Imagineaz?-?i c? e?ti într-o ma?in? a timpului care te poart? înainte ?i înapoi prin propria via??. Te duce în trecut, la anii copil?riei, când înv??ai s? mergi pe biciclet?, apoi te face s? revezi primul t?u s?rut, cel dintâi serviciu sau anii mai târzii, când te confrun?i, eventual, cu divor?ul. Înso?it de Platon, afl? ce spun marii gânditori ai lumii despre toate aceste pietre de hotar de pe drumul vie?ii noastre. Aristotel î?i va vorbi despre importan?a începerii ?colii, Freud despre îndr?gostire, Heidegger despre implica?iile psihologice ale mutatului, iar Nietzsche despre criza vârstei de mijloc. La drum cu Platon te ajut? s? în?elegi ?i s? vezi cu al?i ochi evenimentele majore, momentele-cheie ?i fazele de tranzi?ie din via?a ta, f?când filosofia s? par? accesibil? ?i plin? de umor!

Tr?s?turi fundamentale ale unei concep?ii moderne despre lume?Cum se comport? filosofia c? art? fa?? de libertatea omului, ce este aceast? libertate, ?i dac? am ajuns s? ne ?mp?rt??im din ea, sau putem ajunge la acest lucru: iat? problema fundamental? a scrierii mele. Toate celelalte expuneri ?tiin?ifice au fost f?cute numai pentru ca, ?n cele din urm?, s? arunc?m ?i mai mult? lumin? asupra unei probleme care, dup? p?rerea mea, prezint? cea mai mare importan?? pentru om. ?n aceste pagini vrem s? d?m o filosofie a libert??ii.“ – Rudolf Steiner

The present publication is intended to supply a recognised deficiency in our literature—a library edition of the Essays of Montaigne. This great French writer deserves to be regarded as a classic, not only in the land of his birth, but in all countries and in all literatures. His Essays, which are at once the most celebrated and the most permanent of his productions, form a magazine out of which such minds as those of Bacon and Shakespeare did not disdain to help themselves; and, indeed, as Hallam observes, the Frenchman's literary importance largely results from the share which his mind had in influencing other minds, coeval and subsequent. But, at the same time, estimating the value and rank of the essayist, we are not to leave out of the account the drawbacks and the circumstances of the period: the imperfect state of education, the comparative scarcity of books, and the limited opportunities of intellectual intercourse. Montaigne freely borrowed of others, and he has found men willing to borrow of him as freely. We need not wonder at the reputation which he with seeming facility achieved. He was, without being aware of it, the leader of a new school in letters and morals. His book was different from all others which were at that date in the world. It diverted the ancient currents of thought into new channels. It told its readers, with unexampled frankness, what its writer's opinion was about men and things, and threw what must have been a strange kind of new light on many matters but darkly understood. Above all, the essayist uncased himself, and made his intellectual and physical organism public property. He took the world into his confidence on all subjects. His essays were a sort of literary anatomy, where we get a diagnosis of the writer's mind, made by himself at different levels and under a large variety of operating influences. Of all egotists, Montaigne, if not the greatest, was the most fascinating, because, perhaps, he was the least affected and most truthful. What he did, and what he had professed to do, was to dissect his mind, and show us, as best he could, how it was made, and what relation it bore to external objects. He investigated his mental structure as a schoolboy pulls his watch to pieces, to examine the mechanism of the works; and the result, accompanied by illustrations abounding with originality and force, he delivered to his fellow-men in a book. W. C. H. KENSINGTON, November 1877. THE LIFE OF MONTAIGNE The author of the Essays was born, as he informs us himself, between eleven and twelve o'clock in the day, the last of February 1533, at the chateau of St. Michel de Montaigne. His father, Pierre Eyquem, esquire, was successively first Jurat of the town of Bordeaux (1530), Under-Mayor 1536, Jurat for the second time in 1540, Procureur in 1546, and at length Mayor from 1553 to 1556. He was a man of austere probity, who had "a particular regard for honour and for propriety in his person and attire . . . a mighty good faith in his speech, and a conscience and a religious feeling inclining to superstition, rather than to the other extreme. Between 1556 and 1563 an important incident occurred in the life of Montaigne, in the commencement of his romantic friendship with Etienne de la Boetie, whom he had met, as he tells us, by pure chance at some festive celebration in the town. From their very first interview the two found themselves drawn irresistibly close to one another, and during six years this alliance was foremost in the heart of Montaigne, as it was afterwards in his memory, when death had severed it.

