分析哲学是20世纪主要的两大哲学流派之一，自摩尔、罗素以来，大师辈出，经典产品层出不穷，可以说，整个改变了西方哲学的面貌。本书是探讨20世纪分析哲学的一部巨著，作者是著名的分析哲学家，在书中详尽地考察了从摩尔、罗素、维特根斯坦到蒯因、克里普克等大师的哲学思想，对其在哲学史上的主要贡献做了极其精彩的分析，对其论证中的不足同样做了犀利的批评。可以说，本书必将作为一部经典的哲学史而流传后世。分析传统的出现，部分源自对十九世纪形而上学观念论的回应，部分源自逻辑的新发展、逻辑与数学的关系以及逻辑在理解和阐释语言意义中的作用。初，逻辑和语言中的新旨趣集中在对重要概念的分析上，以期找到解决传统哲学问题的新方案。但不久之后，占据主导地位的分析哲学家开始相信，逻辑上的和语言上的新技术需要一种新的哲学观念——在这种新观念中，那些在过去由不可解的、终说来是误解性的问题所产生的无休止的辩论，将被富有成效的、系统性的哲学探究所取代，这些探究所针对的问题虽然具有挑战性，但完全是可理解的并终可解决的。然而，人们很快就发现这种宏大的转变不会成功，因为二十世纪三十和四十年代的哲学家用他们精确的分析技术证明，哲学的这种转变将会面临无法修复的缺陷。卷讲述的正是上述故事。

 今天他将为你启幸福《幸福之路》是罗素的一本经典名著，拥有广泛的读者。在这本书里，罗素不依任何高深的学说，而是把一些经由他自己的经验和观察证实过的通情达理的意见归纳起来，制做出一张良方，希望无数对生活感到困惑和郁闷的男男女女，能够在此找到医治他们病案的方子，能够在以后凭着适当的努力变得幸福。  《幸福之路》浅显易懂，读起来饶有趣味。正如罗素写此书的目的，“希望那些遭受不幸而并未享受幸福的众多男女能够诊断出自己的症状并找出摆脱的方法”。的大门，门外是条布满鲜花的幸福之路！

本书据阿多诺在1963年5月至7月的讲课稿整理而成，全书围绕着对康德道德哲学的评说而展，并结合阿多诺自身的体会，对整个西方哲学传统中的道德哲学予以了理论反思。在本书中，阿多诺分析了道德哲学与伦理学的区别，认为伦理学概念缩小和简化了对道德或伦理问题的深刻思考，因此他反对用伦理学概念代替道德哲学的概念，主张坚持使用康德意义上的“道德哲学”概念。同时，阿多诺不仅认为道德哲学是一种实践哲学，还认为在更深层次上，道德哲学也是一种理论哲学，因为理论和实践在根本上都来自生活，因而具有同一性。 在行文上，不同于阿多诺其他著作的晦涩难懂，本书朴实直白、明白晓畅，甚至不乏幽默诙谐之处，读者从字里行间也可领略到阿多诺的上课风格。

本书是英语世界*权威的马克思生平、思想研究文献之一。它的*特色：一是详细剖析了以往不为人注意和重视的后来发表的马克思的思想文献，如马克思的几大本经济学笔记；二是深细致地刻画了马克思一生的生活、工作和理论研究经历，揭示了许多鲜为人知的情况和资料。书中所提供的新资料对我国学界正在盛行的马克思著作的版本和文献研究，无疑有重要参考价值。

《劝学篇》是晚清名臣张之洞（1837—1909）撰写的近代思想著作，共24篇，4万余言。全书贯穿“旧学为体，新学为用”的论，主张在维护封建统治的基本原则下受西方资本主义的技术，猛烈攻维新派的“议院、兴民权”的学说。此书深得慈禧太后和光绪帝的赏识，得以“挟朝廷之力以行之，不胫而遍于海内”，据称发行数百万册。

《庄子》以其绮丽诡谲的文辞、夸张怪诞的寓言、字里行间透露出的潇洒飘逸的人生态度受到人们的喜爱，百读不厌。本书作者力求用通俗易懂而又不乏文采的文字解读《庄子》，为广大读者呈现一部译注类之佳作。本书注释简明准确，译文通达晓畅，解析深浅出， 将一个个《庄子》故事娓娓道来，让读者在感受《庄子》优美文风的同时，享受精神上的愉悦。

