涵盖了从古代到近现代时期的百家哲学思想，以老子、庄子、孔子、孟子、朱子等圣哲为主线，在立足各哲学家经典著作的基础上，总结概括了其哲学思想的精髓。通过本书，读者不仅可以系统地了解中国经典哲学，也能清晰地感受胡适严谨的治学态度。

老子他说+道家、密宗与东方神秘学+静坐修道与长生不老+中国道教发展史略+禅宗与道家

汇集了南怀瑾先生讲述儒家经典的所有著述。既有讲述人们熟知的“四书”（《论语》《孟子》《大学》《中庸》）的著述，又有讲述被奉为群经之首的《易经》和《周易·系辞》的著述。“四书”蕴含了儒家思想的核心内容，是儒学认识论和方法论的集中体现，更是中国传统文化中的核心要义；《易经》更被奉为群经之首，广大精微，包罗万象，是儒家、道家共同的经典，是中华文明源头和代表。南怀瑾先生讲经典，从不仅止于阐释经义，而是通过儒释道等思想的融会贯通，通过上下五千年人文历史的佐证，通过古今中外世事的投射，通过南先生自身的生命体认，把遥远的经典讲到了当代人的日常行止之中，讲到了当下人事的方方面面，让经典靠近读者。

本书以《诸子学略说》和《诸子略说》为主，汇集太炎先生论诸子之大部分文字，精心编辑校而成。太炎先生治学，贯通经、史、子、集，其于先秦之儒、道、墨、法等家学说尤有深研究，其论诸子之是非得失，每有独到之见解，而又能深浅出引人胜。本书为太炎先生治诸子学之毕生心血，实为先秦诸子思想门之*读物。

《厚黑学》自诞生以来，多次再版重印，畅销数，成为中国文化界一犬奇观！20世纪80年代又成为台湾、香港地区及日本的畅销书。 “厚黑学”的奇妙就在于能教会你在风云变换的人生舞台上掌握先机、抓住制胜要的智慧。作者视角独特，观新颖，自成一家，使人不能不佩服其对传统文化的切肤感受与妙悟能力。《厚黑学》就像一面镜子，理所当然地成为了《丑陋的中国人》等一系列抨落后国民性著作的先河之作。 本书插图珍藏版以1935年成都《华西日报》社出版的《厚黑丛话》、《社会问题之研究》、1936年成都晨钟书局出版的《中国学术之趋势》为底本，广泛收集李宗吾先生各个时期的作品精心编撰而成。并对书中所涉及的历史人物和事件，配大量相关的插图及文字说明，便于读者更加直观生动地领悟到厚黑学的精髓。

　　《因为苦过，所以知足：智藏法师教你守住幸福》是一部在浮躁尘世收获安然的悟之书，一部风靡全国悟亿万心灵的养心之作，一部迄今为止富有哲理的身心灵修养书。 　　全书旨在用佛学的智慧，告知读者“人懂得知足，心意解，真正离苦得乐”的人生哲学，并从肤浅的做人做事的技巧，讲到深的生命哲学，为读者解：生活中的烦恼、学会取舍、解决心苦的两大病魔、剔除执著、宽于待人、知足便是福……种种阻碍我们幸福的绊脚石，是一本真正让读者通晓人生哲理的心灵修养书。

《中国哲学史史料学》是著名的哲学家张岱年先生的著作。张先生曾任清华大学哲学系教授、北京大学哲学系教授，他也曾为北大哲学系研究生设中国哲学史史料学课程，本书是他整理课程讲义的成果。 观与材料的统一，是哲学史研究的基本要求；掌握信实的材料，是达到这一要求的前提。张先生说，本书的任务，就是对中国哲学史的材料行考订、鉴别，确定其历史年代与史料价值。 本书列举了从先秦到近代的重要的中国哲学史料，简要地介绍了每一种史料的重要观和学术价值，清晰地考证了其成书年代，并引用史学家的观，吸纳了出土简帛文献及现当代学者的研究成果，来帮助读者更好地理解史料内容，十分具有引导性。本书考证有理有据，语言简洁干练，引文准确精审，是学习和研究中国哲学的经典门书。 此次出版，是以河北人民大学出版社1996年版的《张岱年全集》（第四卷）页269-445为底本，以三联书店1982年版《中国哲学史史料学》为校本行修订的。《附录》所列若干重要文献目录，具有极高的文献价值，因底本无而校本有，便附于此版正文之后。

