Prezentul volum este dedicat unei expuneri sintetice ?i accesibile a psihanalizei, care ?nglobeaz? ?i dep??e?te primele Prelegeri de introducere ?n psihanaliz? (1916–) ?i seria nou? a acelora?i prelegeri din 1933. Cronologic, ea acoper? aproape treizeci de ani, din 1909, anul celor cinci conferin?e ?inute ?n Statele Unite, care au marcat intrarea triumfal? a psihanalizei ?n Lumea Nou?, ?i 1938, ultimul an de via?? al lui Freud, c?nd ?ncepe aceast? scriere, r?mas? neterminat?.Adres?ndu-se, datorit? con?inutului s?u, ?n primul r?nd celor care doresc s? se ini?ieze ?n psihanaliz? —studen?i ai facult??ilor de psihologie, medicin?, pedagogie, sociologie, filosofie, litere ?i teologie —, volumul de fa?? poate re?ine ?i aten?ia speciali?tilor prin faptul c? reprezint? o sintez? a ?ntregii opere a lui Freud, la care se adaug? idei noi.?Nu, con?tien?a nu poate fi esen?a elementului psihic, ea este numai o calitate a acestuia, ?i anume o calitate inconstant? care mai des este absent?, dec?t prezent?. Factorul psihic ?n sine, oricare i-ar fi natura, este incon?tient, ?i probabil de un tip asem?n?tor cu toate celelalte procese din natur? despre care avem cuno?tin??. Pentru argumentarea acestei aser?iuni, psihanaliza se raporteaz? la un num?r de fapte.Visul este o psihoz?, cu toate inep?iile, forma?iunile delirante, iluziile senzoriale ale unei psihoze. E adev?rat, este o psihoz? de scurt? durat?, inofensiv?, ?nzestrat? chiar cu o func?ie folositoare, ini?iat? prin acordul persoanei, ?ncheiat? printr-un act de voin?? de c?tre ea. Cu toate acestea, este o psihoz? ?i ?nv???m pe baza ei c? p?n? ?i o modificare at?t de profund? a vie?ii psihice poate fi anulat?, poate l?sa spa?iu func?iei normale. Este atunci prea temerar s? sper?m c? ar trebui s? putem supune ?i ?mboln?virile spontane temute ale vie?ii psihice influen?ei noastre ?i s? le vindec?m?“ – Freud

Fie c? suntem psihologi, medici, profesori sau asisten?i sociali, ne-am dedicat unei profesii ?n care ajut?m oameni afla?i ?n suferin??, ?n nevoie, ?n ne?tiin??, oameni pe care ?i salv?m, ?i protej?m, ?i sus?inem sau ?i cre?tem. Profesii dificile, care cer mari eforturi, dar ofer? ?i mari satisfac?ii. Exist? ?ns? doar aceast? parte luminoas?? Putem face doar bine? Confrunta?i ?n permanen?? cu destine tragice, terapeu?ii pot aluneca pe panta umbrei, evit?nd suferin?a neputin?ei. Prin cartea de fa??, scris? ?ntr-un limbaj accesibil ?i plin? de exemplific?ri, Guggenbühl-Craig ne permite s? examin?m si latura ?ntunecat? a profesiei, unde ?i gasim pe cei care ajut? urm?rind nu beneficiul celuilalt, ci propriul beneficiu ?i de?inerea puterii – ?arlatanul, impostorul, ipocritul, falsul profet. ?i s? descoperim ?i solu?ia – maturizarea psihic?, reducerea clivajelor prin explorarea psihicului ?n ?ntregimea sa, astfel ?nc?t asistentul social s? nu mai considere c? ??i poate practica profesia inginere?te, profesorul s? nu mai cread? c? doar elevii sunt copil?ro?i, iar terapeutul s? nu mai vad? boala doar la pacien?ii lui.?

Este posibil s? r?m?i ?s?n?tos la cap, ?ntro lume nebun?"? Autorii acestei c?r?i cred c? da, ?i ne ofer? 101 c?i pentru a face fa?? acestei adev?rate provoc?ri a secolului nostru. Care sunt elementele vitale ale unei c?snicii de succes; cum s??i gestionezi mai bine furia, depresia, stresul ?i anxietatea; cum este influen?at? starea noastr? de bine de reac?ia la evenimentele de zi cu zi la astfel de ?ntreb?ri autorii r?spund ?n ?pastile" de c?te un minut, scrise ini?ial pentru ascult?torii emisiunii de radio pe care cei doi o realizau ?mpreun?. Pe l?ng? alte teme abordate cu realism ?i umor, cum ar fi pericolele g?ndirii pozitive, pierderea ?n greutate, comunicarea cu ?efii ?i colegii, autorii ofer? sugestii referitoare la alegerea unei psihoterapii, ?nso?ite de descrierea celor mai bune (?i mai rele) tipuri de terapeu?i.

