汉译四部《阿含经》——《杂阿含经》、《中阿含经》、《长阿含经》与《增一阿含经》，是由佛陀的圣弟子于佛陀般涅槃的当年夏安居时结集出来的，忠实地汇集了佛陀自成佛以来至般涅槃前所宣讲的教法，由此说明了《阿含经》的原始性、根本性与权威性。在汉传佛教的三藏典籍中，《阿含经》就代表着原始佛教，也是印度部派佛教时期所公认的“根本佛法”。 　　为便于广大信徒与学者更好地了解、学修原始佛教，本书校注者以高丽藏为底本，尽量保持原本整体风貌，将四部阿含经文转为简体字，加上现代标及分段。并在前人研究成果的基础上，参考《南传大藏经》、《碛砂藏》、《大正新修大藏经》、《正仓院圣语藏本》等不同藏经，纠正原经文部分错漏之处，就经中出现的地名、人名、法相名词、艰涩文句及其它译本的不同翻译作出注释，方便读者更为精准地把握根本教义与修行原理。本书有较高的学术、实用、版本和收藏价值，是广大佛教信徒与佛学研究者难得的学习、研究参考书。

太上感应篇汇编+安士全书(套装共六册)

全书38卷，具体包括：首编语录三卷，为《传习录》，附以《朱子晚年定论》，乃守仁在时，其门人徐爱所辑，而钱德洪删订之者。次为文录五卷，皆杂文；次为别录十卷，乃奏疏公移之类。次外集七卷，为诗及杂文。次续编六卷，则文录所遗，搜辑续刊者。后附以年谱五卷，世德记二卷。其初本各自为卷，隆庆六年，御史谢廷杰巡按浙江，始合刻之。谢氏刻本影响深远，几为后出各本之祖。本次校，即以《四部丛刊》影印之隆庆谢氏刻本为底本行校。本书是研究王阳明思想、哲学和事功史迹的重要且基本的资料。

1917年7月，胡适受蔡元培之邀就任国立北京大学文科教授，讲授中国古代哲学史、中国名学、英文高等修辞学。胡适一边教学，一边编写教材。顾颉刚曾对同窗傅斯年推荐：“胡先生讲的的确不差，他有眼光、有胆量、有断制，确是一个有能力的哲学史家。” 　　自1919年至1937年间。胡适多次在北京大学讲授中国哲学史，而且主要是讲中古哲学史和近世哲学史，其中1919年2月出版的《中国哲学史大纲》（卷上）就是在讲义的内容基础上修定而成。胡适是首位采用了西方近代哲学的体系和方法研究中国哲学的人，由于他的出现，中国的思想史才初具规模。他在中国哲学史，甚至在各种专史和通史的研究方面，都是创性的，他觉得是中国哲学思想史的山鼻祖。 　　《胡适的北大哲学课》以胡适在北京大学的所有哲学讲义为母本，再综合胡适关于中国哲学的其他著作整理而成，力求为读者构建一个*全的胡适哲学体系，让读者*直的感受哲学大师的风采。

本书是在作者组织的永临书院哲学和艺术高级培训班上，授课老师楼宇烈等知名学者讲课时的记录，经整理修改汇集成册。学者们从各自专业角度出发，对诗律、绘画、曲艺、书法等中国优秀传统文化行了深浅出的解读。本书对中国传统文化百姓生活，引导广大读者行经典阅读，弘扬中国优秀传统文化，以及培育民族精神有积极的推动作用。 全书精选了八堂课的内容：《志于道，游于艺——中国传统文化中的艺术精神》（楼宇烈），《达理妙通天——易学大师解读风水奥秘》（张得计），《功夫在字外——漫谈书法与人生》（张索），了彻心源——禅宗与中国文化》（陈中浙），《“谜”之意趣——中国灯谜趣话与佳谜赏析》 （卢志文） ，《雅韵弦歌六十载——梨园大师昆曲丛谈》（丛兆桓），《书法·笔法·规律》——从四则古书论谈起（郑晓华），《寻觅津梁——诗词创作的“易简之道”》（钱伟强）。

提升科学逻辑能力的主要途径在于改思维方法，本书针对高中学生的特，从科学逻辑的实用角度来编写。全书分为演绎逻辑和归纳逻辑两大部分，不仅详细介绍了科学演绎和科学归纳的逻辑原理，而且结合丰富的科学案例来阐明如何发现问题、分析问题和解决问题，以此论述科学的逻辑方法，从而启发高中生的科学思维并提升其科学逻辑技能。

