A compreens?o de Contos d’Escárnio n?o poderia restringir-se à constru??o do horizonte no qual nasce, o século XX. A inten??o de escrever lixo e bestagem, anunciada pelo narrador, aos poucos, revela um grotesco vindo de um longínquo, de um aquém. Por isto, faz-se necessário também compreender o fluxo histórico-estético que encontra acolhida na imagina??o de Hilda Hilst, cujo amparo conceitual buscou-se à estética da recep??o e do efeito. Na Teoria Estética, o feio insurge como fen?meno da realidade artística contempor?nea; refúgio de sobrevivência da arte e dos belos escritos, deixa livre à plasticidade do presente a tarefa da denúncia da realidade. Em protesto, o dissonante reivindica cidadania e se mantém como possibilidade da arte. Neste sentido, tem lugar em Hilda Hilst a atualidade do grotesco.

Magyarázatok a Srimad-Bhagavatam tizedik éneke harminckettedik fejezetének 16-22. versáhez, az el?z? acaryák írásai alapján. A Na pāraye ’ham három része ?rī K???a, ?rī Caitanya Mahāprabhu és ?rīmatī Rādhārā?ī szeretetét mutatja be. Szeretetük egy-egy hatalmas folyóként h?mp?ly?g a prema óceánja felé. ?cāryáink kegyéb?l a bhakták megérinthetik ennek az óceánnak a partját, s néhány cseppnyi nektárt megízlelhetnek bel?le.

Such is the system which underlies the Meditations of Marcus Aurelius. Some knowledge of it is necessary to the right understanding of the book, but for us the chief interest lies elsewhere. We do not come to Marcus Aurelius for a treatise on Stoicism. He is no head of a school to lay down a body of doctrine for students; he does not even contemplate that others should read what he writes. His philosophy is not an eager intellectual inquiry, but more what we should call religious feeling. The uncompromising stiffness of Zeno or Chrysippus is softened and transformed by passing through a nature reverent and tolerant, gentle and free from guile; the grim resignation which made life possible to the Stoic sage becomes in him almost a mood of aspiration. His book records the innermost thoughts of his heart, set down to ease it, with such moral maxims and reflections as may help him to bear the burden of duty and the countless annoyances of a busy life. It is instructive to compare the Meditations with another famous book, the Imitation of Christ. There is the same ideal of self-control in both. It should be a man's task, says the Imitation, 'to overcome himself, and every day to be stronger than himself.' 'In withstanding of the passions standeth very peace of heart.' 'Let us set the axe to the root, that we being purged of our passions may have a peaceable mind.' To this end there must be continual self-examination. 'If thou may not continually gather thyself together, namely sometimes do it, at least once a day, the morning or the evening. In the morning purpose, in the evening discuss the manner, what thou hast been this day, in word, work, and thought.' But while the Roman's temper is a modest self-reliance, the Christian aims at a more passive mood, humbleness and meekness, and reliance on the presence and personal friendship of God. The Roman scrutinises his faults with severity, but without the self-contempt which makes the Christian 'vile in his own sight.' The Christian, like the Roman, bids 'study to withdraw thine heart from the love of things visible'; but it is not the busy life of duty he has in mind so much as the contempt of all worldly things, and the 'cutting away of all lower delectations.' Both rate men's praise or blame at their real worthlessness; 'Let not thy peace,' says the Christian, 'be in the mouths of men.' But it is to God's censure the Christian appeals, the Roman to his own soul. The petty annoyances of injustice or unkindness are looked on by each with the same magnanimity. 'Why doth a little thing said or done against thee make thee sorry? It is no new thing; it is not the first, nor shall it be the last, if thou live long. At best suffer patiently, if thou canst not suffer joyously.' The Christian should sorrow more for other men's malice than for our own wrongs; but the Roman is inclined to wash his hands of the offender. 'Study to be patient in suffering and bearing other men's defaults and all manner infirmities,' says the Christian; but the Roman would never have thought to add, 'If all men were perfect, what had we then to suffer of other men for God?' The virtue of suffering in itself is an idea which does not meet us in the Meditations. Both alike realise that man is one of a great community. 'No man is sufficient to himself,' says the Christian; 'we must bear together, help together, comfort together.' But while he sees a chief importance in zeal, in exalted emotion that is, and avoidance of lukewarmness, the Roman thought mainly of the duty to be done as well as might be, and less of the feeling which should go with the doing of it. To the saint as to the emperor, the world is a poor thing at best. 'Verily it is a misery to live upon the earth,' says the Christian; few and evil are the days of man's life, which passeth away suddenly as a shadow. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?*** ? "MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS" was born on April 26, A.D. 121. His real name was M. Annius Verus, and he was sprung of a noble family which claimed descent from Numa, second King of Rome. Thus the most religious of emperors came of the blood of the most pious of early kings. His father, Annius Verus, had held high office in Rome, and his grandfather, of the same name, had been thrice Consul. Both his parents died young, but Marcus held them in loving remembrance. On his father's death Marcus was adopted by his grandfather, the consular Annius Verus, and there was deep love between these two. On the very first page of his book Marcus gratefully declares how of his grandfather he had learned to be gentle and meek, and to refrain from all anger and passion. The Emperor Hadrian divined the fine character of the lad, whom he used to call not Verus but Verissimus, more Truthful than his own name. He advanced Marcus to equestrian rank when six years of age, and at the age of eight made him a member of the ancient Salian priesthood. The boy's aunt, A