Rod al efortului de sintetizare a peste 50 000 de cercet?ri, incluzând 250 de milioane de elevi, Înv??area vizibil?. Ghid pentru profesori identific?, pe baze riguros ?tiin?ifice, care sunt cei mai eficien?i factori din procesul de predare-înv??are. Într-o lume preocupat? de aspectele conjuncturale ale activit??ii didactice (politici educa?ionale, management ?colar etc.), John Hattie se întoarce la „via?a de zi cu zi" a profesorilor ?i elevilor. Axat? pe procesele specifice lec?iei ?i interac?iunilor profesor–elev, cartea ofer? criterii clare ?i obiective pentru orice educator care dore?te s? aleag? cele mai bune c?i de optimizare a înv???rii.Volumul se concentreaz? asupra obiectivelor didactice stimulatoare, asupra importan?ei clarific?rii la clas? a criteriilor de reu?it? ?i a progresului individual al elevului ?i asupra felului în care evaluarea continu? poate motiva atât profesorul, cât ?i elevii. Educatorii ?i cercet?torii din domeniul pedagogiei vor g?si aici sfaturi practice pentru implementarea celor mai adecvate strategii didactice, precum ?i studii de caz ?i liste de sarcini pentru diversele etape ale instruirii. „Dup? încerc?ri mai mult sau mai pu?in reu?ite de reforme structurale ?i sistemice în educa?ie, avem nevoie de o revolu?ie a înv???rii. Cartea lui Hattie le ofer? profesorilor ?ansa extraordinar? de a genera fiecare, prin munca de zi de zi, o transformare profund? a înv???rii, aducând acest proces în zona «vizibil?» ?i f?cându-l pl?cut ?i autentic. Astfel, educatorii vor putea contribui direct ?i substan?ial la o Românie educat?..."-Prof. univ. dr. Lucian Ciolan,coordonatorul colec?iei „Educa?ie ?i formare", decanul Facult??ii de Psihologie ?i ?tiin?ele Educa?iei, Universitatea din Bucure?ti

Cartea?B?rbatul con?tient??i ajut? pe b?rba?i s? priveasc? ?nl?untrul lor pentru a-?i descoperi scopul ?i misiunea; pentru a fi conecta?i, dar nu domina?i de emo?iile lor, pentru a-?i tr?i via?a c?ut?ndu-?i propriul drum, dar ?i asum?ndu-?i responsabilit??ile care ?nso?esc acest demers. B?rbatul con?tient exploreaz? 12 calit??i ale noii masculinit??i, cu informa?ii privind modul ?n care biochimia influen?eaz? aceste calit??i.?De asemenea, femeile vor afla ?n fiecare capitol indica?ii despre cum s? g?seasc? un b?rbat bun ?i de ?ncredere, dar ?i cum s?-l sprijine s?-?i valorifice la maximum calit??ile.?

Te mit tennél, ha kiderülne, hogy már csak másfél éved van hátra? Magadba roskadva jajveszékelnél, és hagynád, hogy pocsékba menjen minden napod, vagy ?sszeszednéd tartalék er?idet, amit arra használnál, hogy tartalmasan éld hátralév? napjaidat? Nos, én az utóbbit választottam. ?gy d?nt?ttem, belevágok e k?nyv megírásába, hátha okul a hibáimból valaki. Akárki. Vajon beválik az a kísérleti gyógyszer, amely talán visszafordíthatja a betegségemet, vagy ez a k?nyv lesz minden, amit ?r?kül hagyhatok az utókornak? ...és vajon képes vagyok megbocsátani annak, aki t?nkretette az életemet – vagyis magamnak?

