本卷比较系统地分析和研究了从1976年粉碎“四人帮”、结束十年“文化大革命”，到1992年初邓小平发表南方谈话期间，以邓小平为核心的党的第二代中央领导集体，在领导当代中国的改革放和社会主义现代化建设实践中，拨乱反正，解放思想，把马克思主义基本原理与中国实际和时代特征相结合，围绕建设和发展中国特色社会主义这一主题，创中国特色社会主义道路，不断实现马克思主义中国化的历史程；论述了在不断总结实践经验的基础上形成的马克思主义中国化的理论成果——邓小平理论的主要内容和历史地位；分析了这一时期马克思主义中国化的基本经验。

《禅宗与道家》全书分为两编。上编为“禅宗与佛学”，对佛教产生的历史背景，大小乘佛教的基本教义，禅宗的传承，奠定后世禅宗思想基础的六祖惠能的事迹，禅宗的语录、公案、机锋和棒喝，参禅的方法，禅学与理学的关系，禅宗对唐诗、宋词、元曲、明清小说的影响，以及闻名遐迩的丛林制度等，作了精湛的论述。下编为“道家与道教”，对隐士和方士的由来，养神、服气、饵药、祀祷的派分，老庄之学，齐燕之风，阴阳五行，神仙丹道，道教的形成与演化，以及道家与道教对古代天文、历算、地理（堪舆）、物理、化学、医药等自然科学的贡献等，作了深有见地的剖析。

《中国哲学简史》原名A Short History of Chinese Philosophy，是冯友兰先生于1947至1947年在美国宾夕凡尼亚大学讲授中国哲学史课程的英文讲稿。该书在世界范围内都影响巨大，是迄今为止西方人了解、研究中国哲学的书，是世界各地许多大学教授中国哲学课程的教材。本次收”国民阅读经典”丛书的《简史》，采用赵复三先生的中文译本。

1949年10月至1976年10月，是马克思主义中国化历史程中承前启后的重要时期。1956年社会主义改造基本完成，中国从新民主主义社会社会主义初级阶段，成功实现了中国历*深刻*伟大的社会变革。中国共产党沿着马克思主义基本原理与中国实际“第二次结合”这条主线，围绕“什么是社会主义，怎样建设社会主义”这一时代主题，始了全新的探索历程，其中，既有凯歌行的峥嵘岁月，也有挫折失误的曲折历程，取得了独创性理论成果和巨大成就，为当代中国一切发展步奠定了根本政治前提和制度基础，为新的历史时期创中国特色社会主义提供了宝贵经验、理论准备、物质基础。本书全面阐述了这一时期中国共产党人探索中国社会主义革命和建设道路的曲折历程与经验教训，系统展示了以*为核心的党的*代中央领导集体探索中国社会主义道路、马克思主义基本原理与中国实际“第二次结合”程中的理论成果。

《中论》，又称《中观论》或《正观论》，与《百论》《十二门论》合称三论宗据以立宗的“三论”，撰成时间约相当于三国魏明帝时，题为龙树著，后秦鸠摩罗什译，四卷。本书系印度中观派对部派小乘佛教及其他学派行破斥而显示自宗的论战性著作，主要内容是阐发“八不缘起”和“实相涅槃”，以及诸法皆空义理的大乘中观学说。????本书据《大正藏》所收鸠摩罗什译本，逐偈讲解，疏通文意，阐明义理，并对一些关键性的佛教术语做了重阐释。

本套装所收录书目，都与“生命的认知”有关。修行、参禅、养生这些主题，经过个体实践，终都要归结到对个体生命的认知中去。这也是南怀瑾先生一生中一直关注、参研的主题。他以过来人的经验，将自己亲身体认所凝结的智慧贡献于读者，期望对世人有所帮助。

