Un volum incitant de care nu se pot lipsi adolescen?ii, elevii, studen?ii, profesorii, acest indirect dic?ionar de vise ?i destine reprezint? o carte necesar?, c?ci ?ndeamn? la cunoa?tere de sine. Acest studiu-eseu interdisciplinar con?ine valoroase trimiteri la Freud, Nietzsche, Aristotel ?i al?i g?nditori – eventuale modele ?n epoca tranzi?iei sufocat? de acultura?ie ?i de modele de o calitate ?ndoielnic?.

Rájttem, hogy nem azért jttem vissza a halálból, mert olyan okos vagyok. Vagyis az akaratomnak semmi kze nem volt az élethez. Valami más intelligencia dolgozott, nem az enyém. Ha van egyáltalán valamiféle vallásom, az nem más, mint hit abban, hogy az én intelligenciám részt vesz egy másik, nagyobb intelligenciában. Tehát nem én vagyok okos, hanem valamiféleképpen rezonálok valamivel, ami okos. Részt veszek valamiben. Mindannyian a világmindenség gyümlcsei vagyunk. Ti is a világmindenség gyümlcsei vagytok. A gyümlcs se tudja, hogy miért érik olyan szép szilvává vagy szibarackká, csak úgy csinálja, ahogy mi is csináljuk. Vagy a kisujjamban a sejtek. k is csak részt vesznek bennem, mikzben nem ismerik Feldmár Andrást. n sem ismerem azt, akinek én egy kis sejtje vagyok.”

This book contains a selection of articles and pamphlets on analytical psychology written at intervals during the past fourteen years. These years have seen the development of a new discipline, and as is usual in such a case, have involved many changes of view-point, of concept, and of formulation.??It is not my intention to give a presentation of the fundamental concepts of analytical psychology in this book; it throws some light, however, on a certain line of development which is especially characteristic of the Zürich School of psychoanalysis.??As is well known, the merit of the discovery of the new analytical method of general psychology belongs to Professor Freud of Vienna. His original view-points had to undergo many essential modifications, some of them owing to the work done at Zürich, in spite of the fact that he himself is far from agreeing with the standpoint of this school.??I am unable to explain fully the fundamental differences between the two schools, but would indicate the following points: The Vienna School takes the standpoint of an exclusive sexualistic conception, while that of the Zürich School is symbolistic. The Vienna School interprets the psychological symbol semiotically, as a sign or token of certain primitive psychosexual processes. Its method is analytical and causal.??The Zurich School recognises the scientific feasibility of such a conception, but denies its exclusive validity, for it does not interpret the psychological symbol semiotically only, but also symbolistically, that is, it attributes a positive value to the symbol.??The value does not depend merely on historical causes; its chief importance lies in the fact that it has a meaning for the actual present, and for the future, in their psychological aspects. For to the Zürich School the symbol is not merely a sign of something repressed and concealed, but is at the same time an attempt to comprehend and to point out the way of the further psychological development of the individual. Thus we add a prospective import to the retrospective value of the symbol.??The method of the Zurich School is therefore not only analytical and causal, but also synthetic and prospective, in recognition that the human mind is characterised by "caus?" and also by "fines" (aims). The latter fact needs particular emphasis, because there are two types of psychology, the one following the principle of hedonism, and the other following the principle of power. Scientific materialism is pertinent to the former type, and the philosophy of Nietzsche to the latter. The principle of the Freudian theory is hedonism, while that of Adler (one of Freud's earliest personal pupils) is founded upon the principle of power.??The Zurich School, recognising the existence of these two types (also remarked by the late Professor William James), considers that the views of Freud and Adler are one-sided, and only valid within the limits of their corresponding type.??Freud and Adler interpret in the analytical and causal way, reducing to the infantile and primitive. Thus with Freud the conception of the "aim" is the fulfilment of desire, with Adler it is the usurpation of power. Both authors take the standpoint in their practical analytical work which brings to view only infantile and gross egoistic aims.??The Zurich School is convinced of the fact that within the limits of a diseased mental attitude the psychology is such as Freud and Adler describe. It is, indeed, just on account of such impossible and childish psychology that the individual is in a state of inward dissociation and hence neurotic. The Zürich School, therefore, in agreement with them so far, also reduces the psychological symbol (the phantasy products of the patient) to the fundamental infantile hedonism, or to the infantile desire for power. But Freud and Adler content themselves with the result of mere reduction, according to their scientific biologism and naturalism.