书在等人，人在等书。人在阅读中，可以衔昼与夜，与经典和大师的对话，永不为时间阻隔。 本书由韩浩月的随笔结集而成。悼文，迈克尔·杰克逊、斯坦·李到金庸、二月河，告别带走一个时代的大师；评书，从《局外人》《月亮和六便士》到《堂·吉诃德》，书写作者本人隐秘的经典阅读心灵史；评影，从《少年派》《被解放的姜戈》到《让子弹飞》，力图展现世界电影表达的意志；记人，从村上春树、莱昂纳多到张艺谋，着重从个人视角考察人性与真实。 韩浩月以流畅凝练的文笔，徐徐展一幅生动丰富的光影画卷，细腻地展现自身丰富的内心世界，带领观者与大师、经典在纸上相遇，共赴一场不散的精神盛宴。

本书是法兰克福学派批判理论的创之作，阿多诺于1944年在在美国流亡期间始写作本书，并于1949年完成，1951年出版。 源于作者自身“受损的生活”（他是被法西斯主义迫害流亡的知识分子之一），阿多诺以一种独特而具有发散性的文字，展示了日常行为中*微小的变化与20世纪*灾难性的事件之间的关系。他认为，美好、诚实的生活不再可能，因为人们生活在一个“不人道的社会”。通过敏锐的社会观察，阿多诺提供了他对从日常经验到晚期工业社会种种现象丰富的思想批判。

坚持运用马克思主义的哲学思想、哲学原理、哲学观点，注重吸取古今中外先进的、优秀的文化精华，紧密结合当代实际，对包括为人、处事、生活、工作、学习、家庭等在内的人生，进入了深入而深刻的论述，具有较强的哲理性，具有丰富的知识性，具有一定的学术性。本著作共300篇随笔，每篇2000字左右，以义相反或相近的词对仗作题，如《独角戏与双簧戏》《隔重山与隔层纱》《道具与面具》《跳槽与卧槽》《做与作》《冷与凉》等，文意深邃，文笔明快，文字优美。

中华民族在漫长的文明程中创造出许多优秀的神话。创世神话不仅是众多神话类型的主体，而且内容丰富，形式多样，往往蕴含着一种积极向上、奋发有为、敢于创新的民族精神。 《中华创世神话选注》将中华创世神话划分为综合型创世、神的起源、世界万物起源、人类起源、动植物起源、自然现象起源等六大类型，共选录各类创世神话3000余篇。本书选录的是综合型创世神话。每篇神话除尽可能呈现文本的原来面貌之外，还增添了相应的阅读提示、基本母题等信息，并对原文本出版信息作出必要的补充和规范，使用者能够据此对每篇神话文本的出处、流传情况、叙事主题、文化内涵、关键情节、基本母题等有所把握。

中华民族在漫长的文明程中创造出许多优秀的神话。创世神话不仅是众多神话类型的主体，而且内容丰富，形式多样，往往蕴含着一种积极向上、奋发有为、敢于创新的民族精神。 《中华创世神话选注》将中华创世神话划分为综合型创世、神的起源、世界万物起源、人类起源、动植物起源、自然现象起源等六大类型，共选录各类创世神话3000余篇。本书选录的是神的起源神话。每篇神话除尽可能呈现文本的原来面貌之外，还增添了相应的阅读提示、基本母题等信息，并对原文本出版信息作出必要的补充和规范，使用者能够据此对每篇神话文本的出处、流传情况、叙事主题、文化内涵、关键情节、基本母题等有所把握。

中华民族在漫长的文明程中创造出许多优秀的神话。创世神话不仅是众多神话类型的主体，而且内容丰富，形式多样，往往蕴含着一种积极向上、奋发有为、敢于创新的民族精神。 ? ? 《中华创世神话选注》将中华创世神话划分为综合型创世、神的起源、世界万物起源、人类起源、动植物起源、自然现象起源等六大类型，共选录各类创世神话3000余篇。本书选录的是世界万物起源神话。每篇神话除尽可能呈现文本的原来面貌之外，还增添了相应的阅读提示、基本母题等信息，并对原文本出版信息作出必要的补充和规范，使用者能够据此对每篇神话文本的出处、流传情况、叙事主题、文化内涵、关键情节、基本母题等有所把握。