本卷收梁漱溟先生所著《印度哲学概论》《究元决疑论》和《唯识述义》。 梁先生二十岁（1912？1913？）后思想折佛家，专心佛典者四五年，其间作成《究元决疑论》（1916）。遂以此文为契机，至北京大学教授印度哲学课程（1917），1918至1919年陆续完成《印度哲学概论》，以为课程讲义。1919年增“唯识哲学”课程，又有讲义《唯识述义》。这三部作品俱为梁先生早年钻研印度及佛教哲学的论著，故同时收录于本卷。 其中，《印度哲学概论》于1919年12月由商务印书馆初版发行，1922年三版时有增删。其后再版多次，均以三版为准。本次编校，以山东人民出版社出版的《梁漱溟全集》（2005年）为工作本，以商务印书馆1922年发行的第三版为对校本。 《究元决疑论》1916年发表于《东方杂志》第5、6、7期，1923年收《漱溟卅前文录》，同年12月由商务印书馆作为《东方文库》第45种出版单行本。本次编校，以山东人民出版社出版的《梁漱溟全集》（2005年）为工作本，以商务印书馆1924年再版的《漱溟卅前文录》为对校本。 《唯识述义》全稿共三部分。*部分于1920年1月由中华民国财政部印刷局印行，北京大学出版部发售，是为*册；第二部分作为第二册于次年印行，至今未查得；第三部分未印行，今已无存。故本卷所收仅为*部分，即*册。本次编校，以山东人民出版社出版的《梁漱溟全集》（2005年）为工作本，以中华民国财政部印刷局1920年印本为对校本。其中，书前所附《<东西文化及其哲学>导言》改第二卷《东西文化及其哲学》，本卷不再重复收录。

哲学就其本性而言，并不是要为我们解决生活和工作中的具体问题，它是要我们去思考根本的问题。当一个人懂得用哲学去思考问题的本质时，他就具备了一个宽阔的视野，具备了一个好的心态，达到一种较高的境界，活得更透彻、更明白。读哲学的目的并不是要成为哲人，像苏格拉底、亚里士多德那样先知先觉，而是要品味深藏在理论中的精髓，以此滋养心灵、提升内在，彻底唤醒沉寂的理性与桎梏的心灵。 《每天读西方哲学》以西方哲学史为基础，依据哲学发展的时间顺序，精心选取了50位著名的哲学家，用通俗易懂的语言讲述了他们的生平以及主要的哲学思想，文中还穿插了一些哲学大咖们的趣闻逸事，让读者在轻松的阅读中走哲学家们的真实生活和独特思想。希望每一位翻此书的人，都可以透过哲学大师们的思想和哲语，在喧嚣中找到宁静，在浮华中发现真实，在繁杂中看到简单。

苏格拉底之死，是古希腊哲学的分水岭，也是欧洲乃至世界历史上重要的文化事件之一。本书收选的三篇柏拉图对话：“申辩篇”“克里同篇”和“斐多篇”——分别记述了苏格拉底在审判时、狱后和服刑前的经历。这三篇完整地展现了甘为信仰和真理献身的苏格拉底对自我、对人生价值、对生命和灵魂的看法，让我们在领略他光辉独具的人格与思想魅力的同时，更好地了解到古希腊人是如何将哲学与生活结合在一起的。

尼采曾以“炸药”自喻，是“与被钉在十字架上的耶稣对抗的‘狄奥尼索斯’”，也是本世纪才大放光芒的哲学家和诗人。尼采以*人称的自问自答，在生平*一部自传和绝笔之作中，逐一评了自己的代表作，对“尼采”如何成为“尼采”,做出了权威的诠释。这是一部以思想为核心的自传，也是阅读尼采其他著作，理解他的哲学思想的指导之书，为尼采的其他著作提供了某些心理学和传记性的材料。

