Such an expression of unhappiness was enough by itself to make one's eyes slide above the paper's edge to the poor woman’s face—insignificant without that look, almost a symbol of human destiny with it. Life's what you see in people's eyes; life's what they learn, and, having learnt it, never, though they seek to hide it, cease to be aware of—what? That life's like that, it seems. Five faces opposite—five mature faces—and the knowledge in each face. Strange, though, how people want to conceal it! Marks of reticence are on all those faces: lips shut, eyes shaded, each one of the five doing something to hide or stultify his knowledge. One smokes; another reads; a third checks entries in a pocket book; a fourth stares at the map of the line framed opposite; and the fifth—the terrible thing about the fifth is that she does nothing at all.

The “Manifesto of the Communist Party” was written by Marx and Engels as the Communist League’s programme on the instruction of its Second Congress (London, November 29-December 8, 1847), which signified a victory for the followers of a new proletarian line during the discussion of the programme questions. ??When Congress was still in preparation, Marx and Engels arrived at the conclusion that the final programme document should be in the form of a Party manifesto (see Engels’ letter to Marx of November 23-24, 1847). The catechism form usual for the secret societies of the time and retained in the “Draft of a Communist Confession of Faith” and “Principles of Communism,” was not suitable for a full and substantial exposition of the new revolutionary world outlook, for a comprehensive formulation of the proletarian movement’s aims and tasks. See also “Demands of the Communist Party in Germany,” issued by Marx soon after publication of the Manifesto, which addressed the immediate demands of the movement. ??Marx and Engels began working together on the Manifesto while they were still in London immediately after the congress, and continued until about December 13 when Marx returned to Brussels; they resumed their work four days later (December 17) when Engels arrived there. After Engels’ departure for Paris at the end of December and up to his return on January 31, Marx worked on the Manifesto alone. ??The first edition of the Manifesto was a 23-page pamphlet in a dark green cover. In April-May 1848 another edition was put out. The text took up 30 pages, some misprints of the first edition were corrected, and the punctuation improved. Subsequently this text was used by Marx and Engels as a basis for later authorised editions. Between March and July 1848 the Manifesto was printed in the Deutsche Londoner Zeitung, a democratic newspaper of the German emigrants. Already that same year numerous efforts were made to publish the Manifesto in other European languages. A Danish, a Polish (in Paris) and a Swedish (under a different title: “The Voice of Communism. Declaration of the Communist Party”) editions appeared in 1848. The translations into French, Italian and Spanish made at that time remained unpublished. In April 1848, Engels, then in Barmen, was translating the Manifesto into English, but he managed to translate only half of it, and the first English translation, made by Helen Macfarlane, was not published until two years later, between June and November 1850, in the Chartist journal The Red Republican. Its editor, Julian Harney, named the authors for the first time in the introduction to this publication. All earlier and many subsequent editions of the Manifesto were anonymous.

Volumul reprezint? o binevenit? interogare a reziden?ei adev?ratului spirit democratic, tezaurizat nu ?n institu?iile reprezentative ale statului, ci ?n societate. Numai aici se afl? garan?ia reu?itei democratice a unui popor, pentru c? nimic nu poate asigura libertatea perpetu? a na?iunii mai mult dec?t permanenta responsabilizare a cet??enilor cu privire la destinul politic al comunit??ii ?n care tr?iesc.

Volumul este o culegere de articole publicate ini?ial pe platformele Contributors.ro ?i LaPunkt.ro, precum ?i ?n revista de cultur? contemporan? Timpul, ce au ?n vedere realitatea politic?, social? ?i literar? actual? sau recent?. Cititorii vor avea ocazia rememor?rii unor importante evenimente din aceste zone, cum ar fi ?nfruntarea politic? ocazionat? de alegerile preziden?iale din 2014, protestele legate de Ro?ia Montana, drama din clubul ?Colectiv“, dar ?i controversele generate de acordarea Premiului Na?ional ?Mihai Eminescu“ – Opera Omnia.