【内容简介】 “犬儒”早是指一支承袭自苏格拉底的古希腊哲学流派，他们崇尚归复自然，推行禁欲、苦行的生活方式，同时在举止上放浪形骸、不知廉耻，以“佯狂”的身体为武器，建构一种反理论的批判姿态，以表达愤世嫉俗、反对世俗伦常的观念，由此集结为一众雅典城邦的叛逆者。现代以来，相较古希腊时期而言，犬儒主义更多地指向颓废、虚无、冷酷麻木、玩世不恭等消极的价值；但在巨大差异之中二者依然具有某些共通性。对此进行辨与析，从美学的视角探究犬儒主义在身份认同、理性运用、感性显现、艺术创作和生存状况中的呈现与变化，对深刻理解“犬儒主义”这一文化现象具有重要意义。

是谁提出“人不能两次踏同一条河流”？为什么斯宾诺莎是被骂名包围的哲学家？ 俄罗斯的飞翔的双头鹰国徽有着怎样的历史渊源？……这些我们都该知道。

M. Lévy-Bruhl then explains that, whilst recognising the entire coherence of Comte’s collective labours, he proposes to confine his present study to the earlier and principal work, the Philosophy, which in M. Lévy-Bruhl’s opinion is the dominant and more fruitful composition.??This he regards as the representative work of the nineteenth century, as shown by the intellectual history of the period. He points to its influence on thought in England, in Europe, and in America. It will surprise many persons to learn that in M. Lévy-Bruhl’s opinion two eminent French writers, who assuredly neither were, nor were supposed to be, Positivists, “have done more for the diffusion of the ideas and method of Comte than Littré and all the other Positivists together.” ??These two are Taine and Renan, much as they differed from Comte’s actual scheme and doctrines. Renan indeed spoke of Comte as destined to prove one of the typical names of the century. The present writer remembers Renan saying to him with a most genial welcome, “I too am a believer in the religion of humanity.” ??Professor Lévy-Bruhl followed up his History of Modern Philosophy in France by a substantial work on the philosophy of Auguste Comte. It forms a volume of the Bibliothèque de Philosophie Contemporaine, which has already devoted four other works to the Positive Philosophy. It is as well to premise that this treatise dealt solely with the philosophy, not with the polity, or any part of the religious scheme of Comte. Professor Lévy-Bruhl writes as a student, but not as an adherent of Auguste Comte. His entire work is rather an exposition, not a refutation, or a criticism, or an advocacy of Comte’s philosophical system. But it may be said at once that no one abroad or at home, certainly neither Mill, nor Lewes, nor Spencer, nor Caird, has so truly grasped and assimilated Comte’s ideas as M. Lévy-Bruhl has done.??In his Introduction M. Lévy-Bruhl very clearly states the scope of his work, and his own general attitude. He traces the origin of Comte’s philosophy in the mental effervescence of the first generation of the present century towards a reorganisation of society, after the upheaval left by the Revolution and its consequences. He correctly states the relation of St. Simon to Comte as being that of an initial stimulus. ??The cardinal difference between Comte and all the socialists and founders of social and religious Utopias consisted in this, that Comte saw the necessity of a new system of philosophy as the indispensable preliminary to any reorganisation of society.

In The philosophy of mathematics, mathematics employee classification efforts to understand the philosophy is the branch.?The main question is related to the source of the object that is the subject of mathematics and mathematics. In particular examine the characteris-tics of a true proposition:??? What are the sources of mathematical subject matter??? What is about the meaning of a mathematical object??? What is the nature of a mathematical proposition??? What is the relationship between logic and mathematics??? What is the role of mathematics hermeneutic??? Mathematics played a role in the investigation which type?? What is the subject of mathematical investigations??? What is the human traits behind mathematics??? What is mathematical beauty??? What is the nature and source of mathematical truth???What is the relationship between mathematics and abstract material universe with the world???Another important issue is the reality of a mathematical the-ory. Mathematics (from the Natural Sciences as different) experimentally is sought reasons to find real specific mathematical theory can not be tested (see. Epistemology). Luitz that Brouwer 's laid the foundation for intuitionist mathematics of the representatives knew of this view. The logical mathematics is the approach of Bertrand Russell and Gottlob Frege was defended by David Hilbert, formalism is considered the repre-sentative of the current. Traditionalism logician the empiricist's (Rudolf Carnap, A. J. Ayer, Carl Hempel) were represented by one of the key issues in the philosophy of mathematics is also important to regard the certainty problem. Austrian logician Kurt G?del's also work Mathema-tics and mathematics.