The following pages contain certain rules and suggestions concerning health, and certain simple and sensible ways in which it may, we hope, be acquired and maintained at a very small expense of time and self-denial, by a large number of people who are naturally accustomed to feel not very well. The book is founded on notes made by its two authors who, though they lead for the most part very different lives, are agreed on certain broad principles of health herein set forth. ??One of them, for instance, eats largely of flesh-foods every day, the other has scarcely touched meat for years. But both are accustomed to feel extremely well and to undertake considerable exertion either of mind or body without experiencing any fatigue. One of them takes regular exercise, that is to say he plays an out-door game on most days of his life, while the other who abstains from flesh-foods has little practice of the sort. He will take no out-of-door exercise for several days, work very hard, and find himself perfectly fit for some severe physical test at the end. But they are both agreed that if the one abandoned flesh-foods (which he does not propose to do) he would cease to require regular exercise, and that if the other took flesh-foods (which he does not propose to do) he would not only be very ill, but would also require regular exercise. ??One again is seldom seen without some appliance of tobacco in his mouth, because he finds it agreeable and after an experiment of abstinence from it found that it did not make any difference, as far as he could make out, in his general health. The other never smokes at all. One again takes a cold bath in the morning, the other a hot one followed by cold sponging.??But both are absolutely in accord on far more main points than those on which their practice, at any rate, differs, and they have found it perfectly easy to write this book together without wrangling, on which account they wish to express a pious hope that the very fact that they differ in so many things may have saved them from dogmatism. For it has helped them to realize that even when they are agreed on any point it would be a sheer stupidity to hint that they were therefore right, and in consequence they only put forward the points on which they are agreed as suggestions, hoping that others after trial may also agree with them. ??For universal laws on an empirical matter like health are rare, and the constitutions of men are various. One man’s meat, in fact, is literally another man’s poison. But in the main the two authors are agreed. They believe that the majority of mankind habitually eat too much and habitually take too much stimulating food and drink. They believe also that most people who do so do not take enough exercise, and that either an increase of exercise or a decrease of stimulant is needed. ??They believe that the best sorts of exercise are not those of slow pushing movements such as are made in the use of dumb-bells, but full brisk extended movements, with much use of the breathing apparatus and the large muscle areas of the body. Similarly they are in accord as regards present systems of training which tend to treat an entire crew or team as if they were identical specimens, not as widely different specimens; in every day life also they hold that because a certain mode of diet and work suits A, it will not necessarily suit B and C, though B and C might do worse than try it.

In this special edition of James Allen's classic, As a Man Thinketh, you will learn how to use the power of thought to bring success and happiness into your life. You will discover that you are the creator of the conditions in your life, good and bad, and you can change those conditions by changing the way you think. Bestselling authors Dale Carnegie, Norman Vincent Peale, and others were heavily influenced by Allen's writings, and Inc. Magazine praised Allen's book as "one of the top 10 motivational books of all time." Success coach Tony Robbins says it is his favorite book, and he has read it a dozen times. This Classic Edition was developed for a course at Virtual University by Richard De A'Morelli, a best-selling author and editor with deep experience in the self-help field. Most versions of Allen's book are unedited reprints of his 1903 work, but this collector's edition includes the full text of the book, updated and restyled for today's readers, plus helpful tutorials reviewing key points in each chapter. A bonus chapter offers daily meditations from James Allen's popular book, Meditations for Every Day of the Year. The wisdom of James Allen provides a foundation for living well and being happy in today's hectic world. Whether this is your first exposure to his writings or you are already a fan, this special edition is must reading. Available as an ebook and in paperback (ISBN 978-1-988236-10-0). Add it to your library and give as a gift to your friends who may benefit from this wonderful message of hope and empowerment.