Яку найважлив?шу р?ч мусить зробити майбутня мама п?д час ваг?тност?? Ск?льки годин перед телеекраном можна перебувати малюку? Як у вихованн? д?тей впоратися ?з роздратуванням ? спалахами лют?? Науковц? знають в?д- пов?д? на ц? питання. ?Правила розвитку мозку?, бестселер за верс??ю New York Times, також пояснюють – як насправд? працю? наш мозок ? чому ми повинн? по-новому орган?зувати наше м?сце роботи ? навчання. ?Правила розвитку мозку? долають розб?жност? м?ж знаннями, якими оперу? сучасна наука, та батьк?вським досв?дом. Ось одна з неспод?ванок: що потр?бно ро- бити, щоб дитина вступила в Гарвардський ун?верситет? Навчити ?? контролювати власн? емоц?? та бажання. У чар?вних ? водночас пот?шних ?стор?ях молекулярний б?олог ? батько двох д?тей Джон Мед?на розгаду? та?мницю розвитку дитячого мозку.

Looking back to those days of old, ere the gate shut behind me, I can see now that to children with a proper equipment of parents these things would have worn a different aspect. But to those whose nearest were aunts and uncles, a special attitude of mind may be allowed. They treated us, indeed, with kindness enough as to the needs of the flesh, but after that with indifference (an indifference, as I recognise, the result of a certain stupidity), and therewith the commonplace conviction that your child is merely animal. At a very early age I remember realising in a quite impersonal and kindly way the existence of that stupidity, and its tremendous influence in the world; while there grew up in me, as in the parallel case of Caliban upon Setebos, a vague sense of a ruling power, wilful and freakish, and prone to the practice of vagaries--"just choosing so:" as, for instance, the giving of authority over us to these hopeless and incapable creatures, when it might far more reasonably have been given to ourselves over them. These elders, our betters by a trick of chance, commanded no respect, but only a certain blend of envy--of their good luck--and pity--for their inability to make use of it. Indeed, it was one of the most hopeless features in their character (when we troubled ourselves to waste a thought on them: which wasn't often) that, having absolute licence to indulge in the pleasures of life, they could get no good of it. They might dabble in the pond all day, hunt the chickens, climb trees in the most uncompromising Sunday clothes; they were free to issue forth and buy gunpowder in the full eye of the sun--free to fire cannons and explode mines on the lawn: yet they never did any one of these things. No irresistible Energy haled them to church o' Sundays; yet they went there regularly of their own accord, though they betrayed no greater delight in the experience than ourselves. On the whole, the existence of these Olympians seemed to be entirely void of interests, even as their movements were confined and slow, and their habits stereotyped and senseless. To anything but appearances they were blind. For them the orchard (a place elf-haunted, wonderful!) simply produced so many apples and cherries: or it didn't, when the failures of Nature were not infrequently ascribed to us. They never set foot within fir-wood or hazel-copse, nor dreamt of the marvels hid therein. The mysterious sources--sources as of old Nile--that fed the duck-pond had no magic for them. They were unaware of Indians, nor recked they anything of bisons or of pirates (with pistols!), though the whole place swarmed with such portents. They cared not about exploring for robbers' caves, nor digging for hidden treasure. Perhaps, indeed, it was one of their best qualities that they spent the greater part of their time stuffily indoors. To be sure, there was an exception in the curate, who would receive unblenching the information that the meadow beyond the orchard was a prairie studded with herds of buffalo, which it was our delight, moccasined and tomahawked, to ride down with those whoops that announce the scenting of blood. He neither laughed nor sneered, as the Olympians would have done; but possessed of a serious idiosyncrasy, he would contribute such lots of valuable suggestion as to the pursuit of this particular sort of big game that, as it seemed to us, his mature age and eminent position could scarce have been attained without a practical knowledge of the creature in its native lair. Then, too, he was always ready to constitute himself a hostile army or a band of marauding Indians on the shortest possible notice: in brief, a distinctly able man, with talents, so far as we could judge, immensely above the majority. I trust he is a bishop by this time,--he had all the necessary qualifications, as we knew.These strange folk had visitors sometimes,--stiff and colourless Olympians like themselves, equally without vital interests and intelligent pursuits: emerging out of the clouds, and passing away again to drag on an aimless existence somewhere out of our ken. Then brute force was pitilessly applied. We were captured, washed, and forced into clean collars: silently submitting, as was our wont, with more contempt than anger. Anon, with unctuous hair and faces stiffened in a conventional grin, we sat and listened to the usual platitudes. How could reasonable people spend their precious time so? That was ever our wonder as we bounded forth at last--to the old clay-pit to make pots, or to hunt bears among the hazels. It was incessant matter for amazement how these Olympians would talk over our heads--during meals, for instance--of this or the other social or political inanity, under the delusion that these pale phantasms of reality were among the importances of life. We illuminati, eating silently, our heads full of plans and conspiracies, could have told them what real life was. We had just left it outside

