Dac? n-a?i mai pus m?na de multi?or pe-o carte cu ?de toate“, rezerva?i un loc pe noptier? pentru romanul acesta! Cristian, Zina, Iulia, Radu, Ionu?, Ana. Femei frumoase, b?rba?i complica?i. Rela?ii care seam?n? cu marea, c?nd potolite, c?nd zbuciumate. Personajele centrale ??i joac? destinele la rulet?, a?tept?nd deznod?m?ntul propriilor pove?ti de via??: e?ec sau reu?it?. La fel ca oricare dintre noi. Fericirea e mereu la un pas distan??...

Mai poate fi vorba despre dragoste atunci c?nd un b?rbat ?i o femeie se ?nt?lnesc dup? treizeci de ani de la evenimentul inexplicabil care le-a destr?mat iubirea tr?it? cu pasiune timp de cinci ani? E dragostea cea care le une?te privirile, sau doar nostalgia unor vremuri de mult trecute ?n care se reg?sesc tineri ?i ferici?i? Steinn ?i Solrun se re?nt?lnesc la un vechi hotel din fiordurile Norvegiei ?i rememoreaz? trecutul ?i vina de care nu s-au eliberat ?nc?. Fiind fiecare c?s?torit ?i av?nd propriii copii, cei doi ?nlocuiesc intensitatea tr?irilor de alt?dat? cu aprinse discu?ii purtate prin e-mailuri despre sensurile vie?ii ?i despre for?ele care guverneaz? realitatea din jur. Complice cu autorul care orchestreaz? jocurile narative, cititorul este martorul schimburilor tensionate de idei ?ntre agnosticul Steinn ?i mistica Solrun. Dac? cei doi protagoni?ti decid ca fiecare e-mail s? fie ?ters imediat ce e parcurs, cititorul are privilegiul de a avea sub ochi conversa?iile care caut? r?spunsuri la ?ntreb?rile ce domin? romanului lui Gaarder: este via?? dup? moarte? Exist? coinciden?e sau totul este planul bine pus la punct al unei instan?e superioare, fie ea divine sau explicabile ?tiin?ific? ?ntr-o manier? devenit? deja marc? ?nregistrat? Jostein Gaarder, romanul ce poart? titlul unui tablou al lui René Magritte p?streaz? ceva din misterul suprarealist ?i ?mbin? observa?iile filosofice cu o intrig? plin? de suspans ?i o emo?ionant? poveste de dragoste care rezist? timpului. Ce rezult? – un roman care desfat? intelectual ?i estetic.

ntr-o succesiune de oglinzi creatoare de iluzii nesfrite, Sofiei, protagonista celui mai cunoscut roman al norvegianului Jostein Gaarder, i este povestit, treptat, ntreaga filosofie a culturii occidentale. Dac filosofia sau literatura nsi este pretextul acestei cri cititorul va afla pe cont propriu. El va face cunotin, nc de la nceput, cu amestecul dintre fantezie i marile ntrebri ale omenirii. Pentru c nu gsise n biblioteci sau librrii nicio carte n care tinerilor s li se ofere o form accesibil a marilor idei, scriitorul norvegian pune n scen o poveste i imagineaz un personaj inventiv i curios. Jocurile duble sunt specialitatea lui Gaarder: Sofia va fi pus n oglind de Hilde, destinatara real a cursurilor, profesorii i vor schimba identitile, iar ntrebrile nu vor putea primi niciodat rspunsuri unice. Aventura cunoaterii va ncepe de la filosofii greci, va trece prin zorii cretinismului, prin medievalitatea european, va ajunge la Renatere, Iluminism, Romantism i pn la sistemele de gndire ale secolului al XX-lea. Fr a fi o simpl carte de popularizare, Lumea Sofiei este o introducere n filosofia occidental, deschiznd apetitul cititorului pentru cunoatere i meditaie asupra ntrebrilor eseniale. Cci, aa cum Hilde e Sofia, aceasta nu e nimeni altcineva dect imaginea cititorului nsui.

