The secret significance of journalism: life (says the public) is dull. But good newspapers are a report of life, and good newspapers are not dull. A practical guide for those who are outside and would fain be inside, a newspaper office.

Deseori, cei care solicit? ajutorul unui psihoterapeut nu sunt doar ?n c?utarea unor solu?ii pentru conflictele care ?i fr?m?nt?, ci simt c? au nevoie de un nou ?nceput pentru c? undeva, ?n interior, exist? un defect care trebuie reparat, un defect care a ap?rut ?n rela?iile cu ceilal?i. ?n Defectul fundamental, M. Balint ofer? at?t o descriere a personalit??ii umane ?n termeni rela?ionali, ?n care aceast? arie a defectului fundamental ??i are un loc definit de rela?iile bipersonale primare, c?t ?i o ilustrare a modalit??ii de a repara acest defect fundamental ?i de a oferi pacientului ?ansa unui nou ?nceput. Pentru autor, defectul fundamental reflect? consecin?ele actuale ale unor experien?e traumatice timpurii ?n rela?ia bipersonal? care pot fi retr?ite ?i vindecate pe cale analitic?, chiar dac? vindecarea las? o cicatrice. ?n abordarea sa, Balint recunoa?te importan?a aportului ambilor participan?i pentru rezultatul tratamentului ?i atrage aten?ia asupra contribu?iei terapeutului la desf??urarea procesului terapeutic. Pentru a crea atmosfera necesar? desf??ur?rii acestui proces, este necesar ca terapeutul s? fie flexibil emo?ional ?i s?-i permit? pacientului s? regreseze la nivelul defectului fundamental pentru a reveni, apoi, capabil s? aib? o rela?ie de obiect diferit?, mai matur?, cu cei din jur.

This book contains a selection of articles and pamphlets on analytical psychology written at intervals during the past fourteen years. These years have seen the development of a new discipline, and as is usual in such a case, have involved many changes of view-point, of concept, and of formulation.??It is not my intention to give a presentation of the fundamental concepts of analytical psychology in this book; it throws some light, however, on a certain line of development which is especially characteristic of the Zürich School of psychoanalysis.??As is well known, the merit of the discovery of the new analytical method of general psychology belongs to Professor Freud of Vienna. His original view-points had to undergo many essential modifications, some of them owing to the work done at Zürich, in spite of the fact that he himself is far from agreeing with the standpoint of this school.??I am unable to explain fully the fundamental differences between the two schools, but would indicate the following points: The Vienna School takes the standpoint of an exclusive sexualistic conception, while that of the Zürich School is symbolistic. The Vienna School interprets the psychological symbol semiotically, as a sign or token of certain primitive psychosexual processes. Its method is analytical and causal.??The Zurich School recognises the scientific feasibility of such a conception, but denies its exclusive validity, for it does not interpret the psychological symbol semiotically only, but also symbolistically, that is, it attributes a positive value to the symbol.??The value does not depend merely on historical causes; its chief importance lies in the fact that it has a meaning for the actual present, and for the future, in their psychological aspects. For to the Zürich School the symbol is not merely a sign of something repressed and concealed, but is at the same time an attempt to comprehend and to point out the way of the further psychological development of the individual. Thus we add a prospective import to the retrospective value of the symbol.??The method of the Zurich School is therefore not only analytical and causal, but also synthetic and prospective, in recognition that the human mind is characterised by "caus?" and also by "fines" (aims). The latter fact needs particular emphasis, because there are two types of psychology, the one following the principle of hedonism, and the other following the principle of power. Scientific materialism is pertinent to the former type, and the philosophy of Nietzsche to the latter. The principle of the Freudian theory is hedonism, while that of Adler (one of Freud's earliest personal pupils) is founded upon the principle of power.??The Zurich School, recognising the existence of these two types (also remarked by the late Professor William James), considers that the views of Freud and Adler are one-sided, and only valid within the limits of their corresponding type.??Freud and Adler interpret in the analytical and causal way, reducing to the infantile and primitive. Thus with Freud the conception of the "aim" is the fulfilment of desire, with Adler it is the usurpation of power. Both authors take the standpoint in their practical analytical work which brings to view only infantile and gross egoistic aims.??The Zurich School is convinced of the fact that within the limits of a diseased mental attitude the psychology is such as Freud and Adler describe. It is, indeed, just on account of such impossible and childish psychology that the individual is in a state of inward dissociation and hence neurotic. The Zürich School, therefore, in agreement with them so far, also reduces the psychological symbol (the phantasy products of the patient) to the fundamental infantile hedonism, or to the infantile desire for power. But Freud and Adler content themselves with the result of mere reduction, according to their scientific biologism and naturalism.

