Publicat? ini?ial, ?n prima edi?ie ?n 1785, cu titlul Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, este una dintre cele mai influente crea?ii din ?ntreaga oper? filosofic? a lui Immanuel Kant ?i, totodat?, un reper ?n istoria filosofiei universale. Lucrarea filosofului german cuprinde o prefa??, trei sec?iuni – Trecerea de la cunoa?terea ra?ional? comun? a moravurilor la aceea filosofic?, Trecerea de la ?n?elepciunea moral? popular? la metafizica moravurilor, Trecerea de la metafizica moravurilor la critica ra?iunii pure practice – ?i o remarc? final?, precedate de nota traduc?torului, Valentin Mure?an. ?n prefa??, Kant pledeaz? pentru o metafizic? a moravurilor ?i discut? despre metodologia pe care a folosit-o. El porne?te de la ?mp?r?irea filosofiei grece?ti ?n fizic?, etic? ?i logic?. ?n prima sec?iune, dup? cum ?i titlul sugereaz?, se face trecerea de la forma cunoa?terii comune privind moravurile la cea filosofic?. El discut?, printre altele, despre voin?a bun? ?i datorie. ?n sec?iunea a doua se aprofundeaz? problema imperativelor. ?n ultima sec?iune, Kant discut? despre voin??, libertate. De fapt, cea de-a treia sec?iune reprezint? punctul de pornire de la care Kant a dezvoltat Critica ra?iunii practice, publicat? ?n 1788.

Despre guvernarea reprezentativ” este o carte plin de surprize i sugestii despre bunele practici ale guvernrii, care nu trebuie s lipseasc din bibliotecile celor preocupai de zona politicii. Volumul de fa a vzut prima dat lumina tiparului n 1861 i reunete principiile la care a lucrat filosoful britanic John Stuart Mill n cea mai mare parte a vieii sale. Aceast lucrare publicat la mijlocul secolului al XIX-lea i pstreaz prospeimea i relevana pn astzi, cnd suntem tot mai aproape de a ncheia a doua decad a secolului XXI. n primul rnd, pentru c imagineaz pn n cele mai mici detalii acel model politic pe care l numim democraia reprezentativ”. Winston Churchill spunea despre acesta c este prost, dar e cel mai bun dintre cele pe care le-a inventat omenirea”. John Stuart Mill i descrie organizarea, detaliaz rolul instituiilor, felul n care sunt alei sau numii demnitarii i explic atribuiile fiecruia. Pune n eviden atu-urile, dar i vulnerabilitile guvernrii reprezentative, comparnd-o cu alte sisteme politice din vremea sa. n final, ajunge la o concluzie foarte asemntoare cu cea a premierului britanic din secolul urmtor. Colecia IN NUCE reunete fragmente venic verzi” din cultura omenirii, mpletind discursuri din art, literatur, tiine sociale i religie. Dincolo de renumele autorilor i de valoarea titlurilor pentru fiecare domeniu n parte, acestea sunt pilde ale nelepciunii universale din toate vremurile. De acelasi autor: Utilitarismul

Volumul cuprinde dou? traduceri clasicizate, semnate de Victor Scorade?, Dincolo de bine ?i de r?u, ?i de Janina Iano?i ?i Horia Stanca, Genealogia moralei. Un mare vinovat f?r? vin?, sihastrul de la Sils-Maria a dinamitat g?ndirea secolului al XIX-lea, figur?nd – al?turi de Dostoievski – printre uria?ii profe?i ai omenirii, care au proorocit nenorocirile ce-au urmat, crimele ?n numele unei idei, rasismul, precum ?i devastatorul totalitarism ro?u. Dincolo de bine ?i de r?u e una dintre capodoperele g?nditorului german.