Cartea este o culegere de eseuri pe teme de istorie literar?, istoria ideilor ?i probleme generale de estetica artelor, toate acestea fiind abordate dintr-un accentuat unghi filozofic ?i ?tiin?ific deopotriv?.

„Greu este s? fii bun“. A?a suna verdictul unui filozof presocratic la care m? încruntam abitir pe la 20 de ani. Acum, la 60, dup? ce am înv??at de la aceia?i în?elep?i c? „to?i oamenii sunt r?i“, dar c? „nu trebuie s?-i judeci“, nu m? mai gr?besc cu încruntarea. Doar zâmbesc pu?in ofilit, în dulce resemnare. Cu un astfel de zâmbet – trist, admirativ, îng?duitor ?i comp?timitor totodat? – trebuie întâmpinat (?i f?r? îndoial? iertat) Tomas H., personajul axial din romanul Cameliei Cavadia. Destinat fericirii, dar e?uat lamentabil. Vinovat inocent ?i egofil culpabil. ?i totu?i înseninat, dureros de triumf?tor în final, dup? ce altruismul învinge mizantropia, iar d?ruirea de sine absolv? vinov??ia. În fond, ce ar fi vina f?r? isp??ire? Un roman despre povara fericirii (chiar a?a!) ?i chinul permanent al demonicului de a surpa – prin patologia patimii oarbe – iubirea curat?, armonia conjugal?, farmecul divin al copil?riei ?i nobila condi?ie de p?rinte. Un debut surprinz?tor prin precizia arhitecturii narative ?i siguran?a rotirii caruselului cu multe ?i subtile rela?ii psihologice. În plus, îmbucur?tor prin op?iunea preponderent moral?, într-o vreme dominat? de anarhie, relativism ?i etic? în r?sp?r. – Dan C. Mih?ilescu ?„De când m? ?tiu am vrut s? devin scriitoare. PR de meserie, am scris pove?tile altora, dar mi-am dat seama c? am în?untrul meu propriile pove?ti care a?teapt? s? le dau via??. Tot ceea ce am f?cut pîn? acum a roit în jurul cuvintelor. Prin prisma meseriei mele, am scris sute de comunicate, am luat zeci de interviuri, m-am trezit cu zeci de fraze construite-n cap ?i am adormit cu altele bâzâindu-mi în ureche. Am hot?rât ca e timpul s?-mi urmez visul ?i s? devin ceea ce m-am sim?it mereu.“ – Camelia Cavadia

