Euthyphro (Ancient Greek: Euthuphron) is one of Plato's early dialogues, dated to after 399 BC. Taking place during the weeks leading up to Socrates' trial, the dialogue features Socrates and Euthyphro, a religious expert also mentioned at Cratylus 396a and 396d, attempting to define piety or holiness. Background The dialogue is set near the king-archon's court, where the two men encounter each other. They are both there for preliminary hearings before possible trials (2a).Euthyphro has come to lay manslaughter charges against his father, as his father had allowed one of his workers to die exposed to the elements without proper care and attention (3e–4d). This worker had killed a slave belonging to the family estate on the island of Naxos; while Euthyphro's father waited to hear from the expounders of religious law (exegetes cf. Laws 759d) about how to proceed, the worker died bound and gagged in a ditch. Socrates expresses his astonishment at the confidence of a man able to take his own father to court on such a serious charge, even when Athenian Law allows only relatives of the deceased to sue for murder. Euthyphro misses the astonishment, and merely confirms his overconfidence in his own judgment of religious/ethical matters. In an example of "Socratic irony," Socrates states that Euthyphro obviously has a clear understanding of what is pious and impious. Since Socrates himself is facing a charge of impiety, he expresses the hope to learn from Euthyphro, all the better to defend himself in his own trial. Euthyphro claims that what lies behind the charge brought against Socrates by Meletus and the other accusers is Socrates' claim that he is subjected to a daimon or divine sign which warns him of various courses of action (3b). Even more suspicious from the viewpoint of many Athenians, Socrates expresses skeptical views on the main stories about the Greek gods, which the two men briefly discuss before plunging into the main argument. Socrates expresses reservations about such accounts which show up the gods' cruelty and inconsistency. He mentions the castration of the early sky god, Uranus, by his son Cronus, saying he finds such stories very difficult to accept (6a–6c). Euthyphro, after claiming to be able to tell even more amazing such stories, spends little time or effort defending the conventional view of the gods. Instead, he is led straight to the real task at hand, as Socrates forces him to confront his ignorance, ever pressing him for a definition of 'piety'. Yet, with every definition Euthyphro proposes, Socrates very quickly finds a fatal flaw (6d ff.). At the end of the dialogue, Euthyphro is forced to admit that each definition has been a failure, but rather than correct it, he makes the excuse that it is time for him to go, and Socrates ends the dialogue with a classic example of Socratic irony: since Euthyphro has been unable to come up with a definition that will stand on its own two feet, Euthyphro has failed to teach Socrates anything at all about piety, and so he has received no aid for his own defense at his own trial (15c ff.).

《哲学是很好玩儿的》(套装共15册)包括生命哲学、心灵哲学等多种哲学思想结晶，读者可以从入门开始，通过通俗易懂的方式学会如何用哲学思维思考，感受哲学里的自我和世界，帮读者重新审视自我和我们栖居的世界，以及和这个世界的关系，捕捉心中迸发的迷惑与感悟，进而把它们锤炼为人生的智慧。

Paradise Lost is an epic poem in blank verse by the 17th-century English poet John Milton (1608–1674). The first version, published in 1667, consisted of ten books with over ten thousand lines of verse. A second edition followed in 1674, arranged into twelve books (in the manner of Virgil's Aeneid) with minor revisions throughout and a note on the versification. It is considered by critics to be Milton's "major work", and helped solidify his reputation as one of the greatest English poets of his time. The poem concerns the Biblical story of the Fall of Man: the temptation of Adam and Eve by the fallen angel Satan and their expulsion from the Garden of Eden. Milton's purpose, stated in Book I, is to "justify the ways of God to men" Short Summary:The poem is separated into twelve "books" or sections, the lengths of which vary greatly (the longest is Book IX, with 1,189 lines, and the shortest Book VII, with 640). The Arguments at the head of each book were added in subsequent imprints of the first edition. Originally published in ten books, a fully "Revised and Augmented" edition reorganized into twelve books was issued in 1674, and this is the edition generally used today. The poem follows the epic tradition of starting in medias res (Latin for in the midst of things), the background story being recounted later.Milton's story has two narrative arcs, one about Satan (Lucifer) and the other following Adam and Eve. It begins after Satan and the other rebel angels have been defeated and banished to Hell, or, as it is also called in the poem, Tartarus. In Pand?monium, Satan employs his rhetorical skill to organise his followers; he is aided by Mammon and Beelzebub. Belial and Moloch are also present. At the end of the debate, Satan volunteers to poison the newly created Earth and God's new and most favoured creation, Mankind. He braves the dangers of the Abyss alone in a manner reminiscent of Odysseus or Aeneas. After an arduous traversal of the Chaos outside Hell, he enters God's new material World, and later the Garden of Eden. At several points in the poem, an Angelic War over Heaven is recounted from different perspectives. Satan's rebellion follows the epic convention of large-scale warfare. The battles between the faithful angels and Satan's forces take place over three days. At the final battle, the Son of God single-handedly defeats the entire legion of angelic rebels and banishes them from Heaven. Following this purge, God creates the World, culminating in his creation of Adam and Eve. While God gave Adam and Eve total freedom and power to rule over all creation, He gave them one explicit command: not to eat from the Tree of the knowledge of good and evil on penalty of death.

