本书设计了33个逻辑思考的问题，从知名哲学问题到原创的谜题都有，包括矿车的关问题、忒修斯之船、阿基里斯悖论、赌徒谬误、黑白玛莉和不可能成立的算式…… 　　只要改变一设定，就会让我们产生不同的想法并从各种观来思考问题，而后一步步地推论出自己的答案，你的大脑就是实验室，而你的道德观念、过去累积的知识、逻辑思考、专注力和想象力就是实验器材，在享受故事情节和巧妙圈套的过程中，自然会培养出逻辑思考能力，并且从思考中得到新的发现和体悟。 　　思考实验有着很高的自由度，一个人行很有趣，也能作为聚会时的话题让多人一起同乐，而比起重视答案或知识，培养深逻辑思考才是在职场、社会、教育现场能生存的重要关键，更能训练自己在商务场合或紧急事故发生时，做出谨慎、聪明、迅速及冷静的关键应变判断。

　　本书汇集了作者2000年以前关于《周易》经传、易学史以及帛书《易传》、楚简《周易》研究的17篇论作及2篇附录，又加上了作者新刊的4篇论文、1篇专访，全面反映了作者20年来易学研究的成果及心路历程，不仅代表了当代易学研究的*水平，也是当代经学研究、古典学研究工作的典范，适合文史哲专业工作者和易学爱好者阅读。  

　　与前此的文化史和思想史研究相近，《当代中国人文大系·善的历程：儒家价值体系研究》所作的，首先是一种历史的诠释。当然，诠释不同于历史的简单再现，它总是以诠释者的理论视域为背景，并同时展为一个逻辑重建的过程。事实上，历史的诠释与逻辑的重建往往很难分离，二者从一个侧面展示了历史与逻辑的统一。也正是以此为基本原则，本书对儒家价值体系的考察，并不仅仅限于文化史现象的描述，而是更多地侧重于其历史内涵与逻辑意蕴的双重展示，后者同时又旨在为文化哲学的当代建构提供某种历史的前提。

百家争鸣是怎样的一种盛况？谁是中国位无神论者？哥哥“英雄”弟“好汉”是指哪两个兄弟呢？……我们都该知道。

《宽容》是一部描述人类思想解放的历程、畅销近百年的通俗历史读本，是关于宽容和自由思想的人文主义经典之作。房龙从人文主义的立场出发， 站在全人类的高度，借助“宽容”之眼， 重新审视人类由史前时代、古希腊、古罗马时代、中 世纪、文艺复兴时代到现代几千年文明的变迁和人类寻求自身解放的漫长历程，这期间，善与恶、黑暗与光明、步与反动的不断搏杀，勾勒出一幅波澜壮阔的历史画卷。

    《小窗幽记》，又名《醉古堂剑扫》，十二卷，是明代格言警句类小品文。该书以哲人式的冷隽针砭时弊，抨浇漓世风，意简意赅地阐释了修身养性、为人处世之哲理。行文清雅俊逸，如玲珑碧玉，小巧雅致，益人深省，有淡泊名利、超然万物的旷达之情。此书与《菜根谭》、《围炉夜话》并称为中国修身养性的三大奇书，为明代清言的代表作之一。自问世以来，备受历代读者所青睐，是感悟中国文化、修养心性的哲理好书。

黑格尔的《逻辑学》是西方哲学*晦涩难读的著作之一。本书对《逻辑学》的基本思想行了简要的、比较系统的概括和阐述。本书对于研究西方哲学的学生和教师曾经产生过巨大的影响。

本书是一部文学评论专著，*而系统地收录了安徽大学教授、博导、评论家赵凯自2000年至今撰写并发表的文学评论文章45篇。赵凯系马克思主义文艺理论中国化理论研究的专家，这部评论集的文章主要针对安徽本土的文艺现象有感而发，正是作者着眼于当代中国的文艺实践，将马克思主义文艺理论运用到具体的文学研究和批评中的成果展现，体现出鲜明的时代精神与深刻的历史意味。收录的评论文章曾陆续发表于《人民日报》《光明日报》《文学评论》《文艺报》《文艺研究》《文学理论与批评》《安徽日报》《安徽文学》等报刊，已产生了良好的社会反响。