M. Lévy-Bruhl then explains that, whilst recognising the entire coherence of Comte’s collective labours, he proposes to confine his present study to the earlier and principal work, the Philosophy, which in M. Lévy-Bruhl’s opinion is the dominant and more fruitful composition.??This he regards as the representative work of the nineteenth century, as shown by the intellectual history of the period. He points to its influence on thought in England, in Europe, and in America. It will surprise many persons to learn that in M. Lévy-Bruhl’s opinion two eminent French writers, who assuredly neither were, nor were supposed to be, Positivists, “have done more for the diffusion of the ideas and method of Comte than Littré and all the other Positivists together.” ??These two are Taine and Renan, much as they differed from Comte’s actual scheme and doctrines. Renan indeed spoke of Comte as destined to prove one of the typical names of the century. The present writer remembers Renan saying to him with a most genial welcome, “I too am a believer in the religion of humanity.” ??Professor Lévy-Bruhl followed up his History of Modern Philosophy in France by a substantial work on the philosophy of Auguste Comte. It forms a volume of the Bibliothèque de Philosophie Contemporaine, which has already devoted four other works to the Positive Philosophy. It is as well to premise that this treatise dealt solely with the philosophy, not with the polity, or any part of the religious scheme of Comte. Professor Lévy-Bruhl writes as a student, but not as an adherent of Auguste Comte. His entire work is rather an exposition, not a refutation, or a criticism, or an advocacy of Comte’s philosophical system. But it may be said at once that no one abroad or at home, certainly neither Mill, nor Lewes, nor Spencer, nor Caird, has so truly grasped and assimilated Comte’s ideas as M. Lévy-Bruhl has done.??In his Introduction M. Lévy-Bruhl very clearly states the scope of his work, and his own general attitude. He traces the origin of Comte’s philosophy in the mental effervescence of the first generation of the present century towards a reorganisation of society, after the upheaval left by the Revolution and its consequences. He correctly states the relation of St. Simon to Comte as being that of an initial stimulus. ??The cardinal difference between Comte and all the socialists and founders of social and religious Utopias consisted in this, that Comte saw the necessity of a new system of philosophy as the indispensable preliminary to any reorganisation of society.

Diderot, tanr?sal, dinsel inanc?n yerine akl? ge?iren adamd?r, onun sava??m? buydu ve bütün k?r inan?lar? silip süpüren bu ak?l, g?rünen dünyay?, do?ay?, felsefenin, sanat?n, sa? t?renin temel ilkesi durumuna getirdi. Diderot’un yayg?n ?al??ma alan?n? olu?turan ilkedir bu. Maddeci ve gerekirci bir filozoftu. tanr?ya inanan ki?inin filozof olmayaca??n? s?yledi. 'K?rler üstüne mektup'taki k?r, kendini tanr?ya inand?rmaya ?al??an misyonere "bunun i?in tanr?ya parma??mla dokunmam gerekir" der. Diderot, bu yüzden hapse girdi. 'D'alembert'in dü?ü'nde, madde tanr?n?n yerini alm??t?r art?k. Madde devinim ve duyarl?l?kla donat?lm??t?r. Bilim gerekircili?in kan?t?d?r. Bütün varl?klar ?z?e birdir ve bir ge?i?, de?i?im, olu?um süreci i?inde bulunurlar. ?yle ise sa? t?renin temeli do?a olacakt?r. Do?as? gere?i insan iyidir, hristiyan sagtoresinin sand??? gibi do?u?tan günahkar de?il ve iyilikler de, k?tülükler de, düzenin, ko?ullar?n, e?itimin ürünüdür. ?nsan, bu gerekircilik anlay??? i?inde, ?zgür olamayaca?? i?in, su?lu da bulunamaz. bu üslama sonucu olarak sanat, do?ay? ?rnek almal?d?r. roman, resim, oyun ger?ek?i olmal?d?r. Diderot, bunlar? s?ylemekle kalmam??, romanlar? ve oyunlar? ile ?rneklendirmi?tir de ve ?a??n?n sanat??lar?n? bu a??dan de?erlendirmi?tir. Diderot, büyük sava??m? ve e?siz ?abas? ile insanl???n ba?tac?d?r bugün de ve onu b?ylesine unutulmaz k?lan i?lerinin ba??nda ise elbet 'ansiklopedi' gelir. 'Ansiklopedi', yunanca enkyklios paidela'dan yap?lm??t?r ve bütün bilimleri i?ine alan ??retim anlam?na gelir. s?zcü?ü bulan rabelais'dir (1532). Diderot ile d'alembert'in ansiklopedisine temel olan yap?t, ?ng?l?z chambers’?n cyelopaedia’s? idi; fakat diderot'nun etkisi ile ansiklopedi, bir ?eviri yap?t olmaktan ??k?p, gizemcili?e kar?? bilimin sava? alan? durumunu ald?. Bu yüzden de gerici ?evrelerin kar?? koymas?n? sonu?lad?. diderot, ya?am? boyunca ?al??t? 'ansiklopedi' i?in, bir?ok maddeyi kendisi yazd?. bu u?urda yepyeni ara?t?rmalara giri?ti, teknik de?i?mekte oldu?u i?in ortaya yeni ara?-gere?ler ??kmakta idi, bunlar? tan?d?, adland?rd?, tan?tt? ve fransa'y? ayd?nlanma ?a??'n?n avrupa'da g?zbebe?i durumuna getirdi. Ancak unutmamal? ki, bir ansiklopedi ortaya ??karan her ülkeyi ayd?nlanma ?a??'n? alg?lam?? sayamay?z. ?o?u ülkede bu tür yap?tlar, geni?letilmi? s?zlükler olmaktan ileri gidememi?tir. diderot’nun ansiklopedisi, toplu bilgi vermekten ?ok, dinsel inan?lara kar?? bilimlerin ??retimini üstlenmi?ti, demek yans?z de?ildi, metafizikle ve skolastikle ?arp???yordu..

