La acest ?nceput de secol XXI, ?n ?ntreaga lume se intensific? studierea problemelor fundamentale, eterne, ca via?a ?i moartea, rostul vie?ii, originile ?i destina?iile noastre ultime, c?t ?i ?ntrebarea cu privire la existen?a de dup? moarte. Cartea examineaz? filosofia de via?? a budismului Nichiren ?n lumina ideilor de ultim? or? despre via?? ?i moarte, de?i cuprinderea exhaustiv? ?ntr?un singur volum a unei probleme at?t de vaste este imposibil?. Budismul Nichiren ofer? oamenilor mijloacele de a??i transforma destinele prin ?nf?ptuirea propriei revolu?ii umane individuale ?i dezv?luie calea spre pace ?i fericire.

Volumul de fa?? cuprinde trei eseuri ale autorului francez despre ,,r?sul provocat ?n mod special de c?tre comic“. Acestea au la baz? ideile urm?toare: comicul este uman, r?sul are nevoie de o deta?are emo?ional? fa?? de obiectul/subiectul vizat, r?sul are o func?ie social?. Autorul exploreaz? diferite ipostaze ale comicului ?n art? sau ?n via?a de zi cu zi ?n func?ie de cauza care a produs efectul respectiv. Un om care se ?mpiedic? ?i cade poate st?rni r?sul trec?torilor. ?n aceast? situa?ie comicul survine ca urmare a rigidit??ii mecanice a personajului care a c?zut pentru nu a putut evita un obstacol. ?i o diformitate poate st?rni r?sul, ?nsa una care poate fi imitat? de o persoan? care nu are acea diformitate. Exist? ?i un comic al mi?c?rilor, de exemplu, gesturile unui orator. ?n cel de-al doilea capitol, autorul analizeaz? alt? dou? categorii: comicul de situa?ie ?i pe cel de limbaj. ?n fine, al treilea capitol este consacrat comicului de caracter. Anexa de la sf?r?itul lucr?rii curprinde o scurt? discu?ie despre defini?iile comicului, dar ?i despre metoda utilizat? de autor ?n cele trei capitole. Comicul ?ine de aceast? dimensiune a persoanei prin care se seam?n? cu un lucru, acest aspect al evenimentelor umane care imit? prin rigiditatea sa de un fel cu totul spe-cial, mecanismul pur ?i simplu, automatismul, de fapt mi?carea f?r? via??. El exprim?, a?adar, o imperfec?iune individual? sau colectiv? care necesit? o corec?ie imediat?. R?sul este ?ns??i aceast? corec?ie. R?sul este un anumit tip de gest social care subliniaz? ?i reprim? o distragere special? a oamenilor ?i evenimentelor.

Antropologie ?i antroposofie ? Max Dessoir despre antroposofie ? Franz BrentanoAlc?tuind cuprinsul acestei lucr?ri, Rudolf Steiner reveleaz? ?c?teva din firele ?tiin?ifice care trebuie trasate pornind de la antropozofie la filozofie, la psihologie ?i la fiziologie“. Cunoa?terea omului va trebui atunci s? fie extins? ?in?nd cont de enigmaticele aspecte ale vie?ii sale interioare, privite din perspective multiple. ?n aceast? carte, Rudolf Steiner prezint? ?n scris aspectele semnificative ale configur?rii ?ntreite a fiin?ei omene?ti: corpul fizic, organismul sufletesc ?i configura?ia spiritual?.