“人是自己命运的主宰。”——观念，推动历史改辙18世纪，是启蒙的世纪。从爱丁堡到那不勒斯，从巴黎到柏林，从波士顿到费城，“自由”是这个时代的纲领，它让人倍感欣喜：光荣的独立前景和大展宏图的无限机会向所有人敞了。人类有史以来首次将自信建立在现实基础上，各个阶层的人们自信满满，始相信理性和行动的力量。启蒙哲人们着手设计了各种改造秩序的方案——社会、伦理、科学、艺术、政治、教育……就此，挥别古老的过去，今日世界在他们手中诞生。历史如何在自由观念的冲下改头换面？个人如何在启蒙精神的照耀下主宰命运？现代史学巨擘彼得·盖伊，为我们娓娓道来。

《他者的消失》（书号：978-7-5217-0470-9；定价：35.00元） 他者的时代已然逝去。 那朋友似的、地狱般的、神秘的、诱惑的、爱欲的他者已让位于同者。如今，同质化的扩散形成病理变化，对社会体造成侵害。扩散之势愈演愈烈。使社会体害病的不是异化、退隐、禁令和压制，而是过度交际、过度信息、过度生产和过度消费。 如今的时代标志不是由他者带来的压迫，而是由同者造成的抑郁。当今社会中有诸多具标志性的现象，譬如恐惧、全球化、恐怖主义等，韩炳哲的新作所探究的正是这些现象背后潜藏的同质化的暴力。 韩炳哲用他的作品开辟了一条横穿当代文学之林的甬道。他不求你我点赞，只求警醒世人。 ——德国广播电台（Deutschlandfunk） 《倦怠社会》（书号：978-7-5217-0469-3；定价：35.00元） 否定性的社会已经消失，取而代之的是充溢着积极性的社会。 从这一范式转移出发，韩炳哲展示了当今社会的病理形态，其中包括抑郁症、注意力缺乏症、过劳症等精神疾病。它们不是传染病，而是梗阻症；不是由否定性的、免疫学上的他者导致，而是源于过量的肯定性。 因此，一切免疫学式预防和抵抗措施都失效了。作者的论述*终以一个社会愿景结束，他有意赋予其一个含有歧义的名称“倦怠社会”。其中，生命变成了生存，生存导向对健康的狂热崇拜，健康带来了疾病和僵死。 失去了死亡的否定性，生命自身僵化成为死亡。 一部为当下全球化时代做出诊断的重要作品。 《娱乐何为》（书号：978-7-5217-0481-5；定价：38.00元） 现在，娱乐的无处不在预示着全新的事物即将来临。人们对世界和现实的理解开始发生根本性的变化。 今天，娱乐升级成为一种新式范例，即一种新的决定什么具有处世能力、什么没有，也就是决定什么是存在者的存在模式。因此，现实本身呈现出一种特殊的娱乐效果。 娱乐的绝 对化导致世界变成享乐的世界，受难精神将这样的世界解释和贬低为沉沦、虚无，甚至是非在。然而，受难和娱乐其实并不完全相异。娱乐的纯粹无意义与受难的纯粹意义是紧密相邻的。 小丑的微笑与痛苦之人痛苦扭曲的表情看起来惊人地相似。 韩炳哲创造了一种他个人独有的思想传统。 ——《周日世界报》（Welt am Sonntag）

【内容简介】 本书是北京大学历史系王新生教授承担的国家社科基金重大项目“宗教与东亚近代化”的研究成果。作者从历史与社会的角度，论述了天主教、基督教、道教在中国近代化过程中对民众、知识分子以及教育等方面的影响，分析了神道教在日本近代社会转型中的作用，阐述了佛教对韩国近代化的影响。

古往今来，你信不信每个哲学大咖的背后都有一只脑洞大的狗狗？狗狗思考的哲学问题，是成就这些大名鼎鼎的哲学家的关键。 从西方哲学三大奠基人——苏格拉底、柏拉图、亚里士多德，到东方圣人孔子、兵圣孙子，再到自由主义之父洛克、启蒙运动泰斗伏尔泰、存在主义创始人克尔凯郭尔、西方现代哲学创者尼采、存在主义的重量级人物萨特等，这些哲学大咖三观的形成，其实都依仗着他们的狗狗。狗狗看待世界的方式直决定了哲学家理解世界的方式，这到底是怎么回事呢？ 这是一群什么样的狗狗？这些狗狗的脑洞究竟有多大?它们又是如何认识和观察世界的？作者跟随狗狗的足迹，以独特的视角带你认识熟悉却又陌生的世界。