S? redescoperim miracolul binecuv?nt?rilor Kūkulu Kumuhana este o parte din Ho’oponopono, o metod? eficient?, originar? din tradi?ia ?amanic? hawaiian?, de a solu?iona conflicte ?i de a vindeca rela?ii. Kūkulu Kumuhana ?nseamn? ?ur?rile de bine inten?ionate ale unei familii sau ale unui grup.“ ?n aceast? carte ve?i afla cum folosesc oamenii aceast? binecuv?ntare aparte ?n contexte existen?iale dificile, ve?i ?nv??a s? cunoa?te?i binecuv?ntarea naturii, cum se poate stimula energia unei binecuv?nt?ri ?i cum s? face?i diferen?a ?ntre binecuv?ntarea material? ?i cea spiritual?. Cu aceast? cunoa?tere puternic? ve?i deschide ?n via?a dumneavoastr? por?i care p?n? acum v-au fost t?inuite.

Trebuie cu orice pre? s? treci examenul de admitere? Se cuvine ca so?ul sau so?ia ta s?-?i acorde mai mult timp? Este imperios necesar s? fii apreciat la serviciu? Desigur c? ??i dore?ti s? fie a?a ?i ar fi bine ?i pl?cut dac? aceste lucruri s-ar ?nt?mpla. Dar via?a nu se desf??oar? ?ntotdeauna dup? cum ne dorim noi. Vestea bun? este, ?ns?, c? tu ?i numai tu alegi cum s? te sim?i. Tu alegi dac? o situa?ie este o catastrof? sau o problem? obi?nuit? de via??, ce poate fi ?n?eleas? ?i dep??it?.Aceast? carte ??i ofer? numeroase tehnici ?i metode practice, u?or de aplicat, prin care s? po?i schimba felul ?n care te raportezi la evenimentele de zi cu zi, astfel ?nc?t ele s? devin? mai nuan?ate, mai suportabile, mai pu?in ?nfrico??toare. Utiliz?nd exemple din via?a oamenilor obi?nui?i, te invit? ?i pe tine, cititorule, s? redevii st?p?nul g?ndurilor ?i al vie?ii tale.

O via?? lung? ?i s?n?toas? pentru copilul t?u, dup? modelul japonezPotrivit unei analize recente publicate de prestigioasa revist? The Lancet, copiii din Japonia sunt cei mai s?n?to?i din lume. Naomi Moriyama s-a hot?r?t s? descopere secretele acestui succes. C?l?torind ?mpreun? cu b?iatul ei mic, Naomi a intervievat oameni de ?tiin?? din Japonia ?i SUA ?i a cules informa?ii de la m?micile japoneze.A rezultat un ghid revolu?ionar ?i cu o mare valoare practic?, sfaturile oferite ajut?nd la adoptarea unor obi?nuin?e alimentare ?i a unui stil de via?? care ?i vor ajuta pe p?rin?i s? ob?in? rezultatele dorite ?n cre?terea copiilor. ?Recomand?rile sunt logice, u?or de pus ?n practic? ?i bazate pe ?tiin??, intui?ie ?i tradi?ie. Sunt ?n concordan?? cu convingerea mea c? este nevoie s? ne ?ntoarcem la legile fundamentale ale s?n?t??ii, care ne ?ndeamn? s? dormim bine, s? m?nc?m ce ?i c?t trebuie, s? facem mi?care ?i s? evit?m toxinele." - Prof. Mark Tremblay, Spitalul pentru copii din Ontario, Canada?Rodul unei document?ri meticuloase, aceast? carte fascinant? ??i merit? locul ?n biblioteca oric?rui p?rinte." - Dr Lucy Cooke, cercet?tor principal ?n cadrul Facult??ii de Epidemiologie ?i S?n?tate Public?, University College, Londra

