《论语》《孟子》《大学》《中庸》合称“四书”，是儒家的经典古籍，在中国思想史上占有重要的地位。钱穆先生所著《四书释义》分为《论语要略》《孟子要略》《大学中庸释义》三个部分，对“四书”作出阐释与发挥。其中《论》《孟》两书裁为要略，分门别类，提纲挈领，有助于读者把握两书要领；《学》《庸》则为其释义，备列全文，使学者体悟篇中宏旨。本书已经是经典著作，深受读者喜爱。

《世界·大师·原典·文库：人性论（中文导读插图版）（套装上下册）》作者认为一切科学都与人性有关，对人性的研究应是一切科学的基础。《人性论（中文导读插图版）（套装上下册）》试图通过对人性的研究来揭示制约人的理智、情感和道德行为的准则。全书分三卷，卷讨论知性；第二卷讨论情感；第三卷讨论道德。

《世界·大师·原典·文库：人性论（中文导读插图版）（套装上下册）》作者认为一切科学都与人性有关，对人性的研究应是一切科学的基础。《人性论（中文导读插图版）（套装上下册）》试图通过对人性的研究来揭示制约人的理智、情感和道德行为的准则。全书分三卷，卷讨论知性；第二卷讨论情感；第三卷讨论道德。

《世界·大师·原典·文库：人性论（中文导读插图版）（套装上下册）》作者认为一切科学都与人性有关，对人性的研究应是一切科学的基础。《人性论（中文导读插图版）（套装上下册）》试图通过对人性的研究来揭示制约人的理智、情感和道德行为的准则。全书分三卷，卷讨论知性；第二卷讨论情感；第三卷讨论道德。

本书从哲学角度出发，阐述了古今中外哲学史上的名家对当代哲学和古典哲学的分析研究，有对古典作品的研究，对思想史的研究，还有旧文新刊上的重要论题。真实作为历史的基础我们应该了解;篇幸布局与行文明晰作为手法应该通俗易懂。一个是肌体,另一个是肌体的健康。当我专注于哲学与城邦之间的张力,也就是专注于政治哲学的至高主题时,就进一步确定了这种想法。至高形式的、或海德格尔式的当代哲学与古典哲学的区别,是由当代哲学的历史特性塑造出来的,以所谓的历史意识为先决条件,因此必须了解这种意识多少有些隐私、的根源。

　　儒家思想是我国传统文化中的主要代表思想，她哺育了我中华民族的民族心理和民族品格，她的伦理价值观念已经深深地扎根于每一个中国人的心里，溶化在炎黄子孙的血液中。儒家的核心思想是仁学，仁学就是人学，教我们如何做人，如何做一个真正的中国人，所以儒家思想与我中华民族有着不可分割的联系。许抗生编*的《儒家思想的过去现在和未来》收录有关儒家思想研究的文章二十九篇，涉及孔子、玄学、程朱理学、阳明心学，以及冯友兰、张岱年对儒家思想的讨论。

《了凡四训》又名《命自我立》，为明代袁了凡先生所作的家训，以其亲身经历教戒他的儿子袁天，认识命运的真相，明辨善恶的标准，改过迁善的故事。 本书将了凡四训四篇分为若干章节编写，每一章另外提炼标题，如*篇立命之学，其章节为：*章解题，第二章孔先生算命……除了解题这一章外，其他每一章都分为原文、注释、译文、解读、名言哲语五个部分。 本书的通俗性表现在注释、译文，一般读者读完这两部分就弄懂了原文的含义，注释则具有知识性，将古汉语基本知识告诉读者。 本书的趣味性在于例证这些故事，用事例更好地说明本段文字的含义，形象生动，引人胜。 本书的权威性体现在解读和名言哲语。本书解读注重用简明通俗的语言解读原文内容，同时引用古今圣贤对原文道理的说明。其中的名言哲语则引用古今中外名人的话或者人们长期以来经验总结的警句哲言，以这些*权威性的话来*后说明本文的道理。