Egy kétségtelenül szellemes megjegyzés szerint a cím csak akkor fedheti le pontosan a k?nyv tartalmát, ha bet?r?l bet?re megegyezik vele. Valami hasonló mondható a fülsz?vegekr?l is (biztos Boegesnek is tetszene ez a gondolat), és ennek megfelel?en meg sem kísérlem néhány mondatban ?sszefoglalni, hogy mir?l lesz szó. Ehelyett inkább el?sz?r is azt emelem ki, hogy a címnek megfelel?en mir?l nem: például nem magáról Borgesr?l, a 20. század egyik legjelent?sebb argentin írójáról. Hanem inkább arról, hogy a novelláival kapcsolatban milyen, az irodalomtól olyakor látszólag meglehet?sen távol álló kérdések merülhetnek fel kezdve azon, hogy az általa leírt bábeli k?nyvtár valóban olyan teljes és mindenre kiterjed?-e, miként azt Borges sugallja; folytatva azon, hogy van-e egyáltalán értelme felvetni, hogy milyen lenne, ha valaki t?kéletes emlékezettel rendelkezne (nincs). Meg, hogy elképzelhet?-e, nem pedig, hogy létezik vagy legalább lehetséges-e egy olyan pont vagy térrész: egy olyan Alef, amelyen keresztül egyszerre láthatunk mindent. ?s így tovább egészen addig, hogy mit mondhatunk az irodalomkritikáról, az irodalmi zsánerek létrej?ttér?l meg elt?nésér?l vagy éppen az irodalmi halhatatlanságról – ismét csak mint elméleti problémáról. Azaz végs? soron persze mégiscsak egyfajta bolyongás ez a borgesi k?nyvtában, illetve bizonyos, legalább hipotetikusan lehetséges és az irodalomhoz így vagy úgy kapcsolódó kérdések fázisterében még akkor is, ha a fentebbiekben, miként a figyelmes olvasó már észre vehette, éppen azt tettem, amir?l korábban azt sejttettem, hogy nem fogom: néhány példa említésével próbáltam utalni rá, hogy mir?l szól az egész. De talán ez sincs igazi ellentmondásban azzal a megk?zelítéssel, amit ez a k?nyv sugall. Galántai Zoltán tudományt?rténész és író. Korábbi k?nyvei az eClassicnál: K?nyvkett?. A k?nyv, az írás és az irodalom j?v?jér?l (2013) http://eclassic.xyz/shop/bemutato/konyvketto-a-konyv-az-iras-es-az-irodalom-jovojerol/ Monoverzumok. Kozmosz, t?rvény, tudomány (2016) http://eclassic.xyz/shop/szabadpolc/monoverzumok/

A partir de uma sugest?o de Gilles Deleuze e Félix Guattari – a de que todos os filósofos ocidentais terminaram construindo, no interregno do seu pensamento, personagens conceituais, uma espécie de assinatura do filósofo – este livro objetiva identificar esse tra?o a partir da obra de Michel Foucault. A tese em quest?o é que este autor n?o se enquadra em uma imagem única, como a do Juiz em Kant, ou a do sedutor em Kierkegaard, mas em uma imagem híbrida e triádica, fazendo coro com muitos filósofos chamados de transversais e que se instalaram no horizonte de filosofias chamadas de pós-estruturalistas, como Deleuze.

Em Vida sem Princípio , Henry David Thoreau nos apresenta um verdadeiro manual de como viver em sociedade e em contato com a Natureza respeitando a natureza e ao próximo.? puro Transcendentalismo , um apelo para que cada um siga a sua própria luz interior.Este ensaio foi obtido a partir da palestra''What Shall It Profit? ''apresentada ao publico em 06 de dezembro de 1854, no Sal?o Railroad em Providence Rhode Island.Foi publicado pela primeira vez na edi??o de outubro de 1863 The Atlantic Monthly, onde foi dado o título moderno.Vida sem Princípio é um ensaio em que Thoreau coloca o seu programa para viver bem. Incluem-se aqui as suas ideias sobre a forma de abordagem da comunica??o interpessoal, modos de trabalho, sustento financeiro e outros códigos de conduta baseados na filosofia de de vida de Thoreau.'