The Republic (Greek: Politeia) is a Socratic dialogue, written by Plato around 380 BC, concerning the definition of (justice), the order and character of the just city-state and the just man, reason by which ancient readers used the name On Justice as an alternative title (not to be confused with the spurious dialogue also titled On Justice). The dramatic date of the dialogue has been much debated and though it must take place some time during the Peloponnesian War, "there would be jarring anachronisms if any of the candidate specific dates between 432 and 404 were assigned". It is Plato's best-known work and has proven to be one of the most intellectually and historically influential works of philosophy and political theory. In it, Socrates along with various Athenians and foreigners discuss the meaning of justice and examine whether or not the just man is happier than the unjust man by considering a series of different cities coming into existence "in speech", culminating in a city (Kallipolis) ruled by philosopher-kings; and by examining the nature of existing regimes. The participants also discuss the theory of forms, the immortality of the soul, and the roles of the philosopher and of poetry in society. Short Summary (Epilogue):X.1—X.8. 595a—608b. Rejection of Mimetic ArtX.9—X.11. 608c—612a. Immortality of the SoulX.12. 612a—613e. Rewards of Justice in LifeX.13—X.16. 613e—621d. Judgment of the Dead The paradigm of the city — the idea of the Good, the Agathon — has manifold historical embodiments, undertaken by those who have seen the Agathon, and are ordered via the vision. The centre piece of the Republic, Part II, nos. 2–3, discusses the rule of the philosopher, and the vision of the Agathon with the allegory of the cave, which is clarified in the theory of forms. The centre piece is preceded and followed by the discussion of the means that will secure a well-ordered polis (City). Part II, no. 1, concerns marriage, the community of people and goods for the Guardians, and the restraints on warfare among the Hellenes. It describes a partially communistic polis. Part II, no. 4, deals with the philosophical education of the rulers who will preserve the order and character of the city-state.In Part II, the Embodiment of the Idea, is preceded by the establishment of the economic and social orders of a polis (Part I), followed by an analysis (Part III) of the decline the order must traverse. The three parts compose the main body of the dialogues, with their discussions of the “paradigm”, its embodiment, its genesis, and its decline.The Introduction and the Conclusion are the frame for the body of the Republic. The discussion of right order is occasioned by the questions: “Is Justice better than Injustice?” and “Will an Unjust man fare better than a Just man?” The introductory question is balanced by the concluding answer: “Justice is preferable to Injustice”. In turn, the foregoing are framed with the Prologue (Book I) and the Epilogue (Book X). The prologue is a short dialogue about the common public doxai (opinions) about “Justice”. Based upon faith, and not reason, the Epilogue describes the new arts and the immortality of the soul. ? About Author: Plato (Greek: Platon, " 428/427 or 424/423 BC – 348/347 BC) was a philosopher in Classical Greece. He was also a mathematician, student of Socrates, writer of philosophical dialogues, and founder of the Academy in Athens, the first institution of higher learning in the Western world. Along with his mentor, Socrates, and his most-famous student, Aristotle, Plato helped to lay the foundations of Western philosophy and science. Alfred North Whitehead once noted: "the safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato." Plato's sophistication as a writer is evident in his Socratic dialogues; thirty-six dialogues and thirteen letters have been ascribed to him, although 15–18 of them have been contested. Plato's writings have been published in several fashions; this has led to several conventions regarding the naming and referencing of Plato's texts. Plato's dialogues have been used to teach a range of subjects, including philosophy, logic, ethics, rhetoric, religion and mathematics. Plato is one of the most important founding figures in Western philosophy. His writings related to the Theory of Forms, or Platonic ideals, are basis for Platonism. ? Early lifeThe exact time and place of Plato's birth are not known, but it is certain that he belonged to an aristocratic and influential family. Based on ancient sources, most modern scholars believe that he was born in Athens or Aegina between 429 and 423 BC. His father was Ariston. According to a disputed tradition, reported by Diogenes Laertius, Ariston traced his descent from the king of Athens, Codrus, and the king of Messenia, Melanthus. Plato's mother was Perictione, whose family boasted of a relationship with the famous Athenian lawmaker an

