立德修身的恒言警句为学立业的至理名言《小窗幽记》为陈眉公所著的修身处世格言，条条都是人生的回味和处世的领悟，体现了儒家修身、齐家、治国、平天下的积极人生态度，又兼容了佛家超凡脱俗和道家清静无为的智慧，历来被称为修身养性、提升自我修养的佳作。

《围炉夜话》是明清时期著名的文学品评著作，全书分为221则，以“安身立业”为主旨，分别从道德、修身、读书、教子、忠孝、勤俭等十个方面，揭示了人生的深刻含义，其独到见解在中国文学史上占有重要地位。

蒙养之学  传世经典《龙文鞭影》原名《蒙养故事》，是古代非常有名的汉族儿童启蒙读物。作者的寓意是，看了这本《龙文鞭影》，青少年就有可能成为“千里马”。《龙文鞭影》主要是介绍中国历史上的人物典故和逸事传说。它问世后，成为*受欢迎的童蒙读物之一。

吟诵经典  陶冶情操  采录诸词 脍炙万口 《宋词》是继唐诗后的又一种文学体裁，它兼有文学与音乐两方面的特。宋词是中国古代文学皇冠上光辉夺目的一颗巨钻，在古代文学的阆苑里，她是一块芬芳绚丽的园圃。她以姹紫嫣红、千姿百态的丰神，与唐诗争奇，与元曲斗妍，历来与唐诗并称双绝，都代表一代文学之胜。远从《诗经》《楚辞》及《汉魏六朝诗歌》里汲取营养，又为后来的明清戏剧小说输送了有机成分。直到今天，她仍在陶冶着人们的情操，给我们带来很高的艺术享受。

The Prince (Italian: Il Principe) is a political treatise by the Italian diplomat, historian and political theorist Niccolò Machiavelli. From correspondence a version appears to have been distributed in 1513, using a Latin title, De Principatibus (About Principalities). But the printed version was not published until 1532, five years after Machiavelli's death. This was done with the permission of the Medici pope Clement VII, but "long before then, in fact since the first appearance of the Prince in manuscript, controversy had swirled about his writings" Although it was written as if it were a traditional work in the Mirror of Princes style, it is generally agreed that it was especially innovative, and not only because it was written in Italian rather than Latin. The Prince is sometimes claimed to be one of the first works of modern philosophy, in which the effective truth is taken to be more important than any abstract ideal. It was also in direct conflict with the dominant Catholic and scholastic doctrines of the time concerning how to consider politics and ethics. Although it is relatively short, the treatise is the most remembered of his works and the one most responsible for bringing "Machiavellian" into wide usage as a pejorative term. It also helped make "Old Nick" an English term for the devil, and even contributed to the modern negative connotations of the words "politics" and "politician" in western countries. In terms of subject matter it overlaps with the much longer Discourses on Livy, which was written a few years later. In its use of examples who were politically active Italians who perpetrated criminal deeds for politics, another lesser-known work by Machiavelli which The Prince has been compared to is the Life of Castruccio Castracani. The descriptions within The Prince have the general theme of accepting that ends of princes, such as glory, and indeed survival, can justify the use of immoral means to achieve those ends.

