The present publication is intended to supply a recognised deficiency in our literature—a library edition of the Essays of Montaigne. This great French writer deserves to be regarded as a classic, not only in the land of his birth, but in all countries and in all literatures. His Essays, which are at once the most celebrated and the most permanent of his productions, form a magazine out of which such minds as those of Bacon and Shakespeare did not disdain to help themselves; and, indeed, as Hallam observes, the Frenchman's literary importance largely results from the share which his mind had in influencing other minds, coeval and subsequent. But, at the same time, estimating the value and rank of the essayist, we are not to leave out of the account the drawbacks and the circumstances of the period: the imperfect state of education, the comparative scarcity of books, and the limited opportunities of intellectual intercourse. Montaigne freely borrowed of others, and he has found men willing to borrow of him as freely. We need not wonder at the reputation which he with seeming facility achieved. He was, without being aware of it, the leader of a new school in letters and morals. His book was different from all others which were at that date in the world. It diverted the ancient currents of thought into new channels. It told its readers, with unexampled frankness, what its writer's opinion was about men and things, and threw what must have been a strange kind of new light on many matters but darkly understood. Above all, the essayist uncased himself, and made his intellectual and physical organism public property. He took the world into his confidence on all subjects. His essays were a sort of literary anatomy, where we get a diagnosis of the writer's mind, made by himself at different levels and under a large variety of operating influences. Of all egotists, Montaigne, if not the greatest, was the most fascinating, because, perhaps, he was the least affected and most truthful. What he did, and what he had professed to do, was to dissect his mind, and show us, as best he could, how it was made, and what relation it bore to external objects. He investigated his mental structure as a schoolboy pulls his watch to pieces, to examine the mechanism of the works; and the result, accompanied by illustrations abounding with originality and force, he delivered to his fellow-men in a book. W. C. H. KENSINGTON, November 1877. THE LIFE OF MONTAIGNE The author of the Essays was born, as he informs us himself, between eleven and twelve o'clock in the day, the last of February 1533, at the chateau of St. Michel de Montaigne. His father, Pierre Eyquem, esquire, was successively first Jurat of the town of Bordeaux (1530), Under-Mayor 1536, Jurat for the second time in 1540, Procureur in 1546, and at length Mayor from 1553 to 1556. He was a man of austere probity, who had "a particular regard for honour and for propriety in his person and attire . . . a mighty good faith in his speech, and a conscience and a religious feeling inclining to superstition, rather than to the other extreme. Between 1556 and 1563 an important incident occurred in the life of Montaigne, in the commencement of his romantic friendship with Etienne de la Boetie, whom he had met, as he tells us, by pure chance at some festive celebration in the town. From their very first interview the two found themselves drawn irresistibly close to one another, and during six years this alliance was foremost in the heart of Montaigne, as it was afterwards in his memory, when death had severed it.