本书从抱怨的危害出发，以励志而暖心的有关人生经历的故事给你勇气和力量，让你改变自己，改变世界，与更好的生活相遇，教会人们摒弃抱怨，努力改变，在漫漫黑夜中努力坚持，在艰难的日子里恬静安然，感受到快乐和幸福。

写给大忙人的喵喵漫画哲学书 不读哲学，少了文青感；想读哲学，又怕深奥难懂？ 这套书破你对哲学的认知！ 国内以猫猫形象来讲解哲学的图书，用独创的漫画形式，按时间线为横轴，融合了中西方的哲学思想，随手翻，就能轻松有趣的哲学世界。 本套书分为古代·中世纪、现代和近代三册，全部精选当时*有代表性的大咖喵！ 37位有着人类大智慧的哲学喵，例如“有哲学就够了”的苏格喵底（地球名：苏格拉底）、改变世界的大神牛顿喵（地球名：牛顿）；一统哲学江山的康德喵（地球名：康德）；“英年早疯”的尼采喵（地球名：尼采）等等。大家平时对他们耳熟能详，但未必真正了解他们的生平事迹和观主张，我们把它画出来给你看，保证你是哲学小白也能看得懂、学得会！

《华严金师子章》乃唐代佛教华严宗三祖法藏贤首大师为武则天讲解《华严经》的“十重玄门”、“六相圆融”等教义时，为了使其能够理解空与色、心与境之间的种种关系，法藏大师以殿前的金狮子为譬喻，故有了《华严金师子章》。《华严金师子章》是由法藏大师为武则天讲解《华严经》的记录稿整理而成，此文虽短，但却集中简要地概括了佛教的核心思想。《华严金师子章》在论述真理的方式上简单通俗，层次分明，但又细致微，理精髓。浓缩了《华严经》的思想精华，涵盖了佛教的核心思想。此经不仅可以使学佛者了解佛教的真实义理，而且为学佛者获得究竟的圆满和解脱，指明了道路和方向。

《胜鬘经》弘传于南北朝，备受教内教外的重视。本经为大乘如来藏系经典中代表作之一。内容叙述胜?N夫人对释尊立十大誓愿、三大愿，并自说大乘一乘法门，阐释圣谛、法身、如来藏等。 　经中认为三乘之教归于大乘之一乘，得一乘即得如来法身。众生虽被烦恼所缠，然其本性清净无垢，与如来同等，故皆具有如来之性（佛性、如来藏）。且以如来藏为基础，即使在生死轮回之世界，亦有获得涅槃之可能。本经之一乘思想，即是承继法华经者，而成为大乘佛教之重所在。又本经之特色乃在以在家妇人说法，故与维摩居士所说之“维摩经”，并为大乘佛教在家佛教之代表作。　全书共分十五章，包括如来真实功德、十受、三愿、摄受、一乘、无边圣谛、如来藏、法身、空义隐覆真实、一谛、一依、颠倒真实、自性清净、真子、胜?N等。