The present publication is intended to supply a recognised deficiency in our literature—a library edition of the Essays of Montaigne. This great French writer deserves to be regarded as a classic, not only in the land of his birth, but in all countries and in all literatures. His Essays, which are at once the most celebrated and the most permanent of his productions, form a magazine out of which such minds as those of Bacon and Shakespeare did not disdain to help themselves; and, indeed, as Hallam observes, the Frenchman's literary importance largely results from the share which his mind had in influencing other minds, coeval and subsequent. But, at the same time, estimating the value and rank of the essayist, we are not to leave out of the account the drawbacks and the circumstances of the period: the imperfect state of education, the comparative scarcity of books, and the limited opportunities of intellectual intercourse. Montaigne freely borrowed of others, and he has found men willing to borrow of him as freely. We need not wonder at the reputation which he with seeming facility achieved. He was, without being aware of it, the leader of a new school in letters and morals. His book was different from all others which were at that date in the world. It diverted the ancient currents of thought into new channels. It told its readers, with unexampled frankness, what its writer's opinion was about men and things, and threw what must have been a strange kind of new light on many matters but darkly understood. Above all, the essayist uncased himself, and made his intellectual and physical organism public property. He took the world into his confidence on all subjects. His essays were a sort of literary anatomy, where we get a diagnosis of the writer's mind, made by himself at different levels and under a large variety of operating influences. Of all egotists, Montaigne, if not the greatest, was the most fascinating, because, perhaps, he was the least affected and most truthful. What he did, and what he had professed to do, was to dissect his mind, and show us, as best he could, how it was made, and what relation it bore to external objects. He investigated his mental structure as a schoolboy pulls his watch to pieces, to examine the mechanism of the works; and the result, accompanied by illustrations abounding with originality and force, he delivered to his fellow-men in a book. W. C. H. KENSINGTON, November 1877. THE LIFE OF MONTAIGNE The author of the Essays was born, as he informs us himself, between eleven and twelve o'clock in the day, the last of February 1533, at the chateau of St. Michel de Montaigne. His father, Pierre Eyquem, esquire, was successively first Jurat of the town of Bordeaux (1530), Under-Mayor 1536, Jurat for the second time in 1540, Procureur in 1546, and at length Mayor from 1553 to 1556. He was a man of austere probity, who had "a particular regard for honour and for propriety in his person and attire . . . a mighty good faith in his speech, and a conscience and a religious feeling inclining to superstition, rather than to the other extreme. Between 1556 and 1563 an important incident occurred in the life of Montaigne, in the commencement of his romantic friendship with Etienne de la Boetie, whom he had met, as he tells us, by pure chance at some festive celebration in the town. From their very first interview the two found themselves drawn irresistibly close to one another, and during six years this alliance was foremost in the heart of Montaigne, as it was afterwards in his memory, when death had severed it.

Human reason, in one sphere of its cognition, is called upon to consider questions, which it cannot decline, as they are presented by its own nature, but which it cannot answer, as they transcend every faculty of the mind. It falls into this difficulty without any fault of its own. It begins with principles, which cannot be dispensed with in the field of experience, and the truth and sufficiency of which are, at the same time, insured by experience. With these principles it rises, in obedience to the laws of its own nature, to ever higher and more remote conditions. But it quickly discovers that, in this way, its labours must remain ever incomplete, because new questions never cease to present themselves; and thus it finds itself compelled to have recourse to principles which transcend the region of experience, while they are regarded by common sense without distrust. It thus falls into confusion and contradictions, from which it conjectures the presence of latent errors, which, however, it is unable to discover, because the principles it employs, transcending the limits of experience, cannot be tested by that criterion. The arena of these endless contests is called Metaphysic.Time was, when she was the queen of all the sciences; and, if we take the will for the deed, she certainly deserves, so far as regards the high importance of her object-matter, this title of honour. Now, it is the fashion of the time to heap contempt and scorn upon her; and the matron mourns, forlorn and forsaken, like Hecuba: At first, her gover Modo maxima rerum, Tot generis, natisque potens... Nunc trahor exul, inops. —Ovid, Metamorphoses. xiii under the administration of the dogmatists, was an absolute despotism. But, as the legislative continued to show traces of the ancient barbaric rule, her empire gradually broke up, and intestine wars introduced the reign of anarchy; while the sceptics, like nomadic tribes, who hate a permanent habitation and settled mode of living, attacked from time to time those who had organized themselves into civil communities. But their number was, very happily, small; and thus they could not entirely put a stop to the exertions of those who persisted in raising new edifices, although on no settled or uniform plan. In recent times the hope dawned upon us of seeing those disputes settled, and the legitimacy of her claims established by a kind of physiology of the human understanding—that of the celebrated Locke. But it was found that—although it was affirmed that this so-called queen could not refer her descent to any higher source than that of common experience, a circumstance which necessarily brought suspicion on her claims—as this genealogy was incorrect, she persisted in the advancement of her claims to sovereignty. Thus metaphysics necessarily fell back into the antiquated and rotten constitution of dogmatism, and again became obnoxious to the contempt from which efforts had been made to save it. At present, as all methods, according to the general persuasion, have been tried in vain, there reigns nought but weariness and complete indifferentism—the mother of chaos and night in the scientific world, but at the same time the source of, or at least the prelude to, the re-creation and reinstallation of a science, when it has fallen into confusion, obscurity, and disuse from ill directed effort. I do not mean by this a criticism of books and systems, but a critical inquiry into the faculty of reason, with reference to the cognitions to which it strives to attain without the aid of experience; in other words, the solution of the question regarding the possibility or impossibility of metaphysics, and the determination of the origin, as well as of the extent and limits of this science. All this must be done on the basis of principles. ABOUT AUTHOR: That all our knowledge begins with experience there can be no doubt. For how is it possible that the faculty of cognition should be awakened into exercise otherwise than by means of objects which affect our senses, and partly of themselves produce representations, partly rouse our powers of understanding into activity, to compare to connect, or to separate these, and so to convert the raw material of our sensuous impressions into a knowledge of objects, which is called experience? In respect of time, therefore, no knowledge of ours is antecedent to experience, but begins with it. But, though all our knowledge begins with experience, it by no means follows that all arises out of experience. For, on the contrary, it is quite possible that our empirical knowledge is a compound of that which we receive through impressions, and that which the faculty of cognition supplies from itself (sensuous impressions giving merely the occasion), an addition which we cannot distinguish from the original element given by sense, till long practice has made us attentive to, and skilful in separating it. It is, therefore, a question which requires close investigation, and not to b

