遍看《论语》《道德经》《菜根谭》《资治通鉴》《增广贤文》《弟子规》等古籍，其中不乏关于为人、交友、读书、治家等人生重要问题的精彩智慧点拨，虽远隔千年，但置于当下，随时读来，仍如醍醐灌顶。弱水三千，取其一瓢，本书撷取老祖宗一代代人从亲身体验中总结出的实用智慧，加以深入解读，为当代人提供立身做人的正能量。

　　《民国大师哲学笔记》一书主要介绍季羡林、冯友兰、梁漱溟、李叔同、胡适、林语堂、金岳霖、梁实秋等大师的逸闻趣事，以及他们在学术上的妙语灵思，生动地再现民国一代名流的卓绝文采。大师用他们智慧的思想去观察、探究、感悟人生，并将真谛与我们分享。

　　《为人与为学：胡适言论集（评注本）》是胡适人生言论精华选集。胡适是20世纪以来中国*影响力的知识分子和学术大师之一，新文化运动的领袖。他的文章开一代风气之先，影响至今。 　　为人与为学：胡适言论集（评注本）》从为人与为学角度，精心编注了胡适在当时即引起很大反响的演讲及言论之精要，贴近读者当下生命状态，用*创造性的语言和启蒙意识、担当情怀，打造胡适新的精品。彰显其治学、为人、处世的大师风范，以还原一个真实的胡适。 　　胡适曾反复告诫我们，你*的责任就是把你这块材料打造成器，我们读适之先生，学习他的为学之方，更要学习他的为人之道，以砥砺自己奋发向前、开拓未来。 ?

《论语》是记录孔子及其弟子言行的一部书，是儒家重要的一部经典著作。其编纂者是孔子的弟子和再传弟子。所记录的内容很广，涉及哲学、道德、政治、教育、时事、生活、历史、人物等方面，是研究孔子生平和思想的主要依据，南宋朱子（熹）将其列为“四书”之一。 　　《论语》是一部语录体著作，大部分记言，小部分记事，全书20篇，约15000字。篇与篇、章与章之间隐含着一定的内在联系，篇名取每篇开头的两三个字而定。全书经过后世儒者的编订整理，在东汉末年定型。 　　《论语（玩诵本）》以朱子《四书章句集注》作为底本，对难读难认字的注音重点标记，标出通假字，强调易错读音，标注古今音（读为今音，注释体现古音）。同时，精选先儒的经典注释作为脚注，并将《孔子圣迹图》相关图片作为插图，以便于读者品味玩习。

　　《菜根谭》是明代万历年间隐士洪应明的一部语录体著作，集儒、释、道三家之思想精髓，涉及修身、处世等各方面内容，雅俗共赏，受到了文人学者和市井阶层的广泛欢迎，对后世影响深远。本书按照为学励志、齐家治国、为人处世、修身养性等若干主题，对《菜根谭》原作进行重新编排，加以现代文翻译和评析，并精心选取任伯年、吴观岱、程璋、徐悲鸿、陈少梅等著名画家的作品作插图。希望读者能在文与画的双重熏染中，获得精神上的升华。

《老子》，洋洋五千言，文字简约而意境深远，被誉为“道家精要之书”，《庄子》，先秦散文之典范，其文风恣肆汪洋、意出尘外，其论说诡谲神秘、奇妙瑰丽。读《老子》，感受“无为”的智慧读《庄子》，体悟自由的美学。 通观《老子》全篇，洋洋五千言全用韵文写成，多有对偶，以古音读之，大致合韵，今音读来亦有诗歌之节奏韵味。细细品读，却又不得不感叹其文字简约而意境深远。 《庄子》又称《南华经》，被誉为先秦有文采的哲学著作。作者庄子，名周，战国时期睢阳蒙县人，曾做过漆园吏，后厌恶仕途，隐居著书。书成后，共五十二篇，后散失，只剩得三十三篇，其中内篇七，外篇十五，杂篇十一。全书以内篇为核心，其中的《逍遥游》、《齐物论》和《大宗师》等集中反映了庄子的哲学思想。