规范性是当代规范伦理学的一个核心观念。本书深探究了人类理性层面的规范性与某种植根于自然化的深层规范性之间的关系，考察了作为元概念/范畴的规范性对一系列相关理论概念、题旨的某种奠基性作用，以展示其解释力及整合力。

In The philosophy of mathematics, mathematics employee classification efforts to understand the philosophy is the branch.?The main question is related to the source of the object that is the subject of mathematics and mathematics. In particular examine the characteris-tics of a true proposition:??? What are the sources of mathematical subject matter??? What is about the meaning of a mathematical object??? What is the nature of a mathematical proposition??? What is the relationship between logic and mathematics??? What is the role of mathematics hermeneutic??? Mathematics played a role in the investigation which type?? What is the subject of mathematical investigations??? What is the human traits behind mathematics??? What is mathematical beauty??? What is the nature and source of mathematical truth???What is the relationship between mathematics and abstract material universe with the world???Another important issue is the reality of a mathematical the-ory. Mathematics (from the Natural Sciences as different) experimentally is sought reasons to find real specific mathematical theory can not be tested (see. Epistemology). Luitz that Brouwer 's laid the foundation for intuitionist mathematics of the representatives knew of this view. The logical mathematics is the approach of Bertrand Russell and Gottlob Frege was defended by David Hilbert, formalism is considered the repre-sentative of the current. Traditionalism logician the empiricist's (Rudolf Carnap, A. J. Ayer, Carl Hempel) were represented by one of the key issues in the philosophy of mathematics is also important to regard the certainty problem. Austrian logician Kurt G?del's also work Mathema-tics and mathematics.

本书是一部探讨中国文明起源的著作，作者潜心研究中国历史、哲学和文化多年，力求洞悉中国文明的内在脉络。作者聚焦于中国文明起源过程中的理性要素，通过追溯这个时期理性要素的形态，试图还原中国文明*初的萌发过程。本书沿着中国古代思想观念发展的路，回溯发端，探究这个时期决定历史走向的观念是怎样的，历史是怎样被这种观念所决定的，以及这种观念的来源和后续发展，以此来逐渐揭中国文明起源发展的印记和规律。

本书主要介绍中国儒家的思想。中国有五千年悠久的文明史，两千五百年前，人类文明“轴心时代”。孔子创立了中国历史上*个学派——儒家。两千五百年的儒家，经历了六种历史形态，它们是：子学儒家、经学儒家、理学儒家、心学儒家、气学儒家、新学儒家。为了更好地前，我们要了解过去。我们要用历史的眼光看世界、看未来。儒家是中国传统文化的主体，了解传统首先要了解儒家。