The passages in this Study Book have been taken directly from Krishnamurti’s talks and books from 1933 through 1967. The compil- ers began by reading all the passages from this period which contained the word action—the theme of this book. This would not have been possible without the use of a full text computer database, produced by the Krishnamurti Foundation Trust of England. Over 750 passages were studied in all, and the aspects of “action” most frequently addressed by Krishnamurti were noted. These aspects then formed the outline for the contents of this book.The material selected has not been altered from the way it was originally printed except for limited correction of spelling, punctua- tion, and missing words. Words or phrases that appear in brackets are not Krishnamurti’s, but have been added by the compilers for the sake of clarity. Ellipses introducing a passage, or ending it, indicate that the passage begins or ends in mid-sentence. Ellipses in the course of a passage indicate words or sentences omitted. A series of asterisks between paragraphs shows that there are paragraphs from that talk which have been omitted. Captions, set off from the body of the text, have been used with many passages. Most captions are statements taken directly from the text, with some being a combination of phrases from the passage.Krishnamurti spoke from such a large perspective that his entire vision was implied in any extended passage. If one wishes to see how a statement flows out of his whole discourse, one can find the full context from the references at the foot of each passage. These refer primarily to talks which have been published in The Collected Works of J. Krishnamurti. This seventeen-volume set covers the entire period from which this study book has been drawn. A complete bibliography is included at the end of this book. Students and scholars may also be interested in additional passages on action not used in the book, available for study upon written request, in the archives of the Krishna- murti Foundation of America.This Study Book aims to give the reader as comprehensive a view as possible, in 140 pages, of the question of action as explored by Krishnamurti during the period covered. Most of the material presented has not been previously published, except in the Verbatim Reports which were produced privately, in limited numbers, primarily for those who attended Krishnamurti’s talks.

　　你是不是也对种类繁多的国学典籍头疼不已？你是不是想要一本轻松有趣的国学门书？通过手绘漫画和段子，陈磊（笔名：混子哥）领衔的半小时漫画团队就带读者分清了国学的各大门派，理清了国学的来龙去脉——儒家、道家、法家、墨家、兵家、魏晋玄学、程朱理学、陆王心学： 儒家就像HR，*会处理人际关系，把国家秩序安排得明明白白； 道家向往自由，推崇无为而治，offer送到手里都不； 法家都是职业经理人，他们用公司的套路，把国家一步步做大做强； 玄学就是摸鱼哲学，清谈就像在公司例会上扯淡； 理学是儒学的全新款式，说社会秩序也是自然规律，要追求“天理”； 心学专门跟理学抬杠，说人心就是“天理”，要知行合一，追求“良知”。 本书延续半小时漫画系列严谨又搞笑的风格，从孔孟老庄，到程朱陆王（程颐、程颢、朱熹、陆九渊、王阳明），各门派宗师爆笑登场。让你在哈哈大笑中秒懂各大门派的思想主张和历史发展，不知不觉就门国学、爱上国学！ 　　翻本书，在笑出腹肌的同时，分清国学各大门派，理清国学来龙去脉！

本书是著名学者冯友兰的重要代表作。是自1980年以来，耗时十余年完成的“哲学思想新编”。全套书内容分为七册，以时代思潮为纲，以说明时代思潮为主，将中国哲学史划分为七个时代思潮：先秦诸子、两汉经学、魏晋玄学、隋唐佛学、宋明道学、近代变法、现代革命。体量庞大，广博而不芜杂，严谨而又生动，达到了文与质、博与约的统一。书中着重探讨了中国哲学中的精神境界学说，更使得本书具有探究人类精神发展史世界意义。 本版收录全七册内容，分为上、中、下三卷本，配有中央编译局研究员薛晓源博士手绘的中国古今著名哲学人物画像102幅，立体展现中国哲学史及哲学家的风采。

依据中国哲学元理逻辑体系的天、地、人和合生生道体，中国哲学可以生发为七大原理：元亨利贞论、体用一源论、理一分殊论、能所相资论、不离不杂论、内圣外王论、融突和合论。中国哲学的七大原理（元理）是特定时空环境内在世哲学家通过思维、思想所构建的，其哲学理论思维是那个时代哲学家对人与自然、社会、人生关系的自我体认的升华；是反思人与自然、社会、人生互相关系，超越一般性的诠释而构建的概念、范畴的逻辑；是对人与自然、社会、人生的价值、理想、审美地再反思。这是在哲学家理论思维所把握的那个时代的精神，也即哲学的时代精神。中国哲学是在“继往圣之绝学”哲学理论思维成就基础上，在世哲学家在其理论思维方式引导下地再反思、再体认，以赋予价值理想、伦理道德、审美旨趣、终极关切新生面、新创造、新品格、新气质。