ntr-un orfelinat din Oslo, un biat n vrst de doisprezece ani, pe nume Olav, provoac haos. Agnes Vestavik, directoarea sever a instituiei, vede ceva nspimntator n ochii biatului: o ur neostoit.Cnd Vestavik este gsit moart n biroul su, njunghiat n spate cu un banal cuit de buctrie, iar Olav e de negsit, cazul ajunge n minile rebelei poliiste Hanne Wilhelmsen, recent promovat n funcia de inspector-sef n cadrul Poliiei din Oslo.Este Olav un criminal sau doar o victimi, pentru a rezolva acest caz, va putea Hanne s nvee s aib ncredere n ceilali, nu doar n propriile instincte"Hanne Wilhelmsen e un Sherlock Holmes modern." - Booklist"E o serie care cere s fie citit, i cu ct mai repede, cu att mai bine." – Bookreporter"Dac vrei s v familiarizai cu genul crime scandinav, romanul lui Anne Holt e ghidul perfect." - Kirkus ReviewsLa Editura Trei, de aceeai autoare, au aprut: n spatele norilor ntunecai, Fericii cei nsetai, Zeia oarb, Doamna preedint, Eroare judiciar, Aa ceva nu se ntmpl niciodat.

La momentul rememor?rii i se p?ru c?, de fapt, ziua aceea a avut ceva straniu; prea multe contraste, o prea bizar? combina?ie cromatic?, o var? ca ?n tablourile trompe l’?il, cu frig ?i soare, amestec inextricabil de agonie ?i plenitudine. O lumin? solar? parc? vomat? de viscerele unui canceros, un galben-delir metamorfoz?ndu-se ?n crepuscul s?nger?nd, de?i atunci nu avusese absolut deloc aceast? senza?ie. G?ndindu-se s? scrie ce i s-a ?nt?mplat (?n fapt, ce li s-a ?nt?mplat), dup? ce ie?ise pe poarta scr??nit? a penitenciarului, fusese convins c?, dac? ar fi nevoie, ar lua-o de la cap?t. El r?m?sese uluit de aceast? imprevizibil? metamorfoz?, chinuindu-se zile ?n ?ir ?i ne?tiind cum s? ?nceap?: s? descrie ce sim?ea atunci sau ce simte acum despre atunci: s? ?mprumute faptelor de atunci logica de acum sau s? lase ?n voia hazardului transcrierea acelui ?ir neverosimil de coinciden?e, accidente ?i violen?e, sper?nd ca semnifica?iile lor s? se dezv?luie de la sine. Se sim?ise ?ns? brusc dezarmat: cum s? explice, chiar ?i acum, c? doi oameni care ?n via?a lor nu sup?raser? pe nimeni, care aveau oroare p?n? ?i de actul – normal – de a se ap?ra ?n fa?a unei agresiuni, nicicum s? o mai ?i provoace, fuseser? ?n stare s? ucid? f?r? dureroase deliber?ri interioare sau, mai ales, f?r? nicio remu?care?

Mai mult viu dec?t mort, comisarul San-Antonio asist? la propria-nmorm?ntare. Apoi, mai mult cu umor dec?t cu ?nd?rjire, b?ntuie Parisul ?n c?utarea celor care l-au ucis un pic, temporar. Semi-asasinii nu se las? u?or prin?i, p?n? c?nd fac gre?eala s-o supere pe mama semi-victimei. ?i gata, soarta lor e pecetluit?: nu te iei de mama lui San-Antonio ?i speri s? scapi basma curat?! E o b?tr?nic? prea simpatic?. San-Antonio e convins c? ea e mai ?nger dec?t dolofanii ?ia mici, picta?i cu aripioare prin biserici.Vremuri grele! Nimic nu mai e ce pare a fi: trafican?ii de droguri sunt patrio?i, spioanele sunt fiice care ?tiu de frica ta?ilor. Nevestele sunt un fel de amante costisitoare, iar culmea rafinamentului pervers ar fi s?-?i iei o amant? doar ca s? te ui?i la ea cum tricoteaz?, dup? ce ?i-a servit o sup?.San-Antonio e de savurat pe ?ndelete, o delicates? pentru adev?ra?ii degust?tori ai genului, cei care ?tiu c? un roman poli?ist te poate cuceri ?i prin umor, rafinamente de limbaj, inteligen?? ?i cultur?, nu doar prin suspans, urm?riri ?i ?mpu?c?turi, chiar dac? are – din bel?ug chiar – ?i aceste ingrediente.Mai multe detalii pe san-antonio.ro