Tr?s?turi fundamentale ale unei concep?ii moderne despre lume?Cum se comport? filosofia c? art? fa?? de libertatea omului, ce este aceast? libertate, ?i dac? am ajuns s? ne ?mp?rt??im din ea, sau putem ajunge la acest lucru: iat? problema fundamental? a scrierii mele. Toate celelalte expuneri ?tiin?ifice au fost f?cute numai pentru ca, ?n cele din urm?, s? arunc?m ?i mai mult? lumin? asupra unei probleme care, dup? p?rerea mea, prezint? cea mai mare importan?? pentru om. ?n aceste pagini vrem s? d?m o filosofie a libert??ii.“ – Rudolf Steiner

F?r? a propune o terminologie aristotelic? bine precizat? pe teritoriul limbii rom?ne, transpunerea de fa?? reprezint? un moment important ?n raportarea rom?neasc? la opera Stagiritului.Traducere de ?tefan Bezdechi efectuat? dup? textul grec publicat de W. Christ ?n colec?ia ?Teubner“, Lipsca, 1906. Pentru realizarea ei au fost utilizate urm?toarele surse:Die Metaphysik des Aristoteles, traducere ?n limba german? de J. R. V. Kirchmann, ap?rut? ?n dou? volume ?i prev?zut? cu note ample ?n colec?ia ?Philosophische Bibliothek“, numerele 38 ?i 39, la Berlin, ?n 1871;Aristoteles, Metaphysik, traducere ?n limba german? de Adolf Lasson, ?n care cele patrusprezece c?r?i ale Metafizicii sunt a?ezate ?ntr-o r?nduial? mai logic? dec?t a?a cum au fost transmise ?n originalul grec, traducere ap?rut? ?n 1924, la Jena;Aristote, Métaphysique, traducere ?n limba francez? de J. Tricot, cu o prefa?? de A. Diés, ap?rut? ?n colec?ia ?Bibliothèque des textes philosophiques“, J. Vrin, la Paris, ?n 1933.La marginea textului a fost trecut? pagina?ia edi?iei Bekker, dup? care se fac ?n mod obi?nuit cita?iile din opera lui Aristotel.Confruntarea traducerii a fost f?cut? de prof. Aram M. Frenkian.

Volumul cuprinde dou? din cele mai reprezentative lucr?ri ?n care filosoful german ??i expune concep?ia moral?: ?ntemeierea metafizicii moravurilor (1785) ?i Critica ra?iunii practice (1788). ?n ?ntemeierea metafizicii moravurilor Immanuel Kant expune principiile moralit??ii, iar ?n Critica ra?iunii practice ??i construie?te propriul s?u sistem etic, ceea ce face ca aceasta s? fie considerat?, dup? Critica ra?iunii pure, a doua sa oper? fundamental?.?ntre cele dou? lucr?ri este o at?t de str?ns? leg?tur?, ?nc?t cunoa?terea numai a uneia din ele ne-ar oferi o imagine incomplet? asupra concep?iei sale morale.Immanuel Kant a avansat idei etice ?i ?n alte opere ulterioare (Religia ?n limitele ra?iunii – 1793 sau Metafizica moravurilor – 1797), dar numai ?n cele reunite ?n acest volum se ocup? de problemele teoretice ale moralit??ii.Traducerea a fost f?cut? dup? edi?ia german? din 1956 (Leipzig, Hrsg. Von Raymund Schimidt).