"Wilde è profetico sin dalle prima righe, quando denuncia la prevalenza dell’emozione sulla razionalità, male principe del nostro tempo, e poi del pietismo sull’emancipazione, male di tanta politica di pseudo sinistra" (dall'Introduzione di Alfredo Sgarlato). Wilde: ?perché la vita raggiunga la sua più elevata perfezione, ci vuole qualche cosa di più. Ciò che ci vuole è l'individualismo?, ?Utopia? Una carta geografica del mondo in cui non sia segnato il paese dell'Utopia, non varrebbe la pena d'essere guardata, perché vi mancherebbe il paese in cui l'Umanità atterra ogni giorno. Ma non appena v'è sbarcata, ella guarda più lontano, scorge una terra ancora più bella, e spiega di nuovo le vele. Progredire significa realizzare l'Utopia?. SOMMARIO: Introduzione (di Alfredo Sgarlato) - Postfazione. Breve biblio-nota ai testi e alla traduzione (di Fabrizio Pinna) - OSCAR WILDE Società e libertà: elogio dell'individualismo - APPENDICE I Oscar Wilde, Rapporti fra il socialismo e l'individualismo (di Luigi Fabbri, 1913) - APPENDICE II The Soul of Man under Socialism (1891). LA COLLANA IN/DEFINIZIONI

Human reason, in one sphere of its cognition, is called upon to consider questions, which it cannot decline, as they are presented by its own nature, but which it cannot answer, as they transcend every faculty of the mind. It falls into this difficulty without any fault of its own. It begins with principles, which cannot be dispensed with in the field of experience, and the truth and sufficiency of which are, at the same time, insured by experience. With these principles it rises, in obedience to the laws of its own nature, to ever higher and more remote conditions. But it quickly discovers that, in this way, its labours must remain ever incomplete, because new questions never cease to present themselves; and thus it finds itself compelled to have recourse to principles which transcend the region of experience, while they are regarded by common sense without distrust. It thus falls into confusion and contradictions, from which it conjectures the presence of latent errors, which, however, it is unable to discover, because the principles it employs, transcending the limits of experience, cannot be tested by that criterion. The arena of these endless contests is called Metaphysic.Time was, when she was the queen of all the sciences; and, if we take the will for the deed, she certainly deserves, so far as regards the high importance of her object-matter, this title of honour. Now, it is the fashion of the time to heap contempt and scorn upon her; and the matron mourns, forlorn and forsaken, like Hecuba: At first, her gover Modo maxima rerum, Tot generis, natisque potens... Nunc trahor exul, inops. —Ovid, Metamorphoses. xiii under the administration of the dogmatists, was an absolute despotism. But, as the legislative continued to show traces of the ancient barbaric rule, her empire gradually broke up, and intestine wars introduced the reign of anarchy; while the sceptics, like nomadic tribes, who hate a permanent habitation and settled mode of living, attacked from time to time those who had organized themselves into civil communities. But their number was, very happily, small; and thus they could not entirely put a stop to the exertions of those who persisted in raising new edifices, although on no settled or uniform plan. In recent times the hope dawned upon us of seeing those disputes settled, and the legitimacy of her claims established by a kind of physiology of the human understanding—that of the celebrated Locke. But it was found that—although it was affirmed that this so-called queen could not refer her descent to any higher source than that of common experience, a circumstance which necessarily brought suspicion on her claims—as this genealogy was incorrect, she persisted in the advancement of her claims to sovereignty. Thus metaphysics necessarily fell back into the antiquated and rotten constitution of dogmatism, and again became obnoxious to the contempt from which efforts had been made to save it. At present, as all methods, according to the general persuasion, have been tried in vain, there reigns nought but weariness and complete indifferentism—the mother of chaos and night in the scientific world, but at the same time the source of, or at least the prelude to, the re-creation and reinstallation of a science, when it has fallen into confusion, obscurity, and disuse from ill directed effort. I do not mean by this a criticism of books and systems, but a critical inquiry into the faculty of reason, with reference to the cognitions to which it strives to attain without the aid of experience; in other words, the solution of the question regarding the possibility or impossibility of metaphysics, and the determination of the origin, as well as of the extent and limits of this science. All this must be done on the basis of principles. ABOUT AUTHOR: That all our knowledge begins with experience there can be no doubt. For how is it possible that the faculty of cognition should be awakened into exercise otherwise than by means of objects which affect our senses, and partly of themselves produce representations, partly rouse our powers of understanding into activity, to compare to connect, or to separate these, and so to convert the raw material of our sensuous impressions into a knowledge of objects, which is called experience? In respect of time, therefore, no knowledge of ours is antecedent to experience, but begins with it. But, though all our knowledge begins with experience, it by no means follows that all arises out of experience. For, on the contrary, it is quite possible that our empirical knowledge is a compound of that which we receive through impressions, and that which the faculty of cognition supplies from itself (sensuous impressions giving merely the occasion), an addition which we cannot distinguish from the original element given by sense, till long practice has made us attentive to, and skilful in separating it. It is, therefore, a question which requires close investigation, and not to b