本书是“金阳论道·《道德经》系列丛书”之*种，主要是对《道德经》前九章的释读，由演讲录音整理而成。本书意在重新解释老子文字中“有与无”的内在本质，通过对“有与无”关系的再阐释，展开对老子智慧更深层次的解读。作者结合自身在绘画艺术方面的实践和对老子文字的体悟，为我们提供了关于《道德经》新的注解版本。

我们出世，我们生活，我们一路上受苦，然后我们死去，此后永远地被抹除。我们的存在不过是宇宙时空中的一次小小波动。难怪很多人要问?：“这一切到底是为了什么？” 我在本书中主张，对上述问题的正确回答是?：“说到底，不为什么。”尽管有不多的慰藉，人的境况实际上仍是一种悲剧性的困境，这种困境无人可逃，因为困境不仅在于生，也在于死。 …… 书店里有整片的“自助”书籍区及其他鸡汤读物，却没有“无力自助”区和“悲观主义”区，因为这类思想的市场规模微乎其微。 我不是在认真主张我们无力自助。我是认为存在一些事情，我们的确对之无能为力，但即使依据一种现实的悲观看法，我们仍然可以做些事来减轻我们的困境。 一本悲观的书*有可能慰藉到的对象，是已经有同样看法却因此感到孤独或觉得自己有病的人。若能发觉有人跟自己看法相同，而且这些看法有不错的论证来支撑，这些人或许能因此得到安慰。 …… 无可否认，找到正确的道路很难，因为既要避免大而无当的宣言和过度修辞造成的故弄玄虚，也要避免深奥、乏味、细而又细的条分缕析。换言之，对复杂问题做出易懂、有趣而严格的探讨，并非易事。……不过，本书的写作确实有个目标，那就是既让有悟性的非专业读者能读、能懂，又足够严格，能满足构成本书期望读者群的另一部分人，即专业哲学家（及有志于哲学专业的读者）。但愿我取得了恰切的平衡。?

《思考的智慧》考察了人的本质、宇宙的真相和思想的力量，是帕斯卡留在人间的风景。书中关于宇宙、社会、人性、信仰与生命的意义的阐述，敏锐独特，充满哲学思辨的魅力和激情，深深触动每个人的心灵。近400年来，无论是大师还是普通读者，都从中受益无穷。

本书上一版获得了“2014中国好书”和“第十届文津图书奖”等多个奖项。作者万维钢擅长以“理工科思维”为导向，以前沿的科学视角解读生活，涉及行为经济学、认知心理学、社会学、统计学、物理学等众多学科，为人们提供了认识世界的新方法，破除了认知上的重重迷思。根据近年来的研究成果，本书在*版的基础上，做了必要的延伸、修订和增补，以全新的面貌呈现给读者。本书不仅有趣，还十分有营养

本书为广东省哲学社会科学规划项目“齐泽克后现代主义文艺批评研究”和广东海洋大学科研启动资助项目“齐泽克哲学理论的文学阐释研究”的研究成果。近年来，斯洛文尼亚左翼思想家齐泽克的理论与批评实践引起了中国学界的高度重视。国内学者主要致力于对他进行马克思主义的阐释，本书则从意识形态和法权批评入手，通过梳理齐泽克的思想谱系，回顾从康德、黑格尔、马克思到弗洛伊德、拉康诸位西方思想家的相应理论建构，挖掘齐泽克表面庞杂的理论深处所蕴含的道德哲学与新人本主义闪光。本书在解读齐泽克思想的同时贯穿着坚定的马克思主义立场与辩证思维，对齐泽克研究及西方哲学研究有一定参考价值。

《前期与后期》是清华大学国学院刘东教授以独特视角研究思想史，深刻反思当今人文学科学术状况之作。刘东教授认为，对于人文学者来说，创作生涯的前期与后期同样重要，从前期到后期是一个自我修养、磨炼心性的过程。在前期，需要视野的确立与充分的积累；而后期，则是一个在大量积累的基础之上进一步发挥，走向成熟，释放出更多创造性的过程。有志于学术的学者，应该有所坚守与执信，不必在意短期、世俗意义上的成功；而在学术生涯的后期，要以刻苦与坚忍，坚持进行“后期写作”。