Prin ce difer? cre?terea b?ie?ilor de aceea a fetelor? Sunt predispu?i b?ie?ii no?tri afla?i la pubertate sau la adolescen?? s? intre ?n mai multe buclucuri dec?t fetele de aceea?i v?rst?? Cum ne putem ajuta fiii s? str?bat? cu bine aceste perioade ?i s? se maturizeze f?r? a le ?tirbi masculinitatea ?n devenire??ntr-o societate ?n care femeile sunt considerate categorie marginalizat? ?i privite ca poten?iale victime, b?ie?ii, ulterior b?rba?ii, ajung s? fie privi?i ca poten?iali agresori. Astfel, discrepan?a social? nu se reduce, ci se ad?nce?te. Cum ar fi, ?ns?, ne propune autorul acestei c?r?i, s? pornim de la premisa c? b?ie?ii sunt structura?i diferit, c?, de-a lungul mileniilor, au evoluat av?nd nevoi, scopuri ?i comportamente diferite de cele ale fetelor? ?n loc s? ?ncerc?m s?-i schimb?m, ?ncadr?ndu-i ?ntr-un tipar feminin, putem ?ncepe prin a-i ?n?elege ?i a le oferi acel cadru de dezvoltare de care au nevoie pentru a deveni b?rba?ii pe care ni-i dorim: puternici, protectori, devota?i.?

The following pages contain certain rules and suggestions concerning health, and certain simple and sensible ways in which it may, we hope, be acquired and maintained at a very small expense of time and self-denial, by a large number of people who are naturally accustomed to feel not very well. The book is founded on notes made by its two authors who, though they lead for the most part very different lives, are agreed on certain broad principles of health herein set forth. ??One of them, for instance, eats largely of flesh-foods every day, the other has scarcely touched meat for years. But both are accustomed to feel extremely well and to undertake considerable exertion either of mind or body without experiencing any fatigue. One of them takes regular exercise, that is to say he plays an out-door game on most days of his life, while the other who abstains from flesh-foods has little practice of the sort. He will take no out-of-door exercise for several days, work very hard, and find himself perfectly fit for some severe physical test at the end. But they are both agreed that if the one abandoned flesh-foods (which he does not propose to do) he would cease to require regular exercise, and that if the other took flesh-foods (which he does not propose to do) he would not only be very ill, but would also require regular exercise. ??One again is seldom seen without some appliance of tobacco in his mouth, because he finds it agreeable and after an experiment of abstinence from it found that it did not make any difference, as far as he could make out, in his general health. The other never smokes at all. One again takes a cold bath in the morning, the other a hot one followed by cold sponging.??But both are absolutely in accord on far more main points than those on which their practice, at any rate, differs, and they have found it perfectly easy to write this book together without wrangling, on which account they wish to express a pious hope that the very fact that they differ in so many things may have saved them from dogmatism. For it has helped them to realize that even when they are agreed on any point it would be a sheer stupidity to hint that they were therefore right, and in consequence they only put forward the points on which they are agreed as suggestions, hoping that others after trial may also agree with them. ??For universal laws on an empirical matter like health are rare, and the constitutions of men are various. One man’s meat, in fact, is literally another man’s poison. But in the main the two authors are agreed. They believe that the majority of mankind habitually eat too much and habitually take too much stimulating food and drink. They believe also that most people who do so do not take enough exercise, and that either an increase of exercise or a decrease of stimulant is needed. ??They believe that the best sorts of exercise are not those of slow pushing movements such as are made in the use of dumb-bells, but full brisk extended movements, with much use of the breathing apparatus and the large muscle areas of the body. Similarly they are in accord as regards present systems of training which tend to treat an entire crew or team as if they were identical specimens, not as widely different specimens; in every day life also they hold that because a certain mode of diet and work suits A, it will not necessarily suit B and C, though B and C might do worse than try it.