Ce ai face dac? ai g?si o carte ce te-ar provoca la un joc de-a v-a?i ascunselea cu indicii? Ai accepta provocarea sau ai pune cartea ?napoi ?n raft? ? Lily a l?sat ?n raftul libr?riei preferate din New York un jurnal plin de provoc?ri, care a?teapt? s? fie g?sit de b?iatul potrivi. Acesta este Dash, un adolescent ?n v?rst? de 17 ani, pasionat de c?r?i ?i cu o repulsie nem?rginit? fa?? de tot ce ?nseamn? s?rb?toarea Cr?ciunului. El accept? regulile jocului fetei. Dar sunt ei f?cu?i unul pentru cel?lalt? De?i par a se potrivi perfect ?n ceea ce prive?te exprimarea ?n scris, ?nt?lnirile lor nu sunt lipsite de surprize ?i le pun ?n pericol rela?ia ?nc? dinainte ca aceasta s? se ?nfiripe. ? Rachel Cohn ?i David Levithan au scris o poveste de dragoste care ?i va face pe tineri s? scotoceasc? prin rafturile libr?riilor, c?ut?nd ?i t?njind dup? o iubire (?i un jurnal) care s? fie numai a lor. ? “Cititorii vor fi ?nc?nta?i de limbajul spumos ?i de r?sturn?rile amuzante de situa?ie.“ Publishers Weekly ? “Sim?eam nevoia s?-i absorb numele, ?n timp ce cl?titele absorbeau untul ?i siropul. Abia dac?-mi mai aminteam cum ar?ta; imaginea lui era ?nconjurat? de o p?cl? de culoarea ?ampaniei, dulceag? ?i difuz?, neclar?. ?mi aminteam c? era mai degrab? ?nalt, cu p?rul bine tuns ?i proasp?t piept?nat, c? purta blugi ?i o jachet? marin?reasc? de l?n?, posibil de epoc?, ?i c? mirosea a b?iat, dar la modul pl?cut, nu la cel sc?rbos. ?i mai avea ?i cei mai alba?tri ochi din lume, ?i gene lungi, negre, aproape ca ale unei fete.“

n 1943, soia lui Boris Vian, Michelle, s-a mbolnvit i a trebuit s sufere o intervenie chirurgical. Ca s-o amuze pe Michelle n timpul convalescenei, Boris Vian scrie Conte de fées à l’usage de moyennes personnes (Poveste de adormit oamenii obinuii) i o ilustreaz cu desene fcute de el nsui. mpreun cu trei nuvele – Pompierii, Pensionarul i Amintirea – textul acestei poveti“ constituie un volum pe care fanii lui Boris Vian vor fi ncntai s-l citeasc.

Vanitos, crud, nehot?r?t ?i incompetent, regele Ioan al II-lea cel Bun, din dinastia Valois, st?p?ne?te, comi??nd gre?eal? dup? gre?eal?, o ?ar? aflat? ?n grav? criz?. Sub domnia sa tumultuoas?, R?zboiul de 100 de Ani se ?nte?e?te, fac?iunile nobililor se lupt? ?ntre ele, foametea amenin?? poporul, impozitele sunt zdrobitoare, iar ciuma face ravagii. O epopee nefericit? ?i s?ngeroas?, la cap?tul c?reia are loc dezastrul de la Poitiers, b?t?lia ?n care regele Fran?ei este luat prizonier de c?tre englezi.

Cum poate un tanar timid, introvertit si cu complexe fizice, sociale si culturale sa devina asasin profesionist? Prin vocea protagonistului, intr-un stil alert, caracterizat de o extrema violenta verbala, dar si de sensibilitate, tandrete si umor. Romanul Ucigasul dezvaluie procesele interioare complexe si pline de conflicte, precum si pe cele exterioare care il arunca pe cai nu de el alese, dar inscrise deja, oarecum, intr-un fel de cod genetic social.