本书分两大部分，即禅话与净话。作者分别将佛门禅净的特色深地释义，并且以历代禅净兼修的大德为例证，破斥持门户之见者。书中以“念佛至一心不乱，便是禅定；参禅至彻见自性，即是净土”为立论的根据，写出了禅宗与净土宗同为佛教派别的异与同。

道源法师关于念佛的完整示，包括对念佛的目的、方法、功德等的详细的讲解，为修行净土宗的修行者提供了如何正确念佛的方便法门。

本书旨在弘扬西方阿弥陀佛的净土教义，提出了一系列关于净土信仰和往生方法的理论，并大量引证各种经律论释，多达五十余部，以申明净土要义。全书以《观无量寿经》的趣旨，统以贯之，由于道绰时代正逢北周武帝毁佛，形成佛教末法思想的普遍，再加上诸宗派多排斥净土法门，故本书中亦多有论辩，着重于破除异议，使得净土法门在社会上广泛盛行，深社会各阶层中。

N

　　《精神现象学》为德国古典哲学大师黑格尔阐述其哲学观和方法论原则的部纲领性巨著。黑格尔自认此书为其哲学体系的导言。马克思誉《精神现象学》为“黑格尔哲学的真正起源和秘密”和“黑格尔哲学的圣经”。黑格尔通过此书提出，精神现象学是关于意识到达“*知识”或“科学”（即哲学）的道路的科学，它为个体提供了一把攀登*知识的“梯子”。中译本由贺麟、王玖兴合译，分上、下卷先后于1962年和1979年由商务印书馆出版。上卷1979年再版时曾修订译文，以与下卷译名统一，本次整理出版“贺麟全集”版，对勘再版所作修改，择其重要者，以编注形式留存上卷初版原貌。

　　《黑格尔黑格尔学述》收贺麟于1930年代编译的近代西方新黑格尔主义者的经典黑格尔研究——尔德的《黑格尔》与鲁一士的《黑格尔学述》，二书均能将黑格尔学说体会融化并以清晰流利的文字叙述出来，可谓姊妹关系，互相发明，互相弥补，而又各有所长。尔德注重叙述黑格尔的生活、性格、时代风气、文化背景，特别是政治和宗教背景，以及黑格尔的逻辑学说；鲁一士则着重阐述黑格尔之精神现象学。本书是将黑格尔及其学说译介至中国的人——贺麟对“黑格尔学”发生兴趣之始，贺麟以朱熹太极观会通黑格尔的“*理念”，对于中西比较哲学研究居功甚伟。作为贺麟重要译著收“全集”的《黑格尔》及《黑格尔学述》均为建国后首度整理出版，对于了解哲学家和翻译家贺麟意义非凡。

　　本书是胡适先生对中国古代哲学史的系统论述，是其国学经典著作之一。该书对老子、孔子、孟子、墨子以及庄子等人的哲学思想进行了论说与评判。此外，作者还对各家学派的思想渊源及其发展演变轨迹进行了考证。从孔子的儒家学派到韩非子的法家学派；从墨子的“兼爱非攻”的思想到庄子的“无为而治”理论，胡适先生都做了详细地分析与研究。

本套装包括4册。《交往理性与权力批判》既是作者对法兰克福学派发展沿革的小记、对哈贝马斯个人及其思想关键词的剖析，也同时阐明了作者自身如何从理论和思想上向哈贝马斯靠近，涵盖作者同哈贝马斯的个人交往、哈贝马斯与中国学界的交往、国人对哈贝马斯思想理论的接受过程，等等；此外作者还专门梳理了著名的“1968”学生运动的历史细节，重点凸显了在此运动中法兰克福学派与学生的各种互动及交锋。在《迟到民族与激进思想》中，作者以《德国思想的他者视角》开篇，从著名学者卡尔·曼海姆、马丁·格莱芬哈根、库尔特·伦克的研究成果出发，考察了有关保守主义的不同定义，揭示了德国保守主义思想的发生语境，分析了德国保守主义的思想结构，发掘其背后隐藏的思想关联、社会关联，特别是政治关联，揭示出德国作为后发现代化国家的激进思想；从宏观上勾画出德国保守主义的发展脉络。在《文化间性：记忆与反思》中，以“现代性”为范畴，作者探讨了我国文艺学学科及文化领导权应如何重建，大学精神和大学学术评价制度应如何建构等问题，以及在朝向现代性的过程中，欧洲社会面对的群体自我认同、法律及文化教育制度设计等方面的问题；在这些话题之外，作者还整理收集了自己近几年代表性的阅读札记、时事评论及文艺评论。《赫尔墨斯的口误（增订）》是作者的学术译文合集，涉及形而上学批判、话语政治、文艺理论等，收录了霍克海默、哈贝马斯、伽达默尔、克吕格、巴尔塔萨、罗曼·茵伽登、顾彬等著名学者的经典文章。译文难度较大，可见译者译笔矫健，这些文章也为学术界提供了颇具学术价值的成果。