Geli?mi?li?in ??karsamalar?nda ilk akla gelen ?l?üt, meden? olarak ilerleme kaydetti?ini iddi? eden, d??avurumcu insanlar toplulu?unun bencil yap?la?mas?ndan ge?mektedir. Ara?t?rmalar sonucunda elde edilebilen, g?rsel, i?itsel, yaz?l?, ar?iv v.b tüm veriler do?rultusunda ayd?nlat?lm?? ger?ekler düny?si mevcuttur. Asalak olarak hayata tutunmaya ?al??an, ?z bireyci katmanlar?n en alt?na indirgenmi? insan say?lan varl?klar?n, niteliksel ?zelliklerle ?a?a tutunmas? imk?nsizdir. "En ?ok ben kazanay?m." s?yleminden yola ??karak, rahatl?k ve konforun adresinde bulu?an simbiyoz ya?ant?lar?n; ?a?d??? kalm??, kendi dü?üncesi h?ricindekileri yok sayan, ?ok katmanl? yüzeysel düny?s?nda gezinmenin verdi?i ferahl?k, bir?ok insan? cezbederek, ?ekilsiz ya?ant? portrelerini bilfiil olu?turmu?tur. Dü?ünceleri ve mevc?diyeti ?imento ile kaplanan nesillerin, zenginlik saltanat?na ayak ba?? olmas?ndan korkan erkin, katmerli yapt?r?mlar? bulunmaktad?r. D??s?z kalm?? medeniyetin, ??karsamalarla dolu ??karc? düny?s?nda, kendine en ufak bir yer edinimini ba?ar? sayan birey, ya?ant? düny?sinin ger?ek yüzeyine ula?t??? i?in mutlu olmal? m?d?r? G?rülen ve g?sterilen, verilen, yapt?r?lan tüm edimlerin ve edinimlerin, do?rultusunda, bireyin ??karc? sistem adamlar? ile yapt??? yolculu?a dikkat etmesi gerekir. Ritüel h?line gelmi?, paradoksal d?ngüde her d?im ba?lad??? yerden farkl? bir sona ula?mas? gereken yolculu?u yapan bireyin de, beklentisi bu olan macer?s?nda, üzüntü ve yenilgi verici sonucun, ayn? ?ekilde ikinci, ü?üncü defa ger?ekle?mesi ve ?o?u insan?n, bunun fark?ndal???nda olmay???n?n verdi?i bocalamayla ge?en ?mrünün c?resizli?inde ??rp?nmas? ve bo?ulmas? an meselesidir. Yapt?r?mlar yapt?r?mlar?, bilgisizlik ve c?hillik yeni olu?umlar? tetikleyecektir. ?nemli olan her insan?n asl?nda bir paradoks denkleminde, paradoks yolunda oldu?unu bilmesi ve ba?lad??? noktaya geldi?inde, nas?l bir düzenin i?erisinde ritüel yapt???n?n fark?nda olmas? gerekmektedir. Naz?re davran??lar?, sistem i?erisinde en az?ndan denemek, ayn? dü?üncede bulunan insanlar? bir araya getirmek ?artt?r. Ulusal bilincin her d?im uyan?k tutulmas?, paradokslarla sava??n en mükemmel ?rneklerinden birini olu?turacakt?r. ?nsan?n kat etti?i yol da, bu s?yede dünden kopu?un de?il, yar?n?n güvence alt?na al?nmas?n? tetikleyecektir. Yar?n? güvence alt?na al?nan bireyler de; kof, mesnetsiz, yalan ve riy?karl??a dayal? sistemleri ??kertme ve kendi hastal?kl? sistemlerini dayatmaya ?al??an ?o?unlu?un, katmerli ezici üstünlü?ü alt?nda direni? g?stermenin, mutlak gayreti i?erisinde olacakt?r. ?nsan?n yahut insanl???n bu eylemi ger?ekle?tirmeye ?al??mas?n?, en az?ndan denemesini diliyorum. N??M ONUR TEZMEN, 2013 MUSTAFA VE AY?E Mustafa’ya g?re; canl?lar?n, kompleks ya?am süreci i?erisinde, kabullenebilir davran?? grafi?ini topluma uydurmak ve o uyumu devam ettirme g?revi, bireysel sorumluluk gerektirmekteydi. Toplum i?erisindeki statüsünü belirleyen birtak?m rolleri üstlenen bireyin, davran?? biliminde girece?i rollerin karma?as?na kap?lmadan, gerekli ve ?l?ülü davran??, sosyal bilim do?rulu?u vey? bu do?rulu?a en yak?n olmay? gerektiren tüm birle?imler; bireyin ?zünü, karakterini ve bili?sel zek?sini olu?turmaktayd?. En az?ndan Mustafa'n?n dü?ünceleri ?????nda, akl?n? yordu?u; bilgi, kültür, gelenek ve g?renek birikimi ile a??klamas? buydu. Varolu?unun aksine, ayn? y?nde kürek ?ekmesine ba?l? olan ya?amsal uzamda, kendi do?ruluk pay?n? olu?turmas? ve bu pay?, ?evresindeki insanlara sunmas?, ona zevkli bir hus? veriyordu. Mustafa’ya g?re bilgelik, kazan?lan tecrübelerle birlikte, birikimlerin, paralel vey? ayn? düzlem i?erisinde hareket ettirebilmenin yoluydu. Bundan ??karacak ders de, birine bir do?ruyu empoze etmeden, ikn? k?biliyetini, ki?inin benzer birle?imlerinde ivme kazanan ara?lar gibi haz?rlamak ve var??a ondan ?nce vararak, kendi do?rusunun en yak?n bile?enine, kar??s?ndaki insan? ?ekebilmekti.