Egy kétségtelenül szellemes megjegyzés szerint a cím csak akkor fedheti le pontosan a k?nyv tartalmát, ha bet?r?l bet?re megegyezik vele. Valami hasonló mondható a fülsz?vegekr?l is (biztos Boegesnek is tetszene ez a gondolat), és ennek megfelel?en meg sem kísérlem néhány mondatban ?sszefoglalni, hogy mir?l lesz szó. Ehelyett inkább el?sz?r is azt emelem ki, hogy a címnek megfelel?en mir?l nem: például nem magáról Borgesr?l, a 20. század egyik legjelent?sebb argentin írójáról. Hanem inkább arról, hogy a novelláival kapcsolatban milyen, az irodalomtól olyakor látszólag meglehet?sen távol álló kérdések merülhetnek fel kezdve azon, hogy az általa leírt bábeli k?nyvtár valóban olyan teljes és mindenre kiterjed?-e, miként azt Borges sugallja; folytatva azon, hogy van-e egyáltalán értelme felvetni, hogy milyen lenne, ha valaki t?kéletes emlékezettel rendelkezne (nincs). Meg, hogy elképzelhet?-e, nem pedig, hogy létezik vagy legalább lehetséges-e egy olyan pont vagy térrész: egy olyan Alef, amelyen keresztül egyszerre láthatunk mindent. ?s így tovább egészen addig, hogy mit mondhatunk az irodalomkritikáról, az irodalmi zsánerek létrej?ttér?l meg elt?nésér?l vagy éppen az irodalmi halhatatlanságról – ismét csak mint elméleti problémáról. Azaz végs? soron persze mégiscsak egyfajta bolyongás ez a borgesi k?nyvtában, illetve bizonyos, legalább hipotetikusan lehetséges és az irodalomhoz így vagy úgy kapcsolódó kérdések fázisterében még akkor is, ha a fentebbiekben, miként a figyelmes olvasó már észre vehette, éppen azt tettem, amir?l korábban azt sejttettem, hogy nem fogom: néhány példa említésével próbáltam utalni rá, hogy mir?l szól az egész. De talán ez sincs igazi ellentmondásban azzal a megk?zelítéssel, amit ez a k?nyv sugall. Galántai Zoltán tudományt?rténész és író. Korábbi k?nyvei az eClassicnál: K?nyvkett?. A k?nyv, az írás és az irodalom j?v?jér?l (2013) http://eclassic.xyz/shop/bemutato/konyvketto-a-konyv-az-iras-es-az-irodalom-jovojerol/ Monoverzumok. Kozmosz, t?rvény, tudomány (2016) http://eclassic.xyz/shop/szabadpolc/monoverzumok/

Such is the system which underlies the Meditations of Marcus Aurelius. Some knowledge of it is necessary to the right understanding of the book, but for us the chief interest lies elsewhere. We do not come to Marcus Aurelius for a treatise on Stoicism. He is no head of a school to lay down a body of doctrine for students; he does not even contemplate that others should read what he writes. His philosophy is not an eager intellectual inquiry, but more what we should call religious feeling. The uncompromising stiffness of Zeno or Chrysippus is softened and transformed by passing through a nature reverent and tolerant, gentle and free from guile; the grim resignation which made life possible to the Stoic sage becomes in him almost a mood of aspiration. His book records the innermost thoughts of his heart, set down to ease it, with such moral maxims and reflections as may help him to bear the burden of duty and the countless annoyances of a busy life. It is instructive to compare the Meditations with another famous book, the Imitation of Christ. There is the same ideal of self-control in both. It should be a man's task, says the Imitation, 'to overcome himself, and every day to be stronger than himself.' 'In withstanding of the passions standeth very peace of heart.' 'Let us set the axe to the root, that we being purged of our passions may have a peaceable mind.' To this end there must be continual self-examination. 'If thou may not continually gather thyself together, namely sometimes do it, at least once a day, the morning or the evening. In the morning purpose, in the evening discuss the manner, what thou hast been this day, in word, work, and thought.' But while the Roman's temper is a modest self-reliance, the Christian aims at a more passive mood, humbleness and meekness, and reliance on the presence and personal friendship of God. The Roman scrutinises his faults with severity, but without the self-contempt which makes the Christian 'vile in his own sight.' The Christian, like the Roman, bids 'study to withdraw thine heart from the love of things visible'; but it is not the busy life of duty he has in mind so much as the contempt of all worldly things, and the 'cutting away of all lower delectations.' Both rate men's praise or blame at their real worthlessness; 'Let not thy peace,' says the Christian, 'be in the mouths of men.' But it is to God's censure the Christian appeals, the Roman to his own soul. The petty annoyances of injustice or unkindness are looked on by each with the same magnanimity. 'Why doth a little thing said or done against thee make thee sorry? It is no new thing; it is not the first, nor shall it be the last, if thou live long. At best suffer patiently, if thou canst not suffer joyously.' The Christian should sorrow more for other men's malice than for our own wrongs; but the Roman is inclined to wash his hands of the offender. 'Study to be patient in suffering and bearing other men's defaults and all manner infirmities,' says the Christian; but the Roman would never have thought to add, 'If all men were perfect, what had we then to suffer of other men for God?' The virtue of suffering in itself is an idea which does not meet us in the Meditations. Both alike realise that man is one of a great community. 'No man is sufficient to himself,' says the Christian; 'we must bear together, help together, comfort together.' But while he sees a chief importance in zeal, in exalted emotion that is, and avoidance of lukewarmness, the Roman thought mainly of the duty to be done as well as might be, and less of the feeling which should go with the doing of it. To the saint as to the emperor, the world is a poor thing at best. 'Verily it is a misery to live upon the earth,' says the Christian; few and evil are the days of man's life, which passeth away suddenly as a shadow. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?*** ? "MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS" was born on April 26, A.D. 121. His real name was M. Annius Verus, and he was sprung of a noble family which claimed descent from Numa, second King of Rome. Thus the most religious of emperors came of the blood of the most pious of early kings. His father, Annius Verus, had held high office in Rome, and his grandfather, of the same name, had been thrice Consul. Both his parents died young, but Marcus held them in loving remembrance. On his father's death Marcus was adopted by his grandfather, the consular Annius Verus, and there was deep love between these two. On the very first page of his book Marcus gratefully declares how of his grandfather he had learned to be gentle and meek, and to refrain from all anger and passion. The Emperor Hadrian divined the fine character of the lad, whom he used to call not Verus but Verissimus, more Truthful than his own name. He advanced Marcus to equestrian rank when six years of age, and at the age of eight made him a member of the ancient Salian priesthood. The boy's aunt, A