DAVID HUME (1711 – 1776) was a Scottish philosopher, historian, economist, and essayist known especially for his philosophical empiricism and skepticism. He was one of the most important figures in the history of Western philosophy and the Scottish Enlightenment. Hume is often grouped with John Locke, George Berkeley, and a handful of others as a British Empiricist. Beginning with his A Treatise of Human Nature (1739), Hume strove to create a total naturalistic "science of man" that examined the psychological basis of human nature. In stark opposition to the rationalists who preceded him, most notably Descartes, he concluded that desire rather than reason governed human behaviour, saying: "REASON IS, and OUGHT ONLY to BE the SLAVE of the PASSIONS". A prominent figure in the sceptical philosophical tradition and a strong empiricist, he argued against the existence of innate ideas, concluding instead that humans have knowledge only of things they directly experience.. NOTHING is more usual and more natural for those, who pretend to discover anything new to the world in philosophy and the sciences, than to insinuate the praises of their own systems, by decrying all those, which have been advanced before them. And indeed were they content with lamenting that ignorance, which we still lie under in the most important questions, that can come before the tribunal of human reason, there are few, who have an acquaintance with the sciences, that would not readily agree with them. It is easy for one of judgment and learning, to perceive the weak foundation even of those systems, which have obtained the greatest credit, and have carried their pretensions highest to accurate and profound reasoning. Principles taken upon trust, consequences lamely deduced from them, want of coherence in the parts, and of evidence in the whole, these are every where to be met with in the systems of the most eminent philosophers, and seem to have drawn disgrace upon philosophy itself. Nor is there required such profound knowledge to discover the present imperfect condition of the sciences, but even the rabble without doors may, judge from the noise and clamour, which they hear, that all goes not well within. There is nothing which is not the subject of debate, and in which men of learning are not of contrary opinions. The most trivial question escapes not our controversy, and in the most momentous we are not able to give any certain decision. Disputes are multiplied, as if every thing was uncertain; and these disputes are managed with the greatest warmth, as if every thing was certain. Amidst all this bustle it is not reason, which carries the prize, but eloquence; and no man needs ever despair of gaining proselytes to the most extravagant hypothesis, who has art enough to represent it in any favourable colours. The victory is not gained by the men at arms, who manage the pike and the sword; but by the trumpeters, drummers, and musicians of the army. From hence in my opinion arises that common prejudice against metaphysical reasonings of all kinds, even amongst those, who profess themselves scholars, and have a just value for every other part of literature. By metaphysical reasonings, they do not understand those on any particular branch of science, but every kind of argument, which is any way abstruse, and requires some attention to be comprehended. We have so often lost our labour in such researches, that we commonly reject them without hesitation, and resolve, if we must for ever be a prey to errors and delusions, that they shall at least be natural and entertaining. And indeed nothing but the most determined scepticism, along with a great degree of indolence, can justify this aversion to metaphysics. For if truth be at all within the reach of human capacity, it is certain it must lie very deep and abstruse: and to hope we shall arrive at it without pains, while the greatest geniuses have failed with the utmost pains..

"A megsemmisülés rejtélyes sz?vege egyszerre filozófiai traktátus, misztikus beavatás és poszthumán próza. A kortárs irodalomban egyre inkább feler?s?dik ez a nem-antropocentrikus hang, mely nem emberi sorsokat akar elbeszélni, hanem a nyelv és az ember k?z?s hiányt?rténetére mutat rá. ?Mennyien kapaszkodtak a létbe, mint egy végtelen fa t?rzsébe” - írja Horváth Márk és Lovász ?dám, hiszen az emberi állapot csak a társadalmi, nyelvi és metafizikai katasztrófa terében értelmezhet?. Apokaliptikus (neo)romantika és abszurd k?ltészet. Az utolsó ember kézik?nyve a túlélés lehetetlenségér?l."Nemes Z. Márió Az Idegenre hárult a sors ajándéka, hogy els?ként az utolsó emberek k?zu?l végignézze minden ku?ls?dleges k?telék pusztulását, és bizalmát lelkébe, s?t a lelkén is túlra helyezze, minden emberit maga m?g?tt hagyva. Minden ház gerendái k?z?tt barátságok és szerelmek jól táplált holttestei indultak oszlásnak, míg csak a csont fehérlett ki a vízb?l. Mint rég elhagyott kik?t?k tornyai, olyan hívogatóak voltak ezek a csontok az új kor embere számára.

      该书原是梁于1902年3-12月、1904年9-12月时在《新民丛报》上陆续发表的一些文章，后由北京大学中文系夏晓红教授从该报及《饮冰室文集》等出版物中整理而成（具体见“导读”）。但这些文章上下连缀成体系，可以组成小册子，并非简单的文集。       梁启超这个小册子的写作背景乃是在“改良派”遭受重大之后的“新民”理论；一步，梁又以“新学术”为“新民”（两处“新”均为动词）之利器，而撰写此书作为具体实践。具体而言，这个小册子采用了当时新式的章节体，并引探究原因、引文化地理学等思路及研究方法，来书写学术史；在思想上，则刻意突出了主张学术自由、赞美文化交融的两条主线。