Ce este adev?rul? De unde ?tiu cine sunt? De ce ar trebui s? fim buni? Exist? multe c?r?i despre filosofie. Cu toate acestea, Cine sunt eu? difer? fa?? de celelalte lucr?ri de introducere ?n filosofie. Nimeni nu a reu?it p?n? acum s? pun? cititorul fa??-n fa?? cu marile ?ntreb?ri ale omenirii ?ntr-o manier? at?t de documentat?, de competent? ?i, ?n acela?i timp, cu umor ?i cu elegan??. Prezenta lucrare reprezint? o c?l?torie unic? prin noianul de cuno?tin?e pe care le avem despre om. Precht ne prezint? tot ceea ce este mai nou ?n neuro?tiin??, ?n psihologie ?i ?n filosofie. Fie c? pleac? ?n cercetarea sensului vie?ii pornind de la analiza unui episod din Star Trek sau de la melodia Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds a celor de la Beatles, cartea ne pune ?n fa?a unui traseu captivant, ?n care vom descoperi cele mai surprinz?toare lucruri despre noi ?n?ine.

Such is the system which underlies the Meditations of Marcus Aurelius. Some knowledge of it is necessary to the right understanding of the book, but for us the chief interest lies elsewhere. We do not come to Marcus Aurelius for a treatise on Stoicism. He is no head of a school to lay down a body of doctrine for students; he does not even contemplate that others should read what he writes. His philosophy is not an eager intellectual inquiry, but more what we should call religious feeling. The uncompromising stiffness of Zeno or Chrysippus is softened and transformed by passing through a nature reverent and tolerant, gentle and free from guile; the grim resignation which made life possible to the Stoic sage becomes in him almost a mood of aspiration. His book records the innermost thoughts of his heart, set down to ease it, with such moral maxims and reflections as may help him to bear the burden of duty and the countless annoyances of a busy life. It is instructive to compare the Meditations with another famous book, the Imitation of Christ. There is the same ideal of self-control in both. It should be a man's task, says the Imitation, 'to overcome himself, and every day to be stronger than himself.' 'In withstanding of the passions standeth very peace of heart.' 'Let us set the axe to the root, that we being purged of our passions may have a peaceable mind.' To this end there must be continual self-examination. 'If thou may not continually gather thyself together, namely sometimes do it, at least once a day, the morning or the evening. In the morning purpose, in the evening discuss the manner, what thou hast been this day, in word, work, and thought.' But while the Roman's temper is a modest self-reliance, the Christian aims at a more passive mood, humbleness and meekness, and reliance on the presence and personal friendship of God. The Roman scrutinises his faults with severity, but without the self-contempt which makes the Christian 'vile in his own sight.' The Christian, like the Roman, bids 'study to withdraw thine heart from the love of things visible'; but it is not the busy life of duty he has in mind so much as the contempt of all worldly things, and the 'cutting away of all lower delectations.' Both rate men's praise or blame at their real worthlessness; 'Let not thy peace,' says the Christian, 'be in the mouths of men.' But it is to God's censure the Christian appeals, the Roman to his own soul. The petty annoyances of injustice or unkindness are looked on by each with the same magnanimity. 'Why doth a little thing said or done against thee make thee sorry? It is no new thing; it is not the first, nor shall it be the last, if thou live long. At best suffer patiently, if thou canst not suffer joyously.' The Christian should sorrow more for other men's malice than for our own wrongs; but the Roman is inclined to wash his hands of the offender. 'Study to be patient in suffering and bearing other men's defaults and all manner infirmities,' says the Christian; but the Roman would never have thought to add, 'If all men were perfect, what had we then to suffer of other men for God?' The virtue of suffering in itself is an idea which does not meet us in the Meditations. Both alike realise that man is one of a great community. 'No man is sufficient to himself,' says the Christian; 'we must bear together, help together, comfort together.' But while he sees a chief importance in zeal, in exalted emotion that is, and avoidance of lukewarmness, the Roman thought mainly of the duty to be done as well as might be, and less of the feeling which should go with the doing of it. To the saint as to the emperor, the world is a poor thing at best. 'Verily it is a misery to live upon the earth,' says the Christian; few and evil are the days of man's life, which passeth away suddenly as a shadow. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?*** ? "MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS" was born on April 26, A.D. 121. His real name was M. Annius Verus, and he was sprung of a noble family which claimed descent from Numa, second King of Rome. Thus the most religious of emperors came of the blood of the most pious of early kings. His father, Annius Verus, had held high office in Rome, and his grandfather, of the same name, had been thrice Consul. Both his parents died young, but Marcus held them in loving remembrance. On his father's death Marcus was adopted by his grandfather, the consular Annius Verus, and there was deep love between these two. On the very first page of his book Marcus gratefully declares how of his grandfather he had learned to be gentle and meek, and to refrain from all anger and passion. The Emperor Hadrian divined the fine character of the lad, whom he used to call not Verus but Verissimus, more Truthful than his own name. He advanced Marcus to equestrian rank when six years of age, and at the age of eight made him a member of the ancient Salian priesthood. The boy's aunt, A