S?rmanul Nietzsche, ?bestia blond?“, a avut ?i el parte de crucificare. Multor profe?i ?i m?ntuitori li se ?nt?mpl? asta: eventual ?i ?n timpul vie?ii, ?i dup? moarte. Nietzsche, r?zvr?titul ?mpotriva legilor celor vechi, ?ntemeietorul orgolios al noii sale ?religii“, a trebuit s? suporte ?i el toate e?ecurile ?i r?st?lm?cirile posibile, ba chiar ?i punerea terifiant? ?n practic? a unora dintre ideile lui, care nici nu mai erau ale lui ?i, ?ndeob?te, nu mai erau idei…?Viclenia ra?iunii“, implicit a istoriei, o descrisese Hegel, unul dintre cei mul?i pe care Nietzsche nu-i agrea. Dincoace de istorie ?i chiar dincolo de ea, r?m?n c?r?ile. Omul n-a fost s? fie m?ntuit de Nietzsche. C?r?ile lui vor d?inui printre oameni: pentru oameni.

Cartea este o culegere de eseuri pe teme de istorie literar?, istoria ideilor ?i probleme generale de estetica artelor, toate acestea fiind abordate dintr-un accentuat unghi filozofic ?i ?tiin?ific deopotriv?.

innd seama de multiplele referiri la istorie, ct i de importana i relevana perspectivei temporal-istorice pentru orice alt tem, ajungem firesc la cardinalitatea istoriei n discursul lui Emil Cioran. n noianul tuturor temelor sale obsesive, istoria este o mega-tem, aflat n puternice raporturi cu celelalte. Aderena i entuziasmul pentru studiul problemelor de filosofia istoriei le gsim mrturisite nc de la nceputul traseului, n cteva scrisori ctre Bucur incu din anii ‘30. n acele scrisori vorbete de pasiune, de gndire spontan i personal, de adaptare natural asupra domeniului, i se arat ncredinat c, alturi de problemele de filosofia culturii i antropologiei filosofice, problemele de filosofia istoriei nu pot concepe c lea prsi vreodat. Dintre multiplele justificri ulterioare – opuse ca atitudine fa de cele din perioada iniial, dar care marcheaz aceeai aderen –, s punem dou n corelaie, scrise n ani apropiai, n care preocuparea pentru istorie este descris prin stri de dependen: slbiciune, sete, patim.“ – Ioan Costea

本书以印度论师寂护的《摄真实论》业因业果品及其弟子莲花戒之注疏为主要依托文本，对其展中文翻译、文本解读和哲学分析工作，并引述印度六派哲学对佛教业说的批评，以很大可能呈现出印度六派哲学与佛教哲学论辩的历史图景。 本书对于《摄真实论（疏）》这一关键文本的学理阐释，旨在揭示寂护业论思想在佛教整体业论思想脉络中的价值，并尝试通过对个体同一性和因果律的讨论，使古典哲学的资源参与到当代哲学的讨论中，于国内印度哲学和东方文明研究领域具有重要参考价值。