叔本华（Arthur Schopenhauer，1788—1860），德国哲学家，哲学史上个公开反对理性主义哲学的人，开创了非理性主义哲学的先河，创立了唯意志论哲学，他认为生命意志是主宰世界运作的力量。他毕生致力思考人类幸福的问题，深刻影响了尼采和萨特等20世纪哲学家，也为现代心理疗法提供了哲学依据。代表著作有《作为意志和表象的世界》《建议与箴言》等。

《道德经》问世已两千多年。本书是以逻辑关系重新展开全书81章的，在直译梳通文义后用现代诗揭示出各章的深刻含义，使老子的思想得以神形兼备地展示出来。使读者既可以从整体上认识老子的思想体系，又可以从各章传神达韵的诗译中倾听老子这位世界公认的圣人的心声，净化心灵、鼓舞壮志，获得修身养性、立身处世、安邦治国的知识、哲理与智慧。本书具有较高的学术价值与应用价值，同时兼具可读性。

《道德情操论》是亚当·斯密的伦理学著作，首次出版于1759年，斯密去世前共出版过六次。主要阐明了道德情感的本质、道德评价的性质以及他的以“公民的幸福生活”为目标的伦理思想。亚当·斯密把人本性中的同情的情感作为阐释道德的基础，他用同情的原理来解释人类正义感和其它一切道德情感的根源，来说明道德评价的性质，并以此为基础表明各种基本美德的特征。

《西方美学史》是美学泰斗朱光潜*重要的一部著作，也是中国学者撰写的*部西方美学专著，具有开创性的学术价值。 　　本书选取了西方各个美学流派中*代表性的人物及其美学观点，进行评述。对美学上的一些带有普遍性和现实意义的问题，作了比较深入的探讨。 　　作者挑选的这些人物代表了各时期的主要美学思潮，展现了西方美学的历史发展脉络，通过本书，读者可以全面了解西方美学思想的发展概况。美学、文艺批评、文艺理论等研究者也能从中受到启发，为进一步的美学研究奠定良好的基础。

重拾中西方古典学问坠绪，不仅因为现代性问题迫使学问古共智慧，更因为古学问关乎亘古不移的人世问题。古学经典需要解释，解释是涵养精神的活动，也是思想取向的抉择；宁可跟随柏拉图犯错，也不与那伙人一起正确。举凡疏证诠解中国古学经典、移译西学整理旧故的晚近成果，不外乎愿与中西方古典大智慧一起思想，以期寻回精神的涵养，不负教书育人的人类亘古基业。 　　本书是《经典与解释》系列之一的《霍布斯的修辞》分册，内中具体研究了“霍布斯的哲学思想”，主要收录了：霍布斯《利维坦》中的推理与修辞、霍布斯的“非亚里士多德”政治修辞学、“教条”对抗“数理”、基督教国家的自然法等内容。

南怀瑾先生的著述涉及儒、释、道等中国传统文化经典，他常以经史合参的讲述方式、生动幽默语言，结合古今中外历史人文典故，结合当下的日常生活，引领新世代的人们直入文化的核心智慧，让读者更乐于了解历史人文的博大精深。本套装收录东方出版社已出版的南怀瑾作品。

