拜物教批判理论作为马克思社会批判理论的*，内在地蕴含了马克思的哲学世界观和方法论，贯穿着马克思对资产阶级政治经济学的批判继承和发展。本书从马克思的文本出发，*次比较系统地梳理了马克思拜物教批判理论的历史与逻辑，阐发了马克思对于拜物教世界的超越途径，提炼出马克思拜物教批判的方法论，并且对于西方思想家对马克思拜物教批判理论的解读作出了评析，具有较高的学术价值。

本选题是复旦大学“当代中国马克思主义研究工程”丛书之一。主要对马克思主义美学的原理、思潮、学派和学科史展研究，密切联系当代美学实践，既关注马克思主义美学与中国传统美学思想的结合、创新，重视马克思主义美学的经典性与时代性、本土性、民族性的结合，也重视对非马克思主义美学思潮的研究，回答它们对马克思主义美学的质疑和挑战。

《中国人的修养》收录了蔡元培先生《华工学校讲义》和《中学修身教科书》以及一系列重要的文章。内容全面系统且简明清晰，古今中外的实例个案信手拈来，自然从容，详略得当，意趣兼得，是每一位国民都应该好好读一读的修身塑德的佳作。

本书是楼宇烈教授六十余年思想精华，来自北大火爆的中国哲学大课堂等。楼宇烈教授的中国哲学课，得到了北大学生以及广大传统文化爱好者的广泛认可。 “哲学”给人的印象是艰深难懂的，但是经过楼宇烈教授深浅出、幽默风趣的讲解、阐释，中国哲学的核心理念，变得生动易懂。楼宇烈教授通过醍醐灌顶式的深分析，培养大众的哲学思维方式，构筑中国哲学的宽广知识体系。本书是大众学习中国哲学的佳作。

关学为宋明理学思潮中由北宋哲学家张载创立的一个重要的独立学派,是宋元明清时代的关中理学。本书是作者对自己研究关学三十余年来积年之思的一次系统总结。作者梳理了20世纪80年代以来的有关张载和关学的论争及研究状况，以及自己的反思与展望。又上溯至明清两代的关学继承与研究，论衡各家得失，明确了关学在明清乃至宋元不同时代的学术定位，从而重构了张载关学传承的历史脉络、道统地位、学统框架及其精神命脉。

《近思录》是由南宋著名学者朱熹和吕祖谦，分类选辑北宋理学家周敦颐、程颢、程颐、张载四人语录编辑而成，共14卷622条，是一部代表理学思想的著作。“近思”二字取自《论语·子张》：“博学而笃志，切问而近思，仁在其中矣。”? 《近思录》篇幅小而选文精，阐述了理学的宇宙论、本体论与心性论，讨论了太极、阴阳、性命、仁义等理学*核心的内容。指出学习要以圣人之道作为目标，通过仁爱、恭敬、致知等“内圣”工夫，一步实现齐家、处世，并且治国平天下的“外王”理想。对佛教、道教行了批评，对圣贤行了评。 朱熹认为，《近思录》是学习“四书”的阶梯。《近思录》涵盖了周、张、二程的主要著作，各卷内容的编排颇为考究，逻辑丝丝扣，细致又系统地展现了理学的方方面面，对后世产生了极大的影响，被学者们看作是宋明理学的门著作。?

《菜根谭》文字简练，对仗工整，博大精深，耐人寻味，通俗易懂，雅俗共赏；寥寥几句道出人生玄机，只言片语指明生存之道。它告诫读书人“道乃公正无私，学当随事警惕”；它提醒为官者“为官公廉。居家恕俭”。人生在世，“心善而子孙盛，根固而枝叶荣”，“清浊并包，善恶兼容”，“超然天地之外，不名利之中”，因为“人生一傀儡”，只有如此，才能“自控便超然”。

