佛陀的圣弟子于佛陀般涅槃的当年夏安居时结集出来的，忠实地汇集了佛陀自成佛以来至般涅槃前所宣讲的教法，由此说明了《阿含经》的原始性、根本性与权威性。在汉传佛教的三藏典籍中，《阿含经》就代表着原始佛教，也是印度部派佛教时期所公认的“根本佛法”。 　　为便于广大信徒与学者更好地了解、学修原始佛教，本书校注者以高丽藏为底本，尽量保持原本整体风貌，将四部阿含经文转为简体字，加上现代标及分段。并在前人研究成果的基础上，参考《南传大藏经》、《碛砂藏》、《大正新修大藏经》、《正仓院圣语藏本》等不同藏经，纠正原经文部分错漏之处，就经中出现的地名、人名、法相名词、艰涩文句及其它译本的不同翻译作出注释，方便读者更为精准地把握根本教义与修行原理。本书有较高的学术、实用、版本和收藏价值，是广大佛教信徒与佛学研究者难得的学习、研究参考书。

宋明理学是对时代所面临的冲突和危机的化解，是价值理想和道德形上学的重建，是儒释道三教融突的结晶，是中国古代哲学发展的“造极”。理学是以道体为核心，以穷理为精髓，以“存天理，去人欲”为存养工夫，以“齐家、治国、平天下”为实质，以成圣为标的。 理学是宋元明清时期哲学概念范畴的发展史，一个民族的理论思维、一个时代的哲学思潮和哲学家哲学体系，都是由诸相互联系、作用的哲学概念范畴之间的逻辑顺序或结合方式构成的。 《宋明理学研究》再现各哲学家哲学的面貌，并阐述了理学的称谓、分系、特色、发展阶段、范畴结构演变、时代精神及其历史作用、影响和评价。对宋明理学重要哲学家的身世、生平、哲学逻辑结构、哲学概念的分析及内涵作了深仔细、全面系统的论述，对解读、体认宋明理学很有帮助。

Among the notable books of later times-we may say, without exaggeration, of all time--must be reckoned The Confessions of Jean Jacques Rousseau. It deals with leading personages and transactions of a momentous epoch, when absolutism and feudalism were rallying for their last struggle against the modern spirit, chiefly represented by Voltaire, the Encyclopedists, and Rousseau himself--a struggle to which, after many fierce intestine quarrels and sanguinary wars throughout Europe and America, has succeeded the prevalence of those more tolerant and rational principles by which the statesmen of our own day are actuated. On these matters, however, it is not our province to enlarge; nor is it necessary to furnish any detailed account of our author's political, religious, and philosophic axioms and systems, his paradoxes and his errors in logic: these have been so long and so exhaustively disputed over by contending factions that little is left for even the most assiduous gleaner in the field. The inquirer will find, in Mr. John Money's excellent work, the opinions of Rousseau reviewed succinctly and impartially. The 'Contrat Social', the 'Lattres Ecrites de la Montagne', and other treatises that once aroused fierce controversy, may therefore be left in the repose to which they have long been consigned, so far as the mass of mankind is concerned, though they must always form part of the library of the politician and the historian. One prefers to turn to the man Rousseau as he paints himself in the remarkable work before us. That the task which he undertook in offering to show himself--as Persius puts it--'Intus et in cute', to posterity, exceeded his powers, is a trite criticism; like all human enterprises, his purpose was only imperfectly fulfilled; but this circumstance in no way lessens the attractive qualities of his book, not only for the student of history or psychology, but for the intelligent man of the world. Its startling frankness gives it a peculiar interest wanting in most other autobiographies. Many censors have elected to sit in judgment on the failings of this strangely constituted being, and some have pronounced upon him very severe sentences. Let it be said once for all that his faults and mistakes were generally due to causes over which he had but little control, such as a defective education, a too acute sensitiveness, which engendered suspicion of his fellows, irresolution, an overstrained sense of honour and independence, and an obstinate refusal to take advice from those who really wished to befriend him; nor should it be forgotten that he was afflicted during the greater part of his life with an incurable disease. Lord Byron had a soul near akin to Rousseau's, whose writings naturally made a deep impression on the poet's mind, and probably had an influence on his conduct and modes of thought: In some stanzas of 'Childe Harold' this sympathy is expressed with truth and power; especially is the weakness of the Swiss philosopher's character summed up in the following admirable lines: "Here the self-torturing sophist, wild Rousseau, The apostle of affliction, he who threw Enchantment over passion, and from woe Wrung overwhelming eloquence, first drew The breath which made him wretched; yet he knew How to make madness beautiful, and cast O'er erring deeds and thoughts a heavenly hue Of words, like sunbeams, dazzling as they passed The eyes, which o'er them shed tears feelingly and fast. "His life was one long war with self-sought foes, Or friends by him self-banished; for his mind Had grown Suspicion's sanctuary, and chose, For its own cruel sacrifice, the kind, 'Gainst whom he raged with fury strange and blind. But he was frenzied,-wherefore, who may know? Since cause might be which skill could never find; But he was frenzied by disease or woe To that worst pitch of all, which wears a reasoning show."