　　在林语堂先生看来，孔子的思想不只是“处世格言”“道德修养”，更是一种深沉的理性思索，一种对人生意义的执著追求，充满了诗意的情感内容，具有“终极关怀”的宗教品格。孔子的思想代代相传，渗透在我们每个人的血液里，成为中国人的“文化心魂”。

　　《美国的智慧》是一本通俗哲学著作，介绍了美国建国以来的许许多多的重要哲学家、作家，如富兰克林、爱默生、梭罗、桑塔雅那等等，内容涉及到社会生活的方方面面：生活、生命、情感、自由、幸福、自然、宗教、幽默与讽刺、爱情与婚姻、战争与和平，等等。阅读本书，无异于与众多伟大智慧的头脑在交流，心灵会得到一次净化和升华。

本书通过十课从不同侧面讲述了儒学的精华思想，能够使读者从中吸取人生智慧和做人道理，通俗易懂，是人们学习、认识和了解儒学的基础书籍。

《悟经》有着深厚的历史文化底蕴，它融合了儒、道、兵、法等历代名人的思想，并将其加以客观分析，全书共十一章，充分体现了中国传统的思想体系和道德标准，同时它又与当今人们为人处世的许多观念有深度的契合。

逝者如斯夫，不舍昼夜。雪泥鸿爪，又留下多少可供追寻的痕迹。如果说，回忆过去是不对的，那么我们的力量来自于哪里？我们的生命如何常青？这是一部80后胖孩对历史文化的记录和感悟。如果您还有那么些闲暇，不妨随便翻翻。又如果您还能从字里行间看到一些余秋雨先生的影子，那么这或许就是对作者莫大的褒奖和期许了。

一个诗人，如果没有灵感，或者说没有灵性，那写出来的就只是文字的堆积；一个雕刻家，如果他没有赋予所雕刻对象于灵魂，那只不过是一块木头或者一堆石头而已。而如果你能在别人心目中烙下深刻的印象，那肯定是你灵魂的特质打动了别人，从而使之产生一种共鸣。

《中国人的修养》是蔡元培先生在公民道德修养方面的杰出作品，主要收录了他为重要的道德思想建设代表作：《华工学校讲义》和《中学修身教科书》。《中国人的修养》这本书完美结合了中华传统文化中的修身齐家治国平天下与现代公民道德教育理念，通过细微事件，具体、详尽地阐述了建设道德社会的方法，是一部值得所有国人阅读的道德范本。 中国人或许是保守、固执，亦利己的族群，他们有着发自内心的真诚和善良，却从未试图将这种真诚和善良，变成社会的公共精神。 但蔡元培先生显然并不这么认为。 在他的眼中，中国人是“可改造的”，如果能摒弃过去的束缚，并注入崭新的思想，中国人就一定能从“独善其身”，转而“兼济天下”。 这部几近百年前的教科书，如今的国人也许刚刚翻开页。但翻开便好，便是试图革新，便是大勇气。 《中国人的修养》是蔡元培先生在公民道德修养方面的杰出作品，主要收录了他为重要的道德思想建设代表作：《华工学校讲义》和《中学修身教科书》。《中国人的修养》这本书完美结合了中华传统文化中的修身齐家治国平天下与现代公民道德教育理念，通过细微事件，具体、详尽地阐述了建设道德社会的方法，是一部值得所有国人阅读的道德范本。 中国人或许是保守、固执，亦利己的族群，他们有着发自内心的真诚和善良，却从未试图将这种真诚和善良，变成社会的公共精神。 但蔡元培先生显然并不这么认为。 在他的眼中，中国人是“可改造的”，如果能摒弃过去的束缚，并注入崭新的思想，中国人就一定能从“独善其身”，转而“兼济天下”。 这部几近百年前的教科书，如今的国人也许刚刚翻开页。但翻开便好，便是试图革新，便是大勇气。

本书是沈善增继颠覆《庄子》、《老子》旧注的《还吾庄子》、《还吾老子》之后一部颠覆《论语》旧注的新著。它选取了《论语》中脍炙人口、而又遭受两千多年严重曲解误读的十一章及相关章句进行甄读。