A huszadik század alapvet?en megváltoztatta a nemek kapcsolatát, a család szerepét és a n? helyét a világban. A maga korában minden újabb lépés természetes volt: az emberek jogot formáltak a szerelem szabad élvezetére, megtanultuk, hogyan tervezzünk tudatosan családot, a n?k munkába álltak, és küzdeni kezdtek a szabadságukért. ?s mindek?zben a nemek viszonya el?re nem látott módon változott meg. Megváltozott a férfi és a n? szerepe és biológiája, háttérbe szorult a család, és sokan már a gyerekekr?l is tudatosan mondanak le. Korántsem biztos azonban, hogy ebben az új világban tényleg boldogabbak és szabadabbak vagyunk… Vajon mi lehet az evolúciós háttere a tudatos gyermektelenségnek vagy a szingli életformának? Mit?l változott meg a szépségideál az elmúlt száz esztend?ben? Nem egyszer?en a viszonyok rendez?dtek át: a két nem biológiai értelemben is változik. Változik a n? teste, változik egész lénye. SZENDI G?BOR A n? felemelkedése és tünd?klése cím? nagysiker? k?nyvében még arról írt, mi rejlik a génekben, milyen programok dolgoznak a n?ben és a férfiben. Legújabb k?tetében már azt elemzi, milyen er?k és fordulatok ?sszhatására született meg az ?új n?”, és milyen nehézségekkel kell megküzdenie a jelenben és a j?v?be.

V? ?ngrijoreaz? apatia partenerului din ultima vreme? V? irit? zg?rcenia prietenilor? Sau v? ?nfurie nep?sarea colegilor de birou?Fie c? e vorba despre minusurile observate la al?ii sau de propriile defecte, cartea de fa?? v? invit? s? explora?i ?i s? integra?i ?ntr-un mod constructiv ?i s?n?tos toate aceste aspecte de ?umbr?“ ale vie?ii voastre.Folosind concepte psihologice accesibile (proiec?ie, rezonan??, polaritate), Ruediger Dahlke demonstreaz? prin exemple din realitatea curent? ?n ce fel pute?i transforma sl?biciunile ?n puncte forte ?i asperit??ile interpersonale ?n oportunit??i de cre?tere. G?ndirea ?n ?alb ?i negru“ va fi astfel ?nlocuit? de o con?tientizare a nuan?elor ?i multiplelor ?fe?e“ ale vie?ii, oferind cititorului ?ansa de a ac?iona mai ?n?elept, mai pu?in tensionat, cu acel echilibru specific persoanelor care ?i-au reg?sit centrul.