　　《庄子》是继《老子》之后体现道家学说的一部极其重要的作品，与《老子》如双峰并立。现今通行的《庄子》一书，分为“内篇”、“外篇”、“杂篇”三部分，共三十三篇。以其深邃的思想内容和奇诡的创作手法，在先秦诸子散文中独树一帜，是一部洋溢着浪漫主义的散文集。本书节选《庄子》的精华部分，以新编诸子集成本《庄子集释》为底本核校原文，出注，翻译，引领读者品味它无穷的艺术魅力。

《参同契》又名《周易参同契》，为东汉魏伯阳著。其学说汇融周易、黄老、丹火之功于一体，用《易》的阴阳变化之理，阐述炼丹、内养之道，证明人与天地、宇宙有同体、同功而异用的法则。??《我说<参同契>》是南怀瑾先生继《论语别裁》后用力*深、*有分量的作品之一，共八十余万言，分上、中、下三册。内容涉及广泛，旁征博引，举证极多，更有南师本人所经历的诸多奇特的人和事，是国人了解、解读《参同契》这部“天书”的选择。

《列子》为道家重要典籍之一，与老庄并列。它高深莫测，易读而难懂，以故事、神话的形态，阐释道家的学术及观念。 《列子臆说》是南怀瑾先生关于《列子》的讲记，共分上中下三册。南怀瑾先生讲述列子，深浅出、生动自在，以《列子》的内容为研究重，带领读者广阔的视野、深难测的奇妙境界，并破了意识的种种局限。列子，这个御风而行的人，要我们从一切自设的框架中突围，成就天地间的自在逍遥。

本书首先依据西方马克思主义探讨了马克思主义的“真精神”，特别是探讨了马克思主义与哲学，以及马克思主义哲学与本体论之关系，然后着重从马克思主义的思考角度和范式来审视和反思当今的世界，特别是当今的中国。本书通过对马克思走向政治经济学批判的三次飞跃的分析，发出了“回归政治经济学批判”的呼唤；用马克思两大发现的整体视角剖析了资本主义的“经济人”，并基于此对当今学术界的一些人无原则地宣扬“经济人”展了批判；揭示了改革放以来我国学术界理解马克思主义哲学的三种路向，特别是批判了对马克思主义做启蒙主义和后现代主义解释的缺陷；归纳了马克思主义哲学与中国道路的双向促；用马克思主义公平观审视了社会的不平等，用马克思主义生态观审视了生态危机；描述了“马中西”三大资源在中国道路中的交互汇通。

Human reason, in one sphere of its cognition, is called upon to consider questions, which it cannot decline, as they are presented by its own nature, but which it cannot answer, as they transcend every faculty of the mind. It falls into this difficulty without any fault of its own. It begins with principles, which cannot be dispensed with in the field of experience, and the truth and sufficiency of which are, at the same time, insured by experience. With these principles it rises, in obedience to the laws of its own nature, to ever higher and more remote conditions. But it quickly discovers that, in this way, its labours must remain ever incomplete, because new questions never cease to present themselves; and thus it finds itself compelled to have recourse to principles which transcend the region of experience, while they are regarded by common sense without distrust. It thus falls into confusion and contradictions, from which it conjectures the presence of latent errors, which, however, it is unable to discover, because the principles it employs, transcending the limits of experience, cannot be tested by that criterion. The arena of these endless contests is called Metaphysic.Time was, when she was the queen of all the sciences; and, if we take the will for the deed, she certainly deserves, so far as regards the high importance of her object-matter, this title of honour. Now, it is the fashion of the time to heap contempt and scorn upon her; and the matron mourns, forlorn and forsaken, like Hecuba: At first, her gover Modo maxima rerum, Tot generis, natisque potens... Nunc trahor exul, inops. —Ovid, Metamorphoses. xiii under the administration of the dogmatists, was an absolute despotism. But, as the legislative continued to show traces of the ancient barbaric rule, her empire gradually broke up, and intestine wars introduced the reign of anarchy; while the sceptics, like nomadic tribes, who hate a permanent habitation and settled mode of living, attacked from time to time those who had organized themselves into civil communities. But their number was, very happily, small; and thus they could not entirely put a stop to the exertions of those who persisted in raising new edifices, although on no settled or uniform plan. In recent times the hope dawned upon us of seeing those disputes settled, and the legitimacy of her claims established by a kind of physiology of the human understanding—that of the celebrated Locke. But it was found that—although it was affirmed that this so-called queen could not refer her descent to any higher source than that of common experience, a circumstance which necessarily brought suspicion on her claims—as this genealogy was incorrect, she persisted in the advancement of her claims to sovereignty. Thus metaphysics necessarily fell back into the antiquated and rotten constitution of dogmatism, and again became obnoxious to the contempt from which efforts had been made to save it. At present, as all methods, according to the general persuasion, have been tried in vain, there reigns nought but weariness and complete indifferentism—the mother of chaos and night in the scientific world, but at the same time the source of, or at least the prelude to, the re-creation and reinstallation of a science, when it has fallen into confusion, obscurity, and disuse from ill directed effort. I do not mean by this a criticism of books and systems, but a critical inquiry into the faculty of reason, with reference to the cognitions to which it strives to attain without the aid of experience; in other words, the solution of the question regarding the possibility or impossibility of metaphysics, and the determination of the origin, as well as of the extent and limits of this science. All this must be done on the basis of principles. ABOUT AUTHOR: That all our knowledge begins with experience there can be no doubt. For how is it possible that the faculty of cognition should be awakened into exercise otherwise than by means of objects which affect our senses, and partly of themselves produce representations, partly rouse our powers of understanding into activity, to compare to connect, or to separate these, and so to convert the raw material of our sensuous impressions into a knowledge of objects, which is called experience? In respect of time, therefore, no knowledge of ours is antecedent to experience, but begins with it. But, though all our knowledge begins with experience, it by no means follows that all arises out of experience. For, on the contrary, it is quite possible that our empirical knowledge is a compound of that which we receive through impressions, and that which the faculty of cognition supplies from itself (sensuous impressions giving merely the occasion), an addition which we cannot distinguish from the original element given by sense, till long practice has made us attentive to, and skilful in separating it. It is, therefore, a question which requires close investigation, and not to b

