Alchimia fericirii, publicat? ?n persan? (Kimiya?yi sa’adat), spre sf?r?itul vie?ii autorului, urm?re?te atenuarea tensiunilor dintre filosofii ?i misticii Islamului ?i scoate ?n eviden?? importan?a autodisciplinei ?i a ascetismului. Traducerea de fa?? are la baz? traducerea publicat? ?n 1910, ?n englez? de Claud Field (The Alchemy of Happiness) ?i este structurat? ?n opt capitole, aproximativ egale ca ?ntindere. Cartea de fa?? reune?te o serie de interpret?ri ale unor pilde cu con?inut religios evocate ?n Coran ?i ale unor idei exprimate de Mahomed, de al?i profe?i sau ?nv??ati musulmani. Chestiunile abordate de Al-Ghazali aduc ?n prim-plan ideea unei vie?i religioase exemplare. Astfel, el prezint? mai multe sfaturi pentru musulmanii pio?i. Raportul omului cu divinitatea, cu semenii s?i, cu rudele apropiate, dar ?i implica?iile religioase ale institu?iei c?s?toriei sau ale muzicii ?i dansului sunt printre cele mai importante subiecte din lucrarea lui Al-Ghazali. S? ?tii, o, preaiubite, c? omul nu a fost creat ?n glum? sau la ?nt?mplare, ci a fost f?cut ?ntr?un fel minunat ?i pentru un ?el ?nalt. Chiar dac? nu a existat dintotdeauna, el tr?ie?te ve?nic; ?i chiar dac? trupul s?u este slab ?i p?m?ntesc, spiritul ?i este m?re? ?i dumnezeiesc. ?i cu c?t este mai ales subiectul cunoa?terii noastre,cu at?t mai mare va fi ?nc?ntarea sim?it? ?n studierea acestuia; de exemplu, ne?ar face mai mult? placer s? ?tim secretele unui rege dec?t dac? am afla secretele unui ministru. V?z?nd c? Dumnezeu este cel mai ?nalt obiect posibil pentru cunoa?terea noastr?, cunoa?terea Sa trebuie s? ne d?ruiasc? mai mult? desf?tare dec?t oricare alta.

De La Boétie ofer? una dintre primele ?i cele mai clare explica?ii privind servitutea voluntar?, starea care define?te supunerea majorit??ii fa?? de minoritatea care de?ine puterea politic?. Este ?i va r?m?ne acela?i lucru, indiferent de scurgerea timpului: un eseu memorabil despre m?re?ia ?i micimile naturii umane, slujit exemplar de g?ndul ?i de pana unui geniu cu care timpul nu a avut prea mult? r?bdare.,,Dar, Dumnezeule mare, ce ?nseamn? asta? Cum s? numim aceast? nenorocire? Ce viciu ?ngrozitor e ?sta, s? vezi nenum?ra?i oameni, nu doar c? se supun, ci c? slujesc, nu c? sunt guverna?i, ci c? sunt tiraniza?i, neav?nd nici bunuri, nici p?rin?i, nici copii, nici m?car propria lor via???“ ?tienne de LA Boétie

