尼采曾以“炸药”自喻，是“与被钉在十字架上的耶稣对抗的‘狄奥尼索斯’”，也是本世纪才大放光芒的哲学家和诗人。尼采以*人称的自问自答，在生平*一部自传和绝笔之作中，逐一评了自己的代表作，对“尼采”如何成为“尼采”,做出了权威的诠释。这是一部以思想为核心的自传，也是阅读尼采其他著作，理解他的哲学思想的指导之书，为尼采的其他著作提供了某些心理学和传记性的材料。

《西方美学史》是美学泰斗朱光潜*重要的一部著作，也是中国学者撰写的*部西方美学专著，具有开创性的学术价值。 　　本书选取了西方各个美学流派中*代表性的人物及其美学观点，进行评述。对美学上的一些带有普遍性和现实意义的问题，作了比较深入的探讨。 　　作者挑选的这些人物代表了各时期的主要美学思潮，展现了西方美学的历史发展脉络，通过本书，读者可以全面了解西方美学思想的发展概况。美学、文艺批评、文艺理论等研究者也能从中受到启发，为进一步的美学研究奠定良好的基础。

Valamikor a muzsika egyszer volt, szerény és tiszteletreméltó, ma cicomás lett és zrzavaros, méltóságát és értékét veszített, gyalázatos iparrá süllyedt.” Mikor volt a muzsika egyszer, szerény és tiszteletreméltó, és vajon milyen úton-módon veszítette el méltóságát és értékét Meg tudjuk határozni, hogy melyek a zene zrzavaros és cicomás stíluselemei Tudjuk-e, hogy hogyan és miért süllyedt a zene gyalázatos iparrá Végül, de nem utolsósorban fel tudjuk-e mérni annak jelentségét, hogy a fenti idézet a 6. századból származik, a nagy keresztény gondolkodó, Boethiusz tollából E knyv a zene és a kereszténység hagyományosan feszültségektl terhelt kapcsolatát vizsgálja, a valamikor” és a ma” szakrális zenéjének tükrében. A szerz szándéka, hogy a zene a dicséret és magasztalás eszkze, és ne a feszültségek állandó forrása legyen a keresztény egyházak és gyülekezetek életében. BOLYKI LSZL 1994-ben szerezte mvész-tanári diplomáját a budapesti Zeneakadémián. A Bolyki Brothers énekegyüttes, a Budapesti Fesztiválzenekar és az Erkel Ferenc Kamarazenekar tagjaként rendszeresen fllép Európa, Amerika és zsia legjelentsebb zenei kzpontjaiban. Spirituális szemlélet lelkigondozó, párkapcsolati és nismereti témákra szakosodott tréner, a Kegyelem és kalmárszellem cím ktet szerzje.

Are femeia vreun rol ?n evolu?ia spiritual? a b?rbatului? Ce anume, ?n iubire ?i ?n erotism, declan?eaz? intui?ii ?i tr?iri care dep??esc datul, ordinarul, norma? Otto Weininger, un g?nditor catalogat drept misogin ?i antisemit, repune ?n discu?ie opera Peer Gynt al lui Ibsen, st?ruind asupra temelor sale favorite: superioritatea masculinului, asociat spiritului, fa?? cu femininul, asociat instinctualit??ii oarbe, lipsite de spirit, de perspectiv?, deci ?i de valoare. Aforistica acestui autor, deopotriv? prezent? ?n volumul de fa??, abordeaz? problematica sadismului ?i a masochismului, imoralitatea dus? p?n? la ilegalitate ?i crim?, culmin?nd cu – sau decurg?nd din – p?catul originar.

Modul revolu?ionar ?n care David Hume (1711-1776) a abordat marile teme ale filosofiei a determinat traseul intelectual al multor g?nditori ulteriori (empiri?tii, Kant, Einstein). Despre idei con?ine primele dou? p?r?i din Tratat asupra naturii umane (1739), adic? piatra de hotar a empirismului humean: cele mai importante pagini dedicate originii ideilor ?i leg?turii acestora cu experien?a, cu sim?urile ?i cu imagina?ia, redefinind raportul dintre ideal ?i real.