Questo libro è dedicato a coloro che desiderano vivere ogni momento della propria vita con serenità e consapevolezza. La morte fa parte della vita, come l’amore, come la lotta per le cose in cui crediamo, come i sogni che abbiamo da giovani e i dubbi che abbiamo da adulti. “Imparare a morire” ci spiega come prepararci al momento della morte: per essere pronti, un giorno, a incontrarla con leggerezza e sapere, oggi, come aiutare amici e persone amate mentre la stanno affrontando.

Egy szó, amely sszetrte fiatal géniuszok karrierjét. Egy szó, amely miatt hatalmas vagyonokat pazaroltak el és virágzó vállaltok dltek romba. Egy szó, amely sok-sok nyomorúságért és szégyenért felel. Ez a szó – az EGO. Az EGO az ellenség! Az alkalmazkodóképesség, az ambíció és a siker ellensége. Mert amikor 160-nal száguldasz egy szabálytalanul elz kocsi után azért, hogy durvaságokat vághass a fejéhez, amikor sszeveszel a legjobb barátoddal semmiségeken, amikor nem hívsz fel valakit, akit szeretsz, mert arra vársz, hogy hívjon fel – az egód játszik veled. Ryan Holiday világsiker knyve megmutatja, hogyan ismerheted fel tetteid mgtt a saját egódat, amely sokszor arra kényszerít, hogy érdekeid ellen dnts. Ha felismered, az els és legfontosabb lépést már megtetted! Az egódat el kell pusztítanod. Vagy pusztít el téged.” Ryan Holiday tbb világsiker m szerzje. Texasban él, a Columbia Egyetemen tanít. Knyvei szerte a világon alapmvek lettek, Thaifldtl az Egyesült llamokig, Vietnámtól Franciaországig.

Fehér alapon vrs betk. Sokáig úgy éreztem, hogy a kíváncsiságom vezérel, ma már tudom, hogy az csupán eszkz volt. A fehér számomra a tisztaság, a bels béke jelképe. A tisztaságot és a bels békét azonban csak harccal és fájdalommal lehet elérni: ezt szimbolizálják a vrs betk. Ez a knyv a lángolásról, a szenvedélyrl, a hitrl és a bels békérl szól. Korábbi változata – amelyet 8 évvel ezeltt írtam – az életrl vallott gondolataim durva megfogalmazása volt. Ez a bvített és átdolgozott új Drogma egy nkritikus, niróniával teli knyv, sokkal érettebb írás, amelyben az is benne van, hogy hogyan lehet mindezeket megszerezni. Mindannyian függk vagyunk, mégpedig a félelmeinktl. Azoknak ajánlom ezt a knyvet, akik mindezt már megfogalmazták maguknak…” A DROGMA nem csak a szenvedélyrl és a szenvedésrl szól, hanem magáról a függésrl. A Narkósról”, aki lehet drog-, gyógyszer-, alkohol-, játék-, társ-, vagy akár Csernus-függ is… Arról, hogy mit lehet tenni, ha valaki végképp elveszítette a kontrollt, és zsákutcába kormányozta magát. A DROGMA hét nap trténete. DR. CSERNUS IMRE hét napjáé, amelyeken külns sorsok bontakoznak ki az olvasók eltt. Hét nap, amelynek eseményeihez Dr. Csernus két egykori betege fz megjegyzéseket – hol szinte szeretettel, hol metsz cinizmussal. Hét nap, amelyeknek sikeréért újra és újra meg kell küzdeni. A DROGMA ma már kultuszknyv. Nyolc évvel ezeltt született, mégis aktuálisabb, mint valaha. A szerz ezúttal tükrt tart nmaga elé, és a szveghez fztt kommentárjaiban kegyetlen szinteséggel néz szembe egykori nmagával.