本书首先依据西方马克思主义探讨了马克思主义的“真精神”，特别是探讨了马克思主义与哲学，以及马克思主义哲学与本体论之关系，然后着重从马克思主义的思考角度和范式来审视和反思当今的世界，特别是当今的中国。本书通过对马克思走向政治经济学批判的三次飞跃的分析，发出了“回归政治经济学批判”的呼唤；用马克思两大发现的整体视角剖析了资本主义的“经济人”，并基于此对当今学术界的一些人无原则地宣扬“经济人”展了批判；揭示了改革放以来我国学术界理解马克思主义哲学的三种路向，特别是批判了对马克思主义做启蒙主义和后现代主义解释的缺陷；归纳了马克思主义哲学与中国道路的双向促；用马克思主义公平观审视了社会的不平等，用马克思主义生态观审视了生态危机；描述了“马中西”三大资源在中国道路中的交互汇通。

Human reason, in one sphere of its cognition, is called upon to consider questions, which it cannot decline, as they are presented by its own nature, but which it cannot answer, as they transcend every faculty of the mind. It falls into this difficulty without any fault of its own. It begins with principles, which cannot be dispensed with in the field of experience, and the truth and sufficiency of which are, at the same time, insured by experience. With these principles it rises, in obedience to the laws of its own nature, to ever higher and more remote conditions. But it quickly discovers that, in this way, its labours must remain ever incomplete, because new questions never cease to present themselves; and thus it finds itself compelled to have recourse to principles which transcend the region of experience, while they are regarded by common sense without distrust. It thus falls into confusion and contradictions, from which it conjectures the presence of latent errors, which, however, it is unable to discover, because the principles it employs, transcending the limits of experience, cannot be tested by that criterion. The arena of these endless contests is called Metaphysic.Time was, when she was the queen of all the sciences; and, if we take the will for the deed, she certainly deserves, so far as regards the high importance of her object-matter, this title of honour. Now, it is the fashion of the time to heap contempt and scorn upon her; and the matron mourns, forlorn and forsaken, like Hecuba: At first, her gover Modo maxima rerum, Tot generis, natisque potens... Nunc trahor exul, inops. —Ovid, Metamorphoses. xiii under the administration of the dogmatists, was an absolute despotism. But, as the legislative continued to show traces of the ancient barbaric rule, her empire gradually broke up, and intestine wars introduced the reign of anarchy; while the sceptics, like nomadic tribes, who hate a permanent habitation and settled mode of living, attacked from time to time those who had organized themselves into civil communities. But their number was, very happily, small; and thus they could not entirely put a stop to the exertions of those who persisted in raising new edifices, although on no settled or uniform plan. In recent times the hope dawned upon us of seeing those disputes settled, and the legitimacy of her claims established by a kind of physiology of the human understanding—that of the celebrated Locke. But it was found that—although it was affirmed that this so-called queen could not refer her descent to any higher source than that of common experience, a circumstance which necessarily brought suspicion on her claims—as this genealogy was incorrect, she persisted in the advancement of her claims to sovereignty. Thus metaphysics necessarily fell back into the antiquated and rotten constitution of dogmatism, and again became obnoxious to the contempt from which efforts had been made to save it. At present, as all methods, according to the general persuasion, have been tried in vain, there reigns nought but weariness and complete indifferentism—the mother of chaos and night in the scientific world, but at the same time the source of, or at least the prelude to, the re-creation and reinstallation of a science, when it has fallen into confusion, obscurity, and disuse from ill directed effort. I do not mean by this a criticism of books and systems, but a critical inquiry into the faculty of reason, with reference to the cognitions to which it strives to attain without the aid of experience; in other words, the solution of the question regarding the possibility or impossibility of metaphysics, and the determination of the origin, as well as of the extent and limits of this science. All this must be done on the basis of principles. ABOUT AUTHOR: That all our knowledge begins with experience there can be no doubt. For how is it possible that the faculty of cognition should be awakened into exercise otherwise than by means of objects which affect our senses, and partly of themselves produce representations, partly rouse our powers of understanding into activity, to compare to connect, or to separate these, and so to convert the raw material of our sensuous impressions into a knowledge of objects, which is called experience? In respect of time, therefore, no knowledge of ours is antecedent to experience, but begins with it. But, though all our knowledge begins with experience, it by no means follows that all arises out of experience. For, on the contrary, it is quite possible that our empirical knowledge is a compound of that which we receive through impressions, and that which the faculty of cognition supplies from itself (sensuous impressions giving merely the occasion), an addition which we cannot distinguish from the original element given by sense, till long practice has made us attentive to, and skilful in separating it. It is, therefore, a question which requires close investigation, and not to b