Un mare vinovat f?r? vin?, sihastrul de la Sils-Maria a dinamitat g?ndirea secolului al XIX-lea, figur?nd – al?turi de Dostoievski – printre uria?ii profe?i ai omenirii, care au proorocit nenorocirile ce-au urmat, crimele ?n numele unei idei, rasismul, precum ?i devastatorul totalitarism ro?u. Dincolo de bine ?i de r?u e una dintre capodoperele g?nditorului de la na?terea c?ruia se va s?rb?tori ?n toamna anului 2014 (15 octombrie) 170 de ani.

The Republic (Greek: Politeia) is a Socratic dialogue, written by Plato around 380 BC, concerning the definition of (justice), the order and character of the just city-state and the just man, reason by which ancient readers used the name On Justice as an alternative title (not to be confused with the spurious dialogue also titled On Justice). The dramatic date of the dialogue has been much debated and though it must take place some time during the Peloponnesian War, "there would be jarring anachronisms if any of the candidate specific dates between 432 and 404 were assigned". It is Plato's best-known work and has proven to be one of the most intellectually and historically influential works of philosophy and political theory. In it, Socrates along with various Athenians and foreigners discuss the meaning of justice and examine whether or not the just man is happier than the unjust man by considering a series of different cities coming into existence "in speech", culminating in a city (Kallipolis) ruled by philosopher-kings; and by examining the nature of existing regimes. The participants also discuss the theory of forms, the immortality of the soul, and the roles of the philosopher and of poetry in society. Short Summary (Epilogue):X.1—X.8. 595a—608b. Rejection of Mimetic ArtX.9—X.11. 608c—612a. Immortality of the SoulX.12. 612a—613e. Rewards of Justice in LifeX.13—X.16. 613e—621d. Judgment of the Dead The paradigm of the city — the idea of the Good, the Agathon — has manifold historical embodiments, undertaken by those who have seen the Agathon, and are ordered via the vision. The centre piece of the Republic, Part II, nos. 2–3, discusses the rule of the philosopher, and the vision of the Agathon with the allegory of the cave, which is clarified in the theory of forms. The centre piece is preceded and followed by the discussion of the means that will secure a well-ordered polis (City). Part II, no. 1, concerns marriage, the community of people and goods for the Guardians, and the restraints on warfare among the Hellenes. It describes a partially communistic polis. Part II, no. 4, deals with the philosophical education of the rulers who will preserve the order and character of the city-state.In Part II, the Embodiment of the Idea, is preceded by the establishment of the economic and social orders of a polis (Part I), followed by an analysis (Part III) of the decline the order must traverse. The three parts compose the main body of the dialogues, with their discussions of the “paradigm”, its embodiment, its genesis, and its decline.The Introduction and the Conclusion are the frame for the body of the Republic. The discussion of right order is occasioned by the questions: “Is Justice better than Injustice?” and “Will an Unjust man fare better than a Just man?” The introductory question is balanced by the concluding answer: “Justice is preferable to Injustice”. In turn, the foregoing are framed with the Prologue (Book I) and the Epilogue (Book X). The prologue is a short dialogue about the common public doxai (opinions) about “Justice”. Based upon faith, and not reason, the Epilogue describes the new arts and the immortality of the soul. ? About Author: Plato (Greek: Platon, " 428/427 or 424/423 BC – 348/347 BC) was a philosopher in Classical Greece. He was also a mathematician, student of Socrates, writer of philosophical dialogues, and founder of the Academy in Athens, the first institution of higher learning in the Western world. Along with his mentor, Socrates, and his most-famous student, Aristotle, Plato helped to lay the foundations of Western philosophy and science. Alfred North Whitehead once noted: "the safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato." Plato's sophistication as a writer is evident in his Socratic dialogues; thirty-six dialogues and thirteen letters have been ascribed to him, although 15–18 of them have been contested. Plato's writings have been published in several fashions; this has led to several conventions regarding the naming and referencing of Plato's texts. Plato's dialogues have been used to teach a range of subjects, including philosophy, logic, ethics, rhetoric, religion and mathematics. Plato is one of the most important founding figures in Western philosophy. His writings related to the Theory of Forms, or Platonic ideals, are basis for Platonism. ? Early lifeThe exact time and place of Plato's birth are not known, but it is certain that he belonged to an aristocratic and influential family. Based on ancient sources, most modern scholars believe that he was born in Athens or Aegina between 429 and 423 BC. His father was Ariston. According to a disputed tradition, reported by Diogenes Laertius, Ariston traced his descent from the king of Athens, Codrus, and the king of Messenia, Melanthus. Plato's mother was Perictione, whose family boasted of a relationship with the famous Athenian lawmaker an