本书分两大部分，即禅话与净话。作者分别将佛门禅净的特色深地释义，并且以历代禅净兼修的大德为例证，破斥持门户之见者。书中以“念佛至一心不乱，便是禅定；参禅至彻见自性，即是净土”为立论的根据，写出了禅宗与净土宗同为佛教派别的异与同。

●从未有哪个时代像今天一样，科学让人类社会以肉眼可见的速度向前演化。这场两千多年的长程奔跑似乎来到了冲刺阶段，不断有人做出世界末日的预言，那么，科学*终带给我们的究竟是生存还是毁灭？科学研究的目的究竟是什么？科学能告诉我们*真理吗？ 带着这样的终极关怀，《人人都该懂的科学哲学》首先讲述了科学脱离哲学、独立成长的过程，然后以智慧设计论、弦理论、占星术、有神论、社会建构主义、女性主义等充满争议的问题为例，辨析了科学的定义、方法和目的，科学和社会的关系。伟大的科学哲学家亚里士多德、笛卡儿、休谟、培根、波普尔、库恩等纷纷出场，上演了一场绵亘数千年的*辩论。 面对未来的挑战，无论人类能否破解“公地悲剧”、实现星际殖民、活到长生不老，杰弗里·戈勒姆以科学哲学的视角安慰我们：“当生命终结，人类文化仍然存在，只不过是存在于过去。希望它永远存在就太过分了，无异于希望巴黎时时处处是春天。” ●《人人都该懂的科学哲学》属于湛庐文化重磅推出的“新核心素养”系列图书之一。本系列图书致力于推广通识阅读，扩展读者的阅读面，培养批判性思考的能力。其中涵盖了哲学、心理学、法律、艺术、物理学、生物科技等诸多人文科学和自然科学的知识，其中《人人都该懂的科学哲学》的内容涵盖了科学哲学的核心思想，让你一本书了解科学哲学的核心智慧。