O t?n?r? care ??i pune prietenul s-o ?ncuie ?ntr-o cu?c? ?n propria ei buc?t?rie; un b?rbat locuind singur pe o planet? ?ndep?rtat? dintr-o galaxie necunosct?; un scriitor ?nc?run?it, ?ntr-un pat cu gratii, devenit piesa principal? a arhivei propriei sale opere postume; ?i mai e ?i Lilly, care, ?dup? o zi lung? ?i grea la birou, a constatat c? i-au crescut aripi pe omopla?i: ni?te excrescen?e de piele roz murdar, cu un aspect vulnerabil, care-i d?deau m?nc?rimi ca acelea ale ?n?ep?turilor de ??n?ar“. Sunt doar c?teva dintre personajele stranii ale acestui volum de proz? scurt? al t?n?rului scriitor austriac Clemens J. Setz. La apari?ie, Dragostea ?n vremea Copilului din Mahlstadt a fost o revela?ie pentru critic? ?i public deopotriv?, prin fine?ea ?i rafinamentul limbajului, prin iscusin?a cu care scriitorul ??i pune personajele s? se descurce ?n situa?ii bizare sau de-a dreptul grote?ti, prin inser?iile nea?teptate de fantastic ?i comic ?ntr-un cotidian marcat de banalitatea ?i stresul obliga?iilor sociale.

Soman Chainani els? regénye, a New York Times bestseller Jók és Rosszak Iskolája folytatásában Sophie és Agatha visszatér Gavaldonba, és boldogan élnek saját világukban, ám az élet nem olyan tündérmese, amilyennek képzelték… Agatha már úgy érzi, bárcsak más boldog befejezést kívánt volna a mesének, ám ekkor véletlenül megtalálja és kinyitja a Jók és Rosszak Iskolájának kapuját. A lányok azzal szembesülnek, hogy az a világ, amit az els? tanévben tapasztaltak, megváltozott. A boszorkányok és a hercegn?k a Lányok Iskolájában laknak. Elhatározták, hogy kirekesztik életükb?l a hercegeket. Tedros és a fiúk a Rossz Iskolája régi tornyainak lakói lettek. A két iskola k?z?tt háború van kit?r?ben. Vajon Agatha és Sophie helyre tudják állítani a békét? Vajon Sophie jó tud maradni úgy, hogy Tedros állandóan üld?zi? ?s kihez húz Agatha szíve? A barátn?jéhez vagy a hercegéhez? Soman Chainani kül?nleges világot teremtett. A Newbery-díj legutóbbi jutalmazottja, Ann M. Martin ?páratlan mesének” nevezi, amely ?csupa romantika, varázslat, humor és rejtvény. Legszívesebben egyhuzamban olvasnánk végig.”

The stories were written when Irish nationalism was at its peak, and a search for a national identity and purpose was raging; at a crossroads of history and culture, Ireland was jolted by various converging ideas and influences. They centre on Joyce's idea of an epiphany: a moment where a character experiences self-understanding or illumination. Many of the characters in Dubliners later appear in minor roles in Joyce's novel Ulysses. The initial stories in the collection are narrated by child protagonists, and as the stories continue, they deal with the lives and concerns of progressively older people. This is in line with Joyce's tripartite division of the collection into childhood, adolescence and maturity. THERE was no hope for him this time: it was the third stroke. Night after night I had passed the house (it was vacation time) and studied the lighted square of window: and night after night I had found it lighted in the same way, faintly and evenly. If he was dead, I thought, I would see the reflection of candles on the darkened blind for I knew that two candles must be set at the head of a corpse. He had often said to me: "I am not long for this world," and I had thought his words idle. Now I knew they were true. Every night as I gazed up at the window I said softly to myself the word paralysis. It had always sounded strangely in my ears, like the word gnomon in the Euclid and the word simony in the Catechism. But now it sounded to me like the name of some maleficent and sinful being. It filled me with fear, and yet I longed to be nearer to it and to look upon its deadly work.Old Cotter was sitting at the fire, smoking, when I came downstairs to supper. While my aunt was ladling out my stirabout he said, as if returning to some former remark of his: "No, I wouldn't say he was exactly... but there was something queer... there was something uncanny about him. I'll tell you my opinion...." He began to puff at his pipe, no doubt arranging his opinion in his mind. Tiresome old fool! When we knew him first he used to be rather interesting, talking of faints and worms; but I soon grew tired of him and his endless stories about the distillery. "I have my own theory about it," he said. "I think it was one of those... peculiar cases.... But it's hard to say...." He began to puff again at his pipe without giving us his theory. My uncle saw me staring and said to me:"Well, so your old friend is gone, you'll be sorry to hear." "Who?" said I."Father Flynn.""Is he dead?" ? ABOUT AUTHOR: ? James Augustine Aloysius Joyce (1882 – 1941) was an Irish novelist and poet, considered to be one of the most influential writers in the modernist avant-garde of the early 20th century. Joyce is best known for Ulysses (1922), a landmark work in which the episodes of Homer's Odyssey are paralleled in an array of contrasting literary styles, perhaps most prominent among these the stream of consciousness technique he perfected. Other major works are the short-story collection Dubliners (1914), and the novels A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man (1916) and Finnegans Wake (1939). His complete oeuvre also includes three books of poetry, a play, occasional journalism, and his published letters.