金岳霖的学生，李敖的老师，简明的逻辑思维训练。 逻辑不是高深的学问，也不是咄咄逼人的诡辩，更不是不相干的名词。《逻辑课：如何辨别真假对错》从对”思想“与”实际活动“的争论入手，别出心裁地将你心中对逻辑、逻辑学的疑问和不解融入场景。书中有渊博且耐心的先生，有求知又热情的青年。先生和青年的对话，使读者有身临其境之感，仿佛也在现场参与师生妙趣横生的交流。 《逻辑课：如何辨别真假对错》中，除了深入浅出的说理，还有大量的图表，直观、形象，更有助于理解。如果你对逻辑有懵懂的认知，缺乏清晰的了解；如果你想通过逻辑学大家的经典作品，进一步厘清逻辑、推理、经验等的关系，这本《逻辑课：如何辨别真假对错》正可以解答你心中对逻辑、逻辑学的疑问。

【内容简介】 本书对20世纪西方传播学的起源、范式和方法等问题进行了回顾和反思,并试图回答处于历史流变中的传播学,其建构背后的学科史前史是什么，这些认识论和观念,又如何在学术的场域中互动建构。

哲学一直给人一种远在云端的感觉，很多人对哲学总有种刻板印象，认为哲学太过玄奥，读不读哲学对自己没有多少影响。但其实这种高高在上的哲学是被经院化和学科化了的，这是对哲学原来面貌的*扭曲！ 七格说，哲学与我们的距离并不遥远。哲学家可以很有趣，哲学可以很“普遍”。哲学其实与我们的生活息息相关，它可以启发我们从不同的角度看待生活中的问题。 本书带你认识60位哲学先贤的前世今生。风趣幽默的观剖析，独具一格的人物短评，各类学科与哲学的激情碰撞，让你畅游哲学海洋，重塑不一样的哲学态度！

法兰克福学派学者内部虽然存在着不同的思想趋势，但是他们思考着同一个核心问题：分裂社会中那些孤立的人们如何整合起来？对他们来说，现代资本主义社会的分裂有各种原因：或者是由于人为了征服外在自然而不得不征服内在自然，或者是由于生存斗争永恒化，或者是由于系统侵了生活世界，或者是由于人的非意愿性经验的丧失，等等。他们提出了许多不同的方法来解决这个问题：或者从文化的根子上重新反思，重构形而上学；或者从审美的角度重构人的自然；或者用对话来重建生活世界；或者是在相互斗争中达致相互承认；等等。这些不同的思路为我们批判资本主义，分析现代社会中所出现的类似问题提供了有益的参考。

“当代西方语言哲学翻译与研究”拟包括2016年国家社科基金项目成果：四部译著和一本专著，除《想象与规约》外，三本译著和专著，都有关雷卡纳蒂（Fran?ois Récanati），包括I.译注1.《直指称》（Direct Reference: From Language to Thought）；2.《直引语 间引语》（Oratio Obliqua Oratio Recta）；3.《视角思维》（Perspectival Thought：A Plea for (Moderate) Relativism）II.专著《雷卡纳蒂语言哲学思想研究》，本项目将多维度、全方位、成体系地阐发雷卡纳蒂的理论学说，客观公正、辩证唯物地评价其学术贡献、存在不足及发展动向。

本书以一种引人胜、通俗易懂的方式，通过聚焦于批判性探究的实践，对批判性思维理论行了深浅出的介绍。本书通过在一组角色人物之间不断行的对话，展现出推理和论辩在批判性思维中的作用。通过关注探究的实践，而不仅仅只是单个的论证及其评价，书中所展现的途径也使得读者得以磨炼他们的批判性思维技能。 本书特色包括：1.独特的方式：在一组角色人物之间不断行的对话，为探究过程树立了模型，也凸显了批判性思维的辩证维度。2.跨学科：有专门的章节致力于自然科学、社会科学以及艺术领域的探究，从而展现出批判性思维与哲学系之外的课程的关系。 这一新鲜而独到的批判性思维途径教给学生做出一个有充分理由支持的判断的能力，并且鼓励他们将所学知识应用于探究的实践。 中国版《权衡》拟在原书基础上行修订：保留原书核心理论及论述，删减部分章节，使之更适合基础教育读者群，并邀请业内专家提供中国案例，替换原书中欧美背景的案例，并针对这些新案例做出分析。