自由教育是从庸俗中解放出来。古希腊人关于“庸俗”有一个绝妙的词：他们称之为apeirokalia，形容缺乏对美好事物的经历。自由教育将赠予我们之于美好的事物的经历。根据事物本身的状况，我们可以期望从正确理解的人性人不得不在二者之间选择，要么选择令人愉悦的谬见带来的心灵平静，要么选择令人烦恼的真理带来的心灵平静。哲学总在盼着世界的围墙倒塌，它突破了世界的围墙，放弃了对世界的眷恋（attachmenttheworld），这种放弃*令人痛苦。另一方面，诗歌如同宗教，深深扎根于对世界的眷恋....中比从科学中获得更为直接的帮助，从敏感和精致中比从几何学的精神中获得更为直接的帮助。如果我没弄错，这就是为何现在的身由教育几乎等同于阅读古希腊经典。就像别人被一匹良马、一条好狗或一只灵鸟取悦那样，我自己则因好朋友们而获得更高的快乐……古代的贤人们通过将它们写进书中而遗留下来的财富，我与我的朋友们一起开启它并穿行其中，而且如果我们发现了什么好东西，我们就把它挑出来，并当作一次丰盛的收获，倘若我们因此而能相互促益的话。

      熊十力自述其哲学思想的演变轨迹，初自佛教唯识学（有宗），而探究空宗，*后归宗《大易》体用不二之旨。其1932年出版的《新唯识论》从唯识学脱胎而来；1958年出版《体用论》，乃从自我体系立论，不复借助唯识学的理论框架。与传统儒者的言说方式不同，《体用论》以现代习见的系统论述方式，阐发其体用不二理论，全书分为《明变》《佛法上》《佛法下》《成物》《明心》五章。但《明心》章当时因病未能写出，在初版《体用论》中有目无文；次年补写完稿，于1959年由龙门书局单独付印，名之为《明心篇》。本书将《体用论》《明心篇》合订为一册，以见《体用论》全貌。

      熊十力自述其哲学思想的演变轨迹，自佛教唯识学（有宗），而探究空宗，后悟《大易》体用不二之义。其1932年出版的《新唯识论》从唯识学脱胎而来；1958年出版《体用论》，乃从自我体系立论，不复借助唯识学的理论框架；1961年写成影印《乾坤衍》，是对于《易经》乾坤二卦大义的推演，一方面揭示自家思想的来源，重申其归本《大易》之意，一方面对于现存《周易》文本的不同思想来源作出分析评判。

      本书收录的两部著作，其前身均为熊十力在北京大学任教时的自撰讲义。        《唯识学概论》系熊先生讲授唯识学的*部讲义，1923年由北大印制。本书忠实于此前在南京支那内学院所学，以玄奘、窥基之学为旨归，简明扼要地概述唯识学的思想体系，适合现代人的阅读习惯，为唯识学的门书，亦可作为研究《新唯识论》的参考。           《因明大疏删注》亦为熊先生在北京大学讲授因明学的讲义。其渊源有自：古印度著名论师陈那改造旧因明学，号称新因明之祖，所著《因明正理门论》（简称《门论》）乃因明学奠基之作，其弟子天主（音译商羯罗主）为便后学，删述简括该书而成《因明正理论》（简称《论》）；玄奘东还，相继译出二论，其弟子窥基又为《论》作疏，成为后世研治因明的权威读本，故尊称为《大疏》。熊先生此书，乃是为适应现代学者的需要，删注窥基《因明正理论疏》而成，删削疏文，疏通大义，增设新注，阐发奥蕴，允为治因明之津梁，研唯识之预科。

      本书收录了熊十力的两部著作。 《破破新唯识论》是一部反批评的著作。《新唯识论》（文言文本）1932年出版后，南京支那内学院刘定权（衡如）于同年12月在内院年刊《内学》第六辑发表《破新唯识论》予以驳难，欧阳竟无（渐）特为作序。熊先生随后于1933年2月出版本书反驳刘著；是书由北平斌兴印书局代印，北京大学出版部等处代售。此次出版即以该版本为底本，并参考中华书局1985年本校。 《摧惑显宗记》是熊先生又一部反批评著作，针对印顺法师1948年发表的《评熊十力的<新唯识论>》一文。原稿以黄艮庸（庆）名义发表于1949年《学原》杂志二卷第十一、十二期合刊上，又收《十力语要初续》。1950年，熊先生改写此稿，并于前增写约万言，概述《新唯识论》要旨，又于后附录两长文，由大众书店印行单行本，题曰《摧惑显宗记》，署为“黄庆述”。此次出版以大众书店印本为底本，并参考湖北教育出版社《熊十力全集》本校。为体现辩论的来龙去脉，将刘定权、印顺原文并附于后。