Diderot, tanr?sal, dinsel inanc?n yerine akl? ge?iren adamd?r, onun sava??m? buydu ve bütün k?r inan?lar? silip süpüren bu ak?l, g?rünen dünyay?, do?ay?, felsefenin, sanat?n, sa? t?renin temel ilkesi durumuna getirdi. Diderot’un yayg?n ?al??ma alan?n? olu?turan ilkedir bu. Maddeci ve gerekirci bir filozoftu. tanr?ya inanan ki?inin filozof olmayaca??n? s?yledi. 'K?rler üstüne mektup'taki k?r, kendini tanr?ya inand?rmaya ?al??an misyonere "bunun i?in tanr?ya parma??mla dokunmam gerekir" der. Diderot, bu yüzden hapse girdi. 'D'alembert'in dü?ü'nde, madde tanr?n?n yerini alm??t?r art?k. Madde devinim ve duyarl?l?kla donat?lm??t?r. Bilim gerekircili?in kan?t?d?r. Bütün varl?klar ?z?e birdir ve bir ge?i?, de?i?im, olu?um süreci i?inde bulunurlar. ?yle ise sa? t?renin temeli do?a olacakt?r. Do?as? gere?i insan iyidir, hristiyan sagtoresinin sand??? gibi do?u?tan günahkar de?il ve iyilikler de, k?tülükler de, düzenin, ko?ullar?n, e?itimin ürünüdür. ?nsan, bu gerekircilik anlay??? i?inde, ?zgür olamayaca?? i?in, su?lu da bulunamaz. bu üslama sonucu olarak sanat, do?ay? ?rnek almal?d?r. roman, resim, oyun ger?ek?i olmal?d?r. Diderot, bunlar? s?ylemekle kalmam??, romanlar? ve oyunlar? ile ?rneklendirmi?tir de ve ?a??n?n sanat??lar?n? bu a??dan de?erlendirmi?tir. Diderot, büyük sava??m? ve e?siz ?abas? ile insanl???n ba?tac?d?r bugün de ve onu b?ylesine unutulmaz k?lan i?lerinin ba??nda ise elbet 'ansiklopedi' gelir. 'Ansiklopedi', yunanca enkyklios paidela'dan yap?lm??t?r ve bütün bilimleri i?ine alan ??retim anlam?na gelir. s?zcü?ü bulan rabelais'dir (1532). Diderot ile d'alembert'in ansiklopedisine temel olan yap?t, ?ng?l?z chambers’?n cyelopaedia’s? idi; fakat diderot'nun etkisi ile ansiklopedi, bir ?eviri yap?t olmaktan ??k?p, gizemcili?e kar?? bilimin sava? alan? durumunu ald?. Bu yüzden de gerici ?evrelerin kar?? koymas?n? sonu?lad?. diderot, ya?am? boyunca ?al??t? 'ansiklopedi' i?in, bir?ok maddeyi kendisi yazd?. bu u?urda yepyeni ara?t?rmalara giri?ti, teknik de?i?mekte oldu?u i?in ortaya yeni ara?-gere?ler ??kmakta idi, bunlar? tan?d?, adland?rd?, tan?tt? ve fransa'y? ayd?nlanma ?a??'n?n avrupa'da g?zbebe?i durumuna getirdi. Ancak unutmamal? ki, bir ansiklopedi ortaya ??karan her ülkeyi ayd?nlanma ?a??'n? alg?lam?? sayamay?z. ?o?u ülkede bu tür yap?tlar, geni?letilmi? s?zlükler olmaktan ileri gidememi?tir. diderot’nun ansiklopedisi, toplu bilgi vermekten ?ok, dinsel inan?lara kar?? bilimlerin ??retimini üstlenmi?ti, demek yans?z de?ildi, metafizikle ve skolastikle ?arp???yordu..

Imagineaz?-?i c? e?ti într-o ma?in? a timpului care te poart? înainte ?i înapoi prin propria via??. Te duce în trecut, la anii copil?riei, când înv??ai s? mergi pe biciclet?, apoi te face s? revezi primul t?u s?rut, cel dintâi serviciu sau anii mai târzii, când te confrun?i, eventual, cu divor?ul. Înso?it de Platon, afl? ce spun marii gânditori ai lumii despre toate aceste pietre de hotar de pe drumul vie?ii noastre. Aristotel î?i va vorbi despre importan?a începerii ?colii, Freud despre îndr?gostire, Heidegger despre implica?iile psihologice ale mutatului, iar Nietzsche despre criza vârstei de mijloc. La drum cu Platon te ajut? s? în?elegi ?i s? vezi cu al?i ochi evenimentele majore, momentele-cheie ?i fazele de tranzi?ie din via?a ta, f?când filosofia s? par? accesibil? ?i plin? de umor!