ntreaga noastr via suntem n cutarea unui echilibru satisfctor i sntos ntre legturile simbiotice i puterea de-a aciona liber. ns gsirea justei proporii ntre dependen i autonomie devine extrem de dificil atunci cnd individul a trecut n primii si ani de via printr-o traum simbiotic“ la nivelul relaiei de ataament cu mama sau cu ali ngrijitori apropiai. Atunci cnd sugarul sau copilul mic nu obine de la mama sa iubirea, sigurana, protecia i cldura de care are absolut nevoie, el va cdea prad unor complicaii simbiotice“ care, n dezvoltarea sa ulterioar, vor lua forma unor comportamente adictive, anxioase sau chiar schizofrenice. Prin numeroase studii de caz, Ruppert demonstreaz n ce fel abordarea bazat pe constelaiile familiale – i mai specific pe constelarea inteniei“ – poate aduce autonomia i integrarea persoanelor traumatizate i afectate de un clivaj psihic timpu-riu. Datorit multiplelor forme ale complicaiilor simbiotice“ (din familii, dar i din organizaii sau chiar la nivel de naiune), cartea este de interes nu doar pentru psihotraumatologi, dar i pentru consilieri, terapeui ori sociologi i specialiti n asisten social.

n ultima vreme, gndirea pozitiv a devenit o mod. Selectnd din via numai emoiile pozitive, cutnd cu ndrjire s evitm disconfortul i s obinem fericirea, oare nu ne privm pe noi nine de o parte din propriile triri Suntem fiine umane complexe, imperfecte, angelice i machiavelice deopotriv, nu doar nite mti cu zmbetul pe buze. Reacionm adesea cu mnie, cu team, ne ndoim de propriile capaciti sau recurgem la manipulare, agresivitate i grandomanie pentru a iei din anumite situaii. Bazat pe cercetri tiinifice recente, cartea de fa ne arat cum aceste aspecte ale noastre mai puin dezirabile ne ajut s fim mai adaptabili, s dm un randament mai bun, s gsim soluii la problemele cu care ne confruntm. Alegnd s ascundem sau s reprimm acele pri din noi pe care societatea tinde s le arate cu degetul, nu facem dect s renunm la resurse personale importante i la bucuria de a fi noi nine. Captivant, scris cu umor, presrat cu multe exemple, aceast carte ne dovedete c nimic din ceea ce purtm cu noi nu este de prisos. n cele din urm, aceasta este o carte care ne spune de ce fericirea ne poate ntrista i de ce mindfulness-ul ar putea fi supraevaluat. Partea luminoas a prii ntunecate ofer un set de argumente provocatoare, fundamentate tiinific, n sprijinul unei viei echilibrate. Dac nu ai citit-o nc, ar trebui s te simi vinovat –iar acest lucru va fi spre binele tu. -- Adam Grant Simt c am cinci noi superputeri dup ce am citit aceast carte. Se dovedete c, pentru a avea o via bun i satisfctoare, nu trebuie s ncercm s fim fericii, calmi sau optimiti tot timpul. Putem nva s folosim sentimentele inconfortabile precum mnia, anxietatea, vinovia, tristeea sau plictiseala pentru a fi mai buni, mai curajoi, mai istei, mai creativi i mai persuasivi. Partea ntunecat are ntr-adevr o parte luminoas i aceast carte ne nva cum s-o folosim, pentru a duce n mod real o via mai plin de sens. -- Jane McGonigal, PhD

