《中论》，又称《中观论》或《正观论》，与《百论》《十二门论》合称三论宗据以立宗的“三论”，撰成时间约相当于三国魏明帝时，题为龙树著，后秦鸠摩罗什译，四卷。本书系印度中观派对部派小乘佛教及其他学派行破斥而显示自宗的论战性著作，主要内容是阐发“八不缘起”和“实相涅槃”，以及诸法皆空义理的大乘中观学说。    本书据《大正藏》所收鸠摩罗什译本，逐偈讲解，疏通文意，阐明义理，并对一些关键性的佛教术语做了重阐释。

汇集了南怀瑾先生讲述佛家经典的著述。内容多样，有的讲如何参禅、禅与生命认知，有的讲经典佛经如《金刚经》《圆觉经》《维摩诘经》等，有的讲佛法修持，有的讲佛教发展的历史。学佛须有善知识指引，南先生以过来人的身份，对于理解佛经常见的障碍和学佛修持中容易出现的疑惑及容易走上的歧途，指点得尤为细致。

1949年10月至1976年10月，是马克思主义中国化历史程中承前启后的重要时期。1956年社会主义改造基本完成，中国从新民主主义社会社会主义初级阶段，成功实现了中国历*深刻*伟大的社会变革。中国共产党沿着马克思主义基本原理与中国实际“第二次结合”这条主线，围绕“什么是社会主义，怎样建设社会主义”这一时代主题，始了全新的探索历程，其中，既有凯歌行的峥嵘岁月，也有挫折失误的曲折历程，取得了独创性理论成果和巨大成就，为当代中国一切发展步奠定了根本政治前提和制度基础，为新的历史时期创中国特色社会主义提供了宝贵经验、理论准备、物质基础。本书全面阐述了这一时期中国共产党人探索中国社会主义革命和建设道路的曲折历程与经验教训，系统展示了以*为核心的党的*代中央领导集体探索中国社会主义道路、马克思主义基本原理与中国实际“第二次结合”程中的理论成果。

本卷比较系统地分析和研究了从1976年粉碎“四人帮”、结束十年“文化大革命”，到1992年初邓小平发表南方谈话期间，以邓小平为核心的党的第二代中央领导集体，在领导当代中国的改革放和社会主义现代化建设实践中，拨乱反正，解放思想，把马克思主义基本原理与中国实际和时代特征相结合，围绕建设和发展中国特色社会主义这一主题，创中国特色社会主义道路，不断实现马克思主义中国化的历史程；论述了在不断总结实践经验的基础上形成的马克思主义中国化的理论成果——邓小平理论的主要内容和历史地位；分析了这一时期马克思主义中国化的基本经验。

《老子》《庄子》是道家学术思想的源头和代表作，二者对普通读者来说，也常有一种难以言说的神秘和难解之感。南怀瑾先生讲《老》《庄》，不斤斤于个别语译，游乎经史子集之中，不论出世入世，评比精义，更以禅宗的方式，随说随破，提示其出入禅道的旨意，可以说是与《老》《庄》气质接近的讲解。

南怀瑾先生一生极为重视教育，尤其重视青少年教育问题。这两本书主要谈的就是教育以及教育与文化的问题。他考察了中国两千多年教育概况，并着重讲述了20世纪以来东西文化的交流、新旧教育制度及思想的改革演变，指出，这一切乃是历史趋势中自然的现象，是文化思想在变动时代必起的波澜，也是人类历史分段生命中当然的病态。并呼吁应正本清源地反思家庭教育、社会教育和学校教育，修正学风，建立一番复兴文化的新气象。分析如抽丝剥茧层层深入，论述精辟句句发人深省。

本书自1988年首版出版以来，已经成为当代哲学*重要也*有争议的著作，同时也让阿兰·巴迪欧成为今天世界上首屈一指的哲学家。《存在与事件》是巴迪欧对其哲学蓝图*全面的论述，他重新梳理了自柏拉图以降，经由笛卡儿、斯宾诺莎、莱布尼茨、黑格尔、卢梭、拉康的欧洲哲学传统。在深度上，他的这个宏大的哲学蓝图足以与海德格尔和德勒兹的蓝图相媲美。

