《政府流程再造：理论框架与典型模式》把政府流程再造模式定义为组织结构、运作机制和信息系统三者的整体配置。组织结构体现为从职能结构到流程结构的连续体，运作机制包括决策方式和协调机制，信息系统分为信息协同和信息效率。《政府流程再造：理论框架与典型模式》提出，不同再造模式的关键影响因素包括外部环境和政务特点两个方面，分析了行政服务中心模式、城管执法崇文模式和政府审计四分离模式三种典型政府流程再造模式。结论表明，政府流程再造模式受环境稳定性、环境复杂性、任务规则性和任务独立性影响，组织结构、协调机制和信息系统三者之间存在对应关系。

本书从考研政治的时政热考内容和重要考点多角度设计题目，精心编写了十套模拟试题，并富有参考答案和试题详解。十套试题设计的知识点覆盖面广、重点突出、针对性强。适合考生在后冲刺阶段做实战演练之用。

中国未来政治发展的主要问题并不是要不要民主，而是要什么样的民主和如何能够在逐步提高民主程 度的同时避免不必要的社会纷争与冲突，提升社会的和谐治理水平。《合作博弈与和谐治理（中国合和式 民主研究）》尝试运用中国传统的和合思想、民本思想与国际现代合作博弈论视角，明确提出真正有中国 文化特色的社会主义民主新概念模式——合和式民主。这一模式既是对过于强调个体权利的西方自由式民 主的超越，也是对以往过于强调集中权威作用的传统社会主义民主模式的革新与发展。《合作博弈与和谐 治理（中国合和式民主研究）》对这一民主模式的理论根源与实践发展都进行了一定的梳理，也对它在历史 与现实中的一些案例进行了深度分析，还对中国合和式民主未来发展的顶层设计进行了初步的战略性思考 。本书由彭宗超，马奔，刘涛雄著。

适逢2014年黄埔军校建校九十周年之际出版，以此作为这所伟大军校的献礼。全书共计十三章，自黄埔军校建校起一直写到退出大陆。不但介绍了黄埔师生在这段时间中波澜壮阔的历史和功绩，比如东征、北伐、内战、抗日等等，同时也描述了大量曾经影响中国历史的黄埔精英们不为人所知的故事，以及国共中黄埔重要人物的一些传奇。

本书应广大农村党员干部的实际需求编写，从农村是实现“中国梦”的大舞台、把“为民务实清廉”当成座右铭、干实事才能得民心、联系群众多到“田间地头”、支持“家庭农场”大发展、“赶农民上楼”要不得等51个方面与农村党员干部谈如何做好群众工作。另外，为方便农村党员干部学习书中附有中央对党的群众路线教育实践活动的要求和经典案例。本书是广大农村党员干部与人民心连心、同呼吸、共命运，保持自身的先进性和纯洁性，巩固党的执政基础和执政地位，贯彻落实党的群众路线的读物。

《公共管理评论》是由清华大学公共管理学院组织编写、清华大学出版社出版的一份公共管理和公共政策研究的专业学术出版物。第十三卷共收录8篇论文,1篇评论及4篇书评。所收录的论文反映了国内外公共管理一些研究领域的*进展,包括政治心理、社会冲突管理、老龄化、城管制度选择等问题。书评是对4本与公共管理相关著作的介绍和评价。

　　《公共管理评论（第15卷）》是南清华大学公共管理学院组编、清华大学出版社出版的一份公共管理和公共政策研究的专业学术出版物。第十五卷共收录7篇论文，1篇评论和6篇书评。所收录的论文反映了国内外公共管理前沿的一些研究领域的*进展，包括组织承诺、话语建构、社会稳定风险评估、森林资源与经济发展、土地管理、收入差距和利益协商等问题。书评是对6本与公共管理相关著作的介绍和评价。