BOW-WOW AND MEW-MEW is one of the few books for beginners in reading that may be classed as literature. Written in words of mostly one syllable, it has a story to tell, which is related in so attractive a manner as to immediately win the favor of young children. It teaches English and English literature to the child in the natural way: through a love for the reading matter. It is the character of story that will, in the not distant future, replace the ordinary primer or reader with detached sentences, and which seldom possesses any relation to literature.The ultimate objects of any story can only be effected through the love for a story. The prominent point in this story is development of good character, which may well be regarded as the highest purpose of education. The transformation from bad to good traits in the dog and cat cannot but have a desirable effect on every child that reads the story. Bow-Wow and Mew-Mew become dissatisfied with their home and their surroundings, and ungrateful toward their benefactress. As the story tells, "They did not find good in any thing." But after running away and suffering hunger, neglect, and bad treatment, their characters begin to change. They naturally come to reflect their mistress's goodness. They learn the value of companionship and friendship, and the appreciation of a home. However, the ethical thoughts in the story are presented without a moral. The child really lives the scenes described. He has the emotions of the characters and feels their convictions. And this determines the worth of a story as an agent in character development.The narrative furnishes, further, the proper kind of exercise for the imagination. It affords abundant opportunity for the play of the dramatic instinct in the child, and effects a happy union of the "home world" and the "school world." The illustrations, drawn by Miss Hodge, have been planned and executed with considerable care.

A mérf?ldk?nek számító Sons of Anarchy - Kemény motorosok cím? televíziós sorozat negyedik évadja után játszódó t?rténetét Kurt Sutter, a széria vezet? producere találta ki. A klubtagság fele éppenhogy csak kiszabadult a Stockton állami b?rt?nb?l, de a Galindo drogkartell máris a nyakukban liheg, így nem unatkoznak a motorosok. Jax Teller, a SAMCRO aleln?ke mégis kénytelen egy másik problémával foglalkozni, amikor megtudja, hogy ír féltestvére, Trinity már hónapok óta az Egyesült ?llamokban tartózkodik - és az orosz Bratva-gengszterekkel lóg. Most azonban elt?nt, és Jax biztos abban, hogy ehhez az életét fenyeget? maffiaháborúnak van k?ze. Jax, Chibs és Opie társaságában Nevadába utazik, hogy megkeresse, és hazavigye. Trinity ugyan félig ír, félig viszont Teller, és ahol a Tellerek megjelennek, ott k? k?v?n nem marad. ?A Maffiózók óta nem uralta így a tévéképerny?t egy csapat izzadt, er?szakos vadállat...” - Rolling Stone. ?Els? osztályú... A mai napig az egyik legjobb tévésorozat.” - Newsday. ?Az egyik legjobb dráma a tévében.” - Time. ??t csillagból négy... A Sons csúcsra járatja a drámát.” - New York Daily News.?