DAVID HUME (1711 – 1776) was a Scottish philosopher, historian, economist, and essayist known especially for his philosophical empiricism and skepticism. He was one of the most important figures in the history of Western philosophy and the Scottish Enlightenment. Hume is often grouped with John Locke, George Berkeley, and a handful of others as a British Empiricist. Beginning with his A Treatise of Human Nature (1739), Hume strove to create a total naturalistic "science of man" that examined the psychological basis of human nature. In stark opposition to the rationalists who preceded him, most notably Descartes, he concluded that desire rather than reason governed human behaviour, saying: "REASON IS, and OUGHT ONLY to BE the SLAVE of the PASSIONS". A prominent figure in the sceptical philosophical tradition and a strong empiricist, he argued against the existence of innate ideas, concluding instead that humans have knowledge only of things they directly experience.. NOTHING is more usual and more natural for those, who pretend to discover anything new to the world in philosophy and the sciences, than to insinuate the praises of their own systems, by decrying all those, which have been advanced before them. And indeed were they content with lamenting that ignorance, which we still lie under in the most important questions, that can come before the tribunal of human reason, there are few, who have an acquaintance with the sciences, that would not readily agree with them. It is easy for one of judgment and learning, to perceive the weak foundation even of those systems, which have obtained the greatest credit, and have carried their pretensions highest to accurate and profound reasoning. Principles taken upon trust, consequences lamely deduced from them, want of coherence in the parts, and of evidence in the whole, these are every where to be met with in the systems of the most eminent philosophers, and seem to have drawn disgrace upon philosophy itself. Nor is there required such profound knowledge to discover the present imperfect condition of the sciences, but even the rabble without doors may, judge from the noise and clamour, which they hear, that all goes not well within. There is nothing which is not the subject of debate, and in which men of learning are not of contrary opinions. The most trivial question escapes not our controversy, and in the most momentous we are not able to give any certain decision. Disputes are multiplied, as if every thing was uncertain; and these disputes are managed with the greatest warmth, as if every thing was certain. Amidst all this bustle it is not reason, which carries the prize, but eloquence; and no man needs ever despair of gaining proselytes to the most extravagant hypothesis, who has art enough to represent it in any favourable colours. The victory is not gained by the men at arms, who manage the pike and the sword; but by the trumpeters, drummers, and musicians of the army. From hence in my opinion arises that common prejudice against metaphysical reasonings of all kinds, even amongst those, who profess themselves scholars, and have a just value for every other part of literature. By metaphysical reasonings, they do not understand those on any particular branch of science, but every kind of argument, which is any way abstruse, and requires some attention to be comprehended. We have so often lost our labour in such researches, that we commonly reject them without hesitation, and resolve, if we must for ever be a prey to errors and delusions, that they shall at least be natural and entertaining. And indeed nothing but the most determined scepticism, along with a great degree of indolence, can justify this aversion to metaphysics. For if truth be at all within the reach of human capacity, it is certain it must lie very deep and abstruse: and to hope we shall arrive at it without pains, while the greatest geniuses have failed with the utmost pains..

Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) este o figur? legendar? a filosofiei germane, opera sa fiind baza ? revolu?iei copernicane“ petrecute ?n istoria g?ndirii ?n plin? er? de av?nt al romantismului. ?n volumul de fa?? sunt cuprinse dou? eseuri foarte pu?in cunoscute publicului amator de filosofie, ?n care vom reg?si g?ndurile filosofului privitoare la ?nceputuri (ale istoriei omenirii) ?i sf?r?ituri (ale lumii ?n general). Scrise dup? celebra triad? a ? Criticilor“, textele poart? amprenta sistemului kantian de g?ndire, dar constituie totodat? ?ncerc?ri remarcabile de abordare a unor subiecte de larg interes, analizate din perspectiva ve?nicei clauze a ? condi?iilor de posibilitate“. Orice minte uman? care va ?ncerca s? cuprind? ?nceputul ?i sf?r?itul se va vedea constr?ns? ?ntr-un fel sau ?n altul de limitele pe care Kant ?ncearc? s? le expun? aici ?n idei c?t mai simple.? Istoria naturii ?ncepe a?adar cu binele, c?ci este lucrarea lui Dumnezeu, iar istoria libert??ii cu r?ul, c?ci este lucrarea oamenilor. Pentru individ, care, ?n exerci?iul libert??ii prive?te doar c?tre sine, o astfel de schimbare a fost o pierdere pentru natur?, ale c?rei scopuri sunt orientate spre oameni ca specie, a fost un c??tig.“

　《图解楞严经：绚丽的佛法百科全书（白话图解）》与《法华经》《华严经》《金刚经》等并尊为“经中之王”，有“自从一读《楞严》后，不看人间糟粕书”等赞誉。它是一部“佛法百科全书”，更是一部指导人们修证的系统修炼手册。它还是佛教正法的代表，被历代高僧大德誉为统摄佛教经论的教海指南和禅宗正眼，很久以来就有“《楞严》兴，正法兴，《楞严》灭，正法灭”的悬记。 　　由于《楞严经》文字古奥、义理深邃，许多有心要精研《楞严经》的读者都不免要兴望洋之叹。为此，我们另辟蹊径出版了这本书。 　　《图解楞严经：绚丽的佛法百科全书（白话图解）》共分为五章，分别讲述了《楞严经》的方方面面，包括本经的地位、历史、争议、经题和译者等内容，其中以圆瑛大师的《楞严经讲义》为蓝本，综合各家的的注疏和讲解，精编成一篇篇通俗易懂的短文，同时，以60个系统结构表和严谨流程图，200幅精美绘图和佛像，用全新图解手法综合创意，使古老佛经焕发新鲜活力。

当今社会，到处洋溢着“透明”的热情，而人们的当务之急是培养一下对距离的热情。 距离和羞耻心无法被纳资本、信息及交际的高速循环。因此，人们便以“透明”的名义消除了所有谨慎的回旋余地。它们被照得通亮，被剥夺殆尽。世界也因此变得更加无耻、更加赤裸。 恰恰于信任不在时，人们对“透明”的呼求声才愈发响亮。在以信任为基础的社会中，人们是不会执意要求透明的。透明社会是一个不信任的、怀疑的社会，由于信任日渐消失，社会便始依赖监控。对透明的大声呼求恰恰表明，社会的道德基础已然脆弱不堪，真诚、正直等道德价值越来越失去意义。 作为一项新的社会命令，透明正在取代日渐式微的道德审查机构。 ------------- 韩炳哲作品系列（见识城邦出品）（已出齐） 《精神政治学》（2019年3月） Psychopolitik 《爱欲之死》（2019年3月） Agonie des Eros 《在群中》（2019年3月） Im Schwarm 《他者的消失》（2019年6月） Die Austreibung des Anderen 《倦怠社会》（2019年6月） Müdigkeitsgesellschaft 《娱乐何为》（2019年6月） Gute Unterhaltung 《暴力拓扑学》（2019年10月） Topologie der Gewalt 《透明社会》（2019年10月） Transparenzgesellschaft 《美的救赎》（2019年10月） Die Errettung des Sch?nen