Rela?ii interpersonale intense ?i haotice, accese de furie, impulsivitate, amenin??ri cu abandonul sau cu suicidul… dup? ce ai cunoscut ?ndeaproape o astfel de persoan? r?m?i adesea cu un gust amar ?i cu ?ntrebarea: ?Unde am gre?it?" ?n spatele acestui tablou ?nnegurat, se afl? ?ns? drama protagonistului – temeri profunde, o senza?ie de vid interior, ne?ncredere fundamental? ?n sine.Lumea unui ?borderline" este ?n alb ?i negru, acut?, direct?, f?r? nuan?e, cu at?t mai impresionant?, cu c?t ace?ti oameni sunt capabili s? duc? o via?? func?ional?. Pot fi partenerul de cuplu, colega de serviciu, amicul din copil?rie.Cartea de fa??, bazat? pe informa?ii din cele mai noi cercet?ri ?n domeniu, reprezint? un ghid cuprinz?tor prin h??i?urile acestei personalit??i aflate la grani?a dintre nevroz? ?i psihoz?. Scris? ?ntr-un limbaj accesibil, ea se adreseaz? at?t terapeu?ilor, c?t ?i publicului larg, aduc?nd lumin? asupra posibilelor cauze ale acestei tulbur?ri, descriindu-i plastic tr?s?turile prin intermediul a numeroase exemple, ajut?ndu-te s? ?n?elegi persoana cu borderline de l?ng? tine ?i s? creezi pun?i c?tre ea.Cea mai important? parte a oric?rei terapii este rela?ia dintre pacient ?i terapeut. Aceast? interac?iune formeaz? baza ?ncrederii, constan?ei obiectului ?i a intimit??ii emo?ionale. Terapeutul trebuie s? devin? o figur? de ?ncredere, o oglind? care s? reflecte o identitate coerent? ?n dezvoltare. Pornind de la aceast? rela?ie, persoana borderline ?nva?? s? extind? ?i asupra altora a?tept?rile adecvate ?i ?ncrederea. – Jerold Kreisman, Hal StrausAspectul fizic al lui Jennifer la ?edin?ele de terapie fluctua dramatic. C?nd venea direct de la serviciu era ?mbr?cat? ?ntr-o ?inut? business, eman?nd maturitate ?i rafinament. Dar ?n zilele ei libere, ap?rea ?n pantaloni scur?i, cu ?osete p?n? la genunchi ?i cu codi?e ?mpletite; ?n aceste ?edin?e se comporta ca o feti?? cu voce sub?ire ?i vocabular mult mai limitat. Uneori se transforma chiar sub ochii doctorului Gray. Putea fi plin? de intui?ie ?i inteligent?, colabor?nd pentru ob?inerea unei mai bune ?n?elegeri de sine, iar apoi devenea o copil? cochet? ?i seduc?toare, declar?ndu-se incapabil? s? func?ioneze ?n lumea adult?. – Jerold Kreisman, Hal Straus

Feng-shui reprezint? o art? str?veche chinezeasc? a st?p?nirii energiilor, iar Vladimir Lermontov reprezint? marele maestru al transform?rii realit??ii, cel care red? oamenilor posibilitatea de a tr?i divin, adic? din suflet. Metoda lui de transformare a persoanelor ?i a realit??ii cu ajutorul imaginilor v? readuce fericirea, bucuria, s?n?tatea ?i ?mplinirea ?n via?a dumneavoastr?. Acum ave?i acces la un curs unic – ?Feng-shui-ul imaginilor sufletului. Teritoriul fericirii“. Atr?g?nd ?n spa?iul vie?ii dumneavoastr? talismanele feng-shui, ve?i dob?ndi aceast? fericire. Nu trebuie dec?t s? v? imagina?i sunetul v?ntului care sclipe?te ?n b?taia soarelui, c? ?n camera dumneavoastr? va r?suna melodia lin? care va alunga tot negativul. Imaginea l?nii de aur care se va na?te ?n voi v? va aduce bog??ie ?i prosperitate. Iar imaginea lanternei ro?ii chineze?ti v? va lumina calea spre noi sentimente ?i v? va ?nt?ri rela?iile. Fie ca vechiul feng-shui ?i magia contemporan? s? v? aduc? noroc! Vladimir I. Lermontov, 2007