智慧中的智慧 ?预测学中的行为学《周易》是群经之首，是经典中之经典，哲学中之哲学，谋略中之谋略。从《周易》中，哲学家看到辩证思维，史学家看到历史兴衰，政治家看到治世方略，军事家可参悟兵法，企业家亦可从中找到经营的方法，同样，芸芸众生也可将其视为为人处世、提高修养的不二法宝。 本书将《周易》的六十四卦分别予以详细解读，每卦独立自成一体，各节皆有原文、译文、启示，每卦之后附有中外著名事例，以期抛砖引玉之效。 《周易》一书作为中国早熟的思想文化体系，它在中国传统思想文化中的重要地位，已为世所公认。《周易》被称为六经之首，就是一种证明。

本书从抱怨的危害出发，以励志而暖心的有关人生经历的故事给你勇气和力量，让你改变自己，改变世界，与更好的生活相遇，教会人们摒弃抱怨，努力改变，在漫漫黑夜中努力坚持，在艰难的日子里恬静安然，感受到快乐和幸福。

　　《人生的智慧》取自德国思想家叔本华的《附录和补遗》，而实际上是独立成书的，阐述了生活的本质及如何在生活中获得幸福，所讨论的事情与我们的世俗生活极为近，如健康、财富、荣誉、名声、待人物所应遵循的原则等。正如叔本华所说的，在《人生智慧丛书：人生的智慧（插图版）》里，他尽量从世俗、实用的角度考虑问题。因此，《人生智慧丛书：人生的智慧（插图版）》尤其适合大众阅读。 　　书中含有几分孤芳自赏的自我辩白和自我激励，甚至还流露着顾影自怜的几丝悲凉、几许惆怅，但更多的还是他因为自尊而隐匿在文中的深刻的自我剖析和感悟，以及由此而来的坚定与自信、清醒与睿智。 　　《人生智慧丛书：人生的智慧（插图版）》插了七十余幅摄影作品，由自由摄影师闰笑枫摄影并首次出版，与主题非常呼应。

重拾中西方古典学问坠绪，不仅因为现代性问题迫使学问古共智慧，更因为古学问关乎亘古不移的人世问题。古学经典需要解释，解释是涵养精神的活动，也是思想取向的抉择；宁可跟随柏拉图犯错，也不与那伙人一起正确。举凡疏证诠解中国古学经典、移译西学整理旧故的晚近成果，不外乎愿与中西方古典大智慧一起思想，以期寻回精神的涵养，不负教书育人的人类亘古基业。 　　本书是《经典与解释》系列之一的《霍布斯的修辞》分册，内中具体研究了“霍布斯的哲学思想”，主要收录了：霍布斯《利维坦》中的推理与修辞、霍布斯的“非亚里士多德”政治修辞学、“教条”对抗“数理”、基督教国家的自然法等内容。

 《生命的悲剧意识》是乌纳穆诺*代表性的著作之一。在本书中，作者以充满激情的语言反复呼喊：生命的悲剧意识来自对永恒的渴望。他在书中充满感情地指出，人不是通过幸福来感知自身，因为幸福常常使我们忘了自己。相反，苦难才使得我们回归到自身，获得了属于我们的深刻意识，重新成为自己的中心。这不是一本通常意义上的哲学著作，这里没有艰涩深奥的理论探析，枯燥乏味的概念论证，反而更像是一个哲人充满激情而又克制的内心独白：他不需要依赖理性来探索和追究什么，而是深人本身。在乌纳穆诺笔下，“人”不是一个被用来抽象思考的哲学概念，一个属于共性的词汇，而是具体的存在，是心灵与肉体的结合；是你，是我，是我们的兄弟，是所有人。这是乌纳穆诺哲学中非常动人的闪光，由此出发，他重新肯定了个体生命的价值：对宇宙而言，我是微不足道；对我个人而言，我却是一切。作为一个作家，乌纳穆诺的哲学著作也承袭了他的文学语言，简洁有力，充满诗性。他的语言充满激情，思维却很是缜密。他绝不依靠语词本身的复杂艰深来使读者望之却步。相反，与一般哲学著作相比，本书的行文充满诗意，通俗易懂的语言中蕴含着深刻又直指本心的力量。乌纳穆诺的语言似乎有种魔力：他激情澎湃，却又非常克制，两者的结合使阅读过程极为享受，既震撼于其激烈的情感，又为其深邃的哲理所折服。