孔子家语通解+论语通解(合售二册)，《论语》一书，成于很多人之手。主要是孔子弟子及再传弟子。孔子（前551年～ 前479年），子姓， 孔氏，名丘，字仲尼， 春秋时期鲁国陬邑（今山东曲阜）人，先祖为宋国（今河南商丘市夏邑县）贵族。中国古代的大思想家和大教育家、政治理论家，儒家学派的创始人。相传曾修《诗》、《书》、《礼》、《乐》，序《周易》，撰写《春秋》。他一生从事传道、授业、解惑，被中国人尊称“至圣先师，万世师表”。 相传他有弟子三千，贤弟子七十二人，曾带领部分弟子周游列国。孔子的思想对后世产生了极其深远的影响。孔子死后，其弟子及其再传弟子把孔子及其弟子的言行语录和思想记录下来，整理编成著名的儒家学派经典的《论语》。 《孔子家语》是中国古代记述孔子思想和生平的著作，其内容是自汉朝以前到汉朝早期不断编纂而成，后来王肃对其进行整理，凡二十七卷，现存十卷。《孔子家语》的争议很多。颜师古注《汉书》时，曾指出《孔子家语》二十七卷本“非今所有家语”。王柏《家语考》首先提出《孔子家语》是伪书，清代姚际恒《古今伪书考》、范家相《家语证伪》、孙志祖《家语疏证》，还有崔述、皮锡瑞、王聘珍、丁晏也都认为是伪书。

李叔同说佛+梁启超说佛(全二册)，主要收集了弘一法师一生开示佛徒的讲稿，和其晚年整理、辑录的处事格言。忠实地体现出弘一法师的佛学思想体系：以华严为境，四分律为行，导归净土为果。他平生重践履，讲谈要言不烦，而其慈悲的心怀则处处溢于言表。梁实秋曾称誉其讲稿“一字千金，值得所有人慢慢阅读、慢慢体味、用一生的时间静静领悟”，堪称能启悟世人的大德讲谈录。 是国学大师梁启超有关佛学方面的著作，是全面了解佛学文化起源及发展的读本。书中包括中国佛法沿革说略，印度佛教与佛陀时代，佛教之初输入，佛教与西域，佛学经典等内容。全文见解独到，内容深刻，是梁启超对传统佛学的现代性阐释。

《中国哲学与世界哲学》以分析的重建的方法阐述了中国哲学的主要传统和思想的综合特征，通过分析当代英美哲学的发展阐释西方哲学的特色，以中西哲学家为例比较中西哲学同异，并对中西融合之道、会通之前景、中国哲学与世界哲学的发展等内容行了论述，既体现出中国化特质，又体现出世界化的眼光。

《弟子规》是清朝以来有广泛影响的蒙学读物，与《三字经》、《千字文》等相配合，在推动民间礼义文明和儿童德育事业中发挥了重要作用。《弟子规》的内容来源于《论语》中的“弟子入则孝，出则弟，谨而信，泛爱众，而亲仁，行有余力，则以学文”，这段话可以视为孔子的教学大纲。《弟子规》包括了孝悌、忠信、仁爱、恭谨等儒家修身功夫，内容具体详尽，紧扣人伦日用，为现今国民教育中*为紧缺的儿童礼仪修养教材。 《〈弟子规〉读本》包括原文、注释、译文、解读等部分，准确阐发了《弟子规》的义理，以及它对于当代青少年教育的现实意义，对儿童修身做人具有重要参考价值。