Paradise Lost is an epic poem in blank verse by the 17th-century English poet John Milton (1608–1674). The first version, published in 1667, consisted of ten books with over ten thousand lines of verse. A second edition followed in 1674, arranged into twelve books (in the manner of Virgil's Aeneid) with minor revisions throughout and a note on the versification. It is considered by critics to be Milton's "major work", and helped solidify his reputation as one of the greatest English poets of his time. The poem concerns the Biblical story of the Fall of Man: the temptation of Adam and Eve by the fallen angel Satan and their expulsion from the Garden of Eden. Milton's purpose, stated in Book I, is to "justify the ways of God to men" Short Summary:The poem is separated into twelve "books" or sections, the lengths of which vary greatly (the longest is Book IX, with 1,189 lines, and the shortest Book VII, with 640). The Arguments at the head of each book were added in subsequent imprints of the first edition. Originally published in ten books, a fully "Revised and Augmented" edition reorganized into twelve books was issued in 1674, and this is the edition generally used today. The poem follows the epic tradition of starting in medias res (Latin for in the midst of things), the background story being recounted later.Milton's story has two narrative arcs, one about Satan (Lucifer) and the other following Adam and Eve. It begins after Satan and the other rebel angels have been defeated and banished to Hell, or, as it is also called in the poem, Tartarus. In Pand?monium, Satan employs his rhetorical skill to organise his followers; he is aided by Mammon and Beelzebub. Belial and Moloch are also present. At the end of the debate, Satan volunteers to poison the newly created Earth and God's new and most favoured creation, Mankind. He braves the dangers of the Abyss alone in a manner reminiscent of Odysseus or Aeneas. After an arduous traversal of the Chaos outside Hell, he enters God's new material World, and later the Garden of Eden. At several points in the poem, an Angelic War over Heaven is recounted from different perspectives. Satan's rebellion follows the epic convention of large-scale warfare. The battles between the faithful angels and Satan's forces take place over three days. At the final battle, the Son of God single-handedly defeats the entire legion of angelic rebels and banishes them from Heaven. Following this purge, God creates the World, culminating in his creation of Adam and Eve. While God gave Adam and Eve total freedom and power to rule over all creation, He gave them one explicit command: not to eat from the Tree of the knowledge of good and evil on penalty of death.

Dialoguri cu Vasile Dem. Zamfirescu consemnate de Leonid DragomirLa Facultatea de Filosofie din Bucure?ti unde eram studen?i exista pe atunci mult? libertate ?n alegerea cursurilor pe care doream s? le urm?m. Se afi?a la ?nceputul anului universitar o list? a cursurilor obligatorii ?i op?ionale, acestea din urm? fiind majoritare. A?a am descoperit cursul de Psihanaliz? filosofic? al profesorului Vasile Dem. Zamfirescu, despre care ?tiam vag c? fusese unul dintre discipolii lui Constantin Noica. Atmosfera de libertate ?n care ne mi?cam se reg?sea ?n totalitate aici. Cursul ne interesa at?t prin con?inutul lui — care adolescent n-a fost fascinat de psihanaliz?! — c?t ?i prin rigoarea ?i claritatea expunerii. De?i nu mai predase p?n? atunci, Vasile Dem. Zamfirescu era cu adev?rat profesor. Seminariile erau ?ns? ale noastre. Aici se iscau polemici, se propuneau interpret?ri insolite, se scriau ?i se citeau eseuri inspirate de noile probleme ?i lecturi. De obicei dep??eam limitele temei propuse, astfel ?nc?t totul ar fi putut degenera ?ntr-un dialog al surzilor sau ?n divaga?ii sterile dac? n-ar fi existat polul magnetic: profesorul. Nu numai c? el aducea, cu mult tact, discu?ia pe f?ga?ul normal, la obiect, dar opiniile noastre, oric?t de ?ndr?zne?e, vizau direct sau indirect aprobarea lui. Aceasta uneori venea, alteori nu, dar ceea ce conta pentru noi era faptul de a ne ?ti asculta?i. Sim?eam c? el poate s? vad? ?n spusele noastre sau dincolo de ele personalitatea noastr? ?ntreag?. De aceea voiam s? d?m totul ?n acele seminarii care treceau at?t de repede, de?i discu?iile se prelungeau ?n pauze ?i dup? ?ncheierea lor.