Among the notable books of later times-we may say, without exaggeration, of all time--must be reckoned The Confessions of Jean Jacques Rousseau. It deals with leading personages and transactions of a momentous epoch, when absolutism and feudalism were rallying for their last struggle against the modern spirit, chiefly represented by Voltaire, the Encyclopedists, and Rousseau himself--a struggle to which, after many fierce intestine quarrels and sanguinary wars throughout Europe and America, has succeeded the prevalence of those more tolerant and rational principles by which the statesmen of our own day are actuated. On these matters, however, it is not our province to enlarge; nor is it necessary to furnish any detailed account of our author's political, religious, and philosophic axioms and systems, his paradoxes and his errors in logic: these have been so long and so exhaustively disputed over by contending factions that little is left for even the most assiduous gleaner in the field. The inquirer will find, in Mr. John Money's excellent work, the opinions of Rousseau reviewed succinctly and impartially. The 'Contrat Social', the 'Lattres Ecrites de la Montagne', and other treatises that once aroused fierce controversy, may therefore be left in the repose to which they have long been consigned, so far as the mass of mankind is concerned, though they must always form part of the library of the politician and the historian. One prefers to turn to the man Rousseau as he paints himself in the remarkable work before us. That the task which he undertook in offering to show himself--as Persius puts it--'Intus et in cute', to posterity, exceeded his powers, is a trite criticism; like all human enterprises, his purpose was only imperfectly fulfilled; but this circumstance in no way lessens the attractive qualities of his book, not only for the student of history or psychology, but for the intelligent man of the world. Its startling frankness gives it a peculiar interest wanting in most other autobiographies. Many censors have elected to sit in judgment on the failings of this strangely constituted being, and some have pronounced upon him very severe sentences. Let it be said once for all that his faults and mistakes were generally due to causes over which he had but little control, such as a defective education, a too acute sensitiveness, which engendered suspicion of his fellows, irresolution, an overstrained sense of honour and independence, and an obstinate refusal to take advice from those who really wished to befriend him; nor should it be forgotten that he was afflicted during the greater part of his life with an incurable disease. Lord Byron had a soul near akin to Rousseau's, whose writings naturally made a deep impression on the poet's mind, and probably had an influence on his conduct and modes of thought: In some stanzas of 'Childe Harold' this sympathy is expressed with truth and power; especially is the weakness of the Swiss philosopher's character summed up in the following admirable lines: "Here the self-torturing sophist, wild Rousseau, The apostle of affliction, he who threw Enchantment over passion, and from woe Wrung overwhelming eloquence, first drew The breath which made him wretched; yet he knew How to make madness beautiful, and cast O'er erring deeds and thoughts a heavenly hue Of words, like sunbeams, dazzling as they passed The eyes, which o'er them shed tears feelingly and fast. "His life was one long war with self-sought foes, Or friends by him self-banished; for his mind Had grown Suspicion's sanctuary, and chose, For its own cruel sacrifice, the kind, 'Gainst whom he raged with fury strange and blind. But he was frenzied,-wherefore, who may know? Since cause might be which skill could never find; But he was frenzied by disease or woe To that worst pitch of all, which wears a reasoning show."