"Wilde è profetico sin dalle prima righe, quando denuncia la prevalenza dell’emozione sulla razionalità, male principe del nostro tempo, e poi del pietismo sull’emancipazione, male di tanta politica di pseudo sinistra" (dall'Introduzione di Alfredo Sgarlato). Wilde: ?perché la vita raggiunga la sua più elevata perfezione, ci vuole qualche cosa di più. Ciò che ci vuole è l'individualismo?, ?Utopia? Una carta geografica del mondo in cui non sia segnato il paese dell'Utopia, non varrebbe la pena d'essere guardata, perché vi mancherebbe il paese in cui l'Umanità atterra ogni giorno. Ma non appena v'è sbarcata, ella guarda più lontano, scorge una terra ancora più bella, e spiega di nuovo le vele. Progredire significa realizzare l'Utopia?. SOMMARIO: Introduzione (di Alfredo Sgarlato) - Postfazione. Breve biblio-nota ai testi e alla traduzione (di Fabrizio Pinna) - OSCAR WILDE Società e libertà: elogio dell'individualismo - APPENDICE I Oscar Wilde, Rapporti fra il socialismo e l'individualismo (di Luigi Fabbri, 1913) - APPENDICE II The Soul of Man under Socialism (1891). LA COLLANA IN/DEFINIZIONI

Bogged down by an endless onslaught of stumbling blocks and disasters that keep pushing you farther away from fulfilling your purpose and achieving your goals? ? This book could radically change all that. ? This simple, clear, and highly practical step-by-step guide will show you: ? How to manage all the problems and disasters that come your way while still making progress on all your goals—short-term and long-term—without sacrificing the important things in life. How to turn obstacles into an advantage that will propel you along the path to fulfilling your goals and achieving your purpose. How to shift your thinking so that all you see are opportunities that will open doors to great possibilities you may have never imagined before.

　　《黑格尔黑格尔学述》收贺麟于1930年代编译的近代西方新黑格尔主义者的经典黑格尔研究——尔德的《黑格尔》与鲁一士的《黑格尔学述》，二书均能将黑格尔学说体会融化并以清晰流利的文字叙述出来，可谓姊妹关系，互相发明，互相弥补，而又各有所长。尔德注重叙述黑格尔的生活、性格、时代风气、文化背景，特别是政治和宗教背景，以及黑格尔的逻辑学说；鲁一士则着重阐述黑格尔之精神现象学。本书是将黑格尔及其学说译介至中国的人——贺麟对“黑格尔学”发生兴趣之始，贺麟以朱熹太极观会通黑格尔的“*理念”，对于中西比较哲学研究居功甚伟。作为贺麟重要译著收“全集”的《黑格尔》及《黑格尔学述》均为建国后首度整理出版，对于了解哲学家和翻译家贺麟意义非凡。