Such is the system which underlies the Meditations of Marcus Aurelius. Some knowledge of it is necessary to the right understanding of the book, but for us the chief interest lies elsewhere. We do not come to Marcus Aurelius for a treatise on Stoicism. He is no head of a school to lay down a body of doctrine for students; he does not even contemplate that others should read what he writes. His philosophy is not an eager intellectual inquiry, but more what we should call religious feeling. The uncompromising stiffness of Zeno or Chrysippus is softened and transformed by passing through a nature reverent and tolerant, gentle and free from guile; the grim resignation which made life possible to the Stoic sage becomes in him almost a mood of aspiration. His book records the innermost thoughts of his heart, set down to ease it, with such moral maxims and reflections as may help him to bear the burden of duty and the countless annoyances of a busy life. It is instructive to compare the Meditations with another famous book, the Imitation of Christ. There is the same ideal of self-control in both. It should be a man's task, says the Imitation, 'to overcome himself, and every day to be stronger than himself.' 'In withstanding of the passions standeth very peace of heart.' 'Let us set the axe to the root, that we being purged of our passions may have a peaceable mind.' To this end there must be continual self-examination. 'If thou may not continually gather thyself together, namely sometimes do it, at least once a day, the morning or the evening. In the morning purpose, in the evening discuss the manner, what thou hast been this day, in word, work, and thought.' But while the Roman's temper is a modest self-reliance, the Christian aims at a more passive mood, humbleness and meekness, and reliance on the presence and personal friendship of God. The Roman scrutinises his faults with severity, but without the self-contempt which makes the Christian 'vile in his own sight.' The Christian, like the Roman, bids 'study to withdraw thine heart from the love of things visible'; but it is not the busy life of duty he has in mind so much as the contempt of all worldly things, and the 'cutting away of all lower delectations.' Both rate men's praise or blame at their real worthlessness; 'Let not thy peace,' says the Christian, 'be in the mouths of men.' But it is to God's censure the Christian appeals, the Roman to his own soul. The petty annoyances of injustice or unkindness are looked on by each with the same magnanimity. 'Why doth a little thing said or done against thee make thee sorry? It is no new thing; it is not the first, nor shall it be the last, if thou live long. At best suffer patiently, if thou canst not suffer joyously.' The Christian should sorrow more for other men's malice than for our own wrongs; but the Roman is inclined to wash his hands of the offender. 'Study to be patient in suffering and bearing other men's defaults and all manner infirmities,' says the Christian; but the Roman would never have thought to add, 'If all men were perfect, what had we then to suffer of other men for God?' The virtue of suffering in itself is an idea which does not meet us in the Meditations. Both alike realise that man is one of a great community. 'No man is sufficient to himself,' says the Christian; 'we must bear together, help together, comfort together.' But while he sees a chief importance in zeal, in exalted emotion that is, and avoidance of lukewarmness, the Roman thought mainly of the duty to be done as well as might be, and less of the feeling which should go with the doing of it. To the saint as to the emperor, the world is a poor thing at best. 'Verily it is a misery to live upon the earth,' says the Christian; few and evil are the days of man's life, which passeth away suddenly as a shadow. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?*** ? "MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS" was born on April 26, A.D. 121. His real name was M. Annius Verus, and he was sprung of a noble family which claimed descent from Numa, second King of Rome. Thus the most religious of emperors came of the blood of the most pious of early kings. His father, Annius Verus, had held high office in Rome, and his grandfather, of the same name, had been thrice Consul. Both his parents died young, but Marcus held them in loving remembrance. On his father's death Marcus was adopted by his grandfather, the consular Annius Verus, and there was deep love between these two. On the very first page of his book Marcus gratefully declares how of his grandfather he had learned to be gentle and meek, and to refrain from all anger and passion. The Emperor Hadrian divined the fine character of the lad, whom he used to call not Verus but Verissimus, more Truthful than his own name. He advanced Marcus to equestrian rank when six years of age, and at the age of eight made him a member of the ancient Salian priesthood. The boy's aunt, A

La acest ?nceput de secol XXI, ?n ?ntreaga lume se intensific? studierea problemelor fundamentale, eterne, ca via?a ?i moartea, rostul vie?ii, originile ?i destina?iile noastre ultime, c?t ?i ?ntrebarea cu privire la existen?a de dup? moarte. Cartea examineaz? filosofia de via?? a budismului Nichiren ?n lumina ideilor de ultim? or? despre via?? ?i moarte, de?i cuprinderea exhaustiv? ?ntr?un singur volum a unei probleme at?t de vaste este imposibil?. Budismul Nichiren ofer? oamenilor mijloacele de a??i transforma destinele prin ?nf?ptuirea propriei revolu?ii umane individuale ?i dezv?luie calea spre pace ?i fericire.