Cu o precizie remarcabil?, George Friedman a prognozat tendin?e viitoare ?n politica, tehnologia, cultura ?i demografia global?. ?n Puncte de presiune, Friedman se concentreaz? asupra Europei – centrul cultural ?i de putere al lumii ?n ultimele cinci secole... p?n? acum. Analiz?nd cele mai instabile, imprevizibile ?i fascinante linii de grani?? ale Europei ?i Rusiei – ?i liniile de falie care au existat vreme de secole ?i care au fost motivul a numeroase r?zboaie catastrofale – Friedman scoate ?n eviden??, ?ntr-o modalitate inedit?, punctele de presiune care au ?nceput din nou s? cedeze. Uniunea European? de ast?zi a fost construit? ?n mare parte pentru a reduce la minimum tensiunile geopolitice care au sf??iat continentul de-a lungul istoriei. Dup? cum demonstreaz? Friedman, folosindu-se de o bogat? analiz? istoric? ?i cultural?, acest model a ?nceput s? ??i arate limitele. Puncte de presiune relateaz? istoria vie a Europei ?i explic?, cu mult? claritate, care sunt cele mai volatile regiuni ale acesteia: teritoriul agitat ?i mereu ?n schimbare dintre Occident ?i Rusia (o zon? mare care include, ?n prezent, Ucraina, Belarus ?i Lituania); vechea linie de grani?? dintre Germania ?i Fran?a ?i zona Mediteranei, care este leag?nul iudaismului ?i al cre?tinismului ?i care a devenit un centru al vie?ii islamice. Din paginile scrise de Friedman se desprinde o imagine clar? a regiunilor ?i ??rilor, iar istoria ?ncepe s? se contureze precis. Puncte de presiune este o analiz? cuprinz?toare a Europei moderne, a trecutului s?u remarcabil ?i a faliilor care s-au trezit la via?? ?i care vor fi fundamentale ?n viitorul apropiat. Aceasta este cea mai oportun? ?i, p?n? la urm?, cea mai fascinant? carte a lui Friedman. ?... ?n preajma lui George Friedman, exist? mereu tenta?ia de a-l confunda cu un glob de cristal, capabil s? ??i arate viitorul.“ — The New York Times Magazine ?Friedman descrie ?n culori vii o regiune unde amintirile sunt vechi, vulnerabilit??ile omniprezente ?i amenin??rile apar rapid ?i pe nea?teptate...“ — Publishers Weekly ?Kronika“ este colec?ia ?n care umanitatea este reconstruit? prin c?r?i care ne ajut? s? p?trundem ?n culisele celor mai interesante evenimente politice, sociale sau financiare de ieri ?i de ast?zi.

The book is not a discussion of measures or of programs. It is an attempt to express the new spirit of our politics and to set forth, in large terms which may stick in the imagination, what it is that must be done if we are to restore our politics to their full spiritual vigor again, and our national life, whether in trade, in industry, or in what concerns us only as families and individuals, to its purity, its self-respect, and its pristine strength and freedom. The New Freedom is only the old revived and clothed in the unconquerable strength of modern America. I have not written a book since the campaign. I did not write this book at all. It is the result of the editorial literary skill of Mr. William Bayard Hale, who has put together here in their right sequences the more suggestive portions of my campaign speeches.And yet it is not a book of campaign speeches. It is a discussion of a number of very vital subjects in the free form of extemporaneously spoken words. I have left the sentences in the form in which they were stenographically reported. I have not tried to alter the easy-going and often colloquial phraseology in which they were uttered from the platform, in the hope that they would seem the more fresh and spontaneous because of their very lack of pruning and recasting. They have been suffered to run their unpremeditated course even at the cost of such repetition and redundancy as the ex-temporaneous speaker apparently inevitably falls into. WOODROW WILSON. ABOUT WOLSON: Thomas Woodrow Wilson, known as Woodrow Wil-son (1856 –1924), was an American politician and academic who served as the 28th President of the United States from 1913 to 1921. Born in Staunton, Virginia, he spent his early years in Augusta, Georgia and Columbia, South Carolina. Wilson earned a PhD in political science at Johns Hopkins University, and served as a professor and scholar at various institutions before being chosen as President of Princeton University, a position he held from 1902 to 1910. In the election of 1910, he was the gubernatorial candidate of New Jersey's Democratic Party, and was elected the 34th Governor of New Jersey, serving from 1911 to 1913. Running for president in 1912, Wilson benefited from a split in the Republican Party, which enabled his plurality of just over forty percent to win him a large electoral college margin. He was the first Southerner elected as president since 1848, and Wilson was a lea-ding force in theProgressive Movement, bolstered by his Democratic Party's winning control of both the White House and Congress in 1912. In office, Wilson reintroduced the spoken State of the Union, which had been out of use since 1801. Leading the Congress, now in Democratic hands, he oversaw the passage of progressive legislative policies unparalleled until the New Deal in 1933. Included among these were the Federal Reserve Act, Federal Trade Commission Act, the Clayton Antitrust Act, and the Federal Farm Loan Act. Having taken office one month after ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment, Wilson called a special session of Congress, whose work culminated in theRevenue Act of 1913, reintroducing an income tax and lowering tariffs. Through passage of the Adamson Act, imposing an 8-hour workday for railroads, he averted a railroad strike and an ensuing economic crisis. Upon the outbreak of World War I in 1914, Wilson maintained a policy of neutrality, while pursuing a more aggressive policy in dealing with Mexico's civil war. ***