　　《精神现象学》为德国古典哲学大师黑格尔阐述其哲学观和方法论原则的部纲领性巨著。黑格尔自认此书为其哲学体系的导言。马克思誉《精神现象学》为“黑格尔哲学的真正起源和秘密”和“黑格尔哲学的圣经”。黑格尔通过此书提出，精神现象学是关于意识到达“*知识”或“科学”（即哲学）的道路的科学，它为个体提供了一把攀登*知识的“梯子”。中译本由贺麟、王玖兴合译，分上、下卷先后于1962年和1979年由商务印书馆出版。上卷1979年再版时曾修订译文，以与下卷译名统一，本次整理出版“贺麟全集”版，对勘再版所作修改，择其重要者，以编注形式留存上卷初版原貌。

　　在《迟到民族与激思想》中，作者以《德国思想的他者视角》篇，从著名学者卡尔·曼海姆、马丁·格莱芬哈根、库尔特·伦克的研究成果出发，考察了有关保守主义的不同定义，揭示了德国保守主义思想的发生语境，分析了德国保守主义的思想结构，发掘其背后隐藏的思想关联、社会关联，特别是政治关联，揭示出德国作为后发现代化国家的激思想；从宏观上勾画出德国保守主义的发展脉络。

今天这个时代，不缺乏有理想有抱负想要改造社会改变世界的人，却缺乏一个个安稳悦乐的人。当下的社会，不缺乏高谈阔论做学问的人，却缺乏活出自己生命状态的人。 不是每个人都可以成为孔子，但每个人都可以成为力量的起。薛仁明在其新作《乐以忘忧 薛仁明读<论语>》中，以丰实多样的学养，风姿绰约的文字，再次清晰勾勒出一张张可亲可亲，人性又诗情的孔门面孔，引人想往。在其笔下，孔门仍是其乐陶陶，新有一派光明喜气的景象，尤其是生机盎然、丰富温润的孔子，为我们活出了生命中美的松沉时刻，治愈躁郁时代每一个茫然的心灵。

本书是在中国人民大学哲学院举办的讲座“哲学的星空”季的基础上整理汇集而成的。本书分别阐述了阅读《资本论》的难度和门槛、斯金纳的技治术、实验哲学的兴起及其意义、批判性阅读与写作、道家的自然观念、生命复制的两种含义、罗尔斯的“公平的机会平等”思想、民法典与中国社会的伦理走向、“格义”之广狭二义及其在佛教中国化中的历史作用、中国哲学形上学、身份政治时代的社会正义、先秦法家的历史际遇与价值重估、从“哲学”到“中国哲学”、晚年恩格斯正义观的实践逻辑，各位学者或深分析了新的哲学问题，或对经典文本和经典命题做出新阐释。

本书在《直面人生的困惑》基础上增加了11篇文章。内容源自郭继承老师对传世经典的总结和体悟，源自对现实社会问题的观察和透视。图书的内容力争经得起历史的检验，实实在在地帮助到读者的生活和工作。在现实的关照上，争取做到以文化人，引导读者在生活的细节中改变自己、升华自己，可谓一本有关人生困惑的“答案之书”。

本书收录了阿兰·巴迪欧的13篇讲座，它们是巴迪欧于1998—1999学年、1999—2000学年、2000—2001学年，为哲学国际学院研究班设的课程内容。巴迪欧在其中号召用内在性方法来取代外在性方法，以评价波澜壮阔的20世纪。巴迪欧将20世纪描述为“野兽”，这个新世纪超脱于旧的世界，践行了其思想中的一种真正的无限，它是新生的，同时也是脆弱的。在本书中，可以看到一种后马克思视域中不同寻常的百年反思。

华杉先生精研《论语》30多年，综合了朱熹、王阳明、张居正等先贤的经典阐释，用429篇轻松畅快的解读文章，带你回到2500年前孔子讲道理、讲故事的教学现场，平白如话，亲切有味，读起来毫不费劲。 本书在着力讲透《论语》原意的同时，对于人们因为2500多年的语言和时代隔阅造成的普遍误读、误解，作了正本清源式的详解分析。在此基础上，作者华杉对全书行修订，引文、篇日标题、标符号等一一更新！　 翻本书，逐字逐句读懂《论语》原文，切身体会两千五百多年来，中国人得以修身养性、安身立命的智慧箴言。