Ralph Waldo Emerson, was born at Boston in 1803 into a distinguished family of New England Unitarian ministers. His was the eighth generation to enter the ministry in a dynasty that reached back to the earliest days of Puritan America. Despite the death of his father when Emerson was only eleven, he was able to be educated at Boston Latin School and then Harvard, from which he graduated in 1821. After several years of reluctant school teaching, he returned to the Harvard Divinity School, entering the Unitarian ministry during a period of robust ecclesiastic debate. By 1829 Emerson was married and well on his way to a promising career in the church through his appointment to an important congregation in Boston. However, his career in the ministry did not last long. Following the death of his first wife, Ellen, his private religious doubts led him to announce his resignation to his congregation, claiming he was unable to preach a doctrine he no longer believed and that "to be a good minister it was necessary to leave the ministry."With the modest legacy left him from his first wife, Emerson was able to devote himself to study and travel. In Europe he met many of the important Romantic writers whose ideas on art, philosophy, and literature were transforming the writing of the Nineteenth Century. He also continued to explore his own ideas in a series of voluminous journals which he had kept from his earliest youth and from which virtually all of his literary creation would be generated. Taking up residence in Concord, Massachusetts, Emerson devoted himself to study, writing and a series of public lectures in the growing lyceum movement. From these lyceum addresses Emerson developed and then in 1836 published his most important work, Nature. Its publication also coincided with his organizing role in the Transcendental Club, a group of leading New England educators, clergy, and intellectuals interested in idealistic religion, philosophy, and literature.

熊逸说经典作品集(套装共4册)套装分别包含： 《逍遥游：当《庄子》遭遇现实》: 一个坚定地鄙薄《庄子》的人如何*终投向了《庄子》，一个真诚相信《庄子》的人又真的可以在现实世界里驾驭虚舟、逍遥往来吗？《逍遥游》从历史人物与《庄子》的爱恨纠葛入手，除了“ 务虚”地辨析《庄子》的要义，还“务实”地描述出一幅幅“当《庄子》遭遇现实”的冲突画面。 这是一本充满思辨趣味的书，尤其适合那些怀有纯粹的思辨兴趣的读者。循着作者的分析脉络，我们会得到如*精彩的本格推理小说一般的阅读享受。 《逍遥游》还是一部丰富的文化史。作者以《庄子》的文本为线索，从历史上复杂的阐释与实践中勾勒出道家学说恢宏的文化版图，而跨学科地旁征博引又有助于我们以全新的社会科学的眼光，以当代的人文素养，反观两千多年前的古老智慧。 《道可道：《老子》的要义与诘难》:这本书首先是一本更新换代型的《老子》读本。作者结合*的考古材料和前沿海内外研究成果，以缜密的考据和分析破旧立新，把所有重要的疑难问题都推到了证据和逻辑所能达到的极限，并力图扫清每一个思维死角。 这还是一本充满思辨趣味的书，尤其适合那些怀有纯粹的思辨兴趣的读者。循着作者的分析脉络，我们会得到如*精彩的本格推理小说一般的阅读享受。 这还是一本丰富的文化史。作者以《老子》的文本为线索，从历史上复杂的阐释与实践中勾勒出道家学说恢宏的文化版图，而跨学科地旁征博引又有助于我们以全新的社会科学的眼光，以当代的人文素养，反观两千多年前的古老智慧。 《思辨的禅趣》: 与本系列的其他作品不同，这是一本轻松诙谐的小书。在如今这个“禅”已经被无数的励志读物打扮成心灵鸡汤的时代，本书势单力薄地以《坛经》为经线，厘清“禅”乃至整个佛学的本来面目，并为《坛经》清晰梳理出其印度佛学的理论背景，有理有据地挑战着“禅宗是中国本土佛教”的传统看法。 关于禅趣，很多人都会想到林林总总的机锋公案，然而那些讲解机锋公案的读物往往言人人殊，莫衷一是。本书则着力于贯通禅宗的核心义理，高屋建瓴地使所有机锋公案都可以迎刃而解。 zui后有必要提醒读者的是，本书虽然采用了诙谐通俗的行文风格，但仅适合于那些怀有纯粹的文化趣味的读者，如果你需要的是任何形式的心灵慰藉、人生感悟或关怀，那么还是放下这本书为好。 《纸上卧游记》:本书*站从柏拉图的《理想国》出发，沿途经停托马斯·莫尔的《乌托邦》和德尼·维拉斯的《塞瓦兰人的历史》，按照乌托邦的经典旅行线路，带你领略不曾存在过的风景。 　　第二站经停小站颇为频繁，从《于丹论语心得》到《机械复制时代的艺术作品》，中途经过《不抱怨的世界》《论语言的起源》《道家美学与西方文化》《奢侈与资本主义》《茶之书》以及《论语》，进行一场“励志书的诡计和学术书的情感”之旅。 第三站穿越到遥远的中世纪，从《有闲阶级论》到《科文特加登广场女士的哈里名录》，一览“哲学问题和贵族精神”的风貌。 zui后经过由《英国文艺复兴时期文学史》《春秋大义》《大学的兴起》组成的“语言之岛”我们将重返起点。 　经过本次旅程，是不是发现世界有什么不一样了呢？