Ce este adev?rul? De unde ?tiu cine sunt? De ce ar trebui s? fim buni? Exist? multe c?r?i despre filosofie. Cu toate acestea, Cine sunt eu? difer? fa?? de celelalte lucr?ri de introducere ?n filosofie. Nimeni nu a reu?it p?n? acum s? pun? cititorul fa??-n fa?? cu marile ?ntreb?ri ale omenirii ?ntr-o manier? at?t de documentat?, de competent? ?i, ?n acela?i timp, cu umor ?i cu elegan??. Prezenta lucrare reprezint? o c?l?torie unic? prin noianul de cuno?tin?e pe care le avem despre om. Precht ne prezint? tot ceea ce este mai nou ?n neuro?tiin??, ?n psihologie ?i ?n filosofie. Fie c? pleac? ?n cercetarea sensului vie?ii pornind de la analiza unui episod din Star Trek sau de la melodia Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds a celor de la Beatles, cartea ne pune ?n fa?a unui traseu captivant, ?n care vom descoperi cele mai surprinz?toare lucruri despre noi ?n?ine.

Antropologie ?i antroposofie ? Max Dessoir despre antroposofie ? Franz BrentanoAlc?tuind cuprinsul acestei lucr?ri, Rudolf Steiner reveleaz? ?c?teva din firele ?tiin?ifice care trebuie trasate pornind de la antropozofie la filozofie, la psihologie ?i la fiziologie“. Cunoa?terea omului va trebui atunci s? fie extins? ?in?nd cont de enigmaticele aspecte ale vie?ii sale interioare, privite din perspective multiple. ?n aceast? carte, Rudolf Steiner prezint? ?n scris aspectele semnificative ale configur?rii ?ntreite a fiin?ei omene?ti: corpul fizic, organismul sufletesc ?i configura?ia spiritual?.

O analiz? aplicat? a operei unuia dintre cei mai controversa?i g?nditori germani, supranumit monahul de la Sils-Maria; o lectur? ?n filigran a modului nietzschean de abordare a c?torva concepte dificile, interpretate la modul catastrofic: supraomul, ve?nica ?ntoarcere a aceluia?i, anti-Christul. Lucrarea se situeaz? ?n buna ?i prestigioas? tradi?ie a marilor creatori care comenteaz? textele fundamentale ale omenirii dintr-un unghi specific.

Critica ra?iunii pure, tradus? de Nicolae Bagdasar ?i Elena Moisuc ?n 1969, a ajuns la cea de-a treia edi?ie. Cu acest prilej, profesorul dr. Ilie P?rvu, de la Facultatea de Filosofie a Universit??ii din Bucure?ti a ?ngrijit noua opera?ie de editare, fiind astfel corectate unele erori de tipar ?i unele inconsecven?e terminologice. Totodat?, exist? un motiv ?n plus pentru ca studen?ii care posed? edi?ia a II-a a traducerii, ap?rut? ?n 1995, s? apeleze ?i la cea de-a treia edi?ie: ?n aceasta din urm? au fost indicate diferen?ele dintre edi?ia I german? (din 1781) ?i edi?ia a II-a (din 1787).

Volumul red? circuitului public, pentru prima oar? ?n limba rom?n?, trei din operele g?nditorului atenian. Este vorba de Scrisori (?n num?r de treisprezece, deosebit de importante pentru cunoa?terea g?ndirii platoniciene, dar ?i pentru ?n?elegerea epocii ?i a personalit??ilor cu care a venit ?n contact filosoful), Dialoguri suspecte (Minos, Rivalii, Theages, Hipparhos, Clitofon) ?i Dialoguri apocrife (Axiohos, Despre drept, Despre virtute, Demodocus, Sisyfos, Eryxias).Traducerea apara?ine lui ?tefan Bezdechi, care a realizat ?i aparatul critic al Scrisorilor (introducere ?i note).

Imagineaz?-?i c? e?ti într-o ma?in? a timpului care te poart? înainte ?i înapoi prin propria via??. Te duce în trecut, la anii copil?riei, când înv??ai s? mergi pe biciclet?, apoi te face s? revezi primul t?u s?rut, cel dintâi serviciu sau anii mai târzii, când te confrun?i, eventual, cu divor?ul. Înso?it de Platon, afl? ce spun marii gânditori ai lumii despre toate aceste pietre de hotar de pe drumul vie?ii noastre. Aristotel î?i va vorbi despre importan?a începerii ?colii, Freud despre îndr?gostire, Heidegger despre implica?iile psihologice ale mutatului, iar Nietzsche despre criza vârstei de mijloc. La drum cu Platon te ajut? s? în?elegi ?i s? vezi cu al?i ochi evenimentele majore, momentele-cheie ?i fazele de tranzi?ie din via?a ta, f?când filosofia s? par? accesibil? ?i plin? de umor!