全书以时间为序，分别讨论17、18、19世纪的法国美学。部分以古典主义奠基为主题。第二部分是全书重，以美和趣味为主题，分别讨论克鲁萨、杜博、安德烈、巴托、孟德斯鸠和杜博的美学思想。第三部分以美的失势为主题，讨论模仿问题、库赞美学、丹纳决定论、表现与同情问题。全书在全面整理法国美学主要文献的基础上，围绕古典主义这一总论域探讨法国美学的体系性面貌。无论是文献整理还是对法国美学体系的认定，在国内均属首次，有填补空白价值。

他们的思想、品德、事迹，是中华优秀传统文化的结晶。 他们的故事，是对中华民族的禀赋、特和气质生动、鲜活的阐释。 他们的名字，在五千年中华文明为光彩夺目。 他们为五千年中华文明史书写了为光辉灿烂的篇章。 他们，是中华民族的先贤人物。

这是一部关于如何成功行人际交往和如何运用语言艺术的励志类通俗读物。 本书分享了人们日常交谈中的一些好方法，总结了语言交流中容易出现疏漏的小问题，通过话题反映社会热问题，通过社会焦折射百姓生活的不同状态，从而让语言发挥更大的价值。 本书从说话的基本要素展，逐步延伸到家庭沟通、职场交流、人际交往的基本层面。作者将一个个通俗易懂、生动真实的小故事串联起来，辅以评说理，与读者面对面地行心灵沟通，引发大众共鸣，倡导人们交流过程中向上向善，传承中华语言文明，共筑全民温言之城。

我们每个人都会老去。当你年轻时忙碌于工作，是否理解父母的怪脾气？当你年老时忧心于健康，是否纳新的自己？ 贝尔纳·皮沃通过他笔下的主人公纪尧姆·朱鲁斯，讲述了八旬老人的生活故事。纪尧姆退休前是法国一家出版社的总编、老板，退休后他告别了忙碌的生活，成为“朝枚之年的巴黎青年”中的一员。他们一起旅游、聊天，一起对抗脑力衰退、吐槽病痛。纪尧姆爱上了小他十八岁的马侬，却仍独居；塞普图即将与拉斐尔结婚，却死于新冠病毒；盖尔米隆夫妇总是拌嘴争吵，布拉兹奇夫妇却温和安静、小心谨慎；九旬的诺娜是团队的精神领袖——优雅、睿智、古灵精怪。 小团体的幸福、信息孤岛的恐慌、童年回忆的快乐、慢生活的沉醉……通过一篇篇日记般亲切、轻松、幽默的文字，作者呈现了老年生活的达观与智慧，虽八旬有余，但生活还在继续……

《伯爵家书》是英国18世纪的政治家、外交家和文学家切斯特菲尔德伯爵写给自己在欧洲游学的儿子的家信集，共收书信320封。在这数百封信里，伯爵与儿子谈心、并对儿子在学业和为人处世方面加以指导，涉及生活经验、学习方法、思想道德、吃饭穿衣、待人物以及欧洲的政治、军事、经济、外交、历史、语言、文化、社会和风俗习惯方方面面，不但是全面的人生智慧读本，也是18世纪欧洲的真实记录，值得阅读和研究。

《欧悌弗戎》是柏拉图的一篇早期对话作品，它还有一个为后人所加的副标题“或者论虔敬的东西”。对话人物苏格拉底和欧悌弗戎相遇在国王执政官的门廊前，他们各有将要处理的官司。苏格拉底急于向这位神学家学习“什么是虔敬”，来面对将要到来的法庭上的指控，即指控他是一位不虔敬、不敬神的人。对话以苏格拉底当下所面临的困境为契机，以对“什么是虔敬”的发问而展，在苏格拉底不断追问下，自诩擅长宗教事务的神学家欧悌弗戎并没有把“虔敬”的问题解释清楚。后，对话仓促结束，苏格拉底一个人走向法庭去为自己辩护。柏拉图的这篇对话，对古希腊传统神学提出了质疑，也暗示了对苏格拉底的指控是毫无理性根据的。