　　《菜根谭》是明人洪应明晚年所写的一部语录体小品文集，其内容包括修身、正德、处世、为官、居家、求学、励志等，被世人誉为是旷古稀世的奇珍宝训。 　　《菜根谭》历来被视为处世修身之宝典，其蕴含的德育思想积淀着浓厚的中国传统文化底蕴，广泛吸收和融合了儒、释、道三家的思想精华，是中国传统德育思想集大成者。 　　《菜根谭》一书篇幅虽小，但内容极为丰富，“其间有持身语，有涉世语，有隐逸语，有显达语，有迁善语，有介节语，有仁语，有义语，有禅语，有趣语，有学道语，有见道语”(重刊《菜根谭》序盖凡涉及人生根本问题和日常之道者，如生死观、修身养性、为人处世、居官持家、向学之道、品调揽胜等等，无不论及。而从思想意趣上分析，则贯彻始终的是儒、释、道三家思想，并以阳明心学相统摄。《菜根谭》辞藻华丽，雅俗兼并，意蕴深刻，耐人寻味，对于人的修身养性、为人处世等有着潜移默化的作用。

一般认为，《政治正义论》是葛德文的一部光辉、精辟的政论。它不仅对当时的英国激进思想产生过巨大的影响，而且在西方政治思想史上，也占有一定的地位。

　　《传习录》是王阳明的问答语录和论学书信集，是一部儒家简明而有代表性的哲学著作。包含了王阳明的主要哲学思想，是研究思想及心学发展的重要资料。它不但全面阐述了王阳明的思想，也体现了他辩证的授课方法，以及生动活泼、善于用譬、常带机锋的语言艺术。全书分为上、中、下三卷，上卷经王阳明本人审阅；中卷里的书信出自王阳明亲笔，是他晚年的著述；下卷虽未经他本人审阅，但较为具体地解说了他晚年的思想，并记载了王阳明提出的“四句教”。

黄怀信编著的《周易本经汇校新解》对《周易》本经进行全面校理和详细解读，每卦由原文、汇校、注释、训译、卦说五部分组成。《前言》部分主要分析介绍《周易》本经的构成体例，以及整理研究《周易》的方法等问题。

《菜根谭》在参照各种权威版本的基础上，精心筛选出*可靠性、时代性、契合度的经典原文。为便于阅读，我们将全书分为处世篇、修持篇、养身篇、闲适篇，并编制了主题目录。书中准确流畅的“释义”和详尽的“注释”，更便于您去阅读和理解。独特的“新解”，意在扬弃封建糟粕，赋予时代新义，为您处理社会问题时提供有益的借鉴。

《诗经》保持了风、雅、颂的体例，每篇分为原诗、译文、赏析三部分。译文生动流畅，力求做到信、达、雅的完美统一；赏析则深入透彻地分析诗的内容和艺术特色，从精神层面上贯通古今，拉近读者与《诗经》的距离。另外，书中还穿插了一些与诗的意境相配的山水花鸟画，全方位营造出一个诗意盎然的《诗经》世界。