古时候，有个阿阉贳王，特别喜欢吃大雁肉。他 认为大雁肉是世界上好吃的食物。为了保证他每天都能吃到一只大雁，就派猎手们到处张网，捕猎大雁。 在国下的都城外，有一个很大很大的湖。湖边长满绿树、青草，湖中有很多鱼虾，湖水清澈，水面平静，吸引了很多南来北往的鸟儿，在此休息、捕食。

本书是李叔同人生体悟的集大成之作，在这部著作中，李叔同以大才子、大学者、大艺术家的修养向常人揭示出人生的要义。本书除了李叔同的著作之外，还包括他的演讲稿与处世格言，与同时代交往的文化名人、学界泰斗之间的书札、信函，从中感悟人生真谛，从多侧面、多角度领略一代文化巨人的风采。

《沉思录》写于奥勒留担任罗马帝国皇帝期间，战乱不断、灾难频发的时代环境促使奥勒留经常与自己的心灵对话，全书对富贵名利、社会责任、道德修养、存在与死亡等诸多问题行了哲学式思考。字里行间凝聚着智慧、闪烁着思想的光芒，对于提高个人修养、促社会和谐以及人类优秀文化的传承具有较高的价值，可以起到引人深思、发人深省、拯救灵魂的作用。

《贺麟中译黑格尔经典著作》套装：小逻辑，黑格尔早期神学著作，精神现象学，哲学史讲演录《小逻辑》“贺麟全集”卷本书是《哲学全书纲要》的部分，通称《小逻辑》，以区别于《大逻辑》（即逻辑学）。全书除导言外，共分:存在论、本质论、概念论三篇，反映了黑格尔哲学体系的基本框架。黑格尔的《小逻辑》是构成他的《哲学全书》的一个主要环节，它的好处在于把握住全系统的轮廓和重点，材料分配均匀，文字简奥紧凑，而义蕴深厚。初看似颇难解，及细加咀嚼，愈觉意味无穷，启发人深思。他的学生在他逝世后编订全集时，再附加以学生笔记作为附释，于是使得这书又有了明白晓畅，亲切感人的特点。《黑格尔早期神学著作》“贺麟全集”第八卷《黑格尔早期神学著作》是著名哲学家、翻译家贺麟的重要译著之一，以八十岁高龄自诺尔编黑格尔著《早期神学著作》的德文原版翻译而成，并参考诺克斯与克朗纳的英译本。本书也是身为译介黑格尔至中国人的贺麟先生，生前后一部黑格尔相关译著。其中收入黑格尔著《民众宗教和基督教》《耶稣传》《基督教的权威性》《基督教的精神及其命运》及《1800年体系残篇》等五篇论文，是了解和研究黑格尔早期神学思想的手资料。《精神现象学》（上下）“贺麟全集”第15—16卷新校重排本，黑格尔哲学的“圣经”，深刻影响马克思、海德格尔、伽达默尔的哲学经典，对勘上卷初版与再版修订译文，存历史原貌利研究之便。《精神现象学》为德国古典哲学大师黑格尔阐述其哲学观点和方法论原则的部纲领性巨著。黑格尔自认此书为其哲学体系的导言。马克思誉《精神现象学》为“黑格尔哲学的真正起源和秘密”和“黑格尔哲学的圣经”。黑格尔通过此书提出，精神现象学是关于意识到达“*知识”或“科学”（即哲学）的道路的科学，它为个体提供了一把攀登*知识的“梯子”。中译本由贺麟、王玖兴合译，分上、下卷先后于1962年和1979年由商务印书馆出版。上卷1979年再版时曾修订译文，以与下卷译名统一，本次整理出版“贺麟全集”版，对勘再版所作修改，择其重要者，以编注形式留存上卷初版原貌。《哲学史讲演录》“贺麟全集”第11—14卷全新校对，重新排版，据贺麟手迹修订部分文字；德国古典哲学大师黑格尔天才的著作之一，哲学史的开山之作和经典； 贺麟弟子、著名哲学教授张祥龙参与修订编辑；重新收入苗力田选译黑格尔哲学史相关书信。《哲学史讲演录》是德国古典哲学大师黑格尔的代表作之一，“哲学史”的开山之作，治哲学者之书。黑格尔一方面将哲学史纳入他的客观唯心主义体系的框架中，把哲学史归结为理念回归自身的*精神阶段；另一方面把辩证法贯彻于哲学史研究，深刻地揭示了哲学史的发展规律。20世纪五六十年代，贺麟、王太庆等先生将其译成中文出版，是贺麟先生译述黑格尔的重要成果。本次收入“贺麟全集”出版，解决了之前版本由于出版时间相隔较远而存在的体例不一等问题，更符合当下阅读习惯。