Tehnici simple ?i amuzante pentru ?mbun?t??irea memoriei Ui?i mereu unde ??i la?i cheile? Nu mai ?tii zilele de na?tere ale prietenilor, iar atunci c?nd ??i este prezentat cineva ?i ui?i imediat numele? ??i aduci aminte c? trebuie s? mergi la o ?nt?lnire dup? ce a ?nceput deja? Dac? primul lucru la care te g?nde?ti ?n urma acestor constat?ri este c? te vei trezi ?n cur?nd ?ntr-o lume f?r? amintiri, temerea ta este nefondat?. Nu ?i-ai pierdut min?ile, ci doar cheile, iar ?ntre timp ai g?sit cartea care te poate ajuta s? ??i ?mbun?t??e?ti memoria ?i s? ??i ?nt?re?ti capacitatea mental?. Pornind de la cele mai recente cercet?ri ?n domeniu, autorii ne ofer? explica?ii clare despre modul ?n care func?ioneaz? memoria. Creierul uman este un organ mult mai complex, mai flexibil, mai maleabil ?i mai u?or de re?nnoit dec?t se credea. Ca ?i ?n cazul mu?chilor, antrenarea creierului poate duce la rezultate extraordinare. Cele 8 capitole ale lucr?rii sunt u?or de parcurs ?i con?in cele mai eficiente instrumente de ascu?ire a memoriei. Exerci?iile practice, sfaturile ?i trucurile ne ?nva?? cum s? ne concentr?m mai bine, at?t la procesul de codificare a informatiilor, c?t ?i la procesul de recuperare a lor din amintire. Prin cre?terea capacit??ii de a re?ine lucrurile importante pentru noi, se ?mbun?t??e?te garantat ?i calitatea vie?ii. A?adar, dac? ai ?ndoieli ?n leg?tur? cu eficien?a memoriei tale sau ??i dore?ti, pur ?i simplu, s? re?ii lucrurile cu mai mult? u?urin??, ai ?ncredere ?n Doctorul memoriei! Specialitatea lui sunt amintirile clare, complete ?i de durat?.

C?nd omul tr?ie?te ra?ional, iar visele?i vin de la ra?iune ?i respectiv creeaz? imaginile de viitor conform prerogativelor ra?iunii. Cele mai importante lucruri din visele ra?ionale sunt: cifrele, sumele pe care omul dore?te s? le ob?in? ?n viitor. ?i doar odat? cu dob?ndirea banilor, crede el, va sosi ?i momentul delect?rii. Peste tot, la fiecare pas vedem un astfel de mod de via??. Ace?tia sunt oameni activi, de succes care??i pun ?n fa?? o sarcin? foarte clar? – s? c??tige mai mult ?i cel mai important e c? se ?ndreapt? sigur c?tre realizarea acestui scop. Aceast? cale le aduce satisfac?ie ?i mul?umire adev?rat?, ?ns? fericirea nu o pot vedea a?a cum nu??i pot vedea urechile proprii. Pentru a dob?ndi fericirea, iubirea, bog??ia ?i s?n?tatea mai ?nt?i trebuie s? ?nv??a?i s? visa?i din suflet, iar dup? aceast? s? ?mplini?i aceste vise. Sufletul viseaz? la averea, imaginea sentimentelor. Imaginile de viitor corespunz?toare sufletului sunt vii, pulsative, motrice, vibratoare.