Diderot, tanr?sal, dinsel inanc?n yerine akl? ge?iren adamd?r, onun sava??m? buydu ve bütün k?r inan?lar? silip süpüren bu ak?l, g?rünen dünyay?, do?ay?, felsefenin, sanat?n, sa? t?renin temel ilkesi durumuna getirdi. Diderot’un yayg?n ?al??ma alan?n? olu?turan ilkedir bu. Maddeci ve gerekirci bir filozoftu. tanr?ya inanan ki?inin filozof olmayaca??n? s?yledi. 'K?rler üstüne mektup'taki k?r, kendini tanr?ya inand?rmaya ?al??an misyonere "bunun i?in tanr?ya parma??mla dokunmam gerekir" der. Diderot, bu yüzden hapse girdi. 'D'alembert'in dü?ü'nde, madde tanr?n?n yerini alm??t?r art?k. Madde devinim ve duyarl?l?kla donat?lm??t?r. Bilim gerekircili?in kan?t?d?r. Bütün varl?klar ?z?e birdir ve bir ge?i?, de?i?im, olu?um süreci i?inde bulunurlar. ?yle ise sa? t?renin temeli do?a olacakt?r. Do?as? gere?i insan iyidir, hristiyan sagtoresinin sand??? gibi do?u?tan günahkar de?il ve iyilikler de, k?tülükler de, düzenin, ko?ullar?n, e?itimin ürünüdür. ?nsan, bu gerekircilik anlay??? i?inde, ?zgür olamayaca?? i?in, su?lu da bulunamaz. bu üslama sonucu olarak sanat, do?ay? ?rnek almal?d?r. roman, resim, oyun ger?ek?i olmal?d?r. Diderot, bunlar? s?ylemekle kalmam??, romanlar? ve oyunlar? ile ?rneklendirmi?tir de ve ?a??n?n sanat??lar?n? bu a??dan de?erlendirmi?tir. Diderot, büyük sava??m? ve e?siz ?abas? ile insanl???n ba?tac?d?r bugün de ve onu b?ylesine unutulmaz k?lan i?lerinin ba??nda ise elbet 'ansiklopedi' gelir. 'Ansiklopedi', yunanca enkyklios paidela'dan yap?lm??t?r ve bütün bilimleri i?ine alan ??retim anlam?na gelir. s?zcü?ü bulan rabelais'dir (1532). Diderot ile d'alembert'in ansiklopedisine temel olan yap?t, ?ng?l?z chambers’?n cyelopaedia’s? idi; fakat diderot'nun etkisi ile ansiklopedi, bir ?eviri yap?t olmaktan ??k?p, gizemcili?e kar?? bilimin sava? alan? durumunu ald?. Bu yüzden de gerici ?evrelerin kar?? koymas?n? sonu?lad?. diderot, ya?am? boyunca ?al??t? 'ansiklopedi' i?in, bir?ok maddeyi kendisi yazd?. bu u?urda yepyeni ara?t?rmalara giri?ti, teknik de?i?mekte oldu?u i?in ortaya yeni ara?-gere?ler ??kmakta idi, bunlar? tan?d?, adland?rd?, tan?tt? ve fransa'y? ayd?nlanma ?a??'n?n avrupa'da g?zbebe?i durumuna getirdi. Ancak unutmamal? ki, bir ansiklopedi ortaya ??karan her ülkeyi ayd?nlanma ?a??'n? alg?lam?? sayamay?z. ?o?u ülkede bu tür yap?tlar, geni?letilmi? s?zlükler olmaktan ileri gidememi?tir. diderot’nun ansiklopedisi, toplu bilgi vermekten ?ok, dinsel inan?lara kar?? bilimlerin ??retimini üstlenmi?ti, demek yans?z de?ildi, metafizikle ve skolastikle ?arp???yordu..

M. Lévy-Bruhl then explains that, whilst recognising the entire coherence of Comte’s collective labours, he proposes to confine his present study to the earlier and principal work, the Philosophy, which in M. Lévy-Bruhl’s opinion is the dominant and more fruitful composition.??This he regards as the representative work of the nineteenth century, as shown by the intellectual history of the period. He points to its influence on thought in England, in Europe, and in America. It will surprise many persons to learn that in M. Lévy-Bruhl’s opinion two eminent French writers, who assuredly neither were, nor were supposed to be, Positivists, “have done more for the diffusion of the ideas and method of Comte than Littré and all the other Positivists together.” ??These two are Taine and Renan, much as they differed from Comte’s actual scheme and doctrines. Renan indeed spoke of Comte as destined to prove one of the typical names of the century. The present writer remembers Renan saying to him with a most genial welcome, “I too am a believer in the religion of humanity.” ??Professor Lévy-Bruhl followed up his History of Modern Philosophy in France by a substantial work on the philosophy of Auguste Comte. It forms a volume of the Bibliothèque de Philosophie Contemporaine, which has already devoted four other works to the Positive Philosophy. It is as well to premise that this treatise dealt solely with the philosophy, not with the polity, or any part of the religious scheme of Comte. Professor Lévy-Bruhl writes as a student, but not as an adherent of Auguste Comte. His entire work is rather an exposition, not a refutation, or a criticism, or an advocacy of Comte’s philosophical system. But it may be said at once that no one abroad or at home, certainly neither Mill, nor Lewes, nor Spencer, nor Caird, has so truly grasped and assimilated Comte’s ideas as M. Lévy-Bruhl has done.??In his Introduction M. Lévy-Bruhl very clearly states the scope of his work, and his own general attitude. He traces the origin of Comte’s philosophy in the mental effervescence of the first generation of the present century towards a reorganisation of society, after the upheaval left by the Revolution and its consequences. He correctly states the relation of St. Simon to Comte as being that of an initial stimulus. ??The cardinal difference between Comte and all the socialists and founders of social and religious Utopias consisted in this, that Comte saw the necessity of a new system of philosophy as the indispensable preliminary to any reorganisation of society.

The Critique of Practical Reason follows on from Kant's Critique of Pure Reason and deals with his moral philosophy. The second Critique exercised a decisive influence over the subsequent development of the field of ethics and moral philosophy, beginning with Johann Gottlieb Fichte's Doctrine of Science and becoming, during the 20th century, the principal reference point for deontological moral philosophy.