Tr?s?turi fundamentale ale unei concep?ii moderne despre lume?Cum se comport? filosofia c? art? fa?? de libertatea omului, ce este aceast? libertate, ?i dac? am ajuns s? ne ?mp?rt??im din ea, sau putem ajunge la acest lucru: iat? problema fundamental? a scrierii mele. Toate celelalte expuneri ?tiin?ifice au fost f?cute numai pentru ca, ?n cele din urm?, s? arunc?m ?i mai mult? lumin? asupra unei probleme care, dup? p?rerea mea, prezint? cea mai mare importan?? pentru om. ?n aceste pagini vrem s? d?m o filosofie a libert??ii.“ – Rudolf Steiner

F?r? a propune o terminologie aristotelic? bine precizat? pe teritoriul limbii rom?ne, transpunerea de fa?? reprezint? un moment important ?n raportarea rom?neasc? la opera Stagiritului.Traducere de ?tefan Bezdechi efectuat? dup? textul grec publicat de W. Christ ?n colec?ia ?Teubner“, Lipsca, 1906. Pentru realizarea ei au fost utilizate urm?toarele surse:Die Metaphysik des Aristoteles, traducere ?n limba german? de J. R. V. Kirchmann, ap?rut? ?n dou? volume ?i prev?zut? cu note ample ?n colec?ia ?Philosophische Bibliothek“, numerele 38 ?i 39, la Berlin, ?n 1871;Aristoteles, Metaphysik, traducere ?n limba german? de Adolf Lasson, ?n care cele patrusprezece c?r?i ale Metafizicii sunt a?ezate ?ntr-o r?nduial? mai logic? dec?t a?a cum au fost transmise ?n originalul grec, traducere ap?rut? ?n 1924, la Jena;Aristote, Métaphysique, traducere ?n limba francez? de J. Tricot, cu o prefa?? de A. Diés, ap?rut? ?n colec?ia ?Bibliothèque des textes philosophiques“, J. Vrin, la Paris, ?n 1933.La marginea textului a fost trecut? pagina?ia edi?iei Bekker, dup? care se fac ?n mod obi?nuit cita?iile din opera lui Aristotel.Confruntarea traducerii a fost f?cut? de prof. Aram M. Frenkian.

M. Lévy-Bruhl then explains that, whilst recognising the entire coherence of Comte’s collective labours, he proposes to confine his present study to the earlier and principal work, the Philosophy, which in M. Lévy-Bruhl’s opinion is the dominant and more fruitful composition.??This he regards as the representative work of the nineteenth century, as shown by the intellectual history of the period. He points to its influence on thought in England, in Europe, and in America. It will surprise many persons to learn that in M. Lévy-Bruhl’s opinion two eminent French writers, who assuredly neither were, nor were supposed to be, Positivists, “have done more for the diffusion of the ideas and method of Comte than Littré and all the other Positivists together.” ??These two are Taine and Renan, much as they differed from Comte’s actual scheme and doctrines. Renan indeed spoke of Comte as destined to prove one of the typical names of the century. The present writer remembers Renan saying to him with a most genial welcome, “I too am a believer in the religion of humanity.” ??Professor Lévy-Bruhl followed up his History of Modern Philosophy in France by a substantial work on the philosophy of Auguste Comte. It forms a volume of the Bibliothèque de Philosophie Contemporaine, which has already devoted four other works to the Positive Philosophy. It is as well to premise that this treatise dealt solely with the philosophy, not with the polity, or any part of the religious scheme of Comte. Professor Lévy-Bruhl writes as a student, but not as an adherent of Auguste Comte. His entire work is rather an exposition, not a refutation, or a criticism, or an advocacy of Comte’s philosophical system. But it may be said at once that no one abroad or at home, certainly neither Mill, nor Lewes, nor Spencer, nor Caird, has so truly grasped and assimilated Comte’s ideas as M. Lévy-Bruhl has done.??In his Introduction M. Lévy-Bruhl very clearly states the scope of his work, and his own general attitude. He traces the origin of Comte’s philosophy in the mental effervescence of the first generation of the present century towards a reorganisation of society, after the upheaval left by the Revolution and its consequences. He correctly states the relation of St. Simon to Comte as being that of an initial stimulus. ??The cardinal difference between Comte and all the socialists and founders of social and religious Utopias consisted in this, that Comte saw the necessity of a new system of philosophy as the indispensable preliminary to any reorganisation of society.