　　二战是历史上*的武装冲突，将人类的战争艺术提升到了空前的高度。在这一舞台上，名将是其中闪亮的明星。每一位征战沙场的名将都以自己独特的指挥术留名史册。他们或大胆奇诡，创造出令人难以置信的惊人战例；或思维缜密，以无懈可击的战略部署，堂堂正正之师百战不殆；或勇猛顽强，将人类铁血不屈的品质发挥到极致……优秀的统帅可以安邦定国，立不朽之功业，也能挽狂澜于既倒，给后人留下不尽的传奇，更有名将创造出可怕的战争艺术，虽逞凶于一时，终难以阻挡历史的滚滚车轮。 　　本书拨开历史的烟尘，让十八位二战名将从血漫长天的沙场向您走来。

间谍是从敌对方刺探机密情报或者暗中进行破坏活动。他们可以肆无忌惮地在暗中窥视上至政要、下至平民的隐私，并进行绑架、暗杀、窃取情报、走私军火等工作；有时会化身为平民，打进各种团体内部刺探情报。本书从大量真实的间谍案例中，选取了一些精彩的故事为大家一一呈现。它们既真实又诡异，既引人入胜又充满神秘色彩。读者翻开此书，不仅会读到精彩的故事，也会了解到神秘莫测的间谍人物。

　　本书内容简介：伊比利亚半岛的硝烟，掩映着欧洲大陆，法西斯的利爪，在硝烟之后露出锋芒。希特勒牛刀小试，奥地利轻松入装甲军团长驱直入，闪击下的波兰国家亡，欧洲从此陷入了万劫不复的深渊。威悉河演习，挪威和丹麦俯首称臣。阿登山口的突进，马其诺防线的优势荡然无存，比利时、卢森堡、法国拜倒在德国纳粹的旗下。希特勒终于可以勒马海峡，逐鹿英伦三岛。然而不列颠的空战，让希特勒不得不望洋兴叹。纳粹铁骑没有停止战争的步伐，东方的红色苏联成了它的目标，莫斯科城下，曾让拿破仑折戟沉沙，这里又成了希特勒的伤心之地，曾经的辉煌已然不见，风雪中的较量终让纳粹德国向后退缩。西西里岛、诺曼底，联军终于开始向纳粹德国开始反击，德国的灭亡已成定局，莱茵天险丢失了，突出部的反击失败了，柏林终于暴露在了炮火之下，苏联的红旗在德国国会大厦升起，希特勒的帝国轰然倒塌。

　　次世界大战，不能忘却的纪念，日月如梭，抹不去郊原热血。欧洲大地，纳粹的旗帜飞扬，纳粹的战车驰骋，波兰、挪威、丹麦，瞬息沦亡，比利时、卢森堡、法国，纳款投降。不列颠上空，战鹰搏击；大西洋海上，狼群猖狂；北非沙漠里，两雄相争，气势如虹。战戈东指，红色苏联的英雄们保家卫国，在莫斯科，在斯大林格勒，在列宁格勒，风雪中火炮齐鸣，风雪中杀气如云，风雪中纳粹的骄横不在，正义的天平开始倾斜。在太平洋上，倭寇偷袭珍珠港，抢占东南亚，日本军国主义的癫狂发挥到了极致。世界格局在战争中开始改变，从西里到诺曼底，盟军敲开了纳粹的大门，从库尔斯克到易北河畔，苏联红军节节胜利，第三帝国在硝烟炮火中轰然倒塌。从中途岛到硫磺岛，从菲律宾到冲绳，日本的嚣张不复存在。长崎和广岛的蘑菇云尚未散去，日本军国主义的威风荡然无存。

　　历史的魅力就在于它的扑朔迷离，虽然真相永远只有一个，但是在进入历史书中之后，它又产生了不确定性。正是这份不确定，才让“咀嚼”有了味道。比如第二次世界大战，对于这段历史，人们会回想起许多难以忘却的人物和惊心动魄的战事，但是引人关注的，还是其中的诸多未解之谜。尽管随着各国保密档案的一步步解密，一些未解之谜得到了进一步揭示，但也许仍有许多历史事件的真相永不可知。比如，希特鞘为什么那么神经质而又丧心病狂？他是如何从一个流浪汉变成战争狂人的？敦刻尔克之战中，德军为何在胜利指日可待之际放走大批英法盟军？苏联为何在对德作战的初期一溃千里……正因为缺失真相，才让后人产生了无限的想象。