Ce greu este orice nceput! Dar necesar, de neocolit. Nu tim cum va fi sfritul, nu tim nici mcar ce form va lua drumul, dect n linii mari; dar pentru c suntem aici, pe acest pmnt i pe acest continent, Europa, trebuie s re-ncepem, moralitatea noastr va fi cea a luptei i a onestitii n lupt. Avem libertatea, adevrat, n sfrit o avem, a sosit att de trziu nct, dei o pipim i o simim, pare incredibil. Dar ea nu este mai mult dect o form, o form goal ce va trebui umplut...“ (Nicolae Breban)

Ця книга — про економ?ку як просту науку, яку здатен збагнути кожен. Автор — корейський економ?ст Ха-Юн Чан? — показу? нам ?закритий? св?т економ?ки, що прихову?ться в?д загалу за купою чисел, заплутаних формул та незрозум?лих терм?н?в. У книз? стверджу?ться: знатися на економ?ц? може ? повинен кожен.??Серед усього ?ншого автор розм?ркову? над причинами св?тово? кризи 2008 року, над тим, чи справд? люди б?дн?, бо л?нив?, а ус? багат? — працьовит?, а також чи може кра?на досягти економ?чних усп?х?в, перестрибнувши через етап ?ндустр?ал?зац??. ? все це — доступною, подекуди жарт?вливою, мовою.??

O livro analisa como o imigrante foi institucionalizado como amea?a existencial à Uni?o Europeia, sobretudo a partir dos anos 1990. Além de legisla??o e medidas securitárias, como controle de fronteiras e vistos, o livro se debru?a sobre discursos políticos que identificam a imigra??o como um problema de seguran?a, com campanhas de partidos extremistas e casos de racismos contra mul?umanos e indivíduos de origem romana na UE. Mostra como esse processo se vincula à resistência do Estado Na??o como lugar de identidade política e condi??o de cidadania.

Dbbenetes és elspr" Elton JohnA drogellenes háború dbbenetes trténetének els elbeszélése. Bátor nemzetkzi tudósítás, melyben az írót személyes érintettség vezérelte a kábítószerfüggség témájában.2015-ben már pontosan egy évszázada lesz, hogy az Egyesült llamok hadat üzent a kábítószernek. De nincs okunk gyzelmi táncot lejteni. A drogellenes háború centenáriumi évében Johann Hari újságíró a saját szemével látja, miként züllik el egyik kzeli rokona, valamint volt barátja is a kokain és a heroin miatt és talán maga is a drogfüggség felé sodródik. De milyen is valójában a drogellenes háború Mi Hari szerepe, és melyik trténetben A merész tudósító egy két éven át tartó, húszezer mérfldes útra indult ennek a harcnak a frontvonalán, hogy kiderítse, mit jelent a drogellenes háború világszerte, és hogyan léphetnénk túl rajta.A kábulat ára drámai, személyes trténetekre épül. Hari saját trténetére, és azokéra, akikkel kutatómunkája és interjúi során megismerkedik: egy transzszexuális brooklyni kokaindíler, aki tudni akarja, ki lte meg az anyját, és egy mexikói anya, aki éveken át kereste a sivatagban a lánya gyilkosát. Egy gyerek, akit a holokauszt idején egy budapesti gettóból csempésztek ki, és aki segített feltárni a függség tudományos magyarázatát. Uruguay elnke, aki éveket tlttt katonai brtnben, és aki legalizálta a marihuánát, hogy megpróbáljon gátat szabni az országában dúló erszaknak.A kábulat ára erteljes, lendületes és meggyz knyv, mely képet ad arról, mennyire pusztítóak a drogok is, és a kormányok drogellenes erfeszítései is. Egy emberibb jvt mer álmodni.Johann Hari írt tbbek kztt a New York Times, az LA Times, a Guardian, a Le Monde, a Slate, a New Republic és a Nation lapokban. Kilenc éven át volt az Independent rovatvezetje, és kétszer nyerte el az Amnesty International UK Az év újságírója címét. Az Editorial Intelligence- tl Az év kulturális kommentátora, a Stonewall-tól pedig Az év meleg újságírója díjat is megkapta. A kábulat ára az els knyve.