Mülkiyet kar??t? ya?l? anar?ist, hayat?n?n son y?llar?nda ironik bir durumda kald?. ?svi?re vatanda?l???na girmenin yollar?n? arayan Bakunin'e sunulan se?enek, orada bir ev sahibi olmas?yd? ve belki de en hazini, sahip olaca?? bu ev nedeniyle, polisin, resm? tutanaklara “Michael Bakunin, rantiye” notunu dü?mesiydi. 18 May?s 1814'te Rusya'da do?an Michael Aleksandrovich Bakunin, 1 Temmuz 1876'da ?ldü?ünde ülkesinden ?ok uzaklardayd? ve cenazesinde yaln?zca 30–40 ki?i vard?. Gen? Bakunin i?in, “A?k, insan?n yeryüzündeki en üst misyonuydu. Bir insan?n kendini a?ks?z vermesi, Kutsal Ruh’a kar?? i?lenmi? bir günaht?”.. ?Kad?nlar taraf?ndan olduk?a ?ekici bulunan Mihail'in ise kad?nlarla ili?kisi hep ruhsal bir a?k olarak kald?.??svi?re'nin muhte?em manzaras? e?li?inde George Sand romanlar? okuyan Bakunin, Frans?z dü?üncesinin Alman dü?üncesinden üstün oldu?u inanc?n? sa?lamla?t?r?yordu. ? Bakunin, Marx i?in, “O, beni duygusal idealist olarak adland?r?yordu; hakl?yd?. Ben de onu, hoyrat, kendini be?enmi? ve ac?mas?z olarak de?erlendiriyordum; ben de hakl?yd?m” diyordu.. ? Kendisine ili?kin konularda kindar olmayan Bakunin, Herzen'in kar?s?na g?sterdi?i so?uklu?u hayat?n?n sonuna kadar unutamad?.?“Art?k reaksiyonun muzaffer gü?lerine kar?? Sisifos'un ta??n? yuvarlamak i?in ne gerekli güce ne de güvene sahibim. Bu yüzden, mücadeleden ?ekiliyor ve arkada?lar?mdan tek bir iyilik bekliyorum: "Unutulmak”,?Orta ve ge? on dokuzuncu yüzy?lda, radikal sol –yani, a?g?zlü kapitalizm ele?tirmenleri ve sanayi i??ilerinin ?zgürlü?ünün savunucular?– iki temel franksiyona ayr?l?yordu: Marksistler ve anar?istler. Kabaca s?ylemek gerekirse (ki bu son derece kar???k bir hik?yedir), kazanan Marksistler oldu ve yirminci yüzy?l?n tüm ba?ar?l? sol devrimleri –Rus, ?in ve Küba, ?rne?in– Marksist ilkelere ba?l?l?klar?n? ilan ettiler. ? Marksistler ile anar?istler aras?ndaki sava? bu noktada tarihsel bir meraktan ?te devam eden bir meseledir. Pi?man olmayan ya da ele?tirilmeyen tek ger?ek Marksist sol Kim Jong Il ve taraf etraftaki birka? entelektüel ve profes?rdür. Anar?izm ise uygulanabilir bir toplumsal hareket olarak ?kinci Dünya Sava??yla yava? yava? tükenmeye yüz tutmu?ken küreselle?me kar??t? hareket ve d?nemimizin di?er radikalizmleri i?inde yeniden dirilmeye ba?lam??t?r. ? Ne var ki, d?neminde –Marx’?n di?erleriyle aras?ndaki– bu sava? bir ?lüm kal?m meselesiydi ve Marksizm muhtemel kapitalizm kar??t? olarak ve yan? s?ra anar?izm kar??t? olarak tan?mlan?yordu. Asl?nda, Marx’?n yazarl??? anar?izme y?nelik sald?r?lar? a??s?ndan handiyse gülün? bir geni?li?e ula?m??t?r. Marx’?n Alman ?deolojisi kitab?n?n büyük b?lümü –yüzlerce sayfas?– bireyci/anar?ist Max Stirner’e y?nelik bir sald?r?dan ibarettir. Felsefenin Sefaleti Proudhon’a kar?? büyük?e bir fikir sava??d?r. Marx onca zaman ve enerjisini Bakunin’e sald?rmaya harcam??t?r: ?“dangalak!”?“canavar, et ve ya? y???n?,” “sap?k” vesaire: ?bu tabirler, has?mlar? s?z konusu oldu?unda Marx’?n bildik üslubudur: yazarl??? yar? bilimsel inceleme, yar? s?zlü tacizdir. Marx’?n, gerek kendi a?z?ndan gerekse de kimi s?zcülerini kullanarak ony?llar boyunca y?neltti?i ve muhtemelen di?erleri denli e?lenceli olmayan var olan su?lamas?, Bakunin’in bir muhbir oldu?u y?nündeydi ve Marx’?n bu ba?ar?l? sald?r?lar? nihayetinde Bakunin’in Enternasyonal ???i Z?mb?rt?s?ndan tasfiyesine yol a?t?.. ?