本书紧紧围绕马克思主义与中国实际相结合的历史程，以流畅生动的语言、大量翔实的史料、深系统的分析，从马克思主义传中国的东方欲晓，到中国共产党人历经艰难困苦提出和探索马克思主义与中国实际相结合的苦难辉煌，从新中国成立后艰辛探索社会主义道路的风雨前行，到党的十一届三中全会以后我国全面行改革放的关键抉择，从中国特色社会主义道路的确立，到中华民族伟大复兴中国梦的实现，勾勒出了一条清晰的马克思主义中国化百年流变的雄关漫道。本书是一本集理论性、史料性和可读性于一体的阐述马克思主义中国化历史程的理论读物。

《超越审美现代性》讨论的“政治美学”不是本来意义上作为aesthetics的美学，而是关于存在何以可能和哲学何以可能的一种先验形而上学。 本书把本来意义上的美学称为“文艺美学”，它有着极其深厚的理论传统，令人崇敬，正如伟大艺术作品深深感动着每个人。本书对艺术的批判和对文艺美学的批判完全是一种先验的政治的理论思维的结果。同理，本书以中世纪艺术为范本所揭示的艺术的象征性和创造性，也是运用理论思维对艺术本质所做的一种“先验演绎”，与对中世纪艺术的历史性研究不在同一个界面上。 早就有人把马克思学说的根本精神解读为一种美学，在本书所揭示的政治美学的意义上，马克思学说本质上必然是一种关于*美政制和*美人性何以可能的先验政治美学。

《道德经》又名《老子》，分为上下两篇。上篇《道经》讲述了宇宙的根本，道出了天地万物变化的玄机，下篇《德经》说的是处世方略，道出了人事的进退之术《道德经全鉴（典藏诵读版）》以老子的《道德经》为原本，对原文进行注释、解析和翻译，每一章都有大量历史案例作为对原文思想的注解，做到了既有学术性，又有普及性，使读者更广泛。书中以二维码的形式加载配乐朗诵音频，欢迎读者下载品鉴。

《老子》《庄子》是道家学术思想的源头和代表作，二者对普通读者来说，也常有一种难以言说的神秘和难解之感。南怀瑾先生讲《老》《庄》，不斤斤于个别语译，游乎经史子集之中，不论出世入世，评比精义，更以禅宗的方式，随说随破，提示其出入禅道的旨意，可以说是与《老》《庄》气质接近的讲解。

汇集了南怀瑾先生讲述佛家经典的著述。内容多样，有的讲如何参禅、禅与生命认知，有的讲经典佛经如《金刚经》《圆觉经》《维摩诘经》等，有的讲佛法修持，有的讲佛教发展的历史。学佛须有善知识指引，南先生以过来人的身份，对于理解佛经常见的障碍和学佛修持中容易出现的疑惑及容易走上的歧途，指点得尤为细致。

　　本书从为人处世、职场、情感、婚恋、家庭、理财、交友等不同角度、不同方向，将放下的智慧娓娓道来，从而让读者了解放下的真谛，在生活中坦然追求、潇洒面对，用足够的时间和精力来赢取真正该拥有的东西，明确奔向自己的目标。

本卷从卢梭的诞生叙述到1742年他带着他的音乐“数字记谱法”从夏梅特到巴黎。

《中国哲学小史》是日本哲学家武内义雄所作的中国哲学思想史论著。《中国哲学小史》按时间顺序，详尽地介绍并分析了上自殷周、下迄明清的中国哲学史。除一般中国哲学史著作重视的儒家学说、宋明理学之外，本书对以往为主流所忽略的思想流派，如稷下学派、两汉经学，有精到之论述。以“流派”为梳理中国哲学史之枝干，理路清晰，便于读者把握。对中国哲学史之分期及演过程，有独到之见。

本书以当代中国社会主义现代化建设为历史背景，围绕制度之、“善”或“好”的问题，以宪政正义为核心，以权利一义务关系为枢纽，在“善政”、 “善制”、“善治”的统一中，求索现代社会制度正义的伦理基础，探究当代中国制度正义安排及其实现的现实路径，为拓建起属于中国学者自己的制度正义理论做基础性的探索。