Volumul constituie o introducere normativ? ?n sfera de interes reprezentat? de politicile publice aferente spa?iului administrativ, adres?ndu-se at?t speciali?tilor, c?t ?i factorilor de decizie din acest domeniu. Autoarea evoc? problemele actuale din c?mpul politicilor publice, oferind modele decizionale ?i indic?nd provoc?rile cele mai importante la adresa paradigmelor clasice.

　　明清时期，数以千计的年轻女子抗拒父母的权威，终生忠贞于她们的未婚夫，很多以寡妇的身份终其一生，有的为未婚夫自杀殉死。贞女现象引发了中国历史上关于礼与女德的激烈、持久的意识形态争论。《海外中国研究丛书·矢志不渝：明清时期的贞女现象》旨在对贞女现象作一历史描述，并探讨赋予其意义的、反过来又被它所影响的明清社会和文化。通过勾勒贞女现象之形成、发展轨迹以及国家和社会对它的反应，本书试图对贞女现象与帝国晚期的政治、文化、思想变迁的关系达成较全面的了解，并通过判析围绕着贞女现象的矛盾冲突，揭示年轻女子与其家庭和社会之间的关系。《海外中国研究丛书·矢志不渝：明清时期的贞女现象》根本的目的在于探索贞女的情感、理想和生活历程，并由此解释是什么影响了这一时期年轻女性的性别身份，以及她们如何看待和表达尊严、责任、爱情。

《写给青少年的党史》丛书是一套面向新时代少年儿童的有温度、有厚度、有力度、有态度、多角度的党史学习教育读本。该丛书由国内著名党史专家邵维正教授领衔并担纲主编，中央党校、国防大学的多位专家组成创作团队，中国史学会会长李捷、中国中共党史学会副会长张启华担任学术顾问。 丛书紧紧围绕“中华民族是怎样站起来、富起来、强起来的”这一主旨，突破传统的章、节、目框架结构，以问答形式展论述，梳理归纳了当代青少年*为关注的60个问题，突出重、难、热、亮，按党史发展脉络分编成6卷，依次为《中国有了共产党》《红色星火燎原》《战火中成长》《中国人民站起来了》《春天的故事》《筑梦新时代》。每卷既独立成书，连贯起来又构成一个整体，能够系统地反映中国共产党历史的概貌。每个问题后设有“名言金句”“读党史长智慧”栏目，以帮助青少年更好地掌握主要内容和精髓启示，引发思考，从中受益。 在叙述方式和语言风格方面，丛书努力贴近少年儿童的阅读习惯和受程度，力求以生动形象的党史故事作为切，由小到大，由浅深，讲清来龙去脉，剖析前因后果，引发思考共鸣，达到以情感人、以理服人。在版式上，坚持图文并茂，强化视觉冲，增强可读性、趣味性。

重视优势，发掘优势，运用优势，顺势而为，是中国共产党人的优良传统。本书共十三章，紧扣党的*文件精神，坚持以习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想为指导，解析“中国之治”的制度密码，阐述了中国特色社会主义制度十三个方面的显著优势，以期读懂中国优势，用好中国优势。

党员教育管理是党的建设基础性经常性工作。本书根据《中国共产党党员教育管理工作条例》组织编写，对党员教育管理工作做了系统全面的介绍，包括加强党员教育管理工作的总体要求、学习贯彻习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想、党员教育基本任务、党员日常教育管理主要方式、党籍和党员组织关系管理、党员监督和组织处置、流动党员管理、党员教育管理信息化、组织领导和工作保障等九个方面，内容详尽全面，具有较强的工作指导性、操作性和实用性，是一本基层党务工作者案头的工具书，也是党员干部参加“三会一课”等组织生活的参考书。