《中国印度之智慧》撷取了印度、中国文化中颇为精髓和深刻的内容，全书共分两册。《印度的智慧》通过对印度文学、哲学、宗教信仰的展示，让人们一窥印度思想的丰富性和本质精神。《中国的智慧》收录了中国哲学、文学和宗教等方面的代表作，生动全面地介绍了中国的传统文化。林语堂的文学天分和中英文造诣使本书视角独到、视野宽广，两个古老民族的文化积淀和文学述说汇集于此，激荡着读者的心灵。

《中国印度之智慧》撷取了印度、中国文化中颇为精髓和深刻的内容，全书共分两册。《印度的智慧》通过对印度文学、哲学、宗教信仰的展示，让人们一窥印度思想的丰富性和本质精神。《中国的智慧》收录了中国哲学、文学和宗教等方面的代表作，生动全面地介绍了中国的传统文化。林语堂的文学天分和中英文造诣使本书视角独到、视野宽广，两个古老民族的文化积淀和文学述说汇集于此，激荡着读者的心灵。

DAVID HUME (1711 – 1776) was a Scottish philosopher, historian, economist, and essayist known especially for his philosophical empiricism and skepticism. He was one of the most important figures in the history of Western philosophy and the Scottish Enlightenment. Hume is often grouped with John Locke, George Berkeley, and a handful of others as a British Empiricist. Beginning with his A Treatise of Human Nature (1739), Hume strove to create a total naturalistic "science of man" that examined the psychological basis of human nature. In stark opposition to the rationalists who preceded him, most notably Descartes, he concluded that desire rather than reason governed human behaviour, saying: "REASON IS, and OUGHT ONLY to BE the SLAVE of the PASSIONS". A prominent figure in the sceptical philosophical tradition and a strong empiricist, he argued against the existence of innate ideas, concluding instead that humans have knowledge only of things they directly experience.. NOTHING is more usual and more natural for those, who pretend to discover anything new to the world in philosophy and the sciences, than to insinuate the praises of their own systems, by decrying all those, which have been advanced before them. And indeed were they content with lamenting that ignorance, which we still lie under in the most important questions, that can come before the tribunal of human reason, there are few, who have an acquaintance with the sciences, that would not readily agree with them. It is easy for one of judgment and learning, to perceive the weak foundation even of those systems, which have obtained the greatest credit, and have carried their pretensions highest to accurate and profound reasoning. Principles taken upon trust, consequences lamely deduced from them, want of coherence in the parts, and of evidence in the whole, these are every where to be met with in the systems of the most eminent philosophers, and seem to have drawn disgrace upon philosophy itself. Nor is there required such profound knowledge to discover the present imperfect condition of the sciences, but even the rabble without doors may, judge from the noise and clamour, which they hear, that all goes not well within. There is nothing which is not the subject of debate, and in which men of learning are not of contrary opinions. The most trivial question escapes not our controversy, and in the most momentous we are not able to give any certain decision. Disputes are multiplied, as if every thing was uncertain; and these disputes are managed with the greatest warmth, as if every thing was certain. Amidst all this bustle it is not reason, which carries the prize, but eloquence; and no man needs ever despair of gaining proselytes to the most extravagant hypothesis, who has art enough to represent it in any favourable colours. The victory is not gained by the men at arms, who manage the pike and the sword; but by the trumpeters, drummers, and musicians of the army. From hence in my opinion arises that common prejudice against metaphysical reasonings of all kinds, even amongst those, who profess themselves scholars, and have a just value for every other part of literature. By metaphysical reasonings, they do not understand those on any particular branch of science, but every kind of argument, which is any way abstruse, and requires some attention to be comprehended. We have so often lost our labour in such researches, that we commonly reject them without hesitation, and resolve, if we must for ever be a prey to errors and delusions, that they shall at least be natural and entertaining. And indeed nothing but the most determined scepticism, along with a great degree of indolence, can justify this aversion to metaphysics. For if truth be at all within the reach of human capacity, it is certain it must lie very deep and abstruse: and to hope we shall arrive at it without pains, while the greatest geniuses have failed with the utmost pains..