Suntem obi?nui?i s? etichet?m oamenii ?n func?ie de comportamentele pe care le afi?eaz?. Judec?m omul, nu comportamentul. Critic?m persoana, nu ac?iunile sale. Proiect?m asupra altora propriile noastre temeri, speran?e, dorin?e. Condamn?m la al?ii ceea ce nu putem accepta la noi ?n?ine. Ne dorim s? ne fie mai bine, dar omitem c? schimbarea ?ncepe ?ntotdeauna cu noi ?n?ine. Noi ne cre?m experien?ele ?i via?a. Copil?ria este piatra de temelie a vie?ii fiec?rui om. M? aflam la un curs de dezvoltare personal? c?nd unul dintre colegii mei, vorbind despre copil?ria lui ?i despre felul ?n care unele experien?e de atunci i-au trasat harta vie?ii, a izbucnit ?n pl?ns. Atunci am ?n?eles necesitatea de a con?tientiza mecanismele ce declan?eaz? anumite comportamente, pentru a ne putea schimba. Numai ?n momentul ?n care ?n?elegem cauza care a dus la o anumit? manifestare, putem s? ne schimb?m modul de a ac?iona.

In Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego, (1922), Sigmund Freud based his preliminary description of group psychology on Le Bon's work, but went on to develop his own, original theory, related to what he had begun to elaborate in Totem and Taboo. Theodor Adorno reprised Freud's essay in 1951 with his Freudian Theory and the Pattern of Fascist Propaganda, and said that "It is not an overstatement if we say that Freud, though he was hardly interested in the political phase of the problem, clearly foresaw the rise and nature of fascist mass movements in purely psychological categories. Group Dynamics refers to a system of behaviors and psychological processes occurring within a social group (intragroup dynamics), or between social groups (intergroup dynamics). The study of group dynamics can be useful in understanding decision-making behavior, tracking the spread of diseases in society, creating effective therapy techniques, and following the emergence and popularity of new ideas and technologies. Group dynamics are at the core of understanding racism, sexism, and other forms of social prejudice and discrimination. These applications of the field are studied in psychology, sociology, anthropology, political science, epidemiology, education, social work, business, and communication studies. Within the context of psychology, Social Psychology is the scientific study of how people's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are influenced by the actual, imagined, or implied presence of others. By this definition, scientific refers to the empirical method of investigation. The terms thoughts, feelings, and behaviors include all psychological variables that are measurable in a human being. The statement that others' presence may be imagined or implied suggests that we are prone to social influence even when no other people are present, such as when watching television, or following internalized cultural norms. Social psychologists typically explain human behavior as a result of the interaction of mental states and immediate social situations. In general, social psychologists have a preference for laboratory-based, empirical findings. Social psychology theories tend to be specific and focused, rather than global and general.Social psychologists therefore deal with the factors that lead us to behave in a given way in the presence of others, and look at the conditions under which certain behavior/actions and feelings occur. Social psychology is concerned with the way these feelings, thoughts, beliefs, intentions and goals are constructed and how such psychological factors, in turn, influence our interactions with others. Social psychology is an interdisciplinary domain that bridges the gap between psychology and sociology. During the years immediately following World War II, there was frequent collaboration between psychologists and sociologists. However, the two disciplines have become increasingly specialized and isolated from each other in recent years, with sociologists focusing on "macro variables" (e.g., social structure) to a much greater extent. Nevertheless, sociological approaches to social psychology remain an important counterpart to psychological research in this area. In addition to the split between psychology and sociology, there has been a somewhat less pronounced difference in emphasis between American social psychologists and European social psychologists. As a broad generalization, American researchers traditionally have focused more on the individual, whereas Europeans have paid more attention to group level phenomena.. About Author: Sigmund Freud (Born Sigismund Schlomo Freud; 6 May 1856 – 23 September 1939) was an Austrian neurologist who became known as the founding father of psychoanalysis. Freud qualified as a doctor of medicine at the University of Vienna in 1881, and then carried out research into cerebral palsy, aphasia and microscopic neuroanatomy at the Vienna General Hospital. He was appointed a university lecturer in neuropathology in 1885 and became a professor in 1902. In creating psychoanalysis, a clinical method for treating psychopathology through dialogue between a patient and a psychoanalyst, Freud developed therapeutic techniques such as the use of free association (in which patients report their thoughts without reservation and in whichever order they spontaneously occur) and discovered transference (the process in which patients displace on to their analysts feelings derived from their childhood attachments), establishing its central role in the analytic process. Freud’s redefinition of sexuality to include its infantile forms led him to formulate the Oedipus complex as the central tenet of psychoanalytical theory. His analysis of his own and his patients' dreams as wish-fulfillments provided him with models for the clinical analysis of symptom formation and the mechanisms of repression as well as for elaboration of his theory of the unconscious as an agency disruptive of con