本书共有十九讲，涵盖党支部的功能定位、设置、工作机制及组织生活，党员的发展、教育、管理、监督、服务工作，党支部的选举、思想政治、群众、统战、纪律检查等工作，还包括党支部书记的选拔、培训、素质、能力、工作方法和领导艺术、党性修养等内容，并收录党支部工作常用文体。基层党支部书记工作有关内容均被囊括在内，为基层党务工作指明了前方向，是一本不可多得的党支部工作权威读物。

内容简介 高校大学生作为国家重要的人才资源，做好高校党员发展工作具有重大意义。本书共八章，分别从党史、党情、发展党员规程、端正党动机等方面对高校大学生党前后的一系列工作行了展性的论述。作为一本创新与严谨兼具的党培训教材，本书在编写过程中参考借鉴并引用了一些权威媒体的资料、数据、图表，内容权威丰富，版式简约大方。可以说，本书不仅能够帮助广大学生党员更好地了解党史党情、一步端正党动机，而且可以助力高校党务工作者更加规范地完成党员发展和培训工作。

重视和加强党支部建设，是马克思主义政党的鲜明特征。本书作为“新时代党支部建设丛书”系列成果之一，详细论述了新时代党支部工作的各项内容，包括：党支部的功能定位、职责和工作原则，党支部的组织设置和基本任务，党支部的工作机制，党支部的组织生活，党支部委员会建设，党支部主要工作程序，党支部的工作方式和活动方式，党支部的党员发展、教育、管理与服务工作，党支部的纪律检查工作，党支部的选举工作，党支部的思想政治工作、群众工作和统战工作，党支部常用文体等，突出讲述了党支部要担负好直教育党员、管理党员、监督党员和组织群众、宣传群众、凝聚群众、服务群众的职责。

党的十九届四中全会审议通过的《中共中央关于坚持和完善中国特色社会主义制度、推国家治理体系和治理能力现代化若干重大问题的决定》，全面回答了在我国国家制度和国家治理上应该“坚持和巩固什么，完善和发展什么”这个重大政治问题，标志着我们党对巩固发展社会主义制度的规律性认识达到了新高度，标志着“中国之治”创新境界。 什么是中国之治？向着国家治理现代化奋，中国还将面对怎样的挑战？为什么说中国之治，可以为中国政治稳定、经济发展、文化繁荣、民族团结、社会安宁、国家统一提供着有力保障？本书全面梳理了治理的由来、什么是中国特色的国家治理体系、如何推中国国家治理体系和治理能力现代化等问题，使广大读者全面、深地了解“中国之治”。

《孙子兵法》是中国古代兵家和兵学的代表作，也是中国优秀传统文化的重要组成部分。本书简明扼要地介绍了《孙子兵法》的学术地位和特，系统而精练地评述了《孙子兵法》十三篇中所包含的丰富、深刻内容，认为一部《孙子兵法》是由“国家战略：国君的‘大战争’指导艺术”“军事战略：统兵之将的作战指导艺术”和“战术专题”三大部分组成的，从而，基本上揭示了这部世界上*早产生的战争和战略名著的理论真相。本书适合对战略问题和军事理论感兴趣的读者阅读。

究竟是什么原因使得中国和西方在15世纪以后的经济发展历程上，呈现出两条截然不同的道路？ 与现有研究中国道路的大多数著作不同，本书将中国道路置身于历史大视野行审视并揭示其世界意义，具体分析了国家能力如何影响经济发展和中国崛起在经济学理论上的重要意义。通过古今中外的纵横对比和深阐释，书中重新审视和批驳了“西方中心论”和新自由主义经济学。 全书以新的视角揭示出，近代中国落后不是因为市场经济不发达，国家治理能力才是古代中国繁荣与近代中国衰落以及西方兴起与西方衰落的分水岭。今天中国复兴从现象层面看是经济上对西方的赶超，而在本质层面则是国家治理能力对西方的超越。该书以深的论证揭示，离了国家治理能力，单纯的市场经济不但不能带来国家发展，甚至往往成为发展无序和衰落的原因。