Kitab?n ba?l?ca vasf? olarak, Antik Yunan polisinden günümüze uzanan yolda, ?ocuk ve gen? yeti?tirmenin kamusal ve insan? ?nemini ortaya koyarken, fizik?, ahl?k? ve kültürel y?nleriyle bir bütün olarak e?itim felsefesi üzerine kaleme al?nm?? en temel eserlerden biri olmas? g?sterilebilir… ?Bu noktada, Rousseau’nun, “Tüm yazd?klar?m i?inde en iyi eserim” diye takdim etti?i?Emile’in 1762’de yay?nland???nda lanetlenip, 30 y?l sonra, Frans?z Devrimi’nin ?ncüleri i?in Frans?z milli e?itiminin ilham kayna?? addedildi?i dikkate al?nd???nda, Kant’?n e?itim üzerine sarf etti?i s?zlerin tarihsel ve toplumsal ba?lam? da ortaya ??kar. 18.yüzy?l?n ortalar?ndan 19.yüzy?l?n ba?lar?na dek ge?en bir ?mürlük sürede k?ta Avrupas? büyük bir do?umun sanc?lar?yla sars?lmaktad?r. ?ncesi ve sonras? diye tarihi ikiye ay?ran ?ifte Devrim (Sanayi ve Frans?z Devrimi) büyük bir zihinsel d?nü?üme yol a?mak üzeredir. Kant’? büyüten, ya da büyüklü?üne ayr?ca de?er katan bir unsur da, onun i?te bu ?a??n insan? olmas?d?r. ?Kant, 1806’daki Jena Sava??n? ve Napoleon i?galinin Alman milleti üzerinde yaratt??? ?ok ve deh?eti g?remeden vefat etse de, Wilhelm von Humboldt gibi e?itim reformcular? arac?l???yla Prusya (genel itibar?yla da Alman) e?itim sistemi i?in ne denli ?nemli bir yol a?t???n? tüm kitap boyunca seziyor gibidir. Bununla birlikte Kant’?nE?itim ?zerine’si, milli dilde ibadet edip, okumay? yazmay? te?vik eden Luhterci gelene?in Pietizmle kendini yenilemi? ve Büyük Frederich taraf?ndan te?vik edilmi? olan e?itim anlay???n?n olgunla?ma ?a??n?n da bir ürünüdür. Bu sebeple, kitab?n tamam?na h?kim olan motif, Ayd?nlanmac? bir “i?sel ?zgürle?im” ve “ruhan? terbiye” aras?nda kurulmas? gereken büyük dengedir. ? ? ?Bu arka plan? dikkate alarak, ?imdi kitaba biraz daha yak?ndan bakabiliriz… E?itim ?zerine, memleketin sayg?n ?evirmenlerinden biri olan Ahmet Aydo?an’?n sunu? ve ?ns?züyle ba?l?yor. ?stü kapal? fakat sitem dolu bir de?erlendirme yaz?s? olan “’Sapere Aude!’ Diye ??kt?k Yola”, Kant’a s?zü teslim etmeden evvel, 30 sayfada, Kant’?n dü?ünce dünyas?ndan ne denli uzakta kald???m?z?n ele?tirisini yap?yor. Bu arada, kitab?n ortaya ??k?? ?yküsüne de 22.sayfada a??klay?c? bir notla yer veriliyor. K?ningsberg ?niversitesi’nde muhtelif zamanlarda verilen dersler i?in haz?rlanan notlardan derlendi?i anla??lan?E?itim ?zerine, modern Türk?e’nin bir felsefe dili olamamas?n?n da etkisiyle, ?e?itli dipnotlar arac?l???yla kavramlar?n ve kelimelerin daha anla??l?r k?l?nd??? bir h?lde okura sunuluyor. ? “?nsan E?itilmesi Gereken Bir Varl?kt?r”: ? ?Kant, dü?üncelerini temellendirdi?i giri? sayfalar?nda insan?n e?itime muhta? ten varl?k oldu?u ger?e?inden hareket ediyor ve insan?n ancak e?itimle insan olabilece?ini dile getiriyor. (s.35) E?itime y?nelik bu yakla??m, Kant’?n idealizm felsefesinin ger?ekle?mesine giden yolu a?an anahtarlardan biri say?labilir.? ? ???NDEK?LER: ? KANT'IN YA?AMI…KANT'A G?RE AYDINLANMA NED?R?AHLAKIN METAF?Z???…KANT VE E??T?M ?ZER?NE….KANT VE TANRIKANT IN ELE?T?REL FELSEFES?KANT’IN ELE?T?REL FELSEFES?NE PLATON VE PARMEN?DES?N KATKILARI Kritisizm Nedir? KANT FELSEFES?N?N TEMEL KAVRAMLARIKANT’IN KURAMSAL METAF?Z?K ELE?T?R?S? HAKKINDAK? D???NCELER?..I. KANT'IN LE?BN?Z- WOLFF VE HUME'UN FELSEFELER?NE Y?NEL?K ELE?T?R?S?II. KANT'TA METAF?Z?K B?LG?N?N OLANA?I: METAF?Z?K OLANAKLI MIDIR?SONU?LARKANT’IN D?NYA YURTTA?LI?I AMACINA Y?NEL?K GENEL B?R TAR?H D???NCES?KANT’?I EBED? BARI?” D???NCES?S?YAS? HAKLARDA TEOR? VE PRAT?K ?L??K?S? ?ZER?NEK?RESELLE?EN SORUNLAR KAR?ISINDA KANT ET???UNUTULMAZ KANT S?ZLER?…..