The Discovery of the Future is a philosophical lecture by H. G. Wells that argues for the knowability of the future. It was originally delivered to the Royal Institution on January 24, 1902. Before appearing in book form. Wells begins by distinguishing between “two divergent types of mind,” one that judges and attaches importance principally to what has happened in the past and one that judges and attaches importance principally to what will happen in the future. To the former he attributes the adjectives “legal or submissive,” “passive,” and “oriental,” and to the latter the adjectives “legislative, creative, organizing, or masterful,” and “active,” calling it “a more modern and much less abundant type of mind.” ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?*** It will lead into my subject most conveniently to contrast and separate two divergent types of mind, types which are to be distinguished chiefly by their attitude toward time, and more particularly by the relative importance they attach and the relative amount of thought they give to the future. The first of these two types of mind, and it is, I think, the predominant type, the type of the majority of living people, is that which seems scarcely to think of the future at all, which regards it as a sort of blank non-existence upon which the advancing present will presently write events. The second type, which is, I think, a more modern and much less abundant type of mind, thinks constantly and by preference of things to come, and of present things mainly in relation to the results that must arise from them. The former type of mind, when one gets it in its purity, is retrospective in habit, and it interprets the things of the present, and gives value to this and denies it to that, entirely with relation to the past. The latter type of mind is constructive in habit, it interprets the things of the present and gives value to this or that, entirely in relation to things designed or foreseen. While from that former point of view our life is simply to reap the consequences of the past, from this our life is to prepare the future. The former type one might speak of as the legal or submissive type of mind, because the business, the practice, and the training of a lawyer dispose him toward it; he of all men must constantly refer to the law made, the right established, the precedent set, and consistently ignore or condemn the thing that is only seeking to establish itself. The latter type of mind I might for contrast call the legislative, creative, organizing, or masterful type, because it is perpetually attacking and altering the established order of things, perpetually falling away from respect for what the past has given us. It sees the world as one great workshop, and the present is no more than material for the future, for the thing that is yet destined to be. It is in the active mood of thought, while the former is in the passive; it is the mind of youth, it is the mind more manifest among the western nations, while the former is the mind of age, the mind of the oriental. Things have been, says the legal mind, and so we are here. The creative mind says we are here because things have yet to be. Now I do not wish to suggest that the great mass of people belong to either of these two types. Indeed, I speak of them as two distinct and distinguishable types mainly for convenience and in order to accentuate their distinction. There are probably very few people who brood constantly upon the past without any thought of the future at all, and there are probably scarcely any who live and think consistently in relation to the future. The great mass of people occupy an intermediate position between these extremes, they pass daily and hourly from the passive mood to the active, they see this thing in relation to its associations and that thing in relation to its consequences, and they do not even suspect that they are using two distinct methods in their minds.

Capsule de Joyce. O colec?ie de texte inedite marca James Joyce. Biografie, poem, schi?? narativ?, Giacomo Joyce face portretul unei frumoase doamne implicate ?ntr-o afacere amoroas?. ?n Epifanii sunt prinse ?n cuvinte inspira?iile de moment ale scriitorului, difuzate apoi ?n toate c?r?ile sale. Ironia ?i jocul dublu al limbajului sunt instrumente vechi ale lui Joyce, Pisica ?i diavolul fiind o curs? ?n care diavolul cade, dar ?i o critic? cu dedesubturi ale societ??ii anilor '30. O plachet? de inedite, infuzat? de spiritul binecunoscut al lui James Joyce.