书稿属于语言文字学和文献学两个学科的交叉研究，从文字、音韵、训诂等传统语文学角度，对北大藏汉简《老子》中的关键字、词、句行了校勘、考证和注释，以此为基础，对汉简《老子》义理行探讨，对每一章的主题行了概括。综合运用传统小学工具和现代语言学方法释读北京大学藏汉简《老子》，以译注的方式将研究成果融其中，是书稿的一个鲜明特。

暂无相关内容

世间万物皆在运动之中。与有形的事物一样，无形的思维也时刻处于运动之中，有些时候甚至令人难以捉摸。在空间中，行为先于语言发生，正如思维基于行为。我们在空间中的行为不断改变着空间，也改变着我们自身及他人。我们的行为创造了那些在空间中改变自身及他人的事物，而这些事物反过来又影响着自身与他人的思维。就像你正在阅读的这些文字，虽然只是安静地印在纸上，却能影响那些未曾谋面的陌生人。 美国艺术与科学院院士、美国心理科学协会前会长芭芭拉特沃斯基在这本书中提出了一个人类认知的重要新理论：语言不是思考的基础，行为才是。我们如何思考空间以及我们如何利用空间思考，这是本书对于读者的两个重要意义。空间思维，根植于对空间的感知和在空间中的行为，是人们所有思维的基础。 芭芭拉特沃斯基在书中提出了9大认知定律，告诉我们身体和行为是思考的基础。空间认知不仅仅是思维的一个边缘方面，而且是它的基础，使我们能够从身体及其行为中获得意义。