暂无

依据中国哲学元理逻辑体系的天、地、人和合生生道体，中国哲学可以生发为七大原理：元亨利贞论、体用一源论、理一分殊论、能所相资论、不离不杂论、内圣外王论、融突和合论。中国哲学的七大原理（元理）是特定时空环境内在世哲学家通过思维、思想所构建的，其哲学理论思维是那个时代哲学家对人与自然、社会、人生关系的自我体认的升华；是反思人与自然、社会、人生互相关系，超越一般性的诠释而构建的概念、范畴的逻辑；是对人与自然、社会、人生的价值、理想、审美地再反思。这是在哲学家理论思维所把握的那个时代的精神，也即哲学的时代精神。中国哲学是在“继往圣之绝学”哲学理论思维成就基础上，在世哲学家在其理论思维方式引导下地再反思、再体认，以赋予价值理想、伦理道德、审美旨趣、终极关切新生面、新创造、新品格、新气质。

本书是著名哲学家、易学大家余敦康先生关于易学的历史文化与易学的现代价值的门性读物。 《周易》的思想精髓与价值理想，《周易》在中国文化中的特殊功能，《周易》与中国传统文化的关系，《周易》与中国政治文化、伦理思想的关系，这些易学中的根本性问题唯有在本书作者这样的大家处理起来才举重若轻。 书中关于易学对于今天每一个现代人的生活智慧、易学的管理思想的精到讨论，也使易学本身的日用性得以道破；书中对易学史的脉络以及现代中国哲学家对易道的探索的梳理，则凸显了历史的厚重与延续。

本书主要通过对当代上海工匠的案例分析，探讨了如何看待“工匠精神”、工匠精神与传统工艺和现代技术之间的关系、工匠精神与职业道德和生命信仰之间的关系，以及工匠精神在数字技术人工智能时代的挑战和转型要求。 本书关注并分析工匠精神的一般内涵，更重视新时代对工匠精神的变革、更新和重塑，强调工匠精神的当代价值，更注意观照上海近年来的人格示范和遴选实践，在理论与实践的结合处行了深的思考和探索，具有一定的意义。

《本真性的行话》是阿多诺批判20世纪的德意志意识形态，即存在主义思潮的著作。本书的主要批判对象是布伯、雅斯贝斯和海德格尔等人的哲学。阿多诺分析了存在主义者圈子内的一种“内向性”的用语，表明其所指直指向“虚无”，而这就导致了一种主观化的内在经验，丧失了所有的客观性和创造性的主体活动。阿多诺认为，这种向内心世界的退缩，尽管也可以被视为对物化的外在世界的反抗，但是这种反抗是虚弱的，终只是对外界的虚假的隔绝，从而也是另一种形式的受。阿多诺主张德国古典时代的理性精神，主张创造性主体与客体的辩证互动。本书初的意图是作为《否定的辩证法》中的一章，对应着“与本体论的关系”，但因体量超出了计划而独立成书。本书可被视为《否定的辩证法》的一个门读物。