本书是系统研究庄子哲学的专著。书中重讨论了庄子哲学中抽象思辨的本体论部分，同时也比较了早期儒家思想和老子哲学，论述了庄子哲学对后世的影响和后世对庄子哲学的改造，并且与现代西方自然科学思想做了对比，由此对庄子的哲学体系行了深的分析和论证。本书认为，早期儒家思想是封闭的体系，是以社会人文为中心、以相对概念为根据的体系；庄子哲学是放的体系，是以自然为中心、以概念为根据的体系。道家与儒家呈天人互补的结构，二者的类型、性质极不相同，但又共同构成了中国传统思想的主流。其中庄子的本体论思想为历代学者所忽视，但它仍然是存在的，庄子哲学代表着中国古代理论思维的极高成就。

《孟子》一书是孟子的言论汇编，由孟子及其弟子共同编写而成，记录了孟子的语言、政治观和政治行动，属儒家经典著作。其学说出发为性善论，提出“仁政”“王道”，主张德治。南宋时朱熹将《孟子》与《论语》、《大学》、《中庸》合在一起称“四书”。

本书利用孔子教育思想对浙江安吉上墅私立高中校长、湖州上墅教育集团董事长汤有祥近40年艰苦办校的实践进行了分析与介绍，对孔子教育思想进行了有重点的阐述，对汤有祥近40年传承与创新实践孔子教育思想进行了*的研究和总结。

复杂问题如何化繁就简？ 先听好消息，还是坏消息？ 已经付出这么多，该不该放弃？ 为什么压力越大，对于一件事的把握就越低？ 领导说话太含糊，该咋办？...... 不用教科书般的传统讲法，区别于笼统的辩证思维、繁重的哲学史和唯理性的批判思维，以哲学为线索，聚焦日常问题，掌握哲学思考工具，让抽象的哲学实用起来。 哲学是在人类各门学科下行思想沟通的一门事业，是思想界的商人。人类的学科发展越丰富，知识体系越庞大，在不同的知识分支之间，行这种交流的必要性也就越高。诸位现在的这本书，将讨论更为一般的哲学问题。而我们的主旨，就是用哲学理论对标具体的话题，教会你思考问题的方法，以便让哲学有用武之地。

　　老子，又叫老聃，姓李名耳，楚国苦县（今安徽涡阳，也有人认为是河南鹿邑）厉乡曲仁里人，我国古代伟大的思想家，道家创始人，道教教祖。他生于春秋末期，与孔子（前551-前479）同时，比孔子稍长。相传他一生下来就是白眉毛白胡子，所以被称为老子。他曾在周的国都洛邑（今河南洛阳）任守藏史（相当于国家图书馆馆长），孔子周游列国时曾到洛邑向老子问礼，现在洛阳还有孔子周问礼碑。《史记·老子韩非列传》有这样的记载：孔子到周的都城，正要向老子请教有关礼教问题，老子说：“您所说的那些人，他们尸骨都早已腐朽了，只是言论还在罢了。况且君子遇到合适的时机就乘车做官，遇到不合适的时机就随遇而安。我听说，会做生意的商人把货物藏得很深，就像什么也没有；君子虽然品德高尚，表面上却像是很愚钝。抛弃您身上的骄气与过多的欲望，放下您踌躇满志的神态与不切实际的志向，这些都是对您自身没有任何好处的。我所要告诉您的，就是这些罢了。”孔子离周都后，对学生们说：“鸟，我知道它能飞；鱼，我知道它能游；兽，我知道它能跑。能跑的兽可以用网去捉它，能游的鱼可以用线去钓它，能飞的鸟可以用箭去射它。至于龙，我不知道它是怎样乘着风和云升上天空的。我今天看到老子，他大概就像龙啊！”老子晚年离了洛邑，一种说法是他骑着青牛往西去了，在函谷关（也有说是散关）前应关令尹喜请求，写成了五千言的《道德经》，然后不知所终。汉朝以后，有人说老子并没有去世，而是在出关后一直往西走，“过西域，至天竺”，教授胡人及佛家弟子二十九人。另一种说法是他往东走，回到老家，终老乡井。

　　《西方美学史》是朱光潜先生*重要的一部美学著作，也是我国学者撰写的*部西方美学史专著。全书分为上下两卷，对公元前6世纪到20世纪初的西方美学思想发展历史作了全面、系统的论述。具有丰富的史料价值和创性的学术价值，代表着中国研究西方美学思想的水平。长期作为高等学校文科教材使用，被许多学者认为是迄今国内学者撰写的同类著作中*好的一部。行文深浅出，通俗晓畅，广受读者欢迎，是一部不朽的美学经典。