蓝图 本书融合了哲学、历史学、人类学、社会学、遗传学、进化生物学、经济学、流行病学等多个学科领域，横跨了从19世纪的众多沉船事件，到世界各地关于建设乌托邦的众多尝试，再到黑猩猩和大象的社会行为，从爱情与婚姻，到友谊与合作，再到社会网络与文化，克里斯塔基斯雄辩地向我们证明，为什么我们会以社会的形式生活，为什么成功的社会都具备那八大特征。 当下的启蒙 史蒂芬·平克对当前世界进行了quan景式的评述，让读者了解人类状况的真相，人类面临怎样的挑战，以及该如何应对这些挑战。他呼吁我们避开惊悚的头条新闻和灰暗的末日预言，相反，用数据说话：通过75幅震撼的图表，平克论证人类的寿命、健康、食物、和平、知识、幸福等都呈向上趋势，这种趋势不仅限于西方，而是遍及quan世界。这是启蒙运动的礼物——理性、科学和人文主义促进了人类的进步。 比尔?盖茨zui喜爱的一本书。一上市就火爆，长期占据亚马逊畅销榜。《纽约时报》2018年Top100图书。《经济学人》2018年zui佳图书。《卫报》2018年必买图书。 人类的价值 本书为重新思考人类本性、社会秩序、人类进步等一系列基本问题打下了良好的基础。这些旁征博引的论述闪烁着迷人的学术光芒，并对当前人类所面临的 “设计与变革”等问题提出了深刻的建议。 罗伯特·博伊德是文化进化领域研究的先驱，他旁征博引，在书中穿插了许多的逸闻趣事，语言风格轻松幽默，是一本了解人类独特与合作的科普力作。 人类起源的故事 大卫·赖克从古人类遗骨中提取DNA，从基因层面还原了人类祖先的面貌。原来，我们的先祖在地球上已经上演了几百万年的“权力的游戏”：在任何一片大陆上，人群都经历了多次毁灭与更迭；所有当代人的祖先都拥有一段复杂难辨的混血史，没有人是“纯种”；千百万年来的种族、性别、阶层不平等在我们每个人的DNA里都留下了深深的刻痕。 面对DNA序列分析这种zui先进可靠的技术，我们以前所以为的所有关于人类演变的知识，凡是跟这本书所代表的当前科学理解不一样的，都只能改写。因此，这场革命给了两个问题迄今zui为清晰的答案：我们是谁，我们从哪里来。 心智探奇 权威解答“什么是智能”这一深刻问题，破解机器人难题。详细剖析心智的四大能力，权威解读“心智如何工作”。一扇窥视人类心智活动神奇与奥秘的窗户。一场探索心智本质的奇幻之旅。 当代zui伟大思想家、TED演讲人、世界ding尖语言学家和认知心理学家史蒂芬·平克经典重现。 认知神经科学领域颠覆性著作，凝聚认知神经学、人工智能和进化心理学等多项研究成果。 基因之河 一本以现代生物学观点来解释生命进化过程的科普读物。道金斯将生命的进化过程比作一条基因之河,在时间长河中，基因相互碰撞和重组，不断分叉，不断消亡。值得一提的是，道金斯还在书中分析了实现生物信息在宇宙范围内爆炸需要跨越的各个可能门槛，让我们得以对生命未来会走向何方有所想象。 白板 关于主流人性论的颠覆性反叛，破而后立，进而建立起新的意义和道德观念，重塑对人性的信心。 阐明人性的本源、内涵及局限，追溯人类诸多苦难的根源，拨开道德错觉的迷雾，直达现实的彼岸。 直面人性科学研究领域的诸多热点话题：政治、暴力、性别、儿童及艺术，发现诸多现实冲突背后的分岔路口及共享的普世价值观念。 飞奔的物种 享誉quan球的脑科学家、《西部世界》科学顾问携手美国知名音乐大师，提纯人类创新史，揭示了创造力突破的核心法则。在近200个创新案例中，你可以看到，人类如何运用创造力实现飞奔，雄踞万物之首。 从脑科学的角度，解释了人类创造力何以产生，以及大脑进行创新思考的独特方式。作者结合近200个商业、科技、艺术、建筑等不同领域的创新案例，清晰而透彻地阐述了创造力的核心——“3B”法则：扭曲（Bending）、打破（Breaking）、融合（Blending）。通过运用创造力的“3B”法则，无论组织或个人，都能获得源源不断的创造力。更难能可贵的是，书中不仅讲述了如何产生创新，更告诉你创新如何才能被大众接受，成为流行。同时，作者分析了创新者应该具备的四种思维特征，从而帮助你更彻底地实现创新领域的“自我进化”。 简单的逻辑学 这是一本足以彻底改变你思维世界的小书。美国著名逻辑学家、哲学教授D.Q.麦克伦尼，将一门宽广、深奥的逻辑科学以贴近生活、通俗易懂、妙趣横生的语言娓娓道来。它既没有刻板的理论教条，也不是正规的教科书，而是一本必不可少的现实指南。 生活中，逻辑无处不在。无论我们是有意还是无意，逻辑无时无刻不在服务于我们的生活。然而逻辑到底是什么，也许并没有太多的人有很清楚的概念。作者以其简练而又充满趣味的笔触，将逻辑学活化为一种艺术，从它的基本原理，到论证，到非逻辑思维的根源，再到28种就发生在你身边的非逻辑思维形式，带领我们进入这个精彩无比的逻辑世界，体会妙趣横生的思维交锋，跨过无处不在的逻辑陷阱，让你沉醉其中，欲罢不能。 作为zui畅销的逻辑学科普入门书，被香港中文大学奉为40本英文经典之一，被哈佛大学校内书店视为皇冠书籍，还曾位列台湾诚品网络书店英文畅销书榜di一名，同时，还是国内畅销8年、读者热评近10万条的五星好书，再经湛庐文化策划出品，重磅回归。 人人都该懂的认识论 关于知识的问题，几千年来一直是哲学家思考的重点，他们彼此争论，寻求问题的答案。对知识的哲学研究就是认识论。在书中，你可以读到柏拉图、康德、笛卡儿等不同哲学家对知识的思考，重塑你对知识的认识，也能在外在主义、内在主义、怀疑主义、经验主义的理解中开启你对哲学的思考。 人人都该懂的批判性思维 而在现实世界中，广为流传的演讲、电视中的广告、杂志上的一篇文章，很多看似合乎逻辑的背后其实往往存在着逻辑错误。如果可以的话，我们应当反复琢磨自己和他人思考的逻辑，而这就是所谓的批判性思维。 真正的批判性思维是应用正确的逻辑去思考事情。通过学习优秀逻辑的基本原理，就不会再轻易地被混乱逻辑所愚弄。同时，你将更容易在重要的问题上提出可靠的观点。本书的目的就是阐述所有你需要的批判性思维技巧。 人人都该懂的启蒙运动 吉隆·奥哈拉跨越两大洲、三次革命和广泛的历史研究，用独特的视角来审视这个时代。他将启蒙运动描述为一个不断发展的思想和思想家的集合体，并对当时的哲学、政治理论、科学、宗教、艺术的影响进行了新颖的评估，展现了启蒙运动延续至今的持久影响力。 人人都该懂的科学哲学 首先讲述了科学脱离哲学、独立成长的过程，然后以智慧设计论、弦理论、占星术、有神论、社会建构主义、女性主义等充满争议的问题为例，辨析了科学的定义、方法和目的，科学和社会的关系。伟大的科学哲学家亚里士多德、笛卡儿、休谟、培根、波普尔、库恩等纷纷出场，上演了一场绵亘数千年的辩论。 人人都该懂的哲学 生活密切相关的命题，对哲学中的身心问题、个人同一性问题、自由意志问题、道德哲学、政治哲学、知识论、怀疑论等核心思想进行了充分翔实的论证。跟随作者所讲的案例、旁征博引的哲学大师的观点、哲学史上的论争等，你可以将西方哲学的核心思想和核心智慧收为己用。 打破传统的以时间为线索的哲学讲解模式，从10个根本性问题出发解读哲学。身体与心灵、大脑与意识、道德哲学、政治哲学、怀疑论、知识论、上帝证明……从10个根本性的问题出发，带你走进哲学的浩瀚世界。