Cine ne urm?re?te din umbr?? Din zorii omenirii, dorin?a de a controla g?ndurile, comportamentele ?i ac?iunile altora a fost foarte r?sp?ndit?. De la folosirea persuasiunii coercitive de c?tre egiptenii din Antichitate ?i cavalerii templieri p?n? la afirma?iile actuale privind h?r?uirea electronic? ?i ?bombardamentul“ cu microunde, am fost mereu la mila celor dornici s? ne reprogrameze g?ndirea ?i s? ne remodeleze convingerile. ?n R?zboaiele PSI g?sim relat?ri fascinante despre: ?ncerc?rile str?vechi de control al min?ii folosind vr?ji, po?iuni ?i ritualuri; sectele ?i folosirea reprogram?rii mentale; tehnici de control mental moderne, de la hipnoz?, droguri ?i electro?ocuri la radia?ie ?i control mediumnic; povestea secret? a c?ut?rii adev?ratului Candidat Manciurian – MKUltra ?i conexiunea CIA; ?minunata lume nou?“ a metodelor ingenioase de h?r?uire electronic? ?i de supraveghere agresiv?.

O lectur esenial pentru toi cei interesai s-i activeze genele sntii, fericirii i longevitii!“ – Dr. Mark Hyman, autorul crii The Blood Sugar SolutionAutorii bestsellerului Supercreierul prezint o nou i ndrznea nelegere a genelor umane i a modului n care modificri simple ale stilului de via ne pot schimba sntatea general. Saltul ctre starea de bine radical" este o promisiune ce ateapt s fie mplinit.Vreme de decenii, s-a crezut c genele ne determin destinul biologic. Acum, noua genetic ne nva c genele sunt dinamice i rspund la tot ceea ce gndim, spunem i facem. Dintr-odat, au devenit aliaii notri cei mai puternici n ncercarea de nnoire personal. Putem optimiza comportamentul i expresia genelor, pentru a ajunge la o stare de sntate i mplinire la care nici nu visam cu puin timp n urm. Impactul asupra prevenirii bolilor, imunitii, mbtrnirii i bolilor cronice este fr precedent.

…mi hajtja a géniuszokat? Szeretnéd tudni, mit tanulhatsz a t?rténelem nagyjaitól, hogy a legt?bbet hozd ki magadból? Ha igen, vár rád egy kaland. Sean Patrick k?nyve hatalmas sikert aratott a tengerentúlon. Ha elolvasod, tizenegy bámulatos elme életébe pillanthatsz be. Megtudhatod, mi hajtotta ?ket, és hogyan alakította az életüket egy-egy jellemz? tulajdonság. Látni fogod t?bbek k?z?tt, hogyan indult útjára Walt Disney stúdiója, miként vált egy karddal játszó kisfiúból a hódító Nagy Sándor, vagy hogyan lett Nikola Tesla a megannyi nehézség ellenére az elektromosság atyja. A kiválóság nem adottság, hanem egy út, amire Te is ráléphetsz. Mondj ?IGEN!”-t a saját kalandodra, és ébreszd fel a benned rejl? géniuszt!

Cu toate c exist acorduri surprinztoare i frecvente ntre ei, Reich i Jung i abordeaz munca n moduri fundamental diferite. Cu asemenea diferene tulburtoare ale stilului i caracterului celor doi, unirea acestor dou sisteme este un exerciiu neateptat i remarcabil. Ironic, are loc prin medierea teoretic freudian.”Scopul umbrei este de a oferi sufletului omenesc opoziia i tensiunea necesare pentru a se dezvolta mai mult prin intermediul hotrrii i determinrii interioare, de a se elucida prin provocarea contrastelor i de a se trezi, pentru a fi astfel dispus s se transforme ntr-un mod profund.” Jung & Reich. Trupul ca umbr este o explorare a vieilor i a ideilor semnificative a dou figuri principale ale psihanalizei: Carl Jung i Wilhelm Reich, amndoi pionieri i genii controversate care nu s-au ntlnit niciodat dei au fost contemporani. Modul n care John P. Conger trateaz personalitile i perspectivele acestora – precum i ce ar fi putut asimila unul de la cellalt – reprezint o biografie combinat a similaritilor i diferenelor i totodat o evaluare contiincioas a teoriilor lor.