O via?? lung? ?i s?n?toas? pentru copilul t?u, dup? modelul japonezPotrivit unei analize recente publicate de prestigioasa revist? The Lancet, copiii din Japonia sunt cei mai s?n?to?i din lume. Naomi Moriyama s-a hot?r?t s? descopere secretele acestui succes. C?l?torind ?mpreun? cu b?iatul ei mic, Naomi a intervievat oameni de ?tiin?? din Japonia ?i SUA ?i a cules informa?ii de la m?micile japoneze.A rezultat un ghid revolu?ionar ?i cu o mare valoare practic?, sfaturile oferite ajut?nd la adoptarea unor obi?nuin?e alimentare ?i a unui stil de via?? care ?i vor ajuta pe p?rin?i s? ob?in? rezultatele dorite ?n cre?terea copiilor. ?Recomand?rile sunt logice, u?or de pus ?n practic? ?i bazate pe ?tiin??, intui?ie ?i tradi?ie. Sunt ?n concordan?? cu convingerea mea c? este nevoie s? ne ?ntoarcem la legile fundamentale ale s?n?t??ii, care ne ?ndeamn? s? dormim bine, s? m?nc?m ce ?i c?t trebuie, s? facem mi?care ?i s? evit?m toxinele." - Prof. Mark Tremblay, Spitalul pentru copii din Ontario, Canada?Rodul unei document?ri meticuloase, aceast? carte fascinant? ??i merit? locul ?n biblioteca oric?rui p?rinte." - Dr Lucy Cooke, cercet?tor principal ?n cadrul Facult??ii de Epidemiologie ?i S?n?tate Public?, University College, Londra

Nu exist?, probabil, om ?n aceast? lume, care s? nu fi ra?ionat m?car o dat? la ve?nicele ?ntreb?ri de func?ionare a lumii. Dualitatea lumii, aceast? ve?nic? lupt? dintre Bine ?i R?u, Adev?rul care se risipe?te, triumfarea mitic? a Drept??ii... De c?te ori, fiecare dintre noi, a zis cu voce tare sau ?n g?nd fraze sacramentale, ca de exemplu: ?La ce bun ?mi trebuie mie asta?“, ?E nedrept!“. De c?te ori am auzit ?nt?mpl?ri teribile, am fost martori ai unor adev?rate tragedii ?i am ?n?eles lesne c? pedepsele cere?ti nu pogoar? asupra oamenilor chiar pe nemeritate. Cu ce a gre?it un copil de cinci ani, care sufer? de leucemie sau un t?n?r care a c?lcat pe o min?? Cu ce au gre?it cei trei sute de pasageri ai avionului care s-a izbit de st?ncile unui munte? Cum se explic? miile de mor?i absurde survenite dintr-odat? ?i f?r? niciun motiv? Am auzit doar ?i am considerat dintotdeauna c? pentru toate se pl?te?te ?nsutit, c? mai devreme sau mai t?rziu binele va triumfa asupra r?ului ?i c? lumea, prin natura sa, este armonioas?. A?a s? fie oare?

Rájttem, hogy nem azért jttem vissza a halálból, mert olyan okos vagyok. Vagyis az akaratomnak semmi kze nem volt az élethez. Valami más intelligencia dolgozott, nem az enyém. Ha van egyáltalán valamiféle vallásom, az nem más, mint hit abban, hogy az én intelligenciám részt vesz egy másik, nagyobb intelligenciában. Tehát nem én vagyok okos, hanem valamiféleképpen rezonálok valamivel, ami okos. Részt veszek valamiben. Mindannyian a világmindenség gyümlcsei vagyunk. Ti is a világmindenség gyümlcsei vagytok. A gyümlcs se tudja, hogy miért érik olyan szép szilvává vagy szibarackká, csak úgy csinálja, ahogy mi is csináljuk. Vagy a kisujjamban a sejtek. k is csak részt vesznek bennem, mikzben nem ismerik Feldmár Andrást. n sem ismerem azt, akinek én egy kis sejtje vagyok.”