A compreens?o de Contos d’Escárnio n?o poderia restringir-se à constru??o do horizonte no qual nasce, o século XX. A inten??o de escrever lixo e bestagem, anunciada pelo narrador, aos poucos, revela um grotesco vindo de um longínquo, de um aquém. Por isto, faz-se necessário também compreender o fluxo histórico-estético que encontra acolhida na imagina??o de Hilda Hilst, cujo amparo conceitual buscou-se à estética da recep??o e do efeito. Na Teoria Estética, o feio insurge como fen?meno da realidade artística contempor?nea; refúgio de sobrevivência da arte e dos belos escritos, deixa livre à plasticidade do presente a tarefa da denúncia da realidade. Em protesto, o dissonante reivindica cidadania e se mantém como possibilidade da arte. Neste sentido, tem lugar em Hilda Hilst a atualidade do grotesco.

S?rmanul Nietzsche, ?bestia blond?“, a avut ?i el parte de crucificare. Multor profe?i ?i m?ntuitori li se ?nt?mpl? asta: eventual ?i ?n timpul vie?ii, ?i dup? moarte. Nietzsche, r?zvr?titul ?mpotriva legilor celor vechi, ?ntemeietorul orgolios al noii sale ?religii“, a trebuit s? suporte ?i el toate e?ecurile ?i r?st?lm?cirile posibile, ba chiar ?i punerea terifiant? ?n practic? a unora dintre ideile lui, care nici nu mai erau ale lui ?i, ?ndeob?te, nu mai erau idei…?Viclenia ra?iunii“, implicit a istoriei, o descrisese Hegel, unul dintre cei mul?i pe care Nietzsche nu-i agrea. Dincoace de istorie ?i chiar dincolo de ea, r?m?n c?r?ile. Omul n-a fost s? fie m?ntuit de Nietzsche. C?r?ile lui vor d?inui printre oameni: pentru oameni.

Antropologie ?i antroposofie ? Max Dessoir despre antroposofie ? Franz BrentanoAlc?tuind cuprinsul acestei lucr?ri, Rudolf Steiner reveleaz? ?c?teva din firele ?tiin?ifice care trebuie trasate pornind de la antropozofie la filozofie, la psihologie ?i la fiziologie“. Cunoa?terea omului va trebui atunci s? fie extins? ?in?nd cont de enigmaticele aspecte ale vie?ii sale interioare, privite din perspective multiple. ?n aceast? carte, Rudolf Steiner prezint? ?n scris aspectele semnificative ale configur?rii ?ntreite a fiin?ei omene?ti: corpul fizic, organismul sufletesc ?i configura?ia spiritual?.