本书是写给普通人的因果逻辑门书，旨在帮助读者培养严谨的思维方式，在不借助任何专业知识的前提下，准确定位问题。主要内容包括：认识原因，对原因的理解和运用，如何只通过观察找到原因，大数据集与原因的关系，因果关系相关实验，如何利用因果关系来制定有效的干预措施，研究因果关系的意义。 本书适合所有对探究事件真相感兴趣的读者，无须统计学等专业背景。

　　本书是朱熹四十岁后与弟子日常问答的语录类编。学习儒学绕不朱子，《朱子语类》是所有儒学爱好者都可以读懂的经典门书。 　　全书分门别类完整记录了朱熹的哲学体系。从世界本原到人生哲学，再到格物致知、知行相须等为学力行的方法，*后逐一讲解《四书六经》。书中全是口语对谈，还原真实语境，带你重返朱子讲学现场。即通俗易懂，又直抵原意。 　　《朱子语类》宋本已佚。本版本选取明成化九年（1473年）陈炜刻本为底本，参考了现有的古籍整理成果，以简体横排标本的形式呈现。

《儒学六讲》是国学大师梁启超为一般读者讲解儒家文化的普及读物，代表了梁启超儒学研究的精髓。《儒学六讲》系统讲述了自孔子至清末民初两千五百年中儒学的起源、变迁、继承、演化和影响，介绍了孔子、董仲舒、程颐、程颢、张载、朱熹、陆九渊、王阳明等儒学代表人物的学说主张，帮助读者了解儒学各个流派在不同时空内的流衍变化。《儒学六讲》以梁启超在清华国学院讲课稿为底本，通俗易懂，深刻全面，是读者了解儒家哲学和中国文化不可不读的一本经典读物。

《老子永远不老：〈老子〉研究新解》一书，收了12篇曹峰近年来发表的《老子》及道家研究论文，约二十万字。其中有对具体章节如三十六章、三十九章的新解读；有利用出土文献对《老子》首章作出的新诠释；有对老子生成论和幸福观的新思考；有对老子“道”与“天道”关系的新衡量；有对老子“无名”“有名”论述的新考察；有对黄帝与老子关系的新辨析；有对老子政治哲学的新总结。还有对近代日本老子现象的一些研究。这些论文涉及老子研究的各个方面，发表后大多在学界引起重要反响，被广泛引用和转载。这也证明了老子永远不老，老子思想常谈常新。此书的出版相信会对老子及其道家研究产生实质性推动。