《三十六计》或称三十六策，是指中国古代三十六个兵法策略，语源于南北朝，它是根据中国古代军事思想和丰富的斗争经验总结而成的兵书，是中华民族悠久非物质文化遗产之一。《三十六计》在众多的兵书中独树一帜、雄踞一流，它是中华民族智慧宝库中的经典，与《孙子兵法》一起，并称为世界军事史上的“双璧”。故古书中称：“用兵如孙子，策谋三十六。”

《墨子》为战国百家中墨家的经典。墨子提倡兼爱、非攻、尚贤、尚同、天志、明鬼、非命、非乐、节葬、节用，对哲学、逻辑学都有研究和贡献。此外，他在军事学、工程学、力 学、几何学、光学上都有相当的研究和贡献，先秦的科学技术成就大都依赖《墨子》以传。

《黑格尔》被收海德格尔《全集》第68卷，分为两个部分，*部分是围绕黑格尔的重要概念“否定性”，对黑格尔的“有”“无”“变”等概念行阐释，其*的特是概要性地列出了研究黑格尔的思路和计划，是研究海德格尔解构黑格尔思想*珍贵的一手资料。第二部分：对黑格尔《精神现象学》“导论”的解释，不同于《黑格尔的经验概念》中对导论16段的逐段阐释，而是将“导论”概括为五个部分行解释，高屋建瓴，与16段阐释和第32卷《黑格尔的精神现象学》相映生辉，共同构成海德格尔对《精神现象学》的完整阐释。

智慧中的智慧  预测学中的行为学《周易》是群经之首，是经典中之经典，哲学中之哲学，谋略中之谋略。从《周易》中，哲学家看到辩证思维，史学家看到历史兴衰，政治家看到治世方略，军事家可参悟兵法，企业家亦可从中找到经营的方法，同样，芸芸众生也可将其视为为人处世、提高修养的不二法宝。 本书将《周易》的六十四卦分别予以详细解读，每卦独立自成一体，各节皆有原文、译文、启示，每卦之后附有中外著名事例，以期抛砖引玉之效。 《周易》一书作为中国早熟的思想文化体系，它在中国传统思想文化中的重要地位，已为世所公认。《周易》被称为六经之首，就是一种证明。

立德修身的恒言警句为学立业的至理名言《小窗幽记》为陈眉公所著的修身处世格言，条条都是人生的回味和处世的领悟，体现了儒家修身、齐家、治国、平天下的积极人生态度，又兼容了佛家超凡脱俗和道家清静无为的智慧，历来被称为修身养性、提升自我修养的佳作。

《围炉夜话》是明清时期著名的文学品评著作，全书分为221则，以“安身立业”为主旨，分别从道德、修身、读书、教子、忠孝、勤俭等十个方面，揭示了人生的深刻含义，其独到见解在中国文学史上占有重要地位。

蒙养之学  传世经典《龙文鞭影》原名《蒙养故事》，是古代非常有名的汉族儿童启蒙读物。作者的寓意是，看了这本《龙文鞭影》，青少年就有可能成为“千里马”。《龙文鞭影》主要是介绍中国历史上的人物典故和逸事传说。它问世后，成为*受欢迎的童蒙读物之一。

吟诵经典  陶冶情操  采录诸词 脍炙万口 《宋词》是继唐诗后的又一种文学体裁，它兼有文学与音乐两方面的特。宋词是中国古代文学皇冠上光辉夺目的一颗巨钻，在古代文学的阆苑里，她是一块芬芳绚丽的园圃。她以姹紫嫣红、千姿百态的丰神，与唐诗争奇，与元曲斗妍，历来与唐诗并称双绝，都代表一代文学之胜。远从《诗经》《楚辞》及《汉魏六朝诗歌》里汲取营养，又为后来的明清戏剧小说输送了有机成分。直到今天，她仍在陶冶着人们的情操，给我们带来很高的艺术享受。

《礼记》初时据说有一百多篇，后为汉朝学者戴德简化为85篇，世人称之为《大戴礼记》。在编撰过程中，我们从权威版本中筛选出极为经典、实用，且具有文学价值的28个篇章，将其编辑成册。将每篇分为诸多小节，每个小节分为三部分：原文、注释与译文。整本书结构严谨，言简意赅，意蕴深远。