Ralph Waldo Emerson, was born at Boston in 1803 into a distinguished family of New England Unitarian ministers. His was the eighth generation to enter the ministry in a dynasty that reached back to the earliest days of Puritan America. Despite the death of his father when Emerson was only eleven, he was able to be educated at Boston Latin School and then Harvard, from which he graduated in 1821. After several years of reluctant school teaching, he returned to the Harvard Divinity School, entering the Unitarian ministry during a period of robust ecclesiastic debate. By 1829 Emerson was married and well on his way to a promising career in the church through his appointment to an important congregation in Boston. However, his career in the ministry did not last long. Following the death of his first wife, Ellen, his private religious doubts led him to announce his resignation to his congregation, claiming he was unable to preach a doctrine he no longer believed and that "to be a good minister it was necessary to leave the ministry."With the modest legacy left him from his first wife, Emerson was able to devote himself to study and travel. In Europe he met many of the important Romantic writers whose ideas on art, philosophy, and literature were transforming the writing of the Nineteenth Century. He also continued to explore his own ideas in a series of voluminous journals which he had kept from his earliest youth and from which virtually all of his literary creation would be generated. Taking up residence in Concord, Massachusetts, Emerson devoted himself to study, writing and a series of public lectures in the growing lyceum movement. From these lyceum addresses Emerson developed and then in 1836 published his most important work, Nature. Its publication also coincided with his organizing role in the Transcendental Club, a group of leading New England educators, clergy, and intellectuals interested in idealistic religion, philosophy, and literature.

　　本书以生动的故事向读者传递人生的哲理，经典的故事，启迪你生活的智慧。实用的道理，教会你日常做人的事。本书共分为十九章，在指导对个人的缺、面对成败的态度、面对感情的得失等方面，都有细致、合理的方法呈现。

●从未有哪个时代像今天一样，科学让人类社会以肉眼可见的速度向前演化。这场两千多年的长程奔跑似乎来到了冲刺阶段，不断有人做出世界末日的预言，那么，科学*终带给我们的究竟是生存还是毁灭？科学研究的目的究竟是什么？科学能告诉我们*真理吗？ 带着这样的终极关怀，《人人都该懂的科学哲学》首先讲述了科学脱离哲学、独立成长的过程，然后以智慧设计论、弦理论、占星术、有神论、社会建构主义、女性主义等充满争议的问题为例，辨析了科学的定义、方法和目的，科学和社会的关系。伟大的科学哲学家亚里士多德、笛卡儿、休谟、培根、波普尔、库恩等纷纷出场，上演了一场绵亘数千年的*辩论。 面对未来的挑战，无论人类能否破解“公地悲剧”、实现星际殖民、活到长生不老，杰弗里·戈勒姆以科学哲学的视角安慰我们：“当生命终结，人类文化仍然存在，只不过是存在于过去。希望它永远存在就太过分了，无异于希望巴黎时时处处是春天。” ●《人人都该懂的科学哲学》属于湛庐文化重磅推出的“新核心素养”系列图书之一。本系列图书致力于推广通识阅读，扩展读者的阅读面，培养批判性思考的能力。其中涵盖了哲学、心理学、法律、艺术、物理学、生物科技等诸多人文科学和自然科学的知识，其中《人人都该懂的科学哲学》的内容涵盖了科学哲学的核心思想，让你一本书了解科学哲学的核心智慧。

　　在《迟到民族与激思想》中，作者以《德国思想的他者视角》篇，从著名学者卡尔·曼海姆、马丁·格莱芬哈根、库尔特·伦克的研究成果出发，考察了有关保守主义的不同定义，揭示了德国保守主义思想的发生语境，分析了德国保守主义的思想结构，发掘其背后隐藏的思想关联、社会关联，特别是政治关联，揭示出德国作为后发现代化国家的激思想；从宏观上勾画出德国保守主义的发展脉络。