Mülkiyet kar??t? ya?l? anar?ist, hayat?n?n son y?llar?nda ironik bir durumda kald?. ?svi?re vatanda?l???na girmenin yollar?n? arayan Bakunin'e sunulan se?enek, orada bir ev sahibi olmas?yd? ve belki de en hazini, sahip olaca?? bu ev nedeniyle, polisin, resm? tutanaklara “Michael Bakunin, rantiye” notunu dü?mesiydi. 18 May?s 1814'te Rusya'da do?an Michael Aleksandrovich Bakunin, 1 Temmuz 1876'da ?ldü?ünde ülkesinden ?ok uzaklardayd? ve cenazesinde yaln?zca 30–40 ki?i vard?. Gen? Bakunin i?in, “A?k, insan?n yeryüzündeki en üst misyonuydu. Bir insan?n kendini a?ks?z vermesi, Kutsal Ruh’a kar?? i?lenmi? bir günaht?”.. ?Kad?nlar taraf?ndan olduk?a ?ekici bulunan Mihail'in ise kad?nlarla ili?kisi hep ruhsal bir a?k olarak kald?.??svi?re'nin muhte?em manzaras? e?li?inde George Sand romanlar? okuyan Bakunin, Frans?z dü?üncesinin Alman dü?üncesinden üstün oldu?u inanc?n? sa?lamla?t?r?yordu. ? Bakunin, Marx i?in, “O, beni duygusal idealist olarak adland?r?yordu; hakl?yd?. Ben de onu, hoyrat, kendini be?enmi? ve ac?mas?z olarak de?erlendiriyordum; ben de hakl?yd?m” diyordu.. ? Kendisine ili?kin konularda kindar olmayan Bakunin, Herzen'in kar?s?na g?sterdi?i so?uklu?u hayat?n?n sonuna kadar unutamad?.?“Art?k reaksiyonun muzaffer gü?lerine kar?? Sisifos'un ta??n? yuvarlamak i?in ne gerekli güce ne de güvene sahibim. Bu yüzden, mücadeleden ?ekiliyor ve arkada?lar?mdan tek bir iyilik bekliyorum: "Unutulmak”,?Orta ve ge? on dokuzuncu yüzy?lda, radikal sol –yani, a?g?zlü kapitalizm ele?tirmenleri ve sanayi i??ilerinin ?zgürlü?ünün savunucular?– iki temel franksiyona ayr?l?yordu: Marksistler ve anar?istler. Kabaca s?ylemek gerekirse (ki bu son derece kar???k bir hik?yedir), kazanan Marksistler oldu ve yirminci yüzy?l?n tüm ba?ar?l? sol devrimleri –Rus, ?in ve Küba, ?rne?in– Marksist ilkelere ba?l?l?klar?n? ilan ettiler. ? Marksistler ile anar?istler aras?ndaki sava? bu noktada tarihsel bir meraktan ?te devam eden bir meseledir. Pi?man olmayan ya da ele?tirilmeyen tek ger?ek Marksist sol Kim Jong Il ve taraf etraftaki birka? entelektüel ve profes?rdür. Anar?izm ise uygulanabilir bir toplumsal hareket olarak ?kinci Dünya Sava??yla yava? yava? tükenmeye yüz tutmu?ken küreselle?me kar??t? hareket ve d?nemimizin di?er radikalizmleri i?inde yeniden dirilmeye ba?lam??t?r. ? Ne var ki, d?neminde –Marx’?n di?erleriyle aras?ndaki– bu sava? bir ?lüm kal?m meselesiydi ve Marksizm muhtemel kapitalizm kar??t? olarak ve yan? s?ra anar?izm kar??t? olarak tan?mlan?yordu. Asl?nda, Marx’?n yazarl??? anar?izme y?nelik sald?r?lar? a??s?ndan handiyse gülün? bir geni?li?e ula?m??t?r. Marx’?n Alman ?deolojisi kitab?n?n büyük b?lümü –yüzlerce sayfas?– bireyci/anar?ist Max Stirner’e y?nelik bir sald?r?dan ibarettir. Felsefenin Sefaleti Proudhon’a kar?? büyük?e bir fikir sava??d?r. Marx onca zaman ve enerjisini Bakunin’e sald?rmaya harcam??t?r: ?“dangalak!”?“canavar, et ve ya? y???n?,” “sap?k” vesaire: ?bu tabirler, has?mlar? s?z konusu oldu?unda Marx’?n bildik üslubudur: yazarl??? yar? bilimsel inceleme, yar? s?zlü tacizdir. Marx’?n, gerek kendi a?z?ndan gerekse de kimi s?zcülerini kullanarak ony?llar boyunca y?neltti?i ve muhtemelen di?erleri denli e?lenceli olmayan var olan su?lamas?, Bakunin’in bir muhbir oldu?u y?nündeydi ve Marx’?n bu ba?ar?l? sald?r?lar? nihayetinde Bakunin’in Enternasyonal ???i Z?mb?rt?s?ndan tasfiyesine yol a?t?.. ?

...a knyvet ne tekintsük úgy, mint amelynek a fejldése már befejezdtt, és amin már nincs is mit tkéletesíteni... azzal mintha nem foglalkozna senki, hogy a knyvet miként lehetne az olvasó számára használhatóbbá tenni... nagyon is el tudnék képzelni ergonomikusabban megtervezett és knnyebben kézben tartható knyvet is (amelyet nem ejtek el, ha a mobilom után kezdek kotorászni a 6-os villamoson. Ha egyszer vehetünk jobban kézbe ill tollat, akkor talán ez sem képtelenség).”

Within our Society (the International Society for Krishna Consciousness), guru has been taken to be synonymous with diksa-guru, but what about those great souls who have introduced us to Krsna consciousness? What relationship do we have with these Vaisnavas, and what are our obligations toward them, as well as toward parents, teachers, sannyasis, and other superiors who help guide us back to Godhead? Not much has been said by the Society on these topics, and hardly any appreciation is shown for those souls who labor to elevate us day by day.The scriptures, however, glorify as guru all Vaisnavas who guide a conditioned soul back to Godhead — be they instructors or initiators — advocating a culture of honor and respect. ISKCON needs to reflect upon these principles further, and the purpose of this book is to act as a catalyst toward such an end.