Türkiye’nin savata ve barta en ok konutuu konularn banda “Kürt Sorunu” geliyor. Ancak bununla ters orantl olarak Kürt toplumunun yaps, deerleri, deiimi, iliki alar vb. üzerine yaplm nitelikli alan almas bulmak zordur. almalar daha ok Kürt tarihi, dili ve kültürü üzerine yaplm incelemeler. Bunlarn genelde airet Kürtlerinin yaantsn ele alm batllarn almalarna atfla hazrland grülüyor. Dolaysyla “modern” kavram anlamszlayor. Bunun en tipik rneklerinden biri Bruinessen’in almasn yapt Kürt toplumsal düzlemini “aa, eyh, devlet” ekseninde okumas buna karn günümüzde geerliliini kaybetmekte olan bu ve benzeri okumalarn Türke almalarda sklkla tekrarlanmasdr. Oysa Türkiye’deki Kürtler 90 sonrasnda ok büyük bir sosyo-politik deiim yaamtr. alma, 1990 sonras Güneydou Kürt toplumunda dini ve geleneksel hayatn deiimini makro biimde ele alyor. Devlet, PKK, Hizbullah, zorunlu/istee bal gler, medreseler/seydalar, yerel eyhler ve modernlemenin dini-geleneksel hayata etkileri gezi, gzlem, literatür taramas ve mülakatlarla farkl ynleriyle aratrld .. *** Güneydou son 30 ylda sosyal deiimin nemli unsurlar arasnda grülen, ehirleme, modernleme, gler, terr-iddet hadiseleri ve iletiim aralarndaki gelimeler gibi hemen bütün faktrleri beraber yaad. Dolaysyla toplumsal deerlerde pozitif ya da negatif ynde nemli deiimlerin meydana geldii ngrülebilir. Cumhuriyet tarihi boyunca tartmal konularn odanda bulunan ve ülkenin geri kalanna gre daha yava bir sosyo-ekonomik deiim yaayan blge, yakn dnemde nemli yapsal deiimlere tanklk etti. Bunlarn en gze arpanlarndan birisi blge halknn büyük ounluunun son 20-30 ylda ehirlere g etmesidir. PKK ile mücadele etmek iin karlan OHAL kanunlarnn uygulanmas esnasnda yaanan maduriyetler halk ge zorlad. Halk, g sonrasnda kendini iddet eylemleri, isizlik, konut sknts ve ekonomik bunalm ierisinde buldu. Bu durumun blgede dini ve sosyal yaamda daha ok dejenerasyona sebep olduu gzleniyor. Ayn ekilde PKK ve Hizbullah’n faaliyetlerinin de toplumsal deerler sistemini etkiledii ak. 2000’li yllardan sonra yaanan hzl modernlemeyse dini ve sosyal hayatta deiimin ayr bir tetikleyicisi oldu. Bu ksmen dindarlamaya ksmen de lümpenlemeye yol aan bir süreti. Blgede yaanan sosyal deiim sonucunda, Kürt aratrmalarnda sklkla atf yaplan, “aa, eyh-seyda, devlet” eksenli analizler aklama gücünü kaybediyor. Geleneksel otoriteler tamamen etkisizlemese de modern, dini ve seküler rgütlenmeler, internet, moda ve popüler kültür gündelik yaamda, büyük lüde deerleri ekillendirme gücüne ulat. Sonu olarak gelenek-modernite, dinsel-seküler olann bir arada yaand ve Müslüman, Türk, Kürt, Diyarbakrl, Mardinli, Cizreli gibi kolektif kimlikler yerine daha modern saylabilecek senkretik kimliklerin ne kmaya balad bir toplum ortaya kyor. Bu adan yaanan gelimelerin blgenin toplumsal deerler sisteminde yapt etkilerin aratrlmas gereklilik arz etmiti. Bu alma ubat 2015 tarihinde Uluda niversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü tarafndan onaylanan, “DiyarbakrHalknn Geleneksel ve Dini Deerlerdeki Deiime Yaklam zerine Sosyolojik Bir nceleme (1990-2013)” isimli doktora almasnn geniletilmesiyle hazrland. Bu sürete, skc ve dolambal bulunan akademik dilin genel okuyucuya uygun hale getirilmesi hedeflendi. Maalesef konunun arl ve derinlemesine incelenmesi gereklilii almann okunmasn zorlatrd. Diyarbakr dndaki Siirt, Bitlis, Mardin, Batmanve rnakilleri daha nceki grümelere ilaveten bu tarihlerden sonra yaplan gezi, gzlem ve literatür taramalaryla tekrar incelendi.