Amikor egyszer csak azzal szembesülsz, hogy elkap egy mindenféle tünetekkel járó rosszullét, még fogalmad sincs róla, hogy valami olyasmi veszi kezdetét, ami hónapokra, évekre vagy akár évtizedekre is meghatározza majd az életedet. Csak id? kérdése és a rohamok megismétl?dnek, egyre gyakoribbá válnak, szép lassan úrrá lesznek rajtad és átveszik a hatalmat a sorsod felett. El?sz?r még te magad sem hiszed el, hogy mindez veled t?rténik. Valami, amir?l azt mondják pánik(betegség), egy sz?rny? fenevad, rád talált, utolért, beléd bújt, a részed lett és pokollá akarja tenni vagy már azzá is tette az életedet. Ett?l kezdve ugyanis nem te parancsolsz neki, hanem ? neked. Nem tudsz elbújni vagy elmenekülni el?le, mert ott van benned, a saját testedben és a lelkedben. Ha ?r?kre meg akarsz szabadulni t?le, egy életre szóló feladat vár rád, talán életed legnagyobb kihívása ez. Mindenekel?tt el kell d?ntened, hogy képes vagy rá és tudnod kell, hogy valami nagy változásra van szükséged. Ha el akarod felejteni mindazt a sok szomorúságot, kellemetlenséget, fájdalmat és rosszat, amire ezen túl még csak emlékezni sem akarsz, meg kell változnod. A változáshoz semmi másra nincs szükséged, csakis ?nmagadra. Ha úgy d?ntesz, te vagy az er?sebb és legy?z?d minden mutációjával együtt, tudnod kell az el?tted álló út nemcsak hosszú és magányos, de meglehet?sen nehéz, és gy?trelmes lesz, sok ?nfegyelmet és alázatot kíván majd. De cserébe ígérem, talán sok-sokévnyi sikertelen próbálkozás után, az alagút végén te is meglátod a fényt. A fény felé haladva egyre határozottabban látod majd a megoldást, élvezed a sikert, legy?z?d a korlátaidat, és újra kinyílik számodra a világ. Amikor a magamfajta szerencse fia, rátalál a saját pokolból kivezet? útjára, egy id? után egyre világosabban látja, merre kell mennie, és mit kell tennie nemcsak hogy saját magát, de sorstársait is gy?zelemre segítse. Csakis így nyerhet értelmet az életében miden szenvedés, zsákutca vagy kanyar… Szóljon hát ez a k?nyv segítségül mindazoknak, akik velem együtt megjárták a pánik, ama legmélységesebb bugyrait, amit leggonoszabb ellenségeimnek sem kívánnék, ha egyáltalán lennének ilyenek!

Valljuk be, majdnem mindannyian hajlamosak vagyunk az ?nsajnálatra. ?gy hisszük, a legnagyobb baj mindig velünk t?rténik. Nos, ha valamiért szomorú vagy – esetleg elhagytak, megcsaltak, becsaptak vagy elárultak –, és elolvasod ezt a k?nyvet, hidd el, fel fogod tenni magadnak a kérdést: Miért sírok, miért szomorkodom?! Hozzájuk képest hálás lehetek a sorsnak… Ha éppen valamilyen párkapcsolati problémával küzdesz, biztosan találsz a k?nyvemben olyan t?rténetet, amely rímel a mostani gondjaidra. Megtudhatod, mások hogyan oldották meg – vagy hogyan rontották el – azt a bizonyos élethelyzetet. Talán segít felismerni a megoldást, és nem k?veted el ugyanazt a hibát, amit ott és akkor másvalaki már elk?vetett. Igaz a mondás: okos ember más kárán tanul. Nos, ebb?l a k?nyvb?l tanulhatsz b?ven… Megtanulhatod, hogyan lehet a teljes kiszolgáltatottságból felállni, egy t?nkrement életet újraépíteni, elgyászolni az elgyászolhatatlant, elengedni életed legfontosabb szerepl?jét, ahogy megtanulhatod azt is, hogyan rombolhat a legnagyobb szeretet, milyen mélységekbe taszíthat a szegénység, vagy hogy miként lehet újra bizakodni életünk romjain. A regényírók fantáziája végtelen, ám a legnagyobb mesemondó mégiscsak az élet. Aligha olvastál még olyan csavaros, izgalmas, megrázó t?rténeteket, mint ezek itt. Talán, mert ezeket a t?rténeteket tényleg az élet írta. ?n csak papírra vetettem. Tizenegy igaz t?rténet. Tizenegy d?bbenetes sors. Tizenegy ember, aki képes volt újrakezdeni az életét. Szeretettel, Kata