南怀瑾先生的著述涉及儒、释、道等中国传统文化经典，他常以经史合参的讲述方式、生动幽默语言，结合古今中外历史人文典故，结合当下的日常生活，引领新世代的人们直入文化的核心智慧，让读者更乐于了解历史人文的博大精深。本套装收录东方出版社已出版的南怀瑾作品。

本书集中在一个问题上：廊下派与苏格拉底。要理解这个问题，就必须把它放到政治哲学的语境去考察，因为苏格拉底据说是政治哲学的创始人。廊下派间地来自苏格拉底，并且在德性问题等方面也受苏格拉底的观，这是否就意味着廊下派忠实地继承了苏格拉底的思想呢？该问题本身就是现代学术界争论不休的话题。不管廊下派如何对待苏格拉底，他们的结论对我们理解苏格拉底乃至整个西方思想来说，肯定都不只有滴的借鉴意义。  

适应生活变化和危机的能力是健康、富有成效的生活的关键能力。不幸的是，我们很容易陷愤怒和无助的情绪中。"复原力”的优势帮助读者摒弃消极的、自我挫败的想法，摆脱"受害者”和"好孩子”的角色，同时提高解决问题的技能，在困难时期保持幽默和乐观，变得既自立又对社会负责。通过掌握维持健康、活力和积极情绪的五个发展阶段，读者可以学会面对逆境，克服障碍，直面人生。

在“忙”中，有数不尽的乐趣；在“忙”中，有无限的喜悦；在“忙”中，能安身立命；在“忙”中，能多所体悟。“忙”的生活实在太美妙了！在“忙”中，我感觉到懒惰懈怠实在就是罪恶。我感受到生命之可贵在于跃动不息，身为万物之灵的人类焉能不将自己“忙”起来呢？有用的人，即使接受一点小因缘，也能点石成金，做得轰轰烈烈。我一生历经挫折、打击，但我从不灰心失意，因为我始终坚信只要自己不死，一定可以“活”出希望来！

人生的意义在哪里？成功的意义是什么？星云大师以自己的修行体验，从过尽千帆的阅历中，凝练箴言法语，给生活忙碌的现代人一盏指路灯。

北京师范大学历史学院积极探索实践育人的有效路径，逐步形成了依托“课余经常性实践、周末重点性实践以及寒暑假集中性实践”三种模式坚持全时段覆盖，注重“与时事知识相结合，与服务社会相结合，与专业学习相结合、与就业能力提升相结合”四个结合体现实用化设计，实现“传播师大正能量，传播中国好声音，传播正确历史观”三个传播的社会影响，努力探索出“343”实践育人新模式。多年来，北京师范大学历史学院的师生广泛进行义务支教、基层调研、境外交流、专业考察、历史类活动等多种社会实践，时间上可谓全时段，空间上足迹遍布祖国各地，甚至涉足海外，在此过程中既涌现出如义务支教、服务家乡受到《光明日报》等媒体关注的的感动师大人物朱启平、主动休学两年远赴贵州为中国而教的刘智彬、十佳志愿者张容荣等个人代表，也有如首都大学生思政实效奖获奖者形势与政策小组、北京师范大学思政实效奖获奖者《春秋人文报》和志愿讲解队等集体。铭记他们的经历，传颂他们的事迹，记录青春足迹，总结经验遗憾，成为北京师范大学历史学院学生工作者的共同期盼。在这样的期盼下，《教书育人知行合一》诞生了。全书共分五章，由不同的实践经历学生分别从社会民生、文化传承、抗战纪念、历史教学实践、外事活动等视角出发，既有记录社会实践的过程，也有对其中部分问题的深入反思。