《资治通鉴》以原书卷次为序，加以组织整理，既保留了原书的精髓，又在语言文字的运用上更适合当代人的阅读习惯。在古文今译的过程中，力求做到通俗易懂，同时在每个故事的标题下，都附有一段提示性的原文，有助于读者更好地理解故事内容。

礼仪是文明社会约定俗成的行为准则，一个人要想融入社会，就要对社会上的习俗和规范了然于胸，按照这样的习俗和规范来指导自己的言行。礼仪是非常实用的社交艺术，可以使你在人际交往中进退自如，从容应对。 当今社会更是一个注重礼仪的时代，礼仪是一个人的修养、风度和魅力的体现。良好的礼仪会帮助你凝聚人气，建立人脉，赢得丰富的人际关系资源。礼仪是家庭幸福的资本，职场生存的资本，社会立足的资本，提高身份的资本，．走向国际的资本……一个没有良好礼仪风范的人，即使有高智商、高情商，也是无法走向成功的。 本书全面而详细地介绍了现代礼仪知识，从个ASL仪、社交礼仪、职场礼仪、商务礼仪等方面，囊括了社会生活中经常接触到的礼仪，为读者提供一个全面、实用的工具书。．仔细地阅读这本书吧!它会为你提供丰富的精神食粮，让你成为一个言谈得体、举止优雅的人。

　　本书献给心理学的票友，无论你读过多少心理学，本书严密的逻辑推理和重大发现，都会让你震撼。 包括人类智力的起源、智力发育的甘特图、人类母系社会的真相、先天还是后天、命运是由上瘾决定的、基因技术的长期后果等内容。 这本书基本回避价值主张，重点是“看”，客观地看，解释生活中的方方面面。为什么少儿学习外语更合适？为什么全世界的性服务行业绝大多数都是为男性服务的？为什么各种文化背景下的婚配都有相似的选择标准？为什么婆媳容易不合？学习和认知主要的规律是什么？所有的东西立足于科学的解释，面向一个普通读者感到好奇和关心的问题。

《庄子》 一书是道家学说的代表作品， 也是中华传统文化中的一朵奇葩。

逻辑学有三大源流，它们分别是古代中国的名学（辩学）、古希腊的分析学和古代印度的因明学。不过，早期的逻辑学并不是一门独立的学科，而是隶属于哲学。

当前世界上存在着四大文化区，即基督教文化区、伊斯兰教文化区、佛教文化区、儒家伦理文化区，前三大文化区都是以宗教为中心形成的，而以中国为中心的儒家伦理文化区，虽然其内部也存在宗教，但整个文化区的凝结核心却是儒家的伦理文化，一种以家庭文化为基础的文化。本书是马克思?韦伯即研究基督教文化的《新教伦理与资本主义精神》之后的第二部宗教社会学著作，书中以儒家伦理为核心，从社会生活的方方面面去论证儒家伦理对中国社会的影响，并与西方的新教相比较，试图去寻找中国在各种条件都好于西方的情况下，资本主义为什么没能发展起来的原因。

有一类人，他们洒脱、积极进取、享受生活、酷爱自由、富有个性，他们就是BOBO一族。细细体会，你会发现他们就在身边，也许是他、是我，甚至就是你自己。80年代，我们看到捍卫秩序、积极进取、追求精致生活的雅皮，这就是布尔乔亚传统的反扑。如今，两大阵营的人开始讲和，寻求折中之道，于是，一个新的族群BOBO在全世界范围兴起。

　　《传统伦理与现代社会》以先秦伦理思想为基点，论述了中国传统伦理思想的形成和发展的历程，探讨了儒家伦理规范体系的完善及其正统地位的确立，以及封建伦理思想的深化和成熟。在此基础上，本书分析了中国传统伦理思想对现代社会治国兴邦和道德建设的借鉴意义。

李叔同与南怀瑾，都是繁华尘世的修行者，他们博古通今、学贯中西并精研佛法，对佛学都有很深的造诣，在社会上都具有很大的影响力。他们在多部著述中，将佛学的精华与现实智慧相结合，深入浅出，化深奥晦涩的义理为平易晓畅的箴言，向我们讲述人生成败得失的奥妙。 在本书中，李叔同教诲我们在尘世中要时常低下头，审视自身，关注久被遗忘的真实性灵。而南怀瑾却叮嘱我们要在繁华中抬头环视，寻觅和谐的应事接物之道，以使灵魂得到安度。无论是做人的尺度、做事的心态，还是交际的态度、说话的技巧，我们都可以从这本书中找到大师对这些问题的主张和看法。