Volumul constituie o fereastr? larg deschis? c?tre documentele extrase din arhivele cenzurii. Dezv?luirile explozive, atestate ?n aceste acte secrete, sunt menite s? lumineze o fa?? a istoriei rom?nilor, p?n? acum mai bine de un deceniu ascuns?.Cartea se adreseaz? elevilor, studen?ilor, precum ?i publicului larg de cititori.

Aceast? culegere ?nm?nuncheaz? articole ap?rute ?n perioada cuprins? ?ntre vara lui 2014 ?i sf?r?itul anului 2016. Facem acest efort, deoarece omul de azi este at?t de gr?bit, ?nc?t poate nu reu?e?te s? urm?reasc? ni?te articole ce apar pe saituri, care se ?nscriu ?n ceea ce se nume?te la ora actual? media de alternativ?, adic? una care merge ?mpotriva curentului general, dominat de eurolatrie, occidentomanie, spirit de vasalitate ?i chingi (neo)liberale. Selec?ia f?cut? a vizat doar acele articole, care dep??esc cadrul unor polemici de moment, circumstan?iale, mai pu?in relevante pentru viziunea autorului asupra unor procese mai generale. Printre acestea se reg?se?te ?i o serie de recenzii sau prezent?ri mai ample ale unor c?r?i ap?rute ?n diverse ??ri, ?n englez? sau francez?, dar ?i ?n rom?n?, pe care le-am g?sit utile pentru ?n?elegerea unor fenomene de ordin geopolitic, economic ?i cultural, care marcheaz? lumea de azi, afect?nd ?n mod direct interesele na?ionale, identitatea colectiv? ?i perspectivele noastre de afirmare ?i d?inuire ?n istorie. Au fost incluse ?n acest volum ?i c?teva texte semnificative, traduse din rus? ?i francez?, apar?in?nd unor g?nditori de ieri ?i de azi, care consun? perfect cu viziunea autorului.

Volumul analizeaz? con?inutului drepturilor minorit??ilor na?ionale ?i principalele pozi?ii ale comunit??ii interna?ionale ?n abordarea problemelor din acest domeniu. Sunt formulate solu?ii ce pot servi drept baz? pentru dezvoltarea ?i punerea ?n aplicare a programelor pe termen lung privind protec?ia drepturilor minorit??ilor na?ionale. Cartea are un caracter interdisciplinar ?i se adreseaz? studen?ilor facult??ilor de drept, sociologie, psihologie ?i ?tiin?e politice, dar ?i tuturor celor interesa?i s? ?n?eleag? profunzimile unor fenomene at?t de actuale.

Volumul abordeaz? teoretic ?i istoriografic cele mai importante categorii ale g?nditorului politic Antonio Gramsci. Analiza Ioanei Cristea Dr?gulin permite restituirea unit??ii ?i continuit??ii pe care tinde s? le ascund? natura fragmentar? a unei mari p?r?i din opera gramscian?, reconect?nd ?ntr?un cadru unitar apa?ratul conceptual complex pe care autorul ?l disemineaz? pe parcursul Caietelor sale, ?ntr-un context cultural at?t de ?ndep?rtat de cel originar, c?nd au fost scrise.