The first of Immanuel Kant's mature works on moral philosophy and remains one of the most influential in the field. Kant conceives his investigation as a work of foundational ethics, one that clears the ground for future research by explaining the core concepts and principles of moral theory and showing that they are normative for rational agents. Kant aspires to nothing less than this: to lay bare the fundamental principle of morality and show that it applies to us.

书中分别介绍了《尚书》《春秋》《春秋三传》《左传》《史记》《汉书》《后汉书》《三国志》《高僧传》《水经注》等重要史学书目。分别从各书版本区别、源流考证与阅读方法等方面进行分析讲解，是一部重要的史学入门书籍。

“肚子里的胎宝宝听得到音乐吗？” “胎教应当选什么样的音乐？” “听音乐就能激发胎宝宝智力发育？”免费在线读 “自己都听不懂的音乐，对胎宝宝真的有用吗？” …… 如今越来越多的孕妈妈和准爸爸都在重视胎教，可是有些孕妈妈和准爸爸，还不知道为什么要做胎教，也不确定胎教是否真的有意义，更懂得怎么做胎教。 本书就告诉孕妈妈和准爸爸，胎教，尤其是音乐胎教，是让胎宝宝在孕妈妈肚子里就可以自己感知外面世界的一种途径，也是一种通过调节孕妈妈的情绪，激发胎宝宝大脑发育的方法。 不知道怎么做音乐胎教？不用担心，这里汇集了古今中外各类优美的音乐，更有相关背景知识、通俗易懂的音乐解析以供参考，孕妈妈和准爸爸可以一边放轻柔的音乐，一边给胎宝宝讲讲相关知识，不仅带你赏析美妙音乐，更让你轻松做博学父母。

《儒学六讲》是国学大师梁启超为一般读者讲解儒家文化的普及读物，代表了梁启超儒学研究的精髓。《儒学六讲》系统讲述了自孔子至清末民初两千五百年中儒学的起源、变迁、继承、演化和影响，介绍了孔子、董仲舒、程颐、程颢、张载、朱熹、陆九渊、王阳明等儒学代表人物的学说主张，帮助读者了解儒学各个流派在不同时空内的流衍变化。《儒学六讲》以梁启超在清华国学院讲课稿为底本，通俗易懂，深刻全面，是读者了解儒家哲学和中国文化不可不读的一本经典读物。

我们特别编撰了本书。配备原文外主要是根据广大读者学习吸收的特点，除了介绍老子、庄子的生平故事，还在忠实《老子》和《庄子》原著基础上，还增设了简单明白的注释和白话新解，同时还配有相应的启迪故事等，非常易于阅读和理解，是广大读者学习道家经典智慧的读物，相信大家从中会获得新的感受和新的意蕴。

我们特别编撰了本书。主要是根据广大读者学习吸收的特点，除了介绍孔子、孟子的生平故事，还在忠实《论语》和《孟子》原著基础上，除了配备原文外，还增设了简单明白的注释和白话新解，同时还配有相应启迪故事等，非常易于阅读和理解，是广大读者学习儒家经典智慧的上佳读物，相信大家从中会获得新的感受和新的意蕴。

本书包括成功励志方方面面的内容，每篇文章都闪耀着智慧的光芒和精神的力量，具有很强的鼓舞性、哲理性和启迪性，具有成功心理暗示和潜在力量开发的功能，不仅可以成为我们的励志警言，还能增进我们自律的力量。这些文章是智慧的结晶和思想的精髓，是那些著名成功励志著作的高度浓缩和精华荟萃，是成功的奥秘、生命的明灯，是铀，是核，必将引爆璀璨的生命火花！

本书是写给普通人的因果逻辑门书，旨在帮助读者培养严谨的思维方式，在不借助任何专业知识的前提下，准确定位问题。主要内容包括：认识原因，对原因的理解和运用，如何只通过观察找到原因，大数据集与原因的关系，因果关系相关实验，如何利用因果关系来制定有效的干预措施，研究因果关系的意义。 本书适合所有对探究事件真相感兴趣的读者，无须统计学等专业背景。

《老子永远不老：〈老子〉研究新解》一书，收了12篇曹峰近年来发表的《老子》及道家研究论文，约二十万字。其中有对具体章节如三十六章、三十九章的新解读；有利用出土文献对《老子》首章作出的新诠释；有对老子生成论和幸福观的新思考；有对老子“道”与“天道”关系的新衡量；有对老子“无名”“有名”论述的新考察；有对黄帝与老子关系的新辨析；有对老子政治哲学的新总结。还有对近代日本老子现象的一些研究。这些论文涉及老子研究的各个方面，发表后大多在学界引起重要反响，被广泛引用和转载。这也证明了老子永远不老，老子思想常谈常新。此书的出版相信会对老子及其道家研究产生实质性推动。