Cesare Lombroso (1835-1909) tudós elmeorvos. Már korán a pszichiátria tudománya felé fordult. Volt elmegyógyintézetek vezet?je, b?rt?norvos, igazságügyi orvosszakért?k, munkája során vizsgálta a b?n?z?i hajlam kérdését. Lángész és ?rültség cím? k?nyve óriási felt?nést és jelent?s visszhangot keltett az egész világon. M?vében sok olyan témát érint, amelyekre talán még ma sem igazán tudjuk a helyes és végleges választ. Lehetséges, hogy azért nem, mert igazán ma sem ismerjük az idegrendszer és az agy m?k?dését. Miként lehetséges, hogy a k?znapi ember olykor-olykor maga is ráismer a lángész vagy az ?rült viselkedésének, reagálásának egy-egy mozzanatára. Mindannyian zsenik és ?rültek lennénk egyszerre? Hétk?znapi mániáink betegesek-e? A túlérzékeny ember morálja kóros-e? A hipochonder egyúttal elmebeteg is? Akinek szomorú gondolatai vannak és lelkiismeret-furdalások gy?trik, az lelki beteg, vagy egyenesen ?rült? Lombroso a zsenik, a nagy emberek példáján mutatja be, hogan lehet ?megvilágosult” állapotban jelent?set alkotni úgy, hogy k?zben ezek a zsenik mániákusan ragaszkodnak saját mell?z?ttségük vagy üld?z?ttségük tudatához. A k?zkelet? hiedelemre, hogy a lángész és az ?rültség nincs is olyan messzire egymástól, még a modern tudományok eredményeinek tükrében is választ vár az olvasó. S Lombroso e k?nyve kielégíti érdekl?dését. (moly.hu)

Un volum incitant de care nu se pot lipsi adolescen?ii, elevii, studen?ii, profesorii, acest indirect dic?ionar de vise ?i destine reprezint? o carte necesar?, c?ci ?ndeamn? la cunoa?tere de sine. Acest studiu-eseu interdisciplinar con?ine valoroase trimiteri la Freud, Nietzsche, Aristotel ?i al?i g?nditori – eventuale modele ?n epoca tranzi?iei sufocat? de acultura?ie ?i de modele de o calitate ?ndoielnic?.

A kutyák sokkal t?bbre képesek, mint gondolnád. Brian Hare - kutyakutató, evolúciós antropológus, a Duke Kutyagondolkodási K?zpont alapítója, - és Vanessa Woods k?nyve a kutyák intelligenciájának, legokosabb háziállataink gondolatvilágának forradalmian új megk?zelítését mutatja be. Az utóbbi egy évtizedben t?bbet tudtunk meg arról, hogyan is gondolkodnak a kutyák, mint azt megel?z?en egy egész évszázad alatt. A kognitív tudományok területén elért átt?r? eredmények, melyekben Hare is kulcsszerepet játszott, bizonyították, hogy a kutyák az állatok k?z?tt egyedülálló, sajátos zsenialitással tartanak fenn jó viszonyt az emberekkel. Brian Hare leny?g?z? felfedezést tett: amikor a kutyák valamikor 40 000 évvel ezel?tt ?nmagukat háziasították, sokkal hasonlóbbá váltak az embergyerekekhez, mint ?seik, a farkasok. A háziasulással egészen újfajta szociális intelligencia jelent meg a kutyákban. Ez a felfedezés megváltoztat mindent, amit a kutyákról, a kutyák idomításáról gondolunk ráadásul ez a forradalom már meg is kezd?d?tt. Hare kutatásai során számtalan fajta kutyával dolgozott menhelyen él? k?ly?kkutyáktól kezdve az egzotikus, új-guineai énekl? kutyákig; saját gyerekkori kutyájától, Oreótól a legdivatosabb schnauzer-pudli keverékekig. Az okos kutya korunk legfontosabb, kutyákról szóló k?nyve annak a tudósnak a tollából, aki a forradalmasította kutatásukat.