More’s “Utopia” was written in Latin, and is in two parts, of which the second, describing the place ([Greek text]—or Nusquama, as he called it sometimes in his letters—“Nowhere”), was probably written towards the close of 1515; the first part, introductory, early in 1516. The book was first printed at Louvain, late in 1516, under the editorship of Erasmus, Peter Giles, and other of More’s friends in Flanders. It was then revised by More, and printed by Frobenius at Basle in November, 1518. It was reprinted at Paris and Vienna, but was not printed in England during More’s lifetime. Its first publication in this country was in the English translation, made in Edward’s VI.’s reign (1551) by Ralph Robinson. It was translated with more literary skill by Gilbert Burnet, in 1684, soon after he had conducted the defence of his friend Lord William Russell, attended his execution, vindicated his memory, and been spitefully deprived by James II. of his lectureship at St. Clement’s. Burnet was drawn to the translation of “Utopia” by the same sense of unreason in high places that caused More to write the book. Burnet’s is the translation given in this volume. The name of the book has given an adjective to our language—we call an impracticable scheme Utopian. Yet, under the veil of a playful fiction, the talk is intensely earnest, and abounds in practical suggestion. It is the work of a scholarly and witty Englishman, who attacks in his own way the chief political and social evils of his time. Beginning with fact, More tells how he was sent into Flanders with Cuthbert Tunstal, “whom the king’s majesty of late, to the great rejoicing of all men, did prefer to the office of Master of the Rolls;” how the commissioners of Charles met them at Bruges, and presently returned to Brussels for instructions; and how More then went to Antwerp, where he found a pleasure in the society of Peter Giles which soothed his desire to see again his wife and children, from whom he had been four months away. Then fact slides into fiction with the finding of Raphael Hythloday (whose name, made of two Greek words [Greek text] and [Greek text], means “knowing in trifles”), a man who had been with Amerigo Vespucci in the three last of the voyages to the new world lately discovered, of which the account had been first printed in 1507, only nine years before Utopia was written. Designedly fantastic in suggestion of details, “Utopia” is the work of a scholar who had read Plato’s “Republic,” and had his fancy quickened after reading Plutarch’s account of Spartan life under Lycurgus. Beneath the veil of an ideal communism, into which there has been worked some witty extravagance, there lies a noble English argument. Sometimes More puts the case as of France when he means England. Sometimes there is ironical praise of the good faith of Christian kings, saving the book from censure as a political attack on the policy of Henry VIII. Erasmus wrote to a friend in 1517 that he should send for More’s “Utopia,” if he had not read it, and “wished to see the true source of all political evils.” And to More Erasmus wrote of his book, “A burgomaster of Antwerp is so pleased with it that he knows it all by heart.” Sir Thomas More, son of Sir John More, a justice of the King’s Bench, was born in 1478, in Milk Street, in the city of London. After his earlier education at St. Anthony’s School, in Threadneedle Street, he was placed, as a boy, in the household of Cardinal John Morton, Archbishop of Canterbury and Lord Chancellor. It was not unusual for persons of wealth or influence and sons of good families to be so established together in a relation of patron and client. The youth wore his patron’s livery, and added to his state. The patron used, afterwards, his wealth or influence in helping his young client forward in the world.