本书分为上下两篇，上篇主要讨论道德的本质问题，共有七章，首先就道德的概念、社会基础、立足点与内在机制作综合概述；然后分别从善恶之辨、“人是目的”等现代价值理念、权利的内涵、规范与德性、幸福的伦理思考几方面作深度的理论分析和阐述。下篇共有九章，主要关注社会现实，着力辨析生命伦理领域中人们普遍关注的安乐死、克隆人、人类基因组研究、伦理审查等重大热点问题，并就中国传统文化对生命伦理的影响以及当代中国生命伦理学的走向发表自己的见解。本书旨在揭示道德基本理论与应用伦理的内在互动关系，论证道德哲学

本书共九章，分别为殿之基、事物、填补鸿沟、因果律、目的、意愿、判断、真理、表象与实在。作者逐一讲述了循着两位伟大的欧洲思想家的脚步如何建立一种*确定的真相；什么是客体的本质、何为*性质与第二性质、本体又是什么、以及另一出路，等等。

Bogged down by an endless onslaught of stumbling blocks and disasters that keep pushing you farther away from fulfilling your purpose and achieving your goals? ? This book could radically change all that. ? This simple, clear, and highly practical step-by-step guide will show you: ? How to manage all the problems and disasters that come your way while still making progress on all your goals—short-term and long-term—without sacrificing the important things in life. How to turn obstacles into an advantage that will propel you along the path to fulfilling your goals and achieving your purpose. How to shift your thinking so that all you see are opportunities that will open doors to great possibilities you may have never imagined before.

部分是形而上学的视角，梳理知识的本质和缘起，介绍帕拉图的"知识就是回忆”、康德形而上学的理论。 第二部分是逻辑学的视角，逻辑是知识的骨骼，知识就是用逻辑工具去统摄经验材料。梳理逻辑工具，帮助读者很快理解知识、发现知识、构建知识体系。从亚里士多德的论证开始，沿着形式逻辑、先验逻辑、数理逻辑、辩证逻辑、和纯粹逻辑的脉络，展现知识的结构和骨骼。 第三部分是理性批判主义的视角，从皮浪的"不做任何决定，悬置判断”开始，沿着怀疑主义、哥白尼革命和波普尔科学证伪的脉络，展现知识的不断肯定、否定和否定之否定的辩证发展规律。

道德记忆是人类运用其记忆能力对自身特有的道德生活经历的记忆。它是连人类道德生活的过去和现在的桥梁或纽带。我们可以根据不同的标准对道德记忆做出个体道德记忆和集体道德记忆、自然道德记忆和人工道德记忆等区分。人类在漫长道德生活史中形成的道德记忆为当代人类向往、追求和践行道德提供了历史合法性和合理性资源。道德记忆是道德维持其生命力的重要手段、道德文化传统的建构者和推动人类承担道德责任的重要动因。只要道德不死，道德记忆的存在就是必要的。我们必须将自己的道德生活经历作为道德记忆的内容予以保留和传承，以确保自己的道德本性和道德生活能够不断得到巩固与延续。人类记忆行为应该受到记忆道德的规约。记忆道德是人类个体和集体在记忆过程中应该遵守的道德规范。它的在场既提醒我们应该记住什么，也提醒我们不应该记住什么。

在世间，功名富贵也好，为人服务也好，重要的是要人忙心闲。无心不是不用心，而是不计较得失。如我们的身体，平常百般爱护，加意保健，而百年之后身腐灰灭，身体也不是我们的……在世间，我们的能力要和所做的事情相应，人生志趣要与环境相应。禅门的悟道是活水长流，每天都有很多的小悟，集很多小悟为中悟，忽然有个恍然大悟，然后对于“生从何来，死将何去”了然于心，再也无惧了。道，在平常心里面，在日用生活中成就，不必刻意强调，也不求速成，只要有恒心，一片豁然悟境就在你面前。

 本书是爱尔维修的代表作之一。《论精神》在1758年出版后，书中蕴含的无神论思想和对宗教伦理的批判令当时专制的教廷恐慌不已，被列为禁书。但与此同时，该书却在欧洲广受欢迎，短期内即被译成英文、意大利文和德文。在本书中，爱尔维修继承了洛克唯物主义的感觉论，以人的肉体感受性为基石，建立了以“自爱”为核心的功利主义伦理学。他的思想明，认为追求个人的利益和幸福这种趋乐避苦的“自爱”感情是人所共有的，正是这种人所共有的普遍情感推动着社会的步。此外，他在书中还猛烈抨封建专制制度，并公揭露宗教在保护封建制度中的作用。全书警句迭出，行文通俗，并穿插了大量有趣晓畅的比喻和例子来阐释严肃的社会议题和哲学思想，这深刻反映出爱尔维修不仅是一位伟大的思想家，而且还是一位精于修辞的文学家。