Stiinta si misterele OZN arunca o privire cuprinzatoare asupra datelor stiintifice legate de fenomenul farfuriilor zburatoare. Stanton T. Friedman conferentiar si specialist in fizica nucleara si-a sintetizat cei 40 de ani de cercetari despre OZN-uri intr-o carte ce prezinta o varietate impresionanta de sisteme spatiale si de sisteme nucleare avansate secrete. El raspunde la o serie de intrebari de fizica intr-un limbaj accesibil si nespecialistilor si ajunge la concluzia ca zborul interstelar este posibil fara a incalca legile fizicii. Cartea aduna informatii socante din mai multe studii de anvergura dedicate fenomenului OZN care n-au fost suficient dezbatute de-a lungul timpului. Pune mereu intrebarea ?de ce : de ce guvernul musamalizeaza unele informatii de ce extraterestrii vin pe Pamant si de ce nu aleg sa aterizeze direct pe gazonul de la Casa Alba. Friedman dezvaluie informatii despre programul SETI si aminteste de aversiunea scriitorilor de science-fiction fata de OZN-uri. De asemenea vorbeste despre ideile preconcepute fata de cei care cred in extraterestri si e de parere ca fenomenul OZN ar trebui sustinut cu mai multa convingere de mass-media si de comunitatea stiintifica.

Administra?ia Na?ional? pentru Aeronautic? ?i Spa?iu (NASA) a fost ?nfiin?at? pe 29 iulie 1958. ?nc? din primele zile, aceasta s-a aflat ?n avangarda eforturilor de explorare a spa?iului cosmic, iar rezultatele acestora s-au v?zut ?n misiunile selenare Apollo, ?n sta?ia spa?ial? Skylab, precum ?i ?n naveta spa?ial?, a?a cum o ?tim noi ast?zi. De-a lungul timpului, de NASA au fost legate multe opera?iuni de mu?amalizare ?i ascundere a adev?rului la cele mai ?nalte niveluri. Iat? c?teva dintre faimoasele ?secrete“ p?strate de NASA:Ipoteza c? aseleniz?rile Apollo din perioada 1969-1972 au fost, de fapt, simulate, ca parte a efortului de a demonstra superioritatea militar? ?i tehnologic? fa?? de fosta Uniune Sovietic?.Controversatul ?Chip uman de pe Marte“ – despre care mul?i cred c? ar fi o structur? sculptat?, creat? ?n trecutul ?ndep?rtat de mar?ienii indigeni, care ?ntre timp au disp?rut.Numele informatorilor secre?i din cadrul NASA care au ?ncercat s? deconspire cele mai stra?nic p?zite secrete ale organiza?iei cu privire la interac?iunile dintre guvernul american ?i extratere?tri.Cuprins:Mul?umiriIntroducereImplicarea extratere?trilorDe la Mercury la GeminiPr?bu?irea de la KecksburgApollo. Zboruri imaginare?Conexiunea cu Zona 51O epidemie de origine extraterestr?Europa anilor 1970Fra?ii din spa?iuMac Tonnies fa?? ?n fa?? cu mar?ieniiOZN-uri pr?bu?ite ?n BoliviaSabotarea navetelor spa?ialeR?pirile extraterestre ?i NASAMon?trii NASADeschiderea dosarelor X ale NASARoswell ?i astronautulFotografii cenzurateAtacul computerelor NASA Concluzie: Trecut, prezent ?i viitor NoteBibliografie

Femeile ?i b?rba?ii tr?iesc ?n lumi diferite… create de cuvinte diferite. Cartea Ce spun eu ?i ce ?n?elegi tu. De ce b?rba?ii ?i femeile vorbesc limbi diferite este un adev?rat fenomen cultural ?i intelectual care s-a aflat aproape patru ani pe lista de bestselleruri New York Times, din care opt luni pe primul loc. Este cartea ce a adus ?n aten?ia publicului diferen?ele de gen din modurile de vorbire. Cu o combina?ie rar? de perspicacitate ?tiin?ific? ?i scriere ?nc?nt?toare ?i amuzant?, Tannen arat? cum de este posibil ca b?rba?ii ?i femeile s? aib? o impresie total diferit? despre ce s-a spus ?n cadrul unei conversa?ii.