本书没有枯燥无味的说教，作者将自己多年的经历和学员的遭遇作为事例编写其中，这些事例在当今社会具有一定代表性，让大家从故事中有所悟、有所思、有所想，*终有所感。在本书里，作者会直痛，用幸福的理念切实可行地帮助到读者，让读者明白幸福真正的模样。本书没有枯燥无味的说教，作者将自己多年的经历和学员的遭遇作为事例编写其中，这些事例在当今社会具有一定代表性，让大家从故事中有所悟、有所思、有所想，*终有所感。在本书里，作者会直痛，用幸福的理念切实可行地帮助到读者，让读者明白幸福真正的模样。

“儒教是宗教”的判断是中华人民共和国成立以后在宗教和传统文化研究领域*重要的创新学说之一，它否定了近百年来学术界一致认为中国古代是“非宗教国”的定论，以丰富的资料，严密的论证、深刻的分析，流畅的语言叙述了儒教从产生到衰亡的历史，揭示了儒教的神祇系统、祭祀制度、教义教理等从创造到被取消的过程，阐明了儒者如何为实现上帝、神祇的意志而治国、修身，并从事相关的理论探讨。内容包括儒教和佛教、道教、中国伊斯兰教、中国基督教等相关关系，涉及宗教、哲学、科学、史学、文学诸文化领域。

“儒教是宗教”的判断是中华人民共和国成立以后在宗教和传统文化研究领域*重要的创新学说之一，它否定了近百年来学术界一致认为中国古代是“非宗教国”的定论，以丰富的资料，严密的论证、深刻的分析，流畅的语言叙述了儒教从产生到衰亡的历史，揭示了儒教的神祇系统、祭祀制度、教义教理等从创造到被取消的过程，阐明了儒者如何为实现上帝、神祇的意志而治国、修身，并从事相关的理论探讨。内容包括儒教和佛教、道教、中国伊斯兰教、中国基督教等相关关系，涉及宗教、哲学、科学、史学、文学诸文化领域。

Human reason, in one sphere of its cognition, is called upon to consider questions, which it cannot decline, as they are presented by its own nature, but which it cannot answer, as they transcend every faculty of the mind. It falls into this difficulty without any fault of its own. It begins with principles, which cannot be dispensed with in the field of experience, and the truth and sufficiency of which are, at the same time, insured by experience. With these principles it rises, in obedience to the laws of its own nature, to ever higher and more remote conditions. But it quickly discovers that, in this way, its labours must remain ever incomplete, because new questions never cease to present themselves; and thus it finds itself compelled to have recourse to principles which transcend the region of experience, while they are regarded by common sense without distrust. It thus falls into confusion and contradictions, from which it conjectures the presence of latent errors, which, however, it is unable to discover, because the principles it employs, transcending the limits of experience, cannot be tested by that criterion. The arena of these endless contests is called Metaphysic.Time was, when she was the queen of all the sciences; and, if we take the will for the deed, she certainly deserves, so far as regards the high importance of her object-matter, this title of honour. Now, it is the fashion of the time to heap contempt and scorn upon her; and the matron mourns, forlorn and forsaken, like Hecuba: At first, her gover Modo maxima rerum, Tot generis, natisque potens... Nunc trahor exul, inops. —Ovid, Metamorphoses. xiii under the administration of the dogmatists, was an absolute despotism. But, as the legislative continued to show traces of the ancient barbaric rule, her empire gradually broke up, and intestine wars introduced the reign of anarchy; while the sceptics, like nomadic tribes, who hate a permanent habitation and settled mode of living, attacked from time to time those who had organized themselves into civil communities. But their number was, very happily, small; and thus they could not entirely put a stop to the exertions of those who persisted in raising new edifices, although on no settled or uniform plan. In recent times the hope dawned upon us of seeing those disputes settled, and the legitimacy of her claims established by a kind of physiology of the human understanding—that of the celebrated Locke. But it was found that—although it was affirmed that this so-called queen could not refer her descent to any higher source than that of common experience, a circumstance which necessarily brought suspicion on her claims—as this genealogy was incorrect, she persisted in the advancement of her claims to sovereignty. Thus metaphysics necessarily fell back into the antiquated and rotten constitution of dogmatism, and again became obnoxious to the contempt from which efforts had been made to save it. At present, as all methods, according to the general persuasion, have been tried in vain, there reigns nought but weariness and complete indifferentism—the mother of chaos and night in the scientific world, but at the same time the source of, or at least the prelude to, the re-creation and reinstallation of a science, when it has fallen into confusion, obscurity, and disuse from ill directed effort. I do not mean by this a criticism of books and systems, but a critical inquiry into the faculty of reason, with reference to the cognitions to which it strives to attain without the aid of experience; in other words, the solution of the question regarding the possibility or impossibility of metaphysics, and the determination of the origin, as well as of the extent and limits of this science. All this must be done on the basis of principles. ABOUT AUTHOR: That all our knowledge begins with experience there can be no doubt. For how is it possible that the faculty of cognition should be awakened into exercise otherwise than by means of objects which affect our senses, and partly of themselves produce representations, partly rouse our powers of understanding into activity, to compare to connect, or to separate these, and so to convert the raw material of our sensuous impressions into a knowledge of objects, which is called experience? In respect of time, therefore, no knowledge of ours is antecedent to experience, but begins with it. But, though all our knowledge begins with experience, it by no means follows that all arises out of experience. For, on the contrary, it is quite possible that our empirical knowledge is a compound of that which we receive through impressions, and that which the faculty of cognition supplies from itself (sensuous impressions giving merely the occasion), an addition which we cannot distinguish from the original element given by sense, till long practice has made us attentive to, and skilful in separating it. It is, therefore, a question which requires close investigation, and not to b