本套装包括《查拉图斯特拉如是说》《朝霞》《墨西拿的田园诗》《快乐的知识》《人性的，太人性的》《见解与箴言杂录》《漫游者和他的影子》《悲剧的诞生》《不合时宜的思考》《1870－1873年遗作》。《查拉图斯特拉如是说》是德国哲学家、思想家尼采的一部里程碑式的作品，几乎包括了尼采的全部思想；这本以散文诗体写就的杰作，以振聋发聩的奇异灼见和横空出世的警世招语宣讲 “超人哲学”和“权力意志”，横扫了基督教所造成的精神奴性的方方面面，谱写了一曲自由主义的人性壮歌。《快乐的知识》是尼采后期的重要作品，创作于大病初愈之后，浓缩了尼采思想的精髓，对诸如生命、个体与群体能、爱情、文艺、哲学、科学、道德、法律、宗教、社会发展等问题都进行了简明而深刻的论述，语言凝练而隽永，思想鲜明而锐利，行文多为警句或短诗，思想火花处处闪现，令人读后有痛快淋漓之感。《人性的，太人性的》用格言体写成，从各方面探讨了世界与人生的基本问题，作者对西方形而上学传统及其影响下的西方文化进行了全面批判，一方面肯定人性中值得肯定的方面，希望挖掘人的潜力，使人类变得更优秀；另一方面又对人性的弱点和缺点，尤其对西方文化传统下形成的这种弱点和缺点，进行了尖刻的讽刺和挖苦。作者寄希望于“自由精灵”，也就是能超越传统思维方式、传统道德观念而自由思想的人。 《悲剧的诞生》是对古希腊酒神现象的重视，尼采立足于这种不登大雅之堂的现象，把它当作理解高雅的希腊悲剧、希腊艺术、希腊精神的钥匙，从中提升出一种哲学来。