Bun venit ?n lumea program?rii neurolingvistice (neuro-linguistic programming – NLP)! Cartea de fa?? ??i va prezenta principalele teme ?i idei ce constituie NLP. ??i va oferi cuno?tin?e de ansamblu ?i ?n?elegerea conceptelor?cheie, pe l?ng? exerci?ii practice menite a??i pune mintea la contribu?ie. NLP are propriul sistem de limbaj ?i organizare, explicat pe larg cu exemple din problemele profesionale ?i personale. Teoriile ?i practica NLP te vor ajuta s? descoperi ce ?i face pe unii oameni s? exceleze ?n toate aspectele vie?ii lor, stimul?ndu?te s? faci acela?i lucru.

Deseori, cei care solicit? ajutorul unui psihoterapeut nu sunt doar ?n c?utarea unor solu?ii pentru conflictele care ?i fr?m?nt?, ci simt c? au nevoie de un nou ?nceput pentru c? undeva, ?n interior, exist? un defect care trebuie reparat, un defect care a ap?rut ?n rela?iile cu ceilal?i. ?n Defectul fundamental, M. Balint ofer? at?t o descriere a personalit??ii umane ?n termeni rela?ionali, ?n care aceast? arie a defectului fundamental ??i are un loc definit de rela?iile bipersonale primare, c?t ?i o ilustrare a modalit??ii de a repara acest defect fundamental ?i de a oferi pacientului ?ansa unui nou ?nceput. Pentru autor, defectul fundamental reflect? consecin?ele actuale ale unor experien?e traumatice timpurii ?n rela?ia bipersonal? care pot fi retr?ite ?i vindecate pe cale analitic?, chiar dac? vindecarea las? o cicatrice. ?n abordarea sa, Balint recunoa?te importan?a aportului ambilor participan?i pentru rezultatul tratamentului ?i atrage aten?ia asupra contribu?iei terapeutului la desf??urarea procesului terapeutic. Pentru a crea atmosfera necesar? desf??ur?rii acestui proces, este necesar ca terapeutul s? fie flexibil emo?ional ?i s?-i permit? pacientului s? regreseze la nivelul defectului fundamental pentru a reveni, apoi, capabil s? aib? o rela?ie de obiect diferit?, mai matur?, cu cei din jur.

Prin ce difer? cre?terea b?ie?ilor de aceea a fetelor? Sunt predispu?i b?ie?ii no?tri afla?i la pubertate sau la adolescen?? s? intre ?n mai multe buclucuri dec?t fetele de aceea?i v?rst?? Cum ne putem ajuta fiii s? str?bat? cu bine aceste perioade ?i s? se maturizeze f?r? a le ?tirbi masculinitatea ?n devenire??ntr-o societate ?n care femeile sunt considerate categorie marginalizat? ?i privite ca poten?iale victime, b?ie?ii, ulterior b?rba?ii, ajung s? fie privi?i ca poten?iali agresori. Astfel, discrepan?a social? nu se reduce, ci se ad?nce?te. Cum ar fi, ?ns?, ne propune autorul acestei c?r?i, s? pornim de la premisa c? b?ie?ii sunt structura?i diferit, c?, de-a lungul mileniilor, au evoluat av?nd nevoi, scopuri ?i comportamente diferite de cele ale fetelor? ?n loc s? ?ncerc?m s?-i schimb?m, ?ncadr?ndu-i ?ntr-un tipar feminin, putem ?ncepe prin a-i ?n?elege ?i a le oferi acel cadru de dezvoltare de care au nevoie pentru a deveni b?rba?ii pe care ni-i dorim: puternici, protectori, devota?i.?