道学是人类古老的、系统的“大成智慧学”。道学以“ 自然无为”为核心价值，以“逍遥游”的人生境界为目标。本书作者中国管理哲学人葛荣晋教授通过该书分二十讲讲解了道家哲学的精妙，揭秘了老子、庄子、张良 、葛洪的人生智慧，解释了大型现代企业的管理秘密，化解人类冲突困境。

本书系统阐释了张立文教授的学术人生，分别论述了生命的磨炼、生命的考验、生命再煎熬、生命的觉醒，生命学术的起始、曲折与探索等内容，充分展现了老一辈学人的学术成长和发展的历程。

本书分为三部分，*部分是访谈录：与大师面对面，收了苏珊·哈克、冯赖特等世界著名哲学家的访谈录8篇。第二部分是交往实录：体会与感悟，是作者陈波所记述的他与西方分析哲学家的交往和他对他们思想的理解，共10篇。第三部分是国际研讨会纪实，收了8篇国际研讨会纪实。

在中日启蒙思想这一主题下，本书以历史的纵向变化和时代的横向关联为坐标，以严复与福泽谕吉这两位中日近代具有代表性的启蒙思想家为中心，分列时代篇、文化篇、思想篇和实践篇，从不同的方面和维度，系统地对中日近代启蒙思想行了透视和比较，呈现了两位启蒙思想家的复杂图像、相通性和独自性，作者在不少问题上都提出了自己的见解和观，是一部较早展中日启蒙思想比较的学术专著。

本书是星云大师从自己几十年的著作和开示记录中，提炼经典汇编而成的一部语录体心灵励志图书。 全书一套三册，集中记述了星云大师对世界、社会、生命等的证悟智慧，以及怎样立德做人、修身养性的智慧，以及如何才能在烦恼生命中寻求到平静而开阔的心灵境界的智慧。言简意赅，精妙处往往让人醍醐灌顶。若能每日一偈，则日日都有新智慧，日日都能有好心情。

本书是星云大师从自己几十年的著作和开示记录中，提炼经典汇编而成的一部语录体心灵励志图书。 全书一套三册，集中记述了星云大师对世界、社会、生命等的证悟智慧，以及怎样立德做人、修身养性的智慧，以及如何才能在烦恼生命中寻求到平静而开阔的心灵境界的智慧。言简意赅，精妙处往往让人醍醐灌顶。若能每日一偈，则日日都有新智慧，日日都能有好心情。

在“忙”中，有数不尽的乐趣；在“忙”中，有无限的喜悦；在“忙”中，能安身立命；在“忙”中，能多所体悟。“忙”的生活实在太美妙了！在“忙”中，我感觉到懒惰懈怠实在就是罪恶。我感受到生命之可贵在于跃动不息，身为万物之灵的人类焉能不将自己“忙”起来呢？有用的人，即使接受一点小因缘，也能点石成金，做得轰轰烈烈。我一生历经挫折、打击，但我从不灰心失意，因为我始终坚信只要自己不死，一定可以“活”出希望来！

理性主义四部曲

书稿由《菜根谭》《小窗幽记》《幽梦影》《围炉夜话》四种组成，其中的《菜根谭》《小窗幽记》《围炉夜话》更是被称为“处世三大奇书”。它们的共同特点是清言小品，用清新晓畅而有韵味的话语，从道德、修身、读书、忠孝等等方面，对名利、情怀、山川、植物、心境、风景、气韵、法度、人生、社会、生活等等进行了表述，既有立身处世的格言哲理，也有个人对事物的品评，既有对生活情趣的描述，也有对生命与自然的思考，既有对生活的领悟，也有对美好的向往，在喧嚣的当下，摩挲此书，自会获得一份宁静，一份淡然。