《倦怠社会》内容简介：否定性的社会已经消失，取而代之的是充溢着积极性的社会。 从这一范式转移出发，韩炳哲展示了当今社会的病理形态，其中包括抑郁症、注意力缺乏症、过劳症等精神疾病。它们不是传染病，而是梗阻症；不是由否定性的、免疫学上的他者导致，而是源于过量的肯定性。 因此，一切免疫学式预防和抵抗措施都失效了。作者的论述终以一个社会愿景结束，他有意赋予其一个含有歧义的名称“倦怠社会”。其中，生命变成了生存，生存导向对健康的狂热崇拜，健康带来了疾病和僵死。 失去了死亡的否定性，生命自身僵化成为死亡。 一部为当下全球化时代做出诊断的重要作品。 《娱乐何为》内容简介：现在，娱乐的无处不在预示着全新的事物即将来临。人们对世界和现实的理解开始发生根本性的变化。 今天，娱乐升级成为一种新式范例，即一种新的决定什么具有处世能力、什么没有，也就是决定什么是存在者的存在模式。因此，现实本身呈现出一种特殊的娱乐效果。 娱乐的绝 对化导致世界变成享乐的世界，受难精神将这样的世界解释和贬低为沉沦、虚无，甚至是非在。然而，受难和娱乐其实并不完全相异。娱乐的纯粹无意义与受难的纯粹意义是紧密相邻的。 小丑的微笑与痛苦之人痛苦扭曲的表情看起来惊人地相似。 韩炳哲创造了一种他个人独有的思想传统。 ——周日世界报（Welt am Sonntag） 《爱欲之死》内容简介：爱欲是勇于否定自我，肯定他者。 爱欲与他者密切相关，是个体在自我的王国里无法征服的疆土。 爱欲以超验性为前提。当今社会越来越像一个同质化的地狱，而爱欲的经验不在其中。 个体的内在危机在于，一切事物均成为被消费的对象，从而毁掉了爱欲的渴望。吸引自我的、被自我所渴望的他者，无处可栖。 这是一个没有了爱欲的社会。 爱欲之死，是自我反思之死。 《他者的消失》内容简介：他者的时代已然逝去。 那朋友似的、地狱般的、神秘的、诱惑的、爱欲的他者已让位于同者。如今，同质化的扩散形成病理变化，对社会体造成侵害。扩散之势愈演愈烈。使社会体害病的不是异化、退隐、禁令和压制，而是过度交际、过度信息、过度生产和过度消费。 如今的时代标志不是由他者带来的压迫，而是由同者造成的抑郁。当今社会中有诸多标志性的现象，譬如恐惧、全球化、恐怖主义等，韩炳哲的新作所探究的正是这些现象背后潜藏的同质化的暴力。 韩炳哲用他的作品开辟了一条横穿当代文学之林的甬道。他不求你我点赞，只求警醒世人。 ——德国广播电台（Deutschlandfunk） 《在群中：数字媒体时代的大众心理学》内容简介：数字化信息交流和网络社交平台占领了我们的生活。 被数字化了的生命实际上导致了社群、公共空间的坍塌，也慢慢侵蚀了政治行动的可能，妨害了有意义的政治议程。 数字化交流激发了瞬间的冲动性反应，发送和接收这种信息的民众，变成了一个（个）数字化的（蜂）群。这不是大众，而不过是一些被相互隔离的个体；不足以称为“我们”，不能形成解决问题的主导性力量，不能筹谋未来，因为他们深陷当下。 数字群是一个破碎的整体。 当信息胜过思想，一切按照脸书、股市和情报机构的法则运行，民主将受到威胁，自由将受到损害。 《 透明社会 》内容简介： 当今社会，到处洋溢着“透明”的热情，而人们的当务之急是培养一下对距离的热情。 距离和羞耻心无法被纳入资本、信息及交际的高速循环。因此，人们便以“透明”的名义消除了所有谨慎的回旋余地。它们被照得通亮，被剥夺殆尽。世界也因此变得更加无耻、更加赤裸。 恰恰于信任不在时，人们对“透明”的呼求声才愈发响亮。在以信任为基础的社会中，人们是不会执意要求透明的。透明社会是一个不信任的、怀疑的社会，由于信任日渐消失，社会便开始依赖监控。对透明的大声呼求恰恰表明，社会的道德基础已然脆弱不堪，真诚、正直等道德价值越来越失去意义。 作为一项新的社会命令，透明正在取代日渐式微的道德审查机构。 《暴力拓扑学》内容简介：有些事物，永不消逝，暴力即属此类。 暴力性表达并非现代性的标志。暴力只是变化多端而已，其表现形式随社会局势而变。如今，它回到皮下、交际之下、毛细和神经元的领域，呈现出微观物理学的形态；这种形态的存在，无需在统治或敌对关系中的那种否定或排斥性。 它从可见转为无形，从粗野蛮横转为沉思内省，从正面直击转为病毒性感染。暴力起作用的方式不是公然袭击，而是蔓延传染。 作者在本书中首次揭示了暴力事件的变形记，从君权和血亲等前现代社会的斩首，经由现代规训社会的畸变，*终到了今天绩效社会和倦怠社会的抑郁。 《美的救赎》内容简介：美如今正处于一种矛盾的处境。 一方面，它如通货膨胀般蔓延四溢：到处都可以感受到人们对美的狂热崇拜。另一方面，美失去了一切超越性，屈服于消费的内在性：它塑造了资本的美学的一面。美以及崇高或震动所带来的对消极性的体验，完全被纯粹的快乐即点赞所取代。美*终被色情化。 本书既为我们展示了那些以真理、灾难或诱惑表现出来的美的形式，也阐明了那些建立美的伦理或政治的美的维度。 阅读韩炳哲的书，意味着不断地被鞭策唤醒。……他的社会批判虽然不谙体恤之情，然而韩炳哲仍然热情地拥抱自己所处的这个时代。 ——《周刊》 《精神政治学》内容简介：当今世界已逐渐走向精神政治时代。 数字技术正从单纯的监控向主动的操控过渡，人们凭感觉做出的所谓“自由决定”将很快被操控。 无所不在的大数据和新自由主义伦理观造成了资本主义权力的转移和扩张，破坏了个体自由，压制了个体的空间和自主性。 本书扣人心弦地描绘了新自由主义精神政治导致的种种危机。