The present publication is intended to supply a recognised deficiency in our literature—a library edition of the Essays of Montaigne. This great French writer deserves to be regarded as a classic, not only in the land of his birth, but in all countries and in all literatures. His Essays, which are at once the most celebrated and the most permanent of his productions, form a magazine out of which such minds as those of Bacon and Shakespeare did not disdain to help themselves; and, indeed, as Hallam observes, the Frenchman's literary importance largely results from the share which his mind had in influencing other minds, coeval and subsequent. But, at the same time, estimating the value and rank of the essayist, we are not to leave out of the account the drawbacks and the circumstances of the period: the imperfect state of education, the comparative scarcity of books, and the limited opportunities of intellectual intercourse. Montaigne freely borrowed of others, and he has found men willing to borrow of him as freely. We need not wonder at the reputation which he with seeming facility achieved. He was, without being aware of it, the leader of a new school in letters and morals. His book was different from all others which were at that date in the world. It diverted the ancient currents of thought into new channels. It told its readers, with unexampled frankness, what its writer's opinion was about men and things, and threw what must have been a strange kind of new light on many matters but darkly understood. Above all, the essayist uncased himself, and made his intellectual and physical organism public property. He took the world into his confidence on all subjects. His essays were a sort of literary anatomy, where we get a diagnosis of the writer's mind, made by himself at different levels and under a large variety of operating influences. Of all egotists, Montaigne, if not the greatest, was the most fascinating, because, perhaps, he was the least affected and most truthful. What he did, and what he had professed to do, was to dissect his mind, and show us, as best he could, how it was made, and what relation it bore to external objects. He investigated his mental structure as a schoolboy pulls his watch to pieces, to examine the mechanism of the works; and the result, accompanied by illustrations abounding with originality and force, he delivered to his fellow-men in a book. W. C. H. KENSINGTON, November 1877. THE LIFE OF MONTAIGNE The author of the Essays was born, as he informs us himself, between eleven and twelve o'clock in the day, the last of February 1533, at the chateau of St. Michel de Montaigne. His father, Pierre Eyquem, esquire, was successively first Jurat of the town of Bordeaux (1530), Under-Mayor 1536, Jurat for the second time in 1540, Procureur in 1546, and at length Mayor from 1553 to 1556. He was a man of austere probity, who had "a particular regard for honour and for propriety in his person and attire . . . a mighty good faith in his speech, and a conscience and a religious feeling inclining to superstition, rather than to the other extreme. Between 1556 and 1563 an important incident occurred in the life of Montaigne, in the commencement of his romantic friendship with Etienne de la Boetie, whom he had met, as he tells us, by pure chance at some festive celebration in the town. From their very first interview the two found themselves drawn irresistibly close to one another, and during six years this alliance was foremost in the heart of Montaigne, as it was afterwards in his memory, when death had severed it.