Ce ne ?ndeamn? s? r?vnim la acele lucruri care nu ne apar?in, devenind invidio?i, sau chiar s? ni le ?nsu?im uneori, nesocotind, astfel, unul dintre principiile morale esen?iale? Avem oare de-a face cu un atribut uman primar, mai mult sau mai pu?in ?mbl?nzit de-a lungul veacurilor??n mituri ?i basme, furtul ?i pierderea sunt prezente ca mecanisme declan?atoare ale unor serii de evenimente fatidice sau, din contr?, ca germeni ai unei noi stabilit??i, superioar? celei anterioare. Trec?nd dincolo de simpla nara?iune a acestora, cartea de fa?? ne dezv?luie, printr-o fin? analiz? psihologic?, aspectele, motiva?iile, ra?iunile interioare ale ho?iei, acelea care scap? adesea privirii moralizatoare, precum ?i ?n?elesurile ascunse ale pandantului s?u, pierderea.Ho?ul interior este o lectur? util? ?i ?n acela?i timp pl?cut? pentru psihologi, psihoterapeu?i, asisten?i sociali, avoca?i ?i, totodat?, pentru to?i aceia care doresc s? ?n?eleag? ra?iunile ascunse ale comportamentelor respinse, ?n general, de societate.?Un mit esen?ial despre ho?ie este povestea L?nii de Aur. Aceast? legend? are cel pu?in 3000 de ani ?i reprezint? o prim? ilustrare a furtului unui lucru de pre?. [...] Studiind acest mit, vom vedea c? Iason, eroul compromis, se comport?, ?n parte, ca un adolescent care ?nc? nu s-a maturizat ca b?rbat, ca un t?n?r ce consider? c? i se cuvinte totul ?i care nu-?i poate recunoa?te limit?rile. Viitoarea sa so?ie, Medeea, ??i ucide mai t?rziu copiii f?cu?i cu Iason, pentru a evita ru?inea pierderii statutului ei ?i pentru a-?i afirma propria idee de justi?ie ?n fa?a nedrept??ii lui Iason, pe care ea o resimte ca pe o priva?iune. ?ns? lunga lor poveste mai con?ine ?i o alt? ?ntrebare: c?nd ho?ia opre?te brutal procesul de individuare?“ – Robert TyminskiSt?team ?n cabinetul meu de la ?coal?, c?nd a intrat o profesoar? ?i mi-a spus: ?A f?cut-o din nou.? Am ?ntrebat cine a f?cut-o din nou, iar ea mi-a replicat: ?Kyle. A furat ceva din po?eta mea,dar una dintre celelalte profesoare l-a prins dup? aceea, c?nd ?ncerca sa ascund? ce a luat ?n ghiozdan.? Am ?ntrebat ce furase ?i mi-a r?spuns: ?Rujul. La fel ca data trecut?.? A continuat: ?E un ho? de farduri. Din toate lucrurile de furat, el e obsedat de farduri. M?car ?tim, ?n sf?r?it, cine tot lua rujurile.? La vremea aceea, Kyle avea doar 5 ani.“ – Robert Tyminski

Medicamentul cel mai des folosit ?n medicina general? este medicul ?nsu?i; altfel spus, nu doar flaconul sau cutia cu medicamente conteaz?, ci maniera ?n care acestea sunt prescrise pacientului – de fapt, ansamblul atmosferei ?n care medicamentul este dat ?i luat. ?n cartea de fa??, Michael Balint descrie diferite procese incon?tiente ce intervin ?n rela?ia medic-pacient, aspecte care pot favoriza vindecarea, sau pot duce la tensiuni, nepl?ceri ?i tratamente lipsite de rezultatul benefic a?teptat. Dac? rela?ia stabilit? ?ntre specialist ?i client poate fi un obstacol ?n calea bunei desf??ur?ri a activit??ii, atunci unul dintre modurile ?n care rezultatele profesionale pot fi ?mbun?t??ite este supervizarea centrat? pe reac?iile emo?ionale ale medicului fa?? de pacien?ii s?i. ?n?elegerea acestor reac?ii poate oferi date importante despre pacient, pe care specialistul s? le poat? folosi mai departe ?n evaluarea cazului ?i ?n stabilirea unei interven?ii eficiente. Numeroase exemple clinice ilustreaz? dinamica incon?tient? a rela?iei terapeutice, precum ?i modul ?n care se desf??oar? grupurile Balint pentru medici.

nvturile lui Osho, unul dintre cei mai cunoscui lideri spirituali ai secolului XX, rstoarn tiparele clasice de gndire, provocndune la o permanent punere sub semnul ntrebrii a certitudinilor i la un proces de contientizare de sine.Crile din seria Incursiune ntrun nou mod de via prezint viziunea lui Osho privind cele mai importante probleme pe care i le pun oamenii interesai de tiina transformrii de sine i de o spiritualitate adaptat la provocrile cotidiene ale vieii contemporane.