本刊是贵阳学院阳明学与黔学研究院主办的阳明文化讲会集刊。“鱼梁讲会”是研究院的学术文化交流品牌，因贵阳学院在鱼梁河畔而得名，旨在继承和弘扬中华优秀传统文化，侧重阳明文化的研究、普及与传播，促阳明学的当代价值研究，推传统文化（阳明学）与时代主流文化的融合研究和思考。创刊号共二十讲，由国内外阳明学或传统文化领域知名学者的讲稿整理而成。

本书是海内外*部对20世纪佛教唯识学思潮作出系统梳理的研究专著，以20世纪中国法相唯识学发展的历史脉络为研究目的，把唯识学复兴思潮放在整个近现代佛教运动的时代大背景下加以考察，以唯识学派和团体为分界，以主要人物思想为中心，整体上呈现出各个唯识学系、院派、团体、区域的研究特色和学术风貌，全面揭示这一百年上下半叶唯识学发展的线索。本书以1949年为分期，分为清末、民国时期（上编，1900—1949年）与新中国建立以后时期（下编，1949—1999年）的唯识学研究两编行探讨。本研究课题续了唐代唯识宗学和明末唯识学，也补充、丰富了20世纪中国佛学史的内容，对中国现当代佛学及未来唯识学的走向具有一定启示作用。本书通过勾勒前后五十年的佛教唯识学发展的关联性和区别，不仅概括和提炼出20世纪上半叶唯识三系等思想特色，而且对20世纪下半叶唯识学的发展情况作出系统的梳理，尤其是对香港和台湾的唯识学传承和特色作出分析，以此描绘出百年来中国唯识学精彩纷呈、兴衰起落的历史画卷。

本书选取了中国古代经典中探讨名实关系的佳句作简要的解析，这些句子有出自于春秋诸子子，有出自于汉代的思想家，有的出自于宋明的理学家，读者获得传统美德的教育的同时还可以领略思想家们的魅力。

　　《中国古代哲学（上下）》着重论述的是中国古代哲学家从哲学角度探讨天道和人道诸重大问题的思想，也就是从宇宙的生成、宇宙的演变，从人的生命、人的属性和人的价值，以及人类社会的历史几个基本方面出发，去追溯中国古代哲学史上的宇宙生成论、本体论、时空观、常变观、矛盾观、形神观、人性论、人生理想观、历史观等问题。对于每一哲学问题的本末源流、发展演变，作了详细明晰的论述。

知道了真正的，那么难的部分已经解决了。

本书是阿多诺唯*专门探讨黑格尔的著作，包含了三篇各自独立又相互补充的论文。在本书中，阿多诺提出了让人耳目一新的黑格尔理论形象，如思辨唯心主义的极致就是唯物主义，黑格尔对事物的尊重和敬畏前*未有，黑格尔哲学实质上是非体系的等等。在《黑格尔哲学诸方面》一文中，阿多诺试图解读出黑格尔哲学的“整体”；《经验内涵》可以被视为对海德格尔解读黑格尔的回应；而《晦涩，或者该如何阅读黑格尔》一文则是对黑格尔哲学的文学性解读，这个角度在黑格尔研究中并不多见。在阿多诺看来，黑格尔哲学是“真”与“不真”的复合体，正如其作为意识形态是必然的虚假意识，而这些都通过社会性劳动及其构成的社会总体获得了解释。

本书是著名学者姜义华先生研究章太炎生平和思想的代表之作。全书由序编、甲编、乙编、丙编、章炳麟年表、索引等部分组成。序编总括作为中国近代知识精英代表的章炳麟“学问与革命”的一生；甲编叙述章炳麟的革命生涯和政治斗争的经历；乙编对章炳麟各个时期的代表性著作依次行分析、评介，展现其学术成就与思想全貌；丙编结合章炳麟同康有为、孙中山、宋恕、刘光汉、吴稚晖、吴承仕、鲁迅的关系，探讨了他同广东两大知识精英群体、浙江、江苏等不同知识精英群体的关系。全书洋洋五十余万字，是作者研究章太炎一甲子以来蕞重要的成果之一。