Paradise Lost is an epic poem in blank verse by the 17th-century English poet John Milton (1608–1674). The first version, published in 1667, consisted of ten books with over ten thousand lines of verse. A second edition followed in 1674, arranged into twelve books (in the manner of Virgil's Aeneid) with minor revisions throughout and a note on the versification. It is considered by critics to be Milton's "major work", and helped solidify his reputation as one of the greatest English poets of his time. The poem concerns the Biblical story of the Fall of Man: the temptation of Adam and Eve by the fallen angel Satan and their expulsion from the Garden of Eden. Milton's purpose, stated in Book I, is to "justify the ways of God to men" Short Summary:The poem is separated into twelve "books" or sections, the lengths of which vary greatly (the longest is Book IX, with 1,189 lines, and the shortest Book VII, with 640). The Arguments at the head of each book were added in subsequent imprints of the first edition. Originally published in ten books, a fully "Revised and Augmented" edition reorganized into twelve books was issued in 1674, and this is the edition generally used today. The poem follows the epic tradition of starting in medias res (Latin for in the midst of things), the background story being recounted later.Milton's story has two narrative arcs, one about Satan (Lucifer) and the other following Adam and Eve. It begins after Satan and the other rebel angels have been defeated and banished to Hell, or, as it is also called in the poem, Tartarus. In Pand?monium, Satan employs his rhetorical skill to organise his followers; he is aided by Mammon and Beelzebub. Belial and Moloch are also present. At the end of the debate, Satan volunteers to poison the newly created Earth and God's new and most favoured creation, Mankind. He braves the dangers of the Abyss alone in a manner reminiscent of Odysseus or Aeneas. After an arduous traversal of the Chaos outside Hell, he enters God's new material World, and later the Garden of Eden. At several points in the poem, an Angelic War over Heaven is recounted from different perspectives. Satan's rebellion follows the epic convention of large-scale warfare. The battles between the faithful angels and Satan's forces take place over three days. At the final battle, the Son of God single-handedly defeats the entire legion of angelic rebels and banishes them from Heaven. Following this purge, God creates the World, culminating in his creation of Adam and Eve. While God gave Adam and Eve total freedom and power to rule over all creation, He gave them one explicit command: not to eat from the Tree of the knowledge of good and evil on penalty of death.

...a knyvet ne tekintsük úgy, mint amelynek a fejldése már befejezdtt, és amin már nincs is mit tkéletesíteni... azzal mintha nem foglalkozna senki, hogy a knyvet miként lehetne az olvasó számára használhatóbbá tenni... nagyon is el tudnék képzelni ergonomikusabban megtervezett és knnyebben kézben tartható knyvet is (amelyet nem ejtek el, ha a mobilom után kezdek kotorászni a 6-os villamoson. Ha egyszer vehetünk jobban kézbe ill tollat, akkor talán ez sem képtelenség).”

More’s “Utopia” was written in Latin, and is in two parts, of which the second, describing the place ([Greek text]—or Nusquama, as he called it sometimes in his letters—“Nowhere”), was probably written towards the close of 1515; the first part, introductory, early in 1516. The book was first printed at Louvain, late in 1516, under the editorship of Erasmus, Peter Giles, and other of More’s friends in Flanders. It was then revised by More, and printed by Frobenius at Basle in November, 1518. It was reprinted at Paris and Vienna, but was not printed in England during More’s lifetime. Its first publication in this country was in the English translation, made in Edward’s VI.’s reign (1551) by Ralph Robinson. It was translated with more literary skill by Gilbert Burnet, in 1684, soon after he had conducted the defence of his friend Lord William Russell, attended his execution, vindicated his memory, and been spitefully deprived by James II. of his lectureship at St. Clement’s. Burnet was drawn to the translation of “Utopia” by the same sense of unreason in high places that caused More to write the book. Burnet’s is the translation given in this volume. The name of the book has given an adjective to our language—we call an impracticable scheme Utopian. Yet, under the veil of a playful fiction, the talk is intensely earnest, and abounds in practical suggestion. It is the work of a scholarly and witty Englishman, who attacks in his own way the chief political and social evils of his time. Beginning with fact, More tells how he was sent into Flanders with Cuthbert Tunstal, “whom the king’s majesty of late, to the great rejoicing of all men, did prefer to the office of Master of the Rolls;” how the commissioners of Charles met them at Bruges, and presently returned to Brussels for instructions; and how More then went to Antwerp, where he found a pleasure in the society of Peter Giles which soothed his desire to see again his wife and children, from whom he had been four months away. Then fact slides into fiction with the finding of Raphael Hythloday (whose name, made of two Greek words [Greek text] and [Greek text], means “knowing in trifles”), a man who had been with Amerigo Vespucci in the three last of the voyages to the new world lately discovered, of which the account had been first printed in 1507, only nine years before Utopia was written. Designedly fantastic in suggestion of details, “Utopia” is the work of a scholar who had read Plato’s “Republic,” and had his fancy quickened after reading Plutarch’s account of Spartan life under Lycurgus. Beneath the veil of an ideal communism, into which there has been worked some witty extravagance, there lies a noble English argument. Sometimes More puts the case as of France when he means England. Sometimes there is ironical praise of the good faith of Christian kings, saving the book from censure as a political attack on the policy of Henry VIII. Erasmus wrote to a friend in 1517 that he should send for More’s “Utopia,” if he had not read it, and “wished to see the true source of all political evils.” And to More Erasmus wrote of his book, “A burgomaster of Antwerp is so pleased with it that he knows it all by heart.” Sir Thomas More, son of Sir John More, a justice of the King’s Bench, was born in 1478, in Milk Street, in the city of London. After his earlier education at St. Anthony’s School, in Threadneedle Street, he was placed, as a boy, in the household of Cardinal John Morton, Archbishop of Canterbury and Lord Chancellor. It was not unusual for persons of wealth or influence and sons of good families to be so established together in a relation of patron and client. The youth wore his patron’s livery, and added to his state. The patron used, afterwards, his wealth or influence in helping his young client forward in the world.