Orice asem?nare cu persoane în via?? sau decedate este pur întâmpl?toare... Ce-ai face dac? ai descoperi c? în cartea pe care o cite?ti e vorba despre tine? Când g?se?te o carte misterioas? pe noptier?, via?a lui Catherine Ravenscroft se transform? într-un co?mar. De?i pare o n?scocire, cartea, numit? Str?inul des?vâr?it, recreeaz? veridic ?i în cel mai mic detaliu cumplita zi în care Catherine a devenit prizoniera unui secret teribil, un secret pe care o singur? persoan? îl mai cuno?tea – iar acea persoan? a murit. Pe m?sur? ce trecutul o ajunge din urm?, Catherine simte c? lumea ei se pr?bu?e?te. Singura cale este s?-l înfrunte... chiar dac? adev?rul ?ocant ar putea s? o distrug?. Un debut remarcabil, care aminte?te prin atmosfer? de Înainte s? adorm ?i care se bucur? deja de un succes interna?ional, Avertisment vorbe?te despre o femeie bântuit? de secrete, despre dorin?a mistuitoare de r?zbunare ?i pre?ul dureros pe care trebuie s?-l pl?tim dac? încerc?m s? ascundem adev?rul. Avertisment dozeaz? suspansul psihologic uimitor de bine: exact a?a arat? thrillerul perfect. – Lee Child „Un necunoscut a pus cartea pe noptier?. Cu grij?. Nu a deranjat niciun obiect de la locul lui. Pe partea ei de pat. ?tiuse pe ce parte a patului doarme. A aranjat totul a?a încât s? par? c? ea îns??i pusese cartea acolo. Gândurile i se îngr?m?desc unele peste altele ?i se strivesc între ele pân? când devin chinuitoare ?i dureroase. Vinul ?i nelini?tea sunt o combina?ie periculoas?. Ar trebui s? înve?e deja c? nu e bine s? amestece otr?vurile. Î?i ia în mâini capul care o doare. În ultimele zile o doare constant. Închide ochii ?i vede soarele alb ?i arz?tor de pe copert?. Cum naiba a ajuns cartea asta în casa ei?“ Halucinant ?i tulbur?tor, romanul lui Renée Knight te prinde în mrejele sale de la prima pagin?. –? Kirkus Reviews

Pe drumurile foarte lungi ale acestui pustiu asurzitor ai s? vezi, daca e?ti norocos, ?ntrup?ri sfinte precum ?i ademenitoare c?deri ?n p?cat.Unde-i cel mai ?mpov?r?tor dintre ele, ca s?-l po?i recunoa?te? Cel f?cut ?n nemernicie cu trupul sau ?ns??i tr?darea? Poate fi Iuda iertat, dac? toate prin c?in?? se iart?. ?mi spui c? speran?a-i l?sat? chiar pentru to?i?

nainte de Hannah din Girls, Anastasia Steele din Cincizeci de umbre ale lui Grey i Carrie Bradshaw din Sex and the City, a fost Isadora Wing, protagonista direct i lipsit de inhibiii a romanului revoluionar semnat de Erica Jong.Publicat pentru prima dat n 1973, Teama de zbor a fcut vlv n Statele Unite, alimentnd fantezii, strnind dezbateri despre femei i sexualitate i adugnd limbii engleze o expresie memorabil: zipless fuck.Aceast carte va face istorie… datorit ei, femeile scriitoare i vor gsi propria voce i ne vor oferi saga uimitoare despre sex, via, aventur i bucuria de a tri.“ – Henry MillerTeama de zbor, primul i cel mai cunoscut roman al Erici Jong a rsturnat complet toate prejudecile despre femei, csnicie i sexualitate, nregistrnd vnzri de peste 27 de milioane de exemplare i fiind tradus n peste 40 de limbi.E mult mai mult dect o carte scris de o femeie: e un Ulise modern, cu un Bloom feminine care ezit i se poticnete, dar care supravieuiete.“ – Wall Street Journaln Isadora Wing, alter-ego-ul su ficional, Erica Jong a ntruchipat fiecare femeie – dar nu aa cum aprea ea n viaa public din anii ‘70, ci aa cum o definete imaginaia feminin. Nu problema sexualitii n sine a fcut-o pe Erica Jong una dintre vocile literare de referin din ntreaga lume, ci faptul c a ironizat cu subtilitate stereotipiile, ajungnd s vorbeasc fi i necosmetizat – dar fr s dea dovad nici de voyeurism, nici de puritanism – despre intimitatea cea mai profund. A devenit astfel una dintre promotoarele revoluiei sexuale i un icon pentru milioane de femei, ctignd totodat admiraia unor nume importante din literatur, cum ar fi John Updike, Henry Miller, Anthony Burgess sau Jennifer Weiner.

Destin Emprisonné présente l'histoire captivante d'un jeune homme d'affaires, qui danse un dangereux tango avec le destin. Le monde est séduit, pas à pas, par son succès et sa force et la vie semble lui offrir tout sur un plateau. Jusqu'à un certain jour. La réalité immédiate peut enchaner tout ce que nous avons, mais non ce qui nous sommes.