《中华哲学史先秦编》以精炼通俗的文字深浅出地介绍了先秦时期中华先哲思想的大略要义。作者以“理解客观、言辞有据”为原则，以人物及其主要观划分章节，一改当代中国哲学史研究领域以西方哲学思维和术语解读中国哲学的习惯，而是依据中国哲学的自身特确定研究方法，采用传统术语和问题领域对中国哲学的内容行了整理。书中的观都是以古代经典的原文为根本，结合大量相关资料，研究思考后提炼总结出来的，无论是对于从事中国哲学研究的学者提供借鉴拓展思路，还是对于普通大众感受中华文化从中汲取智慧，该书都具有着较大的阅读价值

本书是汉语学界*部专论施泰因特别是施泰因对于交互主体性现象学的研究的专著。自胡塞尔的现象学发生所谓的“超越论的转向”以后，对其现象学是一种“唯我论”的批评就不绝于耳。本书尝试表明，施泰因（以及其他早期现象学家）恰恰是借“同感”来讨论对他人的通达，以避免“唯我论”的困扰，并借此发展交互主体性现象学的。 在此问题脉络中，施泰因有关同感和交互主体性现象学研究的特殊意义与价值主要体现在：（1）她将同感问题置自赫尔德以来的整个思想史传统之中来考察；（2）她在精神科学的总体视域下对同感行现象学的研究；（3）她将同感现象学运用到具体的精神科学领域（比如伦理学、美学和社会政治哲学等）中，并*终成为勾连现象学和中世纪经院哲学的核心基础之一。

这是一部介绍中国古代伟大治国者困惑，并做解惑努力事迹的图书。里面介绍了20位杰出的古代政治家。这一代代身躯渺小的伟人们，面对历史的痛苦和时代的灾难，一次次叩响和摇撼治世之门，然而，这门开开合合，恶作剧般耗尽了那一股经天纬地的移山心力，似乎在嘲笑叩门者的迂阔，又似乎在等待撼门者的顿悟。

新中国成立70年以来，马克思主义经典著作在中国的编译与传播，既是马克思主义中国化的首要前提，又是实现马克思主义中国化的基本途径。自新中国成立以来到1978年改革放时期，是中国历史发展的一个十分重要的特殊阶段，也构成了马克思主义经典著作编译传播史上的一个十分重要的特殊阶段。本书对这一时期马克思主义经典著作编译与传播的社会历史条件、编译与出版机构的建立与完善，以及编译与传播的重要阶段、主要类别、基本特征、传播途径及对马克思主义中国化的历史影响与现实启示等方面行深研究，梳理马克思主义经典著作版本演化的历史轨迹，总结经典文本编译与传播的经验教训，揭示其在推动马克思主义中国化过程中的历史作用和当代价值。

     理学兴于北宋，盛行于南宋与元明清时代，影响一直延续到近代，可以说是唐代以来儒学思想的主流，其影响覆盖整个东亚。理学与国人之思想关系甚深，然而其书率多零碎乏条理，读者难于了解，因而作者吕思勉在其上海沪江大学《中国哲学史》课程讲义的基础上，综合著名理学家重要学说，兼及其对社会风俗之影响，写作了《理学纲要》。迄今为止，中外学界关于理学的简史似乎还没有超过本书者。《理学纲要》作为剪裁得宜的门书，是广大国学爱好者了解理学思想的极佳读本。

　　本书是在当代新的境遇下对马克思所著的思想复杂、影响深远而又毁誉不一的“巴黎手稿”的深度解读和分析。“巴黎手稿”指的是马克思旅居“巴黎时期”（从1843年10月到1845年1月）创作的、与单纯摘录和抄写同时代人以及前人著作的“巴黎笔记”相区别的、大量正面阐述和论证其思想的著述，它包括通常被称为《1844年经济学哲学手稿》的“三个笔记本”和《詹姆斯·穆勒〈政治经济学原理〉一书摘要》。过去由于过于功利的“现实”考量，再加上原始文献资料的欠缺，影响了对这一手稿复杂思想理解的全面性与客观性。为此，本书根据历史考证版（MEGA）及大量权威资料，将“巴黎手稿”作为一个文本个案行了深度研究，从文献疏证、内容解读、思想阐释、逻辑论证多个方面一一给予悉心的探讨，再现了这一著述的原始面貌、深邃意蕴和思想史价值。