● 理性主义驱散了封建专制和教会特权的阴霾，带来了自由、平等和科学的光芒。启蒙运动造就了今天的西方社会，更是现代许多思想和文明的起。了解西方文化历史，了解整个世界的发展变革，启蒙运动是个起，但绝不是终。理性思维真的战胜了无知和偏执吗？它带来的是宽容还是虚伪？它真的是确保人类福祉的关键力量吗？直到今天，由启蒙运动引发的话题争论仍旧如火如荼。 ● 在这本《人人都该懂的启蒙运动》中，吉隆·奥哈拉跨越两大洲、三次革命和广泛的历史研究，用独特的视角来审视这个时代。他将启蒙运动描述为一个不断发展的思想和思想家的集合体，并对当时的哲学、政治理论、科学、宗教、艺术的影响行了新颖的评估，展现了启蒙运动延续至今的持久影响力。 ● 《人人都该懂的启蒙运动》属于湛庐文化重磅推出的“新素养系列”图书之一。本系列图书致力于推广通识阅读，扩展读者的阅读面，培养批判性思考的能力。其中涵盖了哲学、心理学、法律、艺术、物理学、生物科技等诸多人文科学和自然科学的知识，其中《人人都该懂的启蒙运动》所介绍的“启蒙运动”是了解西方哲学和历史非常重要的一部分。

本书共九章，分别为殿之基、事物、填补鸿沟、因果律、目的、意愿、判断、真理、表象与实在。作者逐一讲述了循着两位伟大的欧洲思想家的脚步如何建立一种*确定的真相；什么是客体的本质、何为*性质与第二性质、本体又是什么、以及另一出路，等等。

本书是蔡尚思先生毕生研究《论语》心得的全面总结。蔡先生将《论语》全书归纳为若干问题，以《论语》证明《论语》，引导读者根据经典原文展争鸣。全书分为两部分，上编导读部分重讨论了研究《论语》须知的各种问题。下编类编简释部分是吴瑞武先生在参阅古今多种《论语》注释本，吸收历代学者研究成果，并多所采纳蔡尚思先生见解的基础上做的评注。注释力求简要、全面、易懂，并尽可能反映自古以来不同意见的争鸣。方便读者全面研读《论语》，系统了解孔子思想。

谶纬是兴盛于汉代、流行于魏晋南北朝时期的一种学术思潮，它对汉魏六朝时期的社会政治和思想文化等各方面都产生了很大的影响，其中也对文学产生了重要的影响。本书分四个部分：*部分概述谶纬、谶纬的图像文本、谶纬的文学意义，以及《河图》《洛书》的神话；第二部分谶纬与古代文学创作的关系研究，对谶纬与谣谶、辞赋、志怪小说、诗谶和明清小说等不同文体的关系作了考察与论述；第三部分谶纬中的乐论和诗论研究；第四部分《文心雕龙》中有关谶纬与文学关系的问题研究。通过对谶纬与文学关系的研究，使我们更加清楚地看到古代文学、文学理论与学术思潮之间的关系。

在书中，德宝法师以实际禅修经验，解说了八正道每个道支的深刻内涵，并分析了人们对此可能产生的误解或偏见。本书不仅让人们明白何谓快乐的内在生活，而且还教导人们如何在日常生活中运用八正道达到快乐。尤其重要的是，他融合了南传佛教教理的诠释和现代人的思考方式，精心解说，令人耳目一新。其辩证精辟，见解独到。 ? ? ? 在书中，我们都可以学到通向快乐的八条途径：1正见，带来真正的快乐；2正思维，带来放舍、慈爱与悲悯的快乐；3正语，带来和谐的快乐；4正业，带来享受符合道德原则的快乐；5正命，带来利益自他的快乐；6正精，带来断恶修善的快乐；7正念，带来“活在当下”的快乐；8正定，带来洞见实相的快乐。

本书是作者近若干年特别是近十年关于马克思主义理论教育教学论研究和实际探索的小结。全书分为四篇：*篇探讨了马克思主基本理论和经典著作学习，第二篇论述了马克思主义理论学科建设和科学研究，第三篇阐释了马克思主义理论教材建设和教学改革，第四篇总结了思想政治教育和马克思主义理论队伍建设。力图从马克思主义整体性出发，集中探讨作为一级学科的马克思主义理论的教育教学。本书适合高校思想政治教育专业教师、思想政治理论课教师、党政干部以及马克思主义理论一级学科各个专业的本科生、研究生和博士后研究人员阅读。