Dintre autorii italieni ai secolului XX, Antonio Gramsci este cel mai cunoscut pe plan interna?ional. Utilizarea pe scar? larg? a ideilor, conceptelor ?i categoriilor sale se datoreaz? at?t caracterului antidogmatic ?i eterodox, c?t ?i originalit??ii remarcabile prin care a inovat tradi?ia marxist?. Lucrarea sa principal?, intitulat? Caietele din ?nchisoare, ?n ciuda caracterului fragmentar, s-a remarcat prin bog??ia ?i amploarea subiectelor acoperite, atr?g?nd interesul unui larg spectru de speciali?ti din diverse discipline din ?ntreaga lume.

"...az els? magyar regény, amely g?rbe tük?rben, de megért? szeretettel mutatja be a mai társadalom társkeres? igyekezetét." (Tímár Péter, filmrendez?) "Nem érdemes letenni!" (Schell Judit, színészn?)Hogyan fogjunk pasit negyven f?l?tt? Ahogy ennek a k?nyvnek a f?szerepl?i, talán te is úgy próbálod megtalálni az igazit újra és újra. Eltér? jellemek, eltér? sorsok. Egyben azonban megegyeznek: mindannyian várják még a ?nagy szerelmet”, mik?zben megmosolyogtatóan csetlenek-botlanak a párkeresés labirintusában. Nem akarják elhinni, hogy a mesebeli királyfi nem létezik, ezért kicsit pironkodva bár, de fejest ugranak az internetes társkeresés mélyvizébe, és tucatnyi ?bénázást” k?vet?en rátalálnak a boldogságukra. Vagy mégsem? Netán azt is megbánják, hogy belekezdtek? Létezik-e boldog párkapcsolat, ha már elmúltál negyven? Békésy Erika nem próbál elmélyült társadalomrajzot adni, mégis felvillant helyzeteket a mai magyar valóságból. Szatirikus hangvétel, perg? ritmus, komikus helyzetek, groteszkbe hajló figurák, és humor, humor, humor. Ezek jellemzik a felh?tlen szórakozást nyújtó regényt.

Medierea este o alternativ? la procesul ?n instan??. La mediere, p?r?ile sper? ?ntr-o solu?ie amiabil?; la proces, dimpotriv?, fiecare parte sper? s-o ?nfr?ng? pe cealalt?. Lucrarea de fa?? prezint? o nou? metod? de rezolvare a conflictelor, mult mai rapid?, mai eficient? ?i aproape deloc traumatizant? pentru p?r?ile aflate ?n conflict: medierea.

When, in 1831, Alexis de Tocqueville came to study Democracy in America, the trial of nearly a half-century of the working of our system had been made, and it had been proved, by many crucial tests, to be a government of "liberty regulated by law," with such results in the development of strength, in population, wealth, and military and commercial power, as no age had ever witnessed. De Tocqueville had a special inquiry to prosecute, in his visit to America, in which his generous and faithful soul and the powers of his great intellect were engaged in the patriotic effort to secure to the people of France the blessings that Democracy in America had ordained and established throughout nearly the entire Western Hemisphere. He had read the story of the French Revolution, much of which had been recently written in the blood of men and women of great distinction who were his progenitors; and had witnessed the agitations and terrors of the Restoration and of the Second Republic, fruitful in crime and sacrifice, and barren of any good to mankind. He had just witnessed the spread of republican government through all the vast continental possessions of Spain in America, and the loss of her great colonies. He had seen that these revolutions were accomplished almost without the shedding of blood, and he was filled with anxiety to learn the causes that had placed republican government, in France, in such contrast with Democracy in America. De Tocqueville was scarcely thirty years old when he began his studies of Democracy in America. It was a bold effort for one who had no special training in government, or in the study of political economy, but he had the example of Lafayette in establishing the military foundation of these liberties, and of Washington, Jefferson, Madison, and Hamilton, all of whom were young men, in building upon the Independence of the United States that wisest and best plan of general government that was ever devised for a free people.