Folose?te cea mai mare for?? a propriei vie?i! Inima uman? este o crea?ie plin? de minuni ?i deosebit de complex?, cu un spectru larg de abilit??i neimaginate p?n? acum. Ea de?ine printre altele o inteligen?? proprie ?i o capacitate de percep?ie unic?, ce dep??e?te cu mult sim?urile umane obi?nuite. Noi putem accesa ?i utiliza aceste for?e, le putem aduce ?n echilibru cu propriul mental, descoperind ?n felul acesta cele mai bune solu?ii pentru orice problem? cu care ne confrunt?m. Ruediger Schache, autor a numeroase bestseller-uri, a conceput ?n acest sens 4 ?ntreb?ri cheie pline de ?n?elepciune. Cel care le va utiliza nu va descoperi doar r?spunsuri, ci ?i calea spre poten?ialul s?u cel mai ?nalt.

O colec?ie de scrieri foarte concise ?i la obiectcu privire la subiectul non-dualit??ii. ? O ?ndrumare direct?, orientat? c?tre libertate, reveleaz? ?n termeni simpli c? iubirea necondi?ionat? pe care o caut? persoana este chiar aici, ca Totul, ca Tot Ce Este. Cartea trateaz? ?i dilema persoanei iluzorii, cea care c?ut? s? g?seasc? ceea ce nu poate fi g?sit; iar dilema incomprehensibil? este chiar non-existen?a persoanei. ? Aceast? carte este o rev?rsare a ceea ce este c?utat – a libert??ii.Este o poveste complet? de dragoste. ? Nu exist? un Dumnezeu, exist? doar Dumnezeu. Nimic, Totul... Asta.

C??i dintre noi reu?esc s?-?i exprime o nevoie sau o emo?ie f?r? s? fie recepta?i ca fiind critici, egoi?ti sau manipulatori? De c?te ori nu evit?m, din fric?, s? ne spunem p?rerea? ?i ?n c?te r?nduri nu pornim o discu?ie doar pentru a ne ?desc?rca nervii"? Creat? de psihologul american Marshall B. Rosenberg, metoda Comunic?rii NonViolente (CNV) ofer? un cadru accesibil ?i de impact pentru dezvoltarea unor rela?ii empatice ?i respectuoase at?t cu sine, c?t ?i cu cei din jur. Bazat? pe numeroase exerci?ii ?i povestiri ilustrative, cartea demonstreaz? c? a comunica ?nonviolent “nu ?nseamn? s? devii pasiv sau de o polite?e artificial?, ci s? reu?e?ti s?-?i transmi?i c?t mai autentic ?i mai conving?tor sentimentele ?i opiniile, ?in?nd totodat? cont de impactul vorbelor tale asupra interlocutorului. Metoda CNV poate fi aplicat? cu folos at?t ?n familie, c?t ?i la serviciu, la ?coal? sau ?n rela?iile cu prietenii.

Sunt cuplul ?i familia dou? concepte diferite? Ce ne motiveaz? s? form?m un cuplu? Odat? format, cum putem men?ine echilibrul ?n rela?ia noastr?, cum putem ?ntre?ine focul viu, ?ns? la acea intensitate care nu provoac? arsuri, ci ?nc?lze?te ?i energizeaz??Dac? p?n? nu de mult familia avea o importan?? primordial?, ?n ultimele decenii ideea de cuplu a ?nceput s? prind? tot mai mult contur ?n a?tept?rile ?i ?n vie?ile noastre. Acum ?tim c? un cuplu nu este indestructibil, ?tim c? o rela?ie de iubire, necultivat?, se stinge, ?tim c? nu e suficient dar nici obligatoriu s? ai copii sau bunuri comune pentru a forma un cuplu ci, din contr?, decizia de a "ne a?eza" pare s? afecteze rela?ia amoroas?. Via?a de cuplu a devenit mai savuroas?, dar ?i mai periculoas?.?n volumul de fa??, cunoscutul autor francez ne ?nva?? "mersul pe s?rm?" al unei rela?ii de cuplu satisf?c?toare ?i de durat?, ?n care fiecare partener e invitat s?-?i exercite libertatea de alegere, responsabilitatea, imagina?ia, construind ?i reconstruind permanent ?mpreun? via?a ?n doi.?