Within our Society (the International Society for Krishna Consciousness), guru has been taken to be synonymous with diksa-guru, but what about those great souls who have introduced us to Krsna consciousness? What relationship do we have with these Vaisnavas, and what are our obligations toward them, as well as toward parents, teachers, sannyasis, and other superiors who help guide us back to Godhead? Not much has been said by the Society on these topics, and hardly any appreciation is shown for those souls who labor to elevate us day by day.The scriptures, however, glorify as guru all Vaisnavas who guide a conditioned soul back to Godhead — be they instructors or initiators — advocating a culture of honor and respect. ISKCON needs to reflect upon these principles further, and the purpose of this book is to act as a catalyst toward such an end.

本书坚持马克思主义社会历史观的基本观和基本原理，在存在论的高度上阐释了马克思的生产、劳动、资本、现代和历史等概念。主要内容包括：历史唯物主义是科学的历史观、人类社会和自然界、生产力和生产关系、经济基础和上层建筑、社会意识、科学及其在社会历史中的地位和作用等。

本书集中了维特根斯坦从1930年重回剑桥从事哲学工作到1946年这段时间的主要思想精华，包含了他所处理的大部分哲学话题。 《哲学研究》主要是从语言角度手处理哲学问题的，这些杂驳的哲学问题包括：词语和命题的意义是什么？什么是理解和意谓？逻辑和语言的关系是什么？数学到底有没有基础？人的意识状态该如何得到表达？是否存在一种私人语言？意向性的本质是什么？…… 维特根斯坦以一种崭新的方式为这些古老的哲学问题给出了自己的解答，其紧张的思想分析和逼问创了一种名为“日常语言分析”的哲学派别。

汇聚多部经典的精华，助你深入理解佛法真谛。 具体包括： 《圣大乘临终智慧经讲解》 《圣大乘三归依经讲解》 《父母经讲解》 《父母恩难报经讲解》 《吉祥经讲解》 《摩邓女经讲解》 《盂兰盆经讲解》 《佛说十一想经讲解》 《一字般若修法》

　　《认识世界：古代与中世纪哲学》 　　从西方哲学的发源地美丽的小亚细亚海岸，一直到中世纪后期的修道院和书斋、教堂和大学，一代代著名哲学家轮番登上历史舞台，对世界、对自我、对生活进行着探寻与思考。《认识世界：古代与中世纪哲学》，德国当红哲学家普莱希特，专门为大众读者所写的哲学史*卷，如连载小说一般，将一位位哲学家带到我们眼前，将他们的哲学思考融入故事之中，在轻松的阅读中，帮助我们理解与我们生活密切相关的问题：“什么是好的生活？什么是真理？是否有正义？如果有，它如何可能？生命是否有意义？人在自然和宇宙中居于何种地位？” 　　《认识你自己：近代哲学四百年》 　　15世纪至19世纪初，横亘在库萨与黑格尔之间的，不仅有时代，也有世界。其一是了解权威世界秩序的知识分子世界，每一位哲思的人都在用自己的方式探索这个伟大秩序；另一个则在启蒙与革命之后，见证了资产阶级高光时刻的破晓，伴随着混凝土的烟囱、无产者的贫困…… 　　市民社会逐步发展，自我成为万物的尺度，哲学史上的“大问题”呈现出新的形态。 　　“普莱希特哲学史”系列是德国当红“现象级”哲学家普莱希特为大众读者写作的哲学史。普莱希特以激动人心的生动方式传达了西方哲学的核心概念和思想，并在当时的经济、社会和政治背景下对其进行了阐释——这是一部引人入胜的“思想侦探小说”，让读者沉浸在无穷无尽的思想世界中！"