Trei fo?ti ofi?eri CIA, autorit??i interna?ionale ?n detectarea disimul?rii, v? ofer? un set de tehnici accesibile pentru a afla dac? vorbitorul din fa?a voastr? spune sau nu adev?rul. Fie c? realiza?i un interviu de angajare sau o anchet? judiciar?, fie c? vre?i s? afla?i dac? adolescentul vostru a consumat droguri ori dac? partenerul v? ?n?al?, ave?i acum la dispozi?ie un arsenal de ?ntreb?ri ?i tehnici de interpretare care ?i-au dovedit eficien?a chiar ?i ?n fa?a celor mai versa?i spioni ?i terori?ti. Baz?ndu-se pe analize complexe ale unor anchete de contraspionaj sau ale unor interviuri televizate cu politicieni pref?cu?i, cartea v? ?nva?? s? pune?i cele mai percutante ?ntreb?ri ?i s? identifica?i minciuna pornind de la semnele ei verbale (ezit?ri, generaliz?ri, apelul la divinitate) ?i nonverbale (mutarea centrului de sprijin, acoperirea fe?ei cu palma etc.). ?Arta ?n?el?ciunii este tema principal? a acestei c?r?i, care se adreseaz? unui spectru larg de speciali?ti: psihologi, avoca?i, judec?tori, procurori, poli?i?ti, investigatori, oameni de afaceri, oameni de v?nz?ri etc.“ – Ion Duvac, fondator al Psychological Profiler Academy

nvturile lui Osho, unul dintre cei mai cunoscui lideri spirituali ai secolului XX, rstoarn tiparele clasice de gndire, provocndune la o permanent punere sub semnul ntrebrii a certitudinilor i la un proces de contientizare de sine.Crile din seria Incursiune ntrun nou mod de via prezint viziunea lui Osho privind cele mai importante probleme pe care i le pun oamenii interesai de tiina transformrii de sine i de o spiritualitate adaptat la provocrile cotidiene ale vieii contemporane.

S? redescoperim miracolul binecuv?nt?rilor Kūkulu Kumuhana este o parte din Ho’oponopono, o metod? eficient?, originar? din tradi?ia ?amanic? hawaiian?, de a solu?iona conflicte ?i de a vindeca rela?ii. Kūkulu Kumuhana ?nseamn? ?ur?rile de bine inten?ionate ale unei familii sau ale unui grup.“ ?n aceast? carte ve?i afla cum folosesc oamenii aceast? binecuv?ntare aparte ?n contexte existen?iale dificile, ve?i ?nv??a s? cunoa?te?i binecuv?ntarea naturii, cum se poate stimula energia unei binecuv?nt?ri ?i cum s? face?i diferen?a ?ntre binecuv?ntarea material? ?i cea spiritual?. Cu aceast? cunoa?tere puternic? ve?i deschide ?n via?a dumneavoastr? por?i care p?n? acum v-au fost t?inuite.

Потомственная бабка-шептуха Наталья делится действенными шепотками и обрядами, наговорами, секретами изготовления оберегов, передававшимися из поколения в поколение. Они помогут вам в жизни, лечении болезней, привлечении любви, удачи, благополучия, защитят вас и ваше жилище от недобрых людей и неприятностей. Шепотки от различных болезней детей и взрослых. Обереги для защиты дома и привлечения удачи. Наговоры для привлечения денег. Избавление от порчи и сглаза. Обряды на исполнение желаний. Шепотки для молодости и красоты. Заговоры на верность супруга и т. д. Potomstvennaja babka-sheptuha Natal'ja delitsja dejstvennymi shepotkami i obrjadami, nagovorami, sekretami izgotovlenija oberegov, peredavavshimisja iz pokolenija v pokolenie. Oni pomogut vam v zhizni, lechenii boleznej, privlechenii ljubvi, udachi, blagopoluchija, zashhitjat vas i vashe zhilishhe ot nedobryh ljudej i neprijatnostej. Shepotki ot razlichnyh boleznej detej i vzroslyh. Oberegi dlja zashhity doma i privlechenija udachi. Nagovory dlja privlechenija deneg. Izbavlenie ot porchi i sglaza. Obrjady na ispolnenie zhelanij. Shepotki dlja molodosti i krasoty. Zagovory na vernost' supruga i t. d.