Among the notable books of later times-we may say, without exaggeration, of all time--must be reckoned The Confessions of Jean Jacques Rousseau. It deals with leading personages and transactions of a momentous epoch, when absolutism and feudalism were rallying for their last struggle against the modern spirit, chiefly represented by Voltaire, the Encyclopedists, and Rousseau himself--a struggle to which, after many fierce intestine quarrels and sanguinary wars throughout Europe and America, has succeeded the prevalence of those more tolerant and rational principles by which the statesmen of our own day are actuated. On these matters, however, it is not our province to enlarge; nor is it necessary to furnish any detailed account of our author's political, religious, and philosophic axioms and systems, his paradoxes and his errors in logic: these have been so long and so exhaustively disputed over by contending factions that little is left for even the most assiduous gleaner in the field. The inquirer will find, in Mr. John Money's excellent work, the opinions of Rousseau reviewed succinctly and impartially. The 'Contrat Social', the 'Lattres Ecrites de la Montagne', and other treatises that once aroused fierce controversy, may therefore be left in the repose to which they have long been consigned, so far as the mass of mankind is concerned, though they must always form part of the library of the politician and the historian. One prefers to turn to the man Rousseau as he paints himself in the remarkable work before us. That the task which he undertook in offering to show himself--as Persius puts it--'Intus et in cute', to posterity, exceeded his powers, is a trite criticism; like all human enterprises, his purpose was only imperfectly fulfilled; but this circumstance in no way lessens the attractive qualities of his book, not only for the student of history or psychology, but for the intelligent man of the world. Its startling frankness gives it a peculiar interest wanting in most other autobiographies. Many censors have elected to sit in judgment on the failings of this strangely constituted being, and some have pronounced upon him very severe sentences. Let it be said once for all that his faults and mistakes were generally due to causes over which he had but little control, such as a defective education, a too acute sensitiveness, which engendered suspicion of his fellows, irresolution, an overstrained sense of honour and independence, and an obstinate refusal to take advice from those who really wished to befriend him; nor should it be forgotten that he was afflicted during the greater part of his life with an incurable disease. Lord Byron had a soul near akin to Rousseau's, whose writings naturally made a deep impression on the poet's mind, and probably had an influence on his conduct and modes of thought: In some stanzas of 'Childe Harold' this sympathy is expressed with truth and power; especially is the weakness of the Swiss philosopher's character summed up in the following admirable lines: "Here the self-torturing sophist, wild Rousseau, The apostle of affliction, he who threw Enchantment over passion, and from woe Wrung overwhelming eloquence, first drew The breath which made him wretched; yet he knew How to make madness beautiful, and cast O'er erring deeds and thoughts a heavenly hue Of words, like sunbeams, dazzling as they passed The eyes, which o'er them shed tears feelingly and fast. "His life was one long war with self-sought foes, Or friends by him self-banished; for his mind Had grown Suspicion's sanctuary, and chose, For its own cruel sacrifice, the kind, 'Gainst whom he raged with fury strange and blind. But he was frenzied,-wherefore, who may know? Since cause might be which skill could never find; But he was frenzied by disease or woe To that worst pitch of all, which wears a reasoning show."