《写给大家的西方哲学简史》是诺贝尔文学奖获得者、哲学大师伯特兰·罗素的代表作，本书记述了从西方哲学萌芽的古希腊哲学一直到二十世纪早期西方哲学的发展历程。书中以各个哲学流派及其代表哲学家为中心记述西方哲学的发展历程，同时也对各个哲学流派产生的历史背景、哲学家的生活时代加以描述，以使读者更好地理解西方哲学的发展历程，并明白作为形而上的哲学的产生与发展，都有其深厚的社会政治经济背景，是它们发展的产物。

从2010年到2019年，堪布在各个社会活动现场留下了自己的足迹和身影，更留下了一场场真诚的演讲和珍贵的教言。 全套13本，本书演讲主题为：你会选择什么。

本书是著名佛教学者、四川大学佛教文化研究中心主任、四川大学道教与宗教文化研究所教授陈兵对佛经《普贤行愿品》《维摩诘经》的讲解，陈兵教授以其对佛教深厚的研究，给广大佛教信众和佛学研究者提供了权威和专业的解读和阐释。

本书是著名佛教学者、四川大学佛教文化研究中心主任、四川大学道教与宗教文化研究所教授陈兵对佛经《坛经》的讲解，陈兵教授以其对佛教深厚的研究，给广大佛教信众和佛学研究者提供了权威和专业的解读和阐释。

性别平等是平等理想的重要维度，在人类迈向平等社会的过程中，女性意识逐步觉醒。许多重要的思想家对性别平等的理论行了深探索，也有许多女性为争取平等而行了艰苦卓绝的斗争，甚至付出了生命的代价。 本书回顾了西方思想史上的性别观念，聚焦启蒙以来的性别平等理论以及世界各国的女性运动，讨论社会契约与女性困境、社会主义与女性解放、家庭正义的可能性、生理性别与社会性别、身份政治与女性认同、女性对自己身体的权利、对待性的不同态度、女性与环境保护、国际关系中的女性角色、科技发展对性别平等的影响、女性发展的度量指标、性别平等的具体内涵等问题，以展现性别平等的观念史，并尝试建构理想的两性关系。 —————————— 女性的自由、平等和尊严，首先关乎人类的自由、平等和尊严。李石教授从政治哲学的角度对性别平等的研究，既是中国学者对女性研究的原创性贡献，也必将有助于一步唤醒性别平等意识。 ——俞可平，北京大学讲席教授 性别平等问题既植根于对人性本身的哲学理解，更展为一个社会历史的演过程。本书从多维视角对此行了审理和讨论，提供了一幅丰富多彩的思想图景，从中折射出一个女性学者深具爱的心性、理性思考能力和独立立身之姿，恰为女性如何实现自我认同提供了一个范例。 ——田薇，清华大学哲学系教授 同“爱”与“自由”最具相关性的第三个词，作者告诉我们是“女性”。当爱的力量不足以穿父权社会时，女性何为？这位女性政治哲学家用厚重的篇幅，对这个问题行了深究。 ——吴冠军，华东师范大学政治与国际关系学院教授

《梦游者》讲述了西方宇宙观在几千年的时间里经历了怎样的曲折，最终抵达现代人所熟悉的版本。本书按照时间线分为五个部分，分别是英雄时代、中世纪、哥白尼、普勒以及伽利略。作者突破了“科学”和“人文”之间的僵化区分，用动人的笔墨展示了宇宙学家们的创造性探索，描绘了17世纪的科学革命如何艰难而戏剧性地摆脱中世纪世界观的桎梏。他为一系列伟大的天文学家提供了生动而明智的肖像，并明确指出政治偏见和无意识的偏见在他们的探索中所扮演的角色。

《中国近三百年哲学史》是蒋维乔教授的力作，该书系统梳理了自清初至民国初年近三百年间中国哲学思想的演变历程。蒋维乔将这一时期划分为复演古代学术时期和吸收外来思想时期，深入剖析了各学派、各家的学说述，并进行了详尽的比较分析。书中不仅展现了哲学思想的传承与发展，还揭示了社会变迁对哲学思想的影响。该书是研究中国近现代哲学思想不可或缺的参考资料，对于理解中国哲学史的发展脉络具有重要意义。