科学与伦理问题不仅是科学伦理学、科学哲学等学科中的一个重大理论问题，而且对于科学和技术政策的制定，对于科学家遵守科学研究的道德规范，对于端正社会对科学的态度，具有切实的现实意义。本书作者在研读大量中外文献的基础上，经过缜密的思考，紧紧围绕科学与伦理这个中心，针对其中包含的主要议题，诸如科学的善恶、科学与伦理的关系、科学家对社会的道德责任、科学与军事以及科学家与军事研究、科学和科学家与政治、科学家的科学良心、爱因斯坦的伦理思想和道德实践及做人楷模，以及基因和人工智能技性科学中的伦理问题与道德争端、中国学界的学术不端行为和整饬之道等行了比较全面、深的剖析和探讨，并且针对一些紧迫的、敏感的现实问题提出了自己独到的见解和具有启发性的看法，可谓“科学与人文珠联璧合，学术共思想相得益彰”。本书资料翔实，观新颖，逻辑严谨，结构合理，文字流畅、优美，雅俗共赏，适合于不同层次的读者阅读或深究。

本书是著名哲学家、易学大家余敦康先生关于易学的历史文化与易学的现代价值的门性读物。 《周易》的思想精髓与价值理想，《周易》在中国文化中的特殊功能，《周易》与中国传统文化的关系，《周易》与中国政治文化、伦理思想的关系，这些易学中的根本性问题唯有在本书作者这样的大家处理起来才举重若轻。 书中关于易学对于今天每一个现代人的生活智慧、易学的管理思想的精到讨论，也使易学本身的日用性得以道破；书中对易学史的脉络以及现代中国哲学家对易